Dicalcium silicate-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and autophagy-mediated macrophagic inflammation promotes osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs

KLF2/PPARγ axis contributes to trauma-induced heterotopic ossification by regulating mitochondrial dysfunction

Trauma-induced heterotopic ossification (HO) is a complex disorder after musculoskeletal injury and characterized by aberrant extraskeletal bone formation. Recent studies shed light on critical role of dysregulated osteogenic differentiation in aberrant bone formation. Krupel-like factor 2 (KLF2) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) are master adapter proteins that link cellular responses to osteogenesis; however, their roles and relationships in HO remain elusive. Using a murine burn/tenotomy model in vivo, we identified elevated KLF2 and reduced PPARγ levels in tendon stem/progenitor cells (TSPCs) during trauma-induced HO formation. Both KLF2 inhibition and PPARγ promotion reduced mature HO, whereas the effects of PPARγ promotion were abolished by KLF2 overexpression. Additionally, mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production also increased after burn/tenotomy, and improvements in mitochondrial function (ROS scavenger) could alleviate HO formation, but were abolished by KLF2 activation and PPARγ suppression by affecting redox balance. Furthermore, in vitro, we found increased KLF2 and decreased PPARγ levels in osteogenically induced TSPCs. Both KLF2 inhibition and PPARγ promotion relieved osteogenesis by improving mitochondrial function and maintaining redox balance, and effects of PPARγ promotion were abolished by KLF2 overexpression. Our findings suggest that KLF2/PPARγ axis exerts regulatory effects on trauma-induced HO through modulation of mitochondrial dysfunction and ROS production in TSPCs by affecting redox balance. Targeting KLF2/PPARγ axis and mitochondrial dysfunction can represent attractive approaches to therapeutic intervention in trauma-induced HO.

Tailored biomedical materials for wound healing

Wound healing is a long-term, multi-stage biological process that mainly includes haemostatic, inflammatory, proliferative and tissue remodelling phases. Controlling infection and inflammation and promoting tissue regeneration can contribute well to wound healing. Smart biomaterials offer significant advantages in wound healing because of their ability to control wound healing in time and space. Understanding how biomaterials are designed for different stages of wound healing will facilitate future personalized material tailoring for different wounds, making them beneficial for wound therapy. This review summarizes the design approaches of biomaterials in the field of anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and tissue regeneration, highlights the advanced precise control achieved by biomaterials in different stages of wound healing and outlines the clinical and practical applications of biomaterials in wound healing.

Selenium-modified bone cement promotes osteoporotic bone defect repair in ovariectomized rats by restoring GPx1-mediated mitochondrial antioxidant functions

Over-accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) causes mitochondrial dysfunction and impairs the osteogenic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs). Selenium (Se) protects BMMSCs from oxidative stress-induced damage; however, it is unknown whether Se supplementation can promote the repair of osteoporotic bone defects by rescuing the impaired osteogenic potential of osteoporotic BMMSCs (OP-BMMSCs). In vitro treatment with sodium selenite (Na₂SeO₃) successfully improved the osteogenic differentiation of OP-BMMSCs, as demonstrated by increased matrix mineralization and up-regulated osteogenic genes expression. More importantly, Na₂SeO₃ restored the impaired mitochondrial functions of OP-BMMSCs, significantly up-regulated glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1) expression and attenuated the intracellular ROS and mitochondrial superoxide. Silencing of Gpx1 completely abrogated the protective effects of Na₂SeO₃ on mitochondrial functions of OP-BMMSCs, suggesting the important role of GPx1 in protecting OP-BMMSCs from oxidative stress. We further fabricated Se-modified bone cement based on silk fibroin and calcium phosphate cement (SF/CPC). After 8 weeks of implantation, Se-modified bone cement significantly promoted bone defect repair, evidenced by the increased new bone tissue formation and enhanced GPx1 expression in ovariectomized rats. These findings revealed that Se supplementation rescued mitochondrial functions of OP-BMMSCs through activation of the GPx1-mediated antioxidant pathway, and more importantly, supplementation with Se in SF/CPC accelerated bone regeneration in ovariectomized rats, representing a novel strategy for treating osteoporotic bone fractures or defects.

Recent advances in regenerative biomaterials

Nowadays, biomaterials have evolved from the inert supports or functional substitutes to the bioactive materials able to trigger or promote the regenerative potential of tissues. The interdisciplinary progress has broadened the definition of 'biomaterials', and a typical new insight is the concept of tissue induction biomaterials. The term 'regenerative biomaterials' and thus the contents of this article are relevant to yet beyond tissue induction biomaterials. This review summarizes the recent progress of medical materials including metals, ceramics, hydrogels, other polymers and bio-derived materials. As the application aspects are concerned, this article introduces regenerative biomaterials for bone and cartilage regeneration, cardiovascular repair, 3D bioprinting, wound healing and medical cosmetology. Cell-biomaterial interactions are highlighted. Since the global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019, the review particularly mentions biomaterials for public health emergency. In the last section, perspectives are suggested: (i) creation of new materials is the source of innovation; (ii) modification of existing materials is an effective strategy for performance improvement; (iii) biomaterial degradation and tissue regeneration are required to be harmonious with each other; (iv) host responses can significantly influence the clinical outcomes; (v) the long-term outcomes should be paid more attention to; (vi) the noninvasive approaches for monitoring in vivo dynamic evolution are required to be developed; (vii) public health emergencies call for more research and development of biomaterials; and (viii) clinical translation needs to be pushed forward in a full-chain way. In the future, more new insights are expected to be shed into the brilliant field-regenerative biomaterials.