Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with biologic exposure before and during pregnancy in women with inflammatory systemic diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Patterns and determinants of response to novel therapies in juvenile and adult-onset polyarthritis

Biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) have revolutionized the management of multiple rheumatic inflammatory conditions. Among these, polyarticular JIA (pJIA) and RA display similarities in terms of disease pathophysiology and response pattern to b/tsDMARDs. Indeed, the therapeutic efficacy of novel targeted drugs is variable among individual patients, in both RA and pJIA. The mechanisms and determinants of this heterogeneous response are diverse and complex, such that the development of true 'precision'-medicine strategies has proven highly challenging. In this review, we will discuss pathophysiological, patient-specific, drug-specific and environmental factors contributing to individual therapeutic response in pJIA in comparison with what is known in RA. Although some biomarkers have been identified that stratify with respect to the likelihood of either therapeutic response or non-response, few have proved useful in clinical practice so far, likely due to the complexity of treatment-response mechanisms. Consequently, we propose a pragmatic, patient-centred and clinically based approach, i.e. personalized instead of biomarker-based precision medicine in JIA.

Use of administrative claims data in observational studies of antirheumatic medication effects on pregnancy outcomes: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this review is to examine which disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics used to treat pregnant individuals with rheumatic conditions have been reported in observational studies using population-based health administrative data. The secondary objective is to describe which adverse pregnancy outcomes (both maternal and neonatal) have been reported, their definitions, and corresponding diagnostic and/or procedural codes.

INTRODUCTION

Pregnant individuals are typically excluded from drug trials due to unknown potential risks to both the pregnant person and fetus, leaving most antirheumatic drugs understudied for use in pregnancy. Despite these substantial knowledge gaps, most pregnant individuals continue to be maintained on antirheumatic medications due to the benefits generally outweighing the risks. In contrast to previous systematic reviews of findings from randomized trials, our scoping review aims to leverage this real-world data to generate real-world evidence of antirheumatic drug safety during pregnancy.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Articles must report on observational studies using population-based health administrative data from pregnant individuals with rheumatic conditions (rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis) receiving antirheumatic drug therapy (DMARDs and biologics). Randomized trials, reviews, case studies, opinion pieces, and abstracts will be excluded.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], Embase [Ovid], CINAHL [EBSCOhost]) and gray literature (OpenGrey, Health Services Research Projects in Progress, World Health Organization Library, and Google Scholar) will be searched for relevant evidence. Search terms will combine 4 concepts: rheumatic diseases, drug therapy, pregnancy, and health care administrative data. Identified articles will be independently screened, selected, and extracted by 2 researchers. Data will be analyzed descriptively and presented in tables.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

Open Science Framework https://osf.io/5e6tp.

Exposure to biologic therapy before and during pregnancy in patients with psoriasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Biologicals have transformed the management of severe disease phenotypes in psoriasis and are often prescribed in women of childbearing age. However, information on safety of biologicals in pregnancy are lacking. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe the characteristics and pregnancy outcomes in women with psoriasis exposed to biologics within 3 months before or during pregnancy, and to estimate the pooled prevalence of spontaneous, elective and total abortions, and congenital malformations in their newborns. Bibliographic searches were performed in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases up to 14 April 2022. No restrictions on sample size or publication date were applied. Review performance complied with PRISMA guidelines, and two reviewers assessed randomized controlled trials and nonrandomized studies reporting pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to biologics indicated for psoriasis during the pre-gestational and/or gestational period. Studies focusing on rheumatologic or gastroenterological immune-mediated inflammatory diseases were excluded. Regardless of data heterogeneity, a random-effects model was used to pool prevalence estimates. We included 51 observational studies, involving 739 pregnancies exposed to approved biologics for psoriasis. Administration was mostly (70.4%) limited to the first trimester, and the most common drug was ustekinumab (36.0%). The estimated prevalence of miscarriage was 15.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.7-18.0) and elective abortions, 10.8% (95% CI 7.7-14.3). Congenital malformations occurred in about 3.0% (95% CI 1.6-4.8) of live births exposed to biologics during pregnancy. Altogether, exposure to biologics for psoriasis during pregnancy and/or conception does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of miscarriage/abortion or congenital malformations, showing similar rates to the general population. These results suggest that biologic drugs are safe and pose an acceptable risk to the foetuses/neonates.

Temporal trends in adverse pregnancy outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis in Sweden: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Evidence on the risks associated with pregnancy and childbirth in women with axial spondyloarthritis is scarce and conflicting, with more research needed to guide policy and clinical practice. We aimed to assess the risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in a large cohort of women with axial spondyloarthritis, and to investigate how outcomes varied over time and in relation to anti-rheumatic treatment.

METHODS

In this register-based cohort study, we included births in Sweden between April 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2020, to women with axial spondyloarthritis and general population comparators, matched 1:10 on year of delivery, maternal age, and parity. Our main data source was the Medical Birth Register (MBR), which includes over 98% of births in Sweden and prospectively collects data on antenatal care, delivery, and foetal outcomes. The information in MBR was linked to other registers, including the National Patient Register, the Prescribed Drug Register, and registers with demographic data. Our main outcomes were the relative risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, analysed using modified Poisson regression. We also studied how the frequency of certain adverse outcomes, as well as disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug treatments, changed over the study period by linear regression and loess plots.

FINDINGS

Between April 1, 2007, and Dec 31, 2020, 1580 births in women with axial spondyloarthritis recorded in MBR fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were matched with 15 792 comparator births. Among the 1580 births in women with axial spondyloarthritis, we found increased risks of preterm birth (risk ratio 1·43, 95% CI 1·13-1·80), pre-eclampsia (1·44, 1·08-1·92), elective caesarean delivery (1·59, 1·37-1·84), and serious infant infection (1·29, 1·05-1·59) compared with births in general population comparators. The risks of preterm birth, infant infection, and caesarean delivery decreased by around 0·5 percentage points annually during the study period, while the use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors during pregnancy increased.

INTERPRETATION

In view of remaining concerns regarding safety of the use of biological DMARDs during pregnancy, we saw a reassuring trend in which pregnancy outcomes improved over time in the axial spondyloarthritis group, concurrent with increased use of biological DMARDs. If the current rate of improvement is maintained, women with axial spondyloarthritis treated in accordance with clinical guidelines might eventually not be at an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

FUNDING

Swedish Research Council and The Swedish Rheumatism Association.

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor use during pregnancy is associated with increased birth weight of rheumatoid arthritis patients' offspring

OBJECTIVES

To study pregnancy outcomes in a closely monitored, well-defined cohort of women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In particular, pregnancy outcomes of women that used a TNFi during pregnancy.

METHODS

Patients were derived from a prospective study on pregnancy and RA (Preconception Counseling in Active RA study) and treated according to a treatment protocol aimed at minimal disease activity. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to describe which variables influenced birth weight.

RESULTS

188 patients were included, 92 (48.9%) patients with RA used a TNFi during pregnancy. Disease Activity Score in 28 joints C reactive protein (DAS28CRP) was low at all time points during pregnancy (DAS28CRP in the third trimester: 2.17 (SD 0.73). TNFi use was not associated with an increase of adverse pregnancy outcomes such as low birth weight (<2500 g), (emergency) caesarian section, hypertensive disorders or congenital malformations. TNFi use resulted in less children born small-for-gestational age (p=0.05), however, did not increase the risk of large-for-gestational age (p=0.73). Mean birth weight was 173 g higher in women that used a TNFi during pregnancy (3.344 kg vs 3.171 kg, p=0.03). In the multivariate analysis, maternal age (β -0.023, 95% CI -0.040 to -0.0065, p=0.007), TNFi use (β 0.20, 95% CI 0.066, 0.34, p=0.004), diabetes mellitus (β 0.37, 95% CI 0.12, 0.63, p=0.004) and gestational age (β 0.18, 95% CI 0.15, 0.2, p<0.001) were statistically significant associated with birth weight.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that TNFi use during pregnancy is associated with increased birth weight of offspring of women with well-controlled RA. The underlying mechanism of TNF-inhibition on birth weight and the long-term consequences for the offspring should be explored in future research.

Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Biologic medications, specifically tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors, have become increasingly prevalent in the treatment of chronic inflammatory disease (CID) in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine pregnancy outcomes in women with CID exposed to biologics during pregnancy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through January 1998-July 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Peer-reviewed, English-language cohort, case-control, cross-sectional studies, and case series that contained original data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently conducted data extraction. A meta-analysis of proportions using a random-effects model was used to pool outcomes. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the mean of proportions of outcomes across exposure groups using the 'treated' group as the reference category. All studies were evaluated using an appropriate quality assessment tool. The GRADE approach was used to assess the overall certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-five studies, describing 11 172 pregnancies, were eligible for inclusion. Analysis showed pooled proportions for congenital malformations as follows: treated 0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.04; I2  = 77) versus disease-matched 0.04 (95% CI 0.03-0.05. I2  = 86; p = 0.238); preterm delivery treated 0.04 (95% CI 0.10-0.14; I2  = 88) versus disease-matched 0.10 (95% CI 0.09-0.12; I2  = 87; p = 0.250); severe neonatal infection: treated 0.05 (95% CI 0.03-0.07; I2  = 88) versus disease-matched 0.05 (95% CI 0.02-0.07; I2  = 94; p = 0.970); low birthweight: treated 0.10 (95% CI 0.07-0.12; I2  = 93) versus disease-matched 0.08 (95% CI 0.07-0.09; I2  = 0; p = 0.241); pooled miscarriage: treated 0.13 (95% CI 0.10-0.15; I2  = 77) versus disease-matched 0.08 (95% CI 0.04-0.11; I2  = 5; p = 0.078); pre-eclampsia; treated 0.01 (95% CI 0.01-0.02; I2  = 0) versus disease-matched 0.01 (95% CI 0.00-0.01; I2  = 0; p = 0.193). No statistical differences in proportions were observed. GRADE certainty of findings was low to very low.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated comparable pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies exposed to biologics, disease-matched controls and CID-free pregnancies using the GRADE approach.

Clinical considerations in the management of hidradenitis suppurativa in women

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory disease of the skin with a predilection for women. The role of sex hormones, including estrogen and progesterone, is incompletely understood, but alterations in hormone levels may play a role in disease activity for many patients. Specific clinical considerations should be made for women with HS, particularly in the setting of pregnancy, childbirth, breastfeeding, and menopause. Current knowledge gaps regarding HS include the cumulative impact of disease across an individual's lifespan, as well as the mechanistic role of sex hormones in the disease. An improved understanding of the pathophysiologic role of hormones in HS would optimize our ability to use targeted therapies for hormonally driven disease. Psychological and psychosexual support for women with HS is an important facet of any holistic management strategy for the disease. This article integrates up-to-date pathogenic and mechanistic insights with evidence-based clinical management to optimize care for women with HS.

Pregnancy outcomes in women with psoriatic arthritis with respect to presence and timing of antirheumatic treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pregnancy outcomes in relation to antirheumatic treatment before and during pregnancy as a proxy of disease severity in PsA-pregnancies as compared to non-PsA-pregnancies.

METHODS

Swedish nationwide register-based cohort study of 921 PsA- pregnancies and 9210 non-PSA-pregnancies (matched 1:10 on maternal age, year, and parity) 2007-2017. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) overall and stratified by presence, timing, and type of antirheumatic treatment. Adjustments were made for BMI, smoking, educational level and country of birth. The outcome preterm birth was also stratified by parity.

RESULTS

Women with PsA vs. non-PsA-pregnancies were more obese, more often smokers and had a diagnosis of pre-gestational hypertension and diabetes more often. Increased risks in PsA vs. non-PsA-pregnancies were foremost preterm birth (aOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.27-2.24) and cesarean delivery, (aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.43-2.20 for elective and aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.10-1.84 for emergency cesarean delivery). The risks differed with presence, timing, and type of antirheumatic treatment with the most increased risks in PsA-pregnancies (vs. non-PsA) with antirheumatic treatment during pregnancy, aOR preterm birth; 2.30, 95% CI 1.49-3.56. Corresponding aOR for biologics exposed PsA-pregnancies was 4.49, 95% CI 2.60-7.79. Risk of preterm birth was primarily increased in first pregnancies.

CONCLUSION

In comparison with non-PsA-pregnancies risks of preterm birth and cesarean delivery were mostly increased in those exposed to antirheumatic treatment during pregnancy, especially biologics. As parity influences the risk of preterm birth in PsA pregnancies special attention to first pregnancies is warranted. Women with PsA, should receive individualized monitoring during pregnancy.

Inflammatory factors, genetic variants, and predisposition for preterm birth

Preterm birth is a major clinical and public health challenge, with a prevalence of 11% worldwide. It is the leading cause of death in children younger than 5 years old and represents 70% of neonatal deaths and 75% of neonatal morbidity. Despite the clinical and public health significance, this condition's etiology is still unclear, and most of the cases are spontaneous. There are several known preterm birth risk factors, including inflammatory diseases and the genetic background, although the underlying molecular mechanisms are far from understood. The present review highlights the research advances on the association between inflammatory-related genes and the increased risk for preterm delivery. The most associated genetic variants are the TNFα rs1800629, the IL1α rs17561, and the IL1RN rs2234663. Moreover, many of the genes discussed in this review are also implicated in pathologies involving inflammatory or autoimmune systems, such as periodontal disease, bowel inflammatory disease, and autoimmune rheumatic diseases. This review presents evidence suggesting a common genetic background to preterm birth, autoimmune and inflammatory diseases susceptibility.

Ethical issues in therapeutic use and research in pregnant and breastfeeding women

Pregnant or potentially pregnant women have historically been excluded from clinical trials of new medications. However, it is increasingly recognised that it is imperative to generate evidence from the population in whom the drugs are likely to be used to inform safe, evidence-based shared clinical decision making. Reluctance by researchers and regulators to perform such studies often relates to concerns about risk, particularly to the foetus. However, this must be offset against the risk of untreated disease or using a drug in pregnancy where safety, efficacy and dosing information are not known. This review summarises the historical perspective, and the ethical and legal frameworks that inform the conduct of such research, then highlights examples of innovative practice that have enabled high quality, ethical research to proceed to inform the evidence-based use of medication in pregnancy.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are inflammatory diseases that affect women in their reproductive years. We aimed to investigate whether maternal psoriasis and PsA are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases from inception to 3 August 2020, and reference lists of selected articles. Observational studies reporting at least one pregnancy outcomes in women with psoriasis or PsA with a comparator of general population or healthy subjects were included. Data were pooled by random-effects models and expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Overall, 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled analyses showed pregnant women with psoriatic diseases have significantly higher risk of adverse maternal outcomes compared with general population (caesarean delivery: 1.33 (1.17-1.52); preterm birth: 1.32 (1.15-1.52); (pre)eclampsia: 1.28 (1.14-1.43); gestational diabetes: 1.19 (1.10-1.30); gestational hypertension: 1.30 (1.18-1.44). However, no statistically increased risks of fetal complications were observed in women with psoriatic diseases (small for gestational age: 1.02 (0.93-1.11); low birth weight: 1.15 (0.93-1.42); congenital malformations: 1.03 (0.93-1.14); Apgar score <7: 1.07 (0.81-1.39); neonatal mortality: 1.13 (0.90-1.43); stillbirth: 1.19 (0.95-1.50)). Subgroup analysis found similar results in women with either psoriasis or PsA regarding maternal outcomes and the magnitude of risk estimates seems to be greater in PsA though without statistical difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with psoriasis and PsA have excess risk of adverse maternal events, but not adverse neonatal events. Close monitoring of the mothers' clinical status before and during pregnancy is decidedly required in daily practice.

The Influence of Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis During Pregnancy on the Long-Term Children's Outcome

The management of reproductive issues in women with inflammatory arthritis has greatly changed over decades. In the 1980–1990s, women with refractory forms of arthritis were either not able to get pregnant or did choose not to get pregnant because of their disabling disease. Hence, the traditional belief that pregnancy can induce a remission of arthritis. The availability of biologic agents has allowed a good control of aggressive forms of arthritis. The main topic of discussion during preconception counselling is the use of drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Physicians are now supported by international recommendations released by the European League Against Rheumatism and the American College of Rheumatology, but still they must face with cultural reluctance in accepting that a pregnant woman can take medications. Patient-physician communication should be centered on the message that active maternal disease during pregnancy is detrimental to fetal health. Keeping maternal disease under control with drugs which are not harmful to the fetus is the best way to ensure the best possible outcome for both the mother and the baby. However, there might be concerns about the influence of the in utero exposure to medications on the newborn’s health conditions. Particularly, studies suggesting an increased risk of autism-spectrum-disorders in children born to women with rheumatoid arthritis has raised questions about neuropsychological impairment in the offspring of women with chronic arthritis. As a multidisciplinary group of rheumatologists and child neuropsychiatrists, we conducted a study on 16 women with chronic forms of arthritis whose diagnosis was determined before pregnancy and their 18 school-age children. The children underwent a complete neurological examination and validated tests/questionnaires. Behavioral aspects of somatization and anxiety/depression (internalizing problem) or an “adult profile” were found in nearly one third of children. Children at a high risk of neurodevelopmental problems were born to mothers with a longer history of arthritis and were breastfeed for less than 6 months of age or were not breastfeed at all. No association was found with other maternal characteristics such as autoantibody existence and disease activity during and after the pregnancy.

Modern treatment approach results in low disease activity in 90% of pregnant rheumatoid arthritis patients: the PreCARA study

OBJECTIVES

In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), high disease activity impairs fertility outcomes and increases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of a modern treatment approach, including treat-to-target (T2T) and the prescription of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, in patients with RA with a wish to conceive or who are pregnant.

METHODS

Patients were derived from the Preconception Counseling in Active RA (PreCARA) cohort. Patients with a wish to conceive or who are pregnant were treated according to a modified T2T approach, in which the obvious restrictions of pregnancy were taken into account. Results of the PreCARA study were compared with results of the Pregnancy-induced Amelioration of Rheumatoid Arthritis (PARA) study, a historic reference cohort on RA during pregnancy. Patients in the PARA cohort were treated according to the standards of that time (2002-2010). Differences in disease activity over time between the two cohorts were tested using a linear mixed model.

RESULTS

309 patients with RA were included in the PreCARA study, 188 children were born. 47.3% of the patients used a TNF inhibitor at any time during pregnancy. Mean disease activity over time in the PreCARA cohort was lower than in the reference cohort (p<0.001). In the PreCARA cohort, 75.4% of the patients were in low disease activity (LDA) or remission before pregnancy increasing to 90.4% in the third trimester, whereas in the PARA cohort, these percentages were 33.2% and 47.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This first study on a modern treatment approach in pregnant patients with RA shows that LDA and remission are an attainable goal during pregnancy, with 90.4% of patients achieving this in the third trimester.

Intrauterine Exposure to Biologics in Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory autoimmune diseases are chronic diseases that often affect women of childbearing age. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the safety profile of medications used for management of inflammatory autoimmune diseases during pregnancy is important. However, in many cases the potential harmful effects of medications (especially biologics) during pregnancy (and lactation) on mother and child have not been fully identified.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to update the data on the occurrence of miscarriages and (major) congenital malformations when using biologics during pregnancy based on newly published articles. Additionally, we selected several different secondary outcomes that may be of interest for clinicians, especially information on adverse events in the use of a specific biologic during pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search was conducted from 1 January 2015 until 4 July 2019 in Embase.com, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar with specific search terms for each database. Selection of publications was based on title/abstract and followed by full text (double blinded, two researchers). An overview was made based on outcomes of interest. References of the included publications were reviewed to include and minimize the missing publications.

RESULTS

A total of 143 publications were included. The total number of cases ranged from nine for canakinumab to 4276 for infliximab. The rates of miscarriages and major congenital malformations did not show relevant differences from those rates in the general population.

CONCLUSION

Despite limitations to our study, no major safety issues were reported and no trend could be identified in the reported malformations.

Pregnancy and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder - Reciprocal Effects and Practical Recommendations: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system characterized by severe, antibody-mediated astrocyte loss with secondary demyelination and axonal damage, predominantly targeting optic nerves and the spinal cord. Recent publications have alluded to increased disease activity during pregnancy, and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes in patients with NMOSD. Our objective was to systematically review published literature to help counsel and manage women with NMOSD contemplating pregnancy. Methods: We searched five databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE, for English-language publications describing pregnancies in women with NMOSD. Article selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment using Joanna Briggs' critical appraisal tool for case reports and case series, were performed in duplicate. Pooled incidences were calculated where possible, and a narrative summary was provided. Results: Of 2,118 identified titles, 22 case reports and seven case series, representing 595 pregnancies in 389 women, were included. The mean maternal age was 28.12 ± 5.19 years. At least 20% of cases were first diagnosed during pregnancy. There were no maternal deaths. Pooled estimates for clinical outcomes could not be obtained due to inadequate reporting. NMOSD-related disability and relapses increased considerably during pregnancy and especially in the immediate postpartum period. Although a high proportion of early pregnancy losses were reported, an association with disease activity or therapeutic interventions could not be established. Apart from one publication which reported an increased risk of preeclampsia, there was no increase in adverse obstetric outcomes including preterm birth, fetal growth restriction or congenital malformations. Initial attacks and relapses were successfully managed with oral or intravenous corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, and refractory cases with immunoglobulin, plasma exchange and immunoadsorption. Conclusion: Increased NMOSD-related disability and relapses during pregnancy the postpartum period may respond to aggressive management with corticosteroids and immunosuppressants such as azathioprine, which are safely administered during pregnancy and lactation. Emerging safety data on monoclonal antibodies during pregnancy, make these attractive options, while intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange and immunoadsorption can be safely used to treat severe relapses. The complex interplay between NMOSD and pregnancy outcomes would be best understood through prospective analysis of data collected through an international registry. Disclosure: Dalia Rotstein has served as a consultant or speaker for Alexion and Roche. She has received research support from Roche Canada. Rohan D'Souza has served as a consultant and speaker for Ferring Canada Inc and Ferring Global Inc, on topics unrelated to this manuscript. The other authors have no relevant relationships to disclose.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Systemic Vasculitides

Purpose of Review

In recent years, improvements in the recognition of primary vasculitides and increased treatment options have led to greater survival rates and a better quality of life for patients. Therefore, pregnancy in women with vasculitis has become a more frequent consideration or event. Literature on pregnancy outcomes in this population has grown and allowed us, in this article, to review the effects of pregnancy on disease activity, as well as maternal and fetal outcomes for each type of vasculitides.

Recent Findings

Successful pregnancies in patients with vasculitides are possible, especially when conception is planned, and the disease is in remission. The risk of vasculitis flare is highly dependent on the type of vasculitis, but overall limited. The most frequent complication associated with large-vessel vasculitis (mainly Takayasu arteritis) is hypertension and preeclampsia. Preterm deliveries and intrauterine growth restriction occur more frequently with small- and medium-vessel vasculitis.

Summary

Pregnancies in patients with vasculitis should be considered high risk and followed by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in the field. Flares should be managed as in the non-pregnant population, while avoiding medications with unknown safety in pregnancy or known teratogens. Although commonly prescribed for the prevention of preeclampsia, there is limited evidence supporting the use of low-dose aspirin for pregnant women with vasculitis. Prospective registries or studies are needed, to better assess the value of aspirin, the place and long-term impact of new biologics and, to identify predictors of pregnancy outcomes other than disease status at conception.