Definition of fibromyalgia severity: findings from a cross-sectional survey of 2339 Italian patients

Do FIQR Severity Categories and Symptoms, Differentiate Between Continuous, Intermittent and Non-Opioid Users in the Treatment of Fibromyalgia?

BACKGROUND

Many fibromyalgia patients utilize opioids to treat symptoms. It is important to better understand nuances regarding this treatment option and any stigma associated with this treatment modality.

AIM

This study: (1) assessed the prevalence of opioid use among continuous, intermittent, and non-opioid users in fibromyalgia patients; (2) determined whether the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) was useful in distinguishing opioid use and symptom burden; and (3) assessed whether fibromyalgia patients encountered stigma and/or invalidation.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, observational study of 1,105 participants' responses to validated fibromyalgia and invalidation scales and demographic questions.

METHODS

The study employed online survey methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 45% of patients reported utilizing opioids (27% continuous, 18% intermittent, 55% non-users). FIQR disease categories (mild to most severe) strongly distinguished between opioid and non-opioid users with 59% of users falling in the most severe category and 68% of non-users falling in mild disease category (p < .0001). Interestingly, intermittent users were similar to non-users on FIQR severity (65.9 versus 65.7; p <0.60, 0-100) while continuous users reported greater severity than the former (73.9, p < .0001). Continuous users particularly reported more problems with daily activities (p < .0001), being overwhelmed (p < .0001), and being unable to accomplish goals (p < .0001). Stigma related to being 'drug seeking' and being 'judged'. Invalidation was infrequent.

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid use is common in fibromyalgia and increases monotonically with FIQR severity. Multidisciplinary approaches which help patients perform daily activities, decrease feelings of overwhelm, accomplish goals, and reduce stigma may be beneficial.

Mobile App Use among Persons with Fibromyalgia: A Cross-sectional Survey

Persons with fibromyalgia experience a diverse set of symptoms. Recommendations for management generally focus on multidisciplinary approaches involving multiple modalities. Mobile apps can be an essential component for self-management, yet little is known about how persons with fibromyalgia use mobile apps for health-related purposes. A cross-sectional survey (N = 663) was conducted to understand the real-world use of apps among persons with fibromyalgia. The survey included 2 main foci: 1) eHealth literacy and use of information sources, and 2) mobile app use patterns and preferences for health-related purposes, including the types of apps used and usage characteristics of apps currently in use, as well as those that had been discontinued. Respondents' average eHealth literacy as measured by eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) was 31.4 (SD = 7.1), and they utilized diverse information sources. Approximately two-thirds of the sample used mobile apps; the remaining one-third did not. Diverse health management needs were represented in the apps reported, including scheduling/time management, notetaking, fitness, and wellness. Compared to apps that had been discontinued, participants rated apps that they still used higher in terms of ease of use and used them more frequently. Reasons for discontinuing app use included issues with privacy, the effort required, lack of interest, and lack of perceived quality. Other reasons for app nonuse were lack of awareness and how-to knowledge, indicating that disseminating information about apps and addressing other barriers, such as providing user support, are critical to increasing uptake. These study findings can inform both app design and dissemination. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents how persons with fibromyalgia use mobile apps to manage their health. The findings could inform the development of digital interventions or programs for this population.

Pain Catastrophizing as a Mediator Between Pain Self-Efficacy and Disease Severity in Patients with Fibromyalgia

BACKGROUND

Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by chronic widespread pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, cognitive impairment, and mood disturbance. Both pain catastrophizing and pain self-efficacy have been found to be mediators of pain treatment effectiveness. However, whether pain catastrophizing mediates the association between pain self-efficacy and FM severity remains unclear.

AIM

To examine whether pain catastrophizing mediates the association between pain self-efficacy and disease severity in patients with FM.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included the baseline data of 105 people with FM from a randomized controlled trial. Hierarchical linear regression analysis was performed to examine the predictive ability of pain catastrophizing for FM severity. Furthermore, we examined the mediating effect of pain catastrophizing on the association between pain self-efficacy and FM severity.

RESULTS

Pain self-efficacy was negatively associated with pain catastrophizing (β = -.4043, p < .001). FM severity was positively associated with pain catastrophizing (β = .8290, p < .001) and negatively associated with pain self-efficacy (β = -.3486, p = .014). Pain self-efficacy had a direct effect on FM severity (β = -.6837, p < .001) and an indirect effect on FM severity through the effect of pain catastrophizing (β = -.3352, 95% CI bootstrapping -.5008 to -.1858).

CONCLUSION

Pain catastrophizing independently predicts FM severity and mediates the association between pain self-efficacy and FM severity. Pain catastrophizing should be monitored through interventions aimed at improving pain self-efficacy to reduce symptom burden in patients with FM.

Modified Mediterranean-Ketogenic Diet and Carboxytherapy as Personalized Therapeutic Strategies in Lipedema: A Pilot Study

In recent years, the use of the ketogenic diet as a proper nutritional treatment for lipedema has been hypothesized in the literature. This is the first clinical study evaluating the ketogenic diet and carboxytherapy in lipedema patients. In the present study, it was decided to use a modified Mediterranean ketogenic diet (MMKD) in combination with carboxytherapy. Since lipedema is characterized by microangiopathy, local hypoxia, and increased subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) deposition, carboxytherapy could improve painful symptoms and skin tone. A total of 22 subjects were included in the data analysis, divided into three groups; 8 patients underwent MMKD combined with carboxytherapy sessions (KDCB group), 8 underwent MMKD nutritional treatment alone (KD group), and 6 patients underwent only carboxytherapy sessions (CB group), for a total of 10 weeks of treatment for all three groups. It was observed that the ketogenic diet effectively induced weight and fat mass loss, including in the limbs, areas considered unresponsive to diet therapy in lipedema patients. However, the best results were obtained from the combination of the ketogenic diet and carboxytherapy, which showed improvements in both body composition and skin texture and a reduction in pain, along with an improvement in sleep quality. It would be helpful to conduct a clinical trial on a larger scale and over a more extended period to observe the results in the long term as well.

Treatment patterns in fibromyalgia including the use of opioids

OBJECTIVE

Opioids (except for tramadol) have not been shown to be effective in patients with fibromyalgia, but they can increase the risk of adverse drug reactions. The aim was to determine the treatment patterns of a group of patients with fibromyalgia and to identify the factors associated with the use of opioids in Colombia.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of a group of patients with fibromyalgia from a pain clinic in Colombia. Sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables were identified. Descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 559 patients were analysed, 88.6% of whom were women, and the mean age was 53.4 ± 12.6 years. A total of 40.6% received nonpharmacological management, and the majority were treated with acetaminophen (96.1%) and pregabalin (62.8%). A total of 69.6% received opioids, the most common of which was hydrocodone (36.3%). The average morphine equivalent milligrammes was 36.9 ± 91.2 (range: 2.3-750 mg), and 43.8% had intermediate/high doses. Being male (OR: 3.12; 95% CI: 1.40-6.91), having arterial hypertension (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.04-2.69), obesity (OR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.18-4.24), degenerative disease of vertebral discs (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.10-4.88) and comedication with gabapentinoids (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1,15-2.65) were associated with a higher probability of receiving opioids, while patients treated with muscle relaxants had a lower risk of opioid treatment (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.41-0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of patients were treated with opioids, the most common of which was hydrocodone, which goes against the recommendations of clinical practice guidelines.

"INTEGRO INTEGRated Psychotherapeutic InterventiOn" on the Management of Chronic Pain in Patients with Fibromyalgia: The Role of the Therapeutic Relationship

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic disease characterized by a heterogeneous set of physical and psychological conditions. The chronic experience of disability felt by patients and the impact on quality of life (QoL) of the disease may worsen the cognitive reappraisal ability and contribute to maintaining an altered pain modulation mechanism. This paper presents the study protocol of an INTEGRated psychotherapeutic interventiOn on the management of chronic pain in patients with fibromyalgia (INTEGRO). The aim of the study is to investigate the efficacy of an integrated psychotherapeutic intervention focused on pain management on QoL and pain perception, in a pilot sample of 45 FM patients with idiopathic chronic pain. The contribution of perceived therapeutic relationship (alliance) and physiological attunement, in both the patient and therapist, will be considered as possible mediators of intervention efficacy. Attachment dimensions, traumatic experiences, difficulties in emotion regulation, mindfulness attitude and psychophysiological profile will also be considered as covariates. The objectives are to evaluate longitudinally if patients will experience an increase in QoL perception (primary endpoint), pain-managing self-efficacy and emotion-regulation abilities as well as a reduction in pain intensity (secondary endpoints), considering the mediating role of perceived therapeutic alliance and physiological attunement in both the patient and therapist.

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory compared with traditional measures of disease severity in fibromyalgia

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to explore additional evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) in a large sample of subjects with fibromyalgia (FM).

METHODS

Patients were consecutively enrolled for a cross-sectional assessment comprehensive of three FM-specific measures (the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire [FIQR], the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status [modFAS], and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale [PDS]) and of CSI. To test the convergent validity, the Spearman's rho was used to measure the degree of correlation between the variables CSI and the FM-specific measures. To assess discriminant validity, CSI scores were grouped according to FIQR disease severity states, and differences between these groups studied with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Interpretative cutoffs were established with the interquartile reconciliation approach.

RESULTS

The study included 562 FM patients, 199 (35.4%) were classified as having central sensitization syndrome (CSI ≥40). CSI was largely correlated with modFAS (ρ = 0.580; p < 0.0001), FIQR (ρ = 0.542; p < 0.0001), and PDS (ρ = 0.518; p < 0.0001). The differences between the CSI scores in accordance with the FIQR were significant (p < 0.000001). CSI cutoffs proposed for FM: 21 between remission and mild severity, 30 between mild and moderate severity, 37 between moderate and severe disease, and 51 between severe and very severe disease.

CONCLUSION

The current study successfully showed additional evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the CSI in FM patients.

The Evolution of Fibromyalgia, Its Concepts, and Criteria

Fibromyalgia developed in the 1950s from a substrate of difficult to explain regional and widespread pain mixed with symptoms of psychosocial distress. Controversies regarding psychological issues were common. Multiple criteria arose to define the disorder, but each identified a different set of patients. The identification of widespread pain as a criterion changed the nature of the disorder by effectively eliminating regional pain as a component condition. The easy-to-measure and relatively reliable widespread pain criterion then came to define the disorder. In the primary care community, diagnostic criteria were largely ignored, and a substantial fraction of diagnosed patients with lower pain scores, particularly women and those with high non-pain symptom scores, were diagnosed. Non-pain symptoms were added back to the fibromyalgia definition and criteria in 2010. Recognition grew that fibromyalgia fit the description of a functional somatic disorder. The idea of fibromyalgia as a primary pain disorder with a neurobiological basis contended with fibromyalgia as a broader biopsychosocial disorder. It is increasingly recognized that fibromyalgia represents a dimensional, non-binary condition and that features of fibromyalgia extend to persons who do not satisfy the criteria. Severity assessments are now available but rarely used. The course of fibromyalgia is not well studied, and improvement and remission criteria have not been successfully defined. The future of fibromyalgia as a discrete disorder remains uncertain as features of fibromyalgia are increasingly observed in patients with multiple different medical conditions.

The Italian Society for Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of fibromyalgia Best practices based on current scientific evidence

Fibromyalgia or fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is defined as a central sensitization syndrome characterized by the dysfunction of neurocircuits detecting, transmitting and processing nociceptive stimuli; the prevalent manifestation is musculoskeletal pain. In addition to pain, there are multiple accompanying symptoms, in common with other algo-dysfunctional syndromes, which are reflected in a broad spectrum of somatic, neurocognitive and neuro-vegetative manifestations. An evidence-based approach is essential in FMS management, in order to improve patient health and to reduce its social burden. Since in the last ten years new international guidelines for clinical practice (Clinical Practice Guidelines or CPGs) concerning FMS diagnosis and pharmacological/ non-pharmacological management have been published, the Italian Society of Rheumatology (SIR) has decided to adapt them to the Italian national setting. The framework of the Guidelines International Network Adaptation Working Group was adopted to identify, appraise (AGREE II), synthesize, and customize the most recent CPGs on FMS to the needs of the Italian healthcare context. A working group of rheumatologists from SIR epidemiology unit and FMS experts identified relevant clinical questions to guide the systematic review of the literature. The target audience of these CPGs included physicians and healthcare professionals who manage FMS. The adapted recommendations were finally assessed by an external multidisciplinary panel. From the systematic search in databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase) and grey literature, 6 CPGs were selected and appraised by two independent raters. The combination of the scientific evidence underlying the original CPGs with expert opinion lead to the development of 17 recommendations. The quality of evidence for each recommendation was reported and their potential impact on clinical practice was assessed. These SIR recommendations are expected to be a valuable aid in the diagnosis and treatment of FMS, as they will contribute to disseminate the best practice on the basis of the current scientific evidence.