Radiographic joint space in rheumatoid acromioclavicular joints: a 15 year prospective follow-up study in 74 patients

Thoracic Manifestations of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common chronic systemic inflammatory diseases and the most common chronic inflammatory arthritis. Classically a progressive symmetric polyarthritis, RA is characterized by inflammation, erosions, bone loss, and joint destruction. Up to half of patients with RA exhibit extra-articular manifestations (EAMs), which may precede articular disease and are more common in patients with seropositive RA (patients with detectable serum levels of rheumatoid factor and/or anticitrullinated peptide antibodies). Cardiovascular and pulmonary EAMs are the largest contributors to morbidity and mortality in RA and may be especially devastating. Imaging has a significant role in diagnosing these EAMs and assessing response to treatment. Although treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs has redefined the natural history of RA and helped many patients achieve low disease activity, patients are at risk for treatment-related complications, as well as infections. The clinical features of drug-induced lung disease and infection can overlap considerably with those of EAMs, presenting a diagnostic challenge. Radiologists, by recognizing the imaging characteristics and evolution of these various processes, are essential in diagnosing and distinguishing among EAMs, treatment-related complications, and unrelated processes and formulating an appropriate differential diagnosis. Moreover, recognizing these disease processes at imaging and contextualizing imaging findings with clinical information and laboratory and pathologic findings can facilitate definitive diagnosis and proper treatment. The authors review the articular and extra-articular thoracic imaging manifestations of RA, including cardiovascular, respiratory, and pleural diseases, as well as treatment-related complications and common infections. ^©RSNA, 2021.

[Operative treatment of the rheumatic shoulder]

The duration and severity of rheumatic diseases of the shoulder correlate with symptom frequency, structural changes and associated functional limitations. The multifactorial character of the underlying rheumatic disease requires a multimodal therapeutic concept including interaction of surgical and non-surgical disciplines. In addition to basic systemic anti-inflammatory medication, injections targeting the synovial tissue by corticoid instillation and glenohumeral radiosynoviorthesis (with an intact rotator cuff) are further options. Operative interventions on rheumatic shoulders can be characterized as disease-modifying, protective, reconstructive or palliative, depending on the stage. Combining minimally invasive arthroscopic surgical techniques with modern basic therapy has the potential to shift the indications for operative interventions towards an earlier stage of disease without favoring or propagating structural alterations which have already occurred. In cases of severe joint destruction with loss of the rotator cuff, reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be an appropriate option.

Magnetic resonance imaging of shoulder arthropathies

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating shoulder arthropathies is evolving. This article reviews 4 of the major arthropathies: septic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) deposition disease, and hydroxyapatite disease (HAD), with special attention to their magnetic resonance imaging features. Comfort with identifying these entities allows appropriate and prompt treatment, which is critical for joint preservation in the case of infection, for maximal therapeutic efficacy of disease-modifying drugs in the case of rheumatoid arthritis, and for expediting symptomatic relief in the cases of CPPD deposition disease and HAD.

MRI versus radiography of acromioclavicular joint dislocation

OBJECTIVE

Acromioclavicular joint injuries are usually diagnosed by clinical and radiographic assessment with the Rockwood classification, which is crucial for treatment planning. In view of the implementation of MRI for visualization of the acromioclavicular joint, the purpose of this study was to describe the MRI findings of acromioclavicular joint dislocation in comparison with the radiographic findings.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with suspected unilateral acromioclavicular joint dislocation after acute trauma were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent digital radiography and 1-T MRI with a surface phased-array coil. MRI included coronal proton density-weighted turbo spin-echo and coronal 3D T1-weighted fast field-echo water-selective sequences. The Rockwood classification was used to assess acromioclavicular joint injuries at radiography and MRI. An adapted Rockwood classification was used for MRI evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint ligaments. The classifications of acromioclavicular joint dislocations diagnosed with radiography and MRI were compared.

RESULTS

Among 44 patients with Rockwood type I-IV injuries on radiographs, classification on radiographs and MR images was concordant in 23 (52.2%) patients. At MRI, the injury was reclassified to a less severe type in 16 (36.4%) patients and to a more severe type in five (11.4%) patients. Compared with the findings according to the original Rockwood system, with the adapted system that included MRI findings, additional ligamentous lesions were found in 11 (25%) patients.

CONCLUSION

In a considerable number of patients, the MRI findings change the Rockwood type determined with radiography. In addition to clinical assessment and radiography, MRI may yield important findings on ligaments that may influence management.

Anatomy and biomechanics of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints

The acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints have important soft-tissue static constraints that, based on biomechanical studies, imply a great deal of stability. The infrequency of significant symptoms following dislocations of these joints certainly highlights the fact that the dynamic muscle support is also very important. In performing resections of these joints for degenerative disease, our goal should be to preserve these important ligamentous supports by minimizing the amount of bone excised, as this seems to optimize results [84]. Precise isometric reconstruction of these complex, three-dimensional ligamentous structures merits further investigation in the laboratory and clinical settings.