Axial spondyloarthritis 10 years on: still looking for the lost tribe

A Patient Survey Exploring the Burden of Inflammatory Back Pain in Patients With Known Psoriasis

Background In the United Kingdom, diagnostic delay remains a challenge in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Psoriasis is a frequently identified extra-musculoskeletal manifestation associated with axSpA. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in psoriasis patients at a specialized psoriasis dermatology clinic in a London NHS Trust. Our primary goal was to identify psoriasis patients with IBP who were not referred to a rheumatologist, potentially leading to axSpA diagnostic delays. Additionally, we aimed to investigate factors contributing to these delays and strategies to address them. Methodology A patient survey consisting of 22 questions was used to assess the prevalence of IBP among 66 psoriasis patients attending a weekly specialized psoriasis dermatology clinic within a London NHS Trust between May and July 2023. The survey comprised patient demographic information along with inquiries about the existence of back pain exceeding three months. The Berlin Criteria was utilized to identify IBP among patients who reported experiencing back pain for over three months. Additionally, the survey sought information on prior diagnosis of axSpA and whether participants had consulted healthcare professionals regarding their back pain. Results Of the 66 patients invited, 51 (77%) completed the survey. The average age of the patients was 50 years (range = 19-74 years), with 58.8% being female. The mean duration of psoriasis was 15.7 years (range = 2-44 years). Overall, 45% (23/51) reported back pain lasting over three months. Among the patients who reported back pain for more than three months, 13 met the Berlin Criteria for IBP (25% of the total surveyed), and only four of these patients had a diagnosis of axSpA. Notably, seven patients (14% of the total surveyed) potentially had undiagnosed axSpA. General practitioners (GPs) were commonly consulted for back pain, yet only 39% of those with prolonged back pain had seen a rheumatologist. Despite experiencing prolonged back pain, 17% of patients had not sought healthcare advice for their symptoms. Conclusions This study highlights that IBP is a common yet underdiagnosed comorbidity in psoriasis patients. Dermatologists, GPs, and other allied healthcare professionals play a crucial role in detecting early axSpA. However, limited awareness of IBP hinders its identification in psoriasis patients and subsequent referral to rheumatologists. This highlights the need for improving awareness and education regarding axSpA among dermatologists and allied healthcare professionals as well as the public and patients to ensure timely diagnosis. The development of simple and easy-to-administer screening questionnaires to aid non-rheumatologists in identifying patients with IBP together with simplified referral pathways would increase onward referrals of appropriate patients to rheumatologists.

A mixed methods study to uncover impediments to accurate diagnosis of nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis in the USA

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES

Delayed diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is well documented; little is known about the diagnostic journey and impediments for US patients with nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA). It is hypothesized that impediments are varied and exist at both the healthcare provider (HCP) and patient levels. This study aims to understand patient experiences and contributors to delayed nr-axSpA diagnosis in the USA.

METHOD

Interviews of adults with rheumatologist-diagnosed nr-axSpA, recruited through Spondylitis Association of America outreach and patient panels, and of rheumatologists, explored the diagnostic journey and diagnostic barriers. Emerging themes were further explored in an online patient survey. A multiple logistic regression analysis evaluated the main outcome variable, factors affecting time to nr-axSpA diagnosis.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 25 patients and 16 rheumatologists. Survey responses from 186 eligible patients revealed median time from symptom onset to diagnosis of nr-axSpA was 3.25 years. Delayed diagnosis was significantly more likely for women and people in rural areas. Most patients consulted ≥4 different types of HCPs before a rheumatologist and ≥2 rheumatologists before diagnosis. Impediments to timely diagnosis included insidious chronic pain; episodic symptom patterns attributed to activity; symptoms other than chronic lumbosacral back pain requiring medical consultation; and unfamiliarity with and misperceptions about nr-axSpA among HCPs, radiologists, and rheumatologists.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed nr-axSpA diagnosis is common and reflects HCP knowledge gaps and frequent patient presentation with dominant nonaxial symptoms. Targeted HCP education, research into early disease patterns, and interventions sensitive to the broader spectrum of nr-axSpA manifestations are needed to improve timely diagnosis. Key Points • Patients with nr-axSpA often see multiple types of HCPs, and multiple rheumatologists, before receiving a diagnosis. • Both patients and HCPs are unfamiliar with nr-axSpA and its symptoms, lacking understanding that nr-axSpA can occur in young people, females, and those presenting with normal x-rays. • Disease recognition by nonrheumatology HCPs is key for early referral. • Education on cardinal features, epidemiology, burden, and benefits of timely nr-axSpA diagnosis is warranted for HCPs who commonly manage back pain.

Advanced practice physiotherapists in Scottish primary care: Axial Spondyloarthropathy epidemiology, time to diagnosis, and referrals to rheumatology

OBJECTIVES

(1) Generate empirical knowledge of a Musculoskeletal (MSK) Advanced Practice Physiotherapist (APP) Service in Scottish Primary Care; (2) Identify the incidence and baseline time to diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthropathy (AxSpA); (3) Identify APP Rheumatology referral fulfilment of the NICE 2017 Guidelines and Spondylarthritis Diagnosis Evaluation (SPADE) Tool; (4) Calculate APP Rheumatology referral conversion rates for AxSpA diagnosis and further investigation; (5) Contribute towards the current body of literature for informing analysis of MSK APP services within Scottish Primary Care.

METHODS

An audit and evaluation approach was undertaken over a 3-year period (May 2019-April 2022). Relevant clinical cases from the whole-service data-set were identified and analysed, using retrospective electronic healthcare record review and descriptive statistical techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 37,656 primary care MSK APP consultations took place, with N = 19 suspected AxSpA referrals made to Rheumatology. N = 6 cases of AxSpA were diagnosed by a Rheumatologist (31.6%). The mean age of individuals diagnosed with AxSpA was 39.6 ± 8.8, and 66.7% (4/6) were female. Mean time to diagnosis was 3.4 years, and incidence per-10,000 person-years was 1.6. Compliance of referrals with the NICE 2017 Guidelines and SPADE Tool Criteria was 78.9%. Of those diagnosed with AxSpA, 66.7% met both referral criterion sets.

CONCLUSION

Those referred by an MSK APP from primary care had a 5.1 year shorter time to diagnosis than the previous reported UK average of 8.5 years. APPs identified relevant AxSpA features in referring to Rheumatology, and supported effective implementation of the local secondary care pathway.

Diagnostic delay in axial spondylarthritis: A lost battle?

Diagnostic delay in axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) remains an unacceptable worldwide problem; with evidence suggesting significant detrimental impact both clinically on the individual, and economically on society. There is therefore, a need for global action across various healthcare professions that come into contact with patients living, and suffering, with undiagnosed axSpA. Recent estimates of the median diagnostic delay suggest that globally, individuals with axSpA wait between 2 and 6 years for a diagnosis - revealing a clear benchmark for improvement. This timespan presents a window of opportunity for earlier diagnosis and intervention, which will likely improve patient outcomes. This review describes the current diagnostic delay as estimated across countries and over time, before presenting evidence from published strategies that may be implemented to improve this delay across primary and secondary care, including for specialties treating extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA (ophthalmology, gastroenterology, dermatology). Ongoing campaigns tackling delayed diagnosis in axSpA are also highlighted.

Patient Survey Exploring the Burden of Inflammatory Back Pain in Patients With Uveitis

Background  In the UK, diagnostic delays remain a challenge in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Studies have shown that acute anterior uveitis is the most common extra-articular manifestation associated with axSpA. As part of a National Axial Spondyloarthritis Society (NASS) Aspiring to Excellence quality improvement project, this study aimed to ascertain the burden of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in patients attending a uveitis clinic and to establish the number of these patients who had not been referred to a rheumatologist, thereby contributing to the diagnostic delay. The secondary aims were to explore the factors contributing to the diagnostic delay. Methods  A 22-question patient survey was created to identify the burden of back pain in patients attending a specialist uveitis clinic at a London NHS Trust. Participants were recruited when attending their clinic appointments. Survey content included patient demographics and whether they had experienced back pain for longer than three months. The Berlin Criteria was used to identify the presence of inflammatory back pain, and it was also ascertained whether participants had a previous diagnosis of axSpA. Participants were asked if they had seen any healthcare professionals regarding their back pain and the total number of consultations they had had with each profession. Results  A cohort of 50 patients who attended the uveitis clinic at the Royal Free London NHS Trust completed the survey between February and July 2022. The mean age of the respondents was 52 years with a mean length of time with uveitis of 6.57 years. Of them, 64% were female and 36% were male. Forty per cent (40%) of participants (20 respondents) reported experiencing back pain for more than three months and 12% (six respondents) had a diagnosis of axSpA. Of those who reported back pain for more than three months, the mean age of onset of back pain was 28.6 years. Of the 14 participants (28%) who had back pain and were not diagnosed with axSpA, nine (18%) fulfilled the Berlin criteria for IBP. All participants had seen a GP or allied health professional specifically for their back pain. On average, respondents had seen two allied healthcare professionals, but only 40% (eight) of respondents with back pain had been seen by a rheumatologist. Conclusions  In this study, the data highlights that inflammatory back pain is common in patients with uveitis and the majority of patients with inflammatory back pain had not been referred to a rheumatology service and potentially have undiagnosed axSpA. Contributing factors to this potential delay in diagnosis include a lack of awareness of axSpA and its presenting features and associated conditions and a lack of onward referral for a specialist rheumatology opinion. This highlights the need for public, patient and healthcare professional education and the development of timely referral pathways to reduce delays in diagnosis.

Identifying frailty and its associated factors in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Frailty is an elderly people phenomenon; however, younger adults with comorbidities may show a higher trajectory of frailty toward older age. The frailty status of middle-aged patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) remains little researched. We aimed to identify frailty status and to investigate the association of clinical, sociodemographic, and psychosocial factors with frailty.

METHODS

This study included 114 patients aged between 40 and 65 years. The patients were classified as frail, pre-frail, and robust according to Fried's phenotype and the Kihon Checklist (KCL). Physical function, quality of life, depression, anxiety, and disease-related factors were assessed. Between-group comparisons and multinomial logistic regression analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Frailty and pre-frailty prevalences were 20.2% and 49.1% for Fried's phenotype and 36.0% and 33.3% for the KCL. Frail adults had impaired physical function and increased disease activity compared to pre-frail and robust patients. Adjusted multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed that disease activity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.12-2.34) and Short Physical Performance Battery (OR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.18-0.56) were associated with Fried's phenotype-determined frailty. Disease activity (OR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.11-3.26), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (OR = 2.70, 95% CI = 1.56-4.67), and depression (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.18-2.02) were associated with the KCL determined frailty.

CONCLUSION

Frailty and pre-frailty are commonly detected in middle-aged individuals with axSpA. Our findings highlight a possible need for frailty screening and preventive programs targeting middle-aged axSpA patients.

Axial Spondyloarthritis and Diagnostic Challenges: Over-diagnosis, Misdiagnