Osteopenia in young hypogonadal women with systemic lupus erythematosus receiving chronic steroid therapy: a randomized controlled trial comparing calcitriol and hormonal replacement therapy

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an overview with focus on its prevention and management

The widespread use of glucocorticoids (GCs) contributes to the effective management of several diseases and conditions. However, it comes at a price in the case of the bones causing glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP), the most common cause of secondary osteoporosis and fractures. Several scientific societies have issued comprehensive guidelines on the optimal management of patients receiving GCs with the aim of providing answers to three fundamental questions, namely, whom to treat, when to treat, and how to treat. Both common ground and different approaches exist among them. General preventive measures should start along with GC initiation, and the duration of GC therapy should be limited to the minimal effective range. A pre-existing fracture, age, gender, menopausal status, dose, and duration of GC treatment are key factors in the decision to initiate antiosteoporotic medication. Oral bisphosphonates are typically regarded as the first-line treatment choice for GIOP partly due to their cost-effectiveness. Denosumab is another valid option, but an "exit strategy" should be considered before its initiation due to the risk of rebound-associated vertebral fractures upon its discontinuation. Since impaired bone formation represents the main mechanism by which GCs negatively affect skeletal health, osteoanabolic therapies appear to be pathophysiologically the more appropriate and appealing option, although cost considerations currently limit their use to selected severe cases. Regardless of the agent selected to mitigate the impact of GCs on the skeleton, what is most crucial is that the treating physician correctly stratifies the risk and intervenes at the right time.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in premenopausal women: management for the rheumatologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review seeks to summarize the literature relevant to the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in premenopausal women; an issue commonly encountered by rheumatologists and yet lacking good clinical practice guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although most of the relevant literature on osteoporosis includes postmenopausal women only, data from both randomized controlled trials and case reports suggest bisphosphonates can be an effective and well tolerated treatment for premenopausal patients. Data for other medications to treat premenopausal osteoporosis is less robust.

SUMMARY

The use of bisphosphonates in young women may be safer than initially thought and should likely be used for the treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in rheumatology clinics. Further research is needed to continue to understand long-term risk.

Hormone therapy effect on menopausal systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a systematic review

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) primarily affects women, who may need hormone therapy (HT) in menopause. There is, however, some concern as to its efficacy and safety. This systematic review aimed to determine the effect of HT on the activity of SLE and its safety. The study was a qualitative systematic review. Research was conducted with data retrieved from Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases using MESH terms up to April 2021, with no bar on date or language. Sixteen studies were selected for analysis. Most of them showed HT to be effective in the treatment of menopausal symptoms with no impact in SLE activity, but one randomized clinical trial showed an increase in the number of thrombotic events. The present systematic review demonstrated the efficacy of HT for treating the menopausal symptoms of SLE patients. The risk of flare and thrombosis seems to be very low.

Pharmacological prevention of fractures in patients undergoing glucocorticoid therapies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Objective

To perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) on the efficacy of antiosteoporotic interventions in the prevention of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in adult patients taking glucocorticoids (GCs).

Methods

We performed NMAs based on a prospectively developed protocol. A librarian-assisted database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Chinese databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antiosteoporotic interventions in adult patients taking GCs. Outcomes were vertebral and non-vertebral fracture incidences.

Results

We included 56 RCTs containing 6479 eligible patients in our analysis. We found that alendronate and teriparatide were associated with decreased odds of both vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. Denosumab and risedronate were associated with decreased odds of vertebral fractures, while etidronate, ibandronate and alfacalcidol were associated with decreased odds of non-vertebral fractures. We observed low network heterogeneity as indicated by the I2 statistic, and we did not detect evidence of publication bias. All outcomes were based on a moderate quality of evidence according to GRADE.

Conclusion

Bisphosphonates, teriparatide and denosumab are associated with decreased odds of fracture in patients undergoing GC therapy. Vitamin D metabolites and analogues (e.g. alfacalcidol) may have greater anti-fracture efficacy compared with plain vitamin D.

Systematic Review Registration

The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO)—CRD42019127073

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: from clinical trials to clinical practice

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) is the most common form of secondary osteoporosis. To date, six large randomized controlled clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmaceutical treatment in GIOP have been conducted. All of these studies have focused predominately on bone mineral density outcomes, and none of them have been statistically powered to address fracture endpoints. The purpose of this review is to highlight differences in the design and results within these large randomized GIOP clinical trials, and how these differences might affect clinical decisions. Differences between studies in trial design, populations studied, and variable efficacy impact the comparability and generalizability of these findings, and ultimately should affect practitioners’ behavior. We review the clinical trials that provide the best quality evidence on comparative efficacy and safety of GIOP treatments. We also propose suggestions on the design of future GIOP clinical trials with attention to improved generalizability, and, ideally, study designs that might achieve fracture outcomes.

Anabolics in the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an evidence-based review of long-term safety, efficacy and place in therapy

Introduction

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is an underrecognized complication of chronic glucocorticoid therapy characterized by a decrease in new bone formation. Anabolic therapies, such as teriparatide, a recombinant human parathyroid hormone, combat the disease by promoting new bone growth.

Aims

This article outlines the pathophysiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and details the evidence of efficacy, safety, and patterns of use of teriparatide and other future anabolic therapies.

Evidence review

In multiple clinical trials, teriparatide has been shown to significantly increase lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis when compared with placebo, alendronate, and risedronate. When compared with alendronate, significantly fewer vertebral fractures were noted in the teriparatide group. Adverse effects noted in clinical trials include nausea, insomnia, flushing, myalgias, and mild hypercalcemia/hyperuricemia. Early studies in rats noted an increased incidence of osteosarcoma; however, an increased rate beyond levels seen in general populations has not been noted in human studies or with long-term pharmacovigilance. Abaloparatide and romosozumab are newer anabolic therapies that have shown some benefit in postmenopausal osteoporosis but have not yet been studied in the chronic glucocorticoid population.

Place in therapy

Major specialty organizations continue to recommend bisphosphonates as first-line therapy in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis due to the proven benefit and relative affordability. However, the use of anabolics shows promise to improve outcomes by increasing BMD and reducing fracture-associated morbidity and mortality and has a role for selected populations at high fracture risk.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: 2019 concise clinical review

Glucocorticoids remain widely used for many medical conditions, and fractures are the most serious common adverse event related to long-term glucocorticoid use. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) develops in a time- and dose-dependent manner, but even at low doses, an increased risk of fragility fracture may be observed even within the first month of treatment. GIOP is mediated by multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms resulting in an inhibition of bone formation and an increase in bone resorption. The clinical assessment of GIOP has potential pitfalls since dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) may underestimate the risk of fracture in patients treated with glucocorticoids. Many national organizations have developed guidelines for assessing fracture risk and treating patients with, or at risk for, GIOP. These groups advocate both antiresorptive agents and bone-forming agents based predominately on their efficacy in improving bone mineral density. Oral bisphosphonates are generally the first-line therapy for GIOP in most patients due to their proven efficacy, good safety, and low cost. For those patients at greater risk of fracture, teriparatide should be considered earlier, based on its ability to significantly reduce vertebral fractures when compared with alendronate. GIOP remains a major public health concern that is at least partially preventable with current and potential future therapeutic options.

Glucocorticoids and Bone: Consequences of Endogenous and Exogenous Excess and Replacement Therapy

Osteoporosis associated with long-term glucocorticoid therapy remains a common and serious bone disease. Additionally, in recent years it has become clear that more subtle states of endogenous glucocorticoid excess may have a major impact on bone health. Adverse effects can be seen with mild systemic glucocorticoid excess, but there is also evidence of tissue-specific regulation of glucocorticoid action within bone as a mechanism of disease. This review article examines (1) the role of endogenous glucocorticoids in normal bone physiology, (2) the skeletal effects of endogenous glucocorticoid excess in the context of endocrine conditions such as Cushing disease/syndrome and autonomous cortisol secretion (subclinical Cushing syndrome), and (3) the actions of therapeutic (exogenous) glucocorticoids on bone. We review the extent to which the effect of glucocorticoids on bone is influenced by variations in tissue metabolizing enzymes and glucocorticoid receptor expression and sensitivity. We consider how the effects of therapeutic glucocorticoids on bone are complicated by the effects of the underlying inflammatory disease being treated. We also examine the impact that glucocorticoid replacement regimens have on bone in the context of primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency. We conclude that even subtle excess of endogenous or moderate doses of therapeutic glucocorticoids are detrimental to bone. However, in patients with inflammatory disorders there is a complex interplay between glucocorticoid treatment and underlying inflammation, with the underlying condition frequently representing the major component underpinning bone damage.

A review of osteoporosis management in younger premenopausal women

The purpose of this review is to describe the available evidence for osteoporosis treatments in young and premenopausal women. A review of articles evaluating the treatment or prevention of osteoporosis in young (age less than 50 years) or premenopausal women was conducted. Several trials evaluating the treatment of anorexia nervosa and use of hormone therapy in those women, the use of bisphosphonates in women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer and the use of bisphosphonates, teriparatide and vitamin D in women with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis are described. Limited data were found to support the treatment of osteoporosis in women with idiopathic osteoporosis or cystic fibrosis, or after kidney transplant. The evidence for treatment of osteoporosis in premenopausal women is not nearly as robust as that for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Although fracture risk in the premenopausal population is low, women with secondary osteoporosis may benefit from treatment with various agents, depending upon the condition.

Treatment of skeletal impairment in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism: when and how?

Guidelines for the management of osteoporosis induced by endogenous hypercortisolism are not available. Both the American College of Rheumatology and the International Osteoporosis Foundation recommend to modulate the treatment of exogenous glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) based on the individual fracture risk profile (calculated by FRAX) and dose of glucocorticoid used, but it is difficult to translate corticosteroid dosages to different degrees of endogenous hypercortisolism, and there are no data on validation of FRAX stratification method in patients with endogenous hypercortisolism. Consequently, it is unclear whether such recommendations may be adapted to patients with endogenous hypercortisolism. Moreover, patients with exogenous GIO take glucocorticoids since suffering a disease that commonly affects bone. On the other hand, the correction of coexistent risk factors, which may contribute to increase the fracture risk in patients exposed to glucocorticoid excess, and the removal of the cause of endogenous hypercortisolism, may lead to the recovery of bone health. Although the correction of hypercortisolism and of possible coexistent risk factors is necessary to favor the normalization of bone turnover with recovery of bone mass; in some patients, the fracture risk could not be normalized and specific anti-osteoporotic drugs should be given. Who, when, and how the patient with endogenous hypercortisolism should be treated with bone-active therapy is discussed.

A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

This paper provides a framework for the development of national guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in men and women aged 18 years and over in whom oral glucocorticoid therapy is considered for 3 months or longer.

INTRODUCTION

The need for updated guidelines for Europe and other parts of the world was recognised by the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the European Calcified Tissue Society, which set up a joint Guideline Working Group at the end of 2010.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The epidemiology of GIO is reviewed. Assessment of risk used a fracture probability-based approach, and intervention thresholds were based on 10-year probabilities using FRAX. The efficacy of intervention was assessed by a systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Guidance for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is updated in the light of new treatments and methods of assessment. National guidelines derived from this resource need to be tailored within the national healthcare framework of each country.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: treatment update and review

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is a serious consequence of glucocorticoid therapy leading to fractures in 30-50% of patients. A wide range of protective medications have been studied in this condition including calcium, vitamin D, vitamin D analogs, oral and intravenous bisphosphonates, sex hormones, anabolic agents and calcitonin. The mechanism of action, and evidence for these therapies, are reviewed - focusing on important trials and new evidence. Recently published guidelines are also reviewed and compared. Bisphosphonates are currently the recommended first-line therapy for the prevention and treatment of GIO. They have been shown to increase bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and hip and to decrease the incidence of vertebral fractures (especially in postmenopausal women). Testosterone therapy and female hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have been found to increase lumbar spine BMD in hypogonadal patients on glucocorticoid therapy, but effects on hip BMD have not been consistent and there is no fracture data in the GIO population. Similarly, calcitonin increases lumbar spine BMD but has no proven fracture efficacy. The effect of selective estrogen receptor modulators, the oral contraceptive pill and strontium on GIO is relatively unknown. Parathyroid hormone (PTH 1-34) and zoledronic acid have emerged as exciting new options for the treatment of GIO. Both therapies have been found to result in gains in BMD at the spine and hip that are either noninferior or superior to those seen with oral bisphosphonate therapy. PTH 1-34 has also been found to decrease the incidence of new vertebral fractures and may be an option in high-risk patients established on long-term glucocorticoid therapy.

Corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis: an update for dermatologists

Long-term corticosteroid treatment is the most common secondary cause of bone loss. Patients treated with long-term corticosteroid therapy may develop osteopenia or osteoporosis, and many have fractures. It is difficult to predict which corticosteroid-treated patients will develop significant skeletal complications because of variability in the underlying diseases treated with corticosteroids, and because of variation in corticosteroid dose over time. Corticosteroid therapy causes an alteration in the ratio between osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B (RANK) ligand (RANKL), which leads to early increased bone resorption for the first 3-6 months, with long-term treatment leading primarily to suppression of bone formation. Recently published recommendations advise the use of bisphosphonates or teriparatide in high-risk patients, depending on fracture risk assessed by bone mineral density testing. This article gives an update of current knowledge regarding the pathophysiology, clinical presentation and evaluation, and prevention and treatment of patients with corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

Bone health in systemic lupus erythematosus

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) confront an increased risk of developing osteoporosis and fragility fractures. Traditional risk factors, such as smoking, advanced age, physical inactivity, and low weight, are partly responsible, but a number of lupus-specific risk factors may also play an important role. Chronic, systemic inflammation in patients with SLE has been proposed as a possible mechanism for osteoporosis development. Other potential risk factors include vitamin D deficiency due to sun avoidance, premature gonadal failure, and the chronic use of medications known to increase osteoporosis risk. Increased awareness of this potentially preventable condition is warranted, as early detection and treatment help optimize bone health and improve long-term outcomes in patients with SLE. This article presents recent epidemiologic data related to bone health in SLE and discusses preventative and therapeutic strategies.

Genistein aglycone reverses glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and increases bone breaking strength in rats: a comparative study with alendronate

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIO) is the leading cause of secondary osteoporosis. Clinical evidence suggests a role for genistein aglycone in the treatment of post-menopausal osteopenia although proof of efficacy in comparison with currently available treatments is still lacking. To clarify this issue, we investigated the effects of genistein on bone compared with alendronate in experimental GIO.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

A total of 28 female Sprague-Dawley rats were used. GIO was induced by daily injections of methylprednisolone (MP; 30 mg x kg(-1) s.c.) for 60 days. Sham GIO animals (Sham-MP) were injected daily with the MP vehicle. At the end of the osteoporosis development period, MP rats were randomized to receive: vehicle (n= 7), genistein aglycone (5 mg x kg(-1) s.c.; n= 7) or alendronate (0.03 mg x kg(-1) s.c.; n= 7). Treatment lasted 60 days. Sham-MP animals were treated with vehicle for an additional 60 days. At the beginning and at the end of treatments, animals were examined for bone mineral density and bone mineral content. Bone-alkaline phosphatase and carboxy-terminal collagen cross links were determined; femurs were removed and tested for breaking strength and histology.

KEY RESULTS

Genistein aglycone showed a greater increase in bone mineral density, bone mineral content and in breaking strength than alendronate and significantly increased bone-alkaline phosphatase (bone formation marker), reduced carboxy-terminal collagen cross links (bone resorption marker), compared with alendronate. Both treatments improved bone histology and the histological score.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The results strongly suggest that the genistein aglycone might be an alternative therapy for the management of secondary osteoporosis.

Learning from past mistakes: assessing trial quality, power and eligibility in non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the post hoc study power of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the treatment of non-renal SLE and to determine the generalizability of these RCTs using an SLE database.

METHODS

RCTs in non-renal SLE were identified using PubMed (1975-2007). Inclusion/exclusion criteria, trial quality (5-point scale) and results of each study were recorded. The inclusion/exclusion criteria were compared with an SLE database to determine the proportion of patients from the database who would theoretically be eligible for these trials. For each negative study, we calculated the post hoc study power. We also looked for temporal improvements of trials in the literature and examined if pharmaceutical involvement influenced trial quality.

RESULTS

Sixty-four articles were included; the mean power of 30 negative studies was 24.6 +/- s.e.m. 3.9% (range 2.5-81.1%). Only one study had a power > 80%. Overall, potential eligibility of SLE patients in the database was 45.1 +/- s.e.m. 3.6%. Only 14 studies (21.9%) were of good quality. Fortunately, RCT quality is improving over time (trials <1995, compared with 1996-2002 and >2003; P < 0.001). Trials with pharmaceutical involvement had a significantly higher number of enrollees and better study quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Negative RCTs in SLE were mostly underpowered but the generalizability of these trials was high. Determination of study power and the impact of eligibility criteria on generalizability of study results are crucial in the design of clinical trials to ensure applicability to clinical practice.

Risedronate for prevention of bone mineral density loss in patients receiving high-dose glucocorticoids: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

This 6-month randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial shows that risedronate is well tolerated and effective in improving lumbar spine BMD and reducing loss of BMD at the hips in patients receiving high-dose prednisolone.

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates have proven benefits in patients receiving chronic low-dose glucocorticoids. However, whether they are effective in preventing bone mineral density (BMD) loss during periods of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment is unclear. The objective of this paper is to study the efficacy of risedronate in preventing bone mineral density (BMD) loss in users of high-dose glucocorticoids.

METHODS

Adult patients with medical diseases treated with high-dose prednisolone (>0.5 mg/kg/day) were randomized to receive risedronate (5 mg/day) or placebo for 6 months in a double-blind manner, along with elemental calcium (1,000 mg/day). Changes in BMD were studied.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty patients were recruited (82 women, age 42.8 +/- 14.3 years, 63% corticosteroid-naive, 30% women postmenopausal) and 103 completed the study. Baseline clinical characteristics and BMD were similar in the risedronate and placebo groups. At 6 months, a significant gain in spinal BMD was observed in the risedronate group (+0.7 +/- 0.3%; p = 0.03) but a drop was detected in the placebo group (-0.7 +/- 0.4%; p = 0.12). After adjustment for baseline BMD, age, gender, body mass index and cumulative prednisolone dosages, the inter-group difference in spinal BMD remained significant (1.4%; p = 0.006). Both groups had a significant drop in hip BMD, but the magnitude was greater in the placebo arm (-0.8 +/- 0.4% in risedronate versus -1.3 +/- 0.5% the in placebo). No new fractures developed. Subgroup analysis of corticosteroid-naive patients yielded similar results. Upper gastrointestinal adverse events were numerically more frequent in the risedronate group.

CONCLUSIONS

Risedronate improves spinal BMD in users of high-dose glucocorticoids.

[Modern therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus]

Even though no new treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been approved in over 40 years, the treatment possibilities have expanded decisively in this time. The available evidence for most forms of therapy is rather thin, yet there is a wide consensus on an individual immunosuppressive therapy that is adjusted to the illness activity and severity. Various new substances, e.g. other immunosuppressants and anti-cell therapies have been tested, mostly in open studies. Considering the experience in other indications, mycophenolate mofetil and rituximab have a very promising potential to be approved for therapy of SLE. Aside from these, "old medications" such as antimalarial drugs still possess a high value. Besides the effective suppression of the illness activity, this is especially decisive for the improvement of the long-term prognosis, the treatment of co-morbidities and secondary prevention and the avoidance of negative effects of the illness and therapy, such as infections, osteoporosis, and premature arteriosclerosis. As these "simple" measures often remain disregarded in modern therapy, they will be focused on in this overview on the current treatment concepts for SLE and these aspects will be discussed in greater depth. With regard to new future therapies, we refer the reader to other current publications.

Prevention and treatment strategies for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporotic fractures

Glucocorticoids are the most common cause of drug-related osteoporosis. We reviewed current evidence on risk factors for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) and prevention and treatment of GIOP-related fractures. Guidelines for GIOP management published since 2000 were also reviewed. Significant bone loss and increased fracture risk is seen with daily prednisone doses as low as 5 mg. Alternate-day glucocorticoid therapy can lead to similar bone loss. No conclusive evidence exists for a safe minimum dose or duration of glucocorticoid exposure. Physicians should consider risk factors for involutional osteoporosis such as older age, postmenopausal status, and baseline bone density measurements as they assess patients for prevention or treatment of GIOP. Bisphosphonates were reported to reduce GIOP-related vertebral fractures, but inconclusive data exist for hip fractures associated with glucocorticoid use. Hormone replacement therapy and parathyroid hormone analogs are effective in preserving bone density in GIOP. The risk of osteoporosis and fractures should be routinely assessed in patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy. Effective prevention and treatment options are available and can result in meaningful reduction of GIOP-related morbidity and mortality. Current guidelines for GIOP management recommend bisphosphonates, especially alendronate and risedronate, as first-line agents for GIOP, and these guidelines propose the preventive use of bisphosphonates early in the course of glucocorticoid therapy in high-risk patient subgroups.

Bone health and systemic lupus erythematosus

Osteoporosis is a potentially preventable condition frequently encountered in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Bone loss in SLE is likely a multi- factorial process involving traditional osteoporosis risk factors along with lupus-related factors. Recognizing potential contributors to bone loss in patients with SLE may allow earlier detection of osteoporosis, optimize bone health, and minimize future fracture risk. This paper discusses recent epidemiologic information related to osteoporosis and fractures in SLE, and highlights relevant developments regarding evaluation and treatment of patients at risk for bone loss.

Osteoporosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Mechanisms

Osteoporosis is a potentially preventable condition frequently encountered in patients who have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Bone loss in SLE is heterogeneous and likely a multifactorial process involving both traditional and lupus-related risk factors. Recognizing potential contributors to bone loss in the SLE patient may allow for earlier detection of osteoporosis and optimize bone health. This article reviews the current epidemiologic information available on osteoporosis and fracture data in SLE and discusses evaluation and management strategies pertinent to patients who have lupus.

The effect of 1-year transdermal estrogen replacement therapy on bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteopenic postmenopausal systemic lupus erythematosus patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

We studied the effect of 1-year transdermal estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteopenic postmenopausal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SLE patients were randomly allocated to treatment (estradiol; 50 microg transdermal 17beta-estradiol; n=15) or placebo ( n=17) group. Both groups received 5 mg continuous oral medroxyprogesterone acetate, 500 mg calcium and 400 IU vitamin D(3). L(1)-L(4) spine (LS), left femur and total hip BMD were measured at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Serum osteocalcin (OC) and degradation products of C-terminal telopeptides of type-I collagen (CTx) levels were measured at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. There was a significant difference in the percentage change of LS BMD at 6 months between the two groups (103.24+/-3.74% (estradiol group) vs 98.99+/-3.11% (placebo group); P<0.005). There was a significant decrease within the estradiol group in the CTx levels between baseline and all subsequent visits ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in SLE disease activity index, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) damage index and corticosteroid dose during the study period. Transdermal estradiol may prevent bone loss in postmenopausal SLE women at the lumbar spine and femur, with no increase in disease activity among postmenopausal SLE women receiving transdermal ERT. The high dropout rate (8/15) leads us to the conclusion that efficacy of HRT in a high-risk group such as SLE women can be attained only in a small number of patients, provided all inclusion/exclusion criteria are strictly adhered to.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: pathophysiological data and recent treatments

Long-term glucocorticoid therapy promptly induces osteoporosis, whose severity depends on the dose and duration of the treatment. Recent data suggest that there is no safety threshold for adverse effects on bone. Glucocorticoid therapy impairs calcium intestinal absorption, dramatically suppresses osteoblastic formation, and stimulates osteocyte apoptosis. In contrast, the contribution of secondary hyperparathyroidism and increased bone resorption, although frequently mentioned, is now a focus of controversy. Beneficial effects on bone have been obtained with calcium and vitamin D supplementation, as well as with hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. Bisphosphonates are clearly effective in preventing and treating glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, although their mechanism of action in this condition remains poorly understood. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is being evaluated as a potential therapeutic agent for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Treatment of lupus with corticosteroids

Through direct signals to the nucleus mediated by the glucocorticoid receptor, exogenous glucocorticoids impact a broad array of cellular functions. DNA binding of the glucocorticoid receptor, depending upon the specific promoter to which the receptor binds, affects gene expression by recruiting transcription factors to the promoter or by interfering with the function of co-factors required for gene transcription. Steroid effects on the adhesion functions and release of products by phagocytic cells are prompt, occurring within hours of administration. Administration of corticosteroids results in rapid depletion of circulating T-cells due to a combination of effects including enhanced circulatory emigration, induction of apoptosis, inhibition of T-cell growth factors, and impaired release of cells from lymphoid tissues. Corticosteroid effects on B-cell function and immunoglobulin production are more delayed. The broad, generally suppressive effects of corticosteroids on the immune response render them useful for the management of most organ system manifestations of lupus. Corticosteroid toxicity in lupus is notable for greater susceptibility to infections, osteoporosis, osteonecrosis and accelerated atherogenesis. Although use of corticosteroids for patients with severe disease manifestations is associated with higher numbers of deaths from infections, overall survival appears to be improved.

Osteoporosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: prevention and treatment

The patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is at risk of osteoporosis through several factors: the inflammatory disease itself, disease-related co-morbidity, and its treatment. Bone loss is apparent early in the disease and this may be confounded primarily by treatment with corticosteroids. Patients should be assessed for additional risk factors for osteoporosis and general lifestyle measures adopted. Bone mineral density measurement should be considered in SLE patients at high risk of osteoporosis, particularly those starting corticosteroids and in postmenopausal women. Calcium and vitamin D supplementation provide general prophylaxis and are a suitable first-line option. Hormone replacement should be used in hypogondal subjects unless contra-indicated. In subjects at high fracture risk, particularly in postmenopausal women, bisphosphonate therapy should be considered as these agents have been shown to significantly reduce vertebral fracture risk. These measures should reduce the burden of osteoporosis and fracture in patients with lupus.

Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Glucocorticoid drugs interact with bone metabolism at many levels, but their principal action is to reduce osteoblast number and bone matrix synthesis. Virtually all patients receiving glucocorticoids in doses above 5 mg per day lose bone, the amount lost being dependent on the cumulative steroid dose. The risk of fracture is also related to the individual's initial bone density, which in turn reflects race, sex, age, menopausal status, body weight, smoking and the nature of any underlying illness. Bone density measurement and personal fracture history are the best predictors of future fracture risk. Steroid-induced bone loss is reversible, so measures to minimize the systemic steroid dose or to withdraw these drugs altogether should be pursued no matter how long an individual has been using them. Increasing the calcium intake to 1.5 g per day, encouraging them to stop smoking and take more exercise, and treating any vitamin D deficiency are sensible measures in all patients. In those at high risk, bisphosphonates are the best documented interventions, although sex hormone replacement is also effective and can be used alone or in addition to bisphosphonates.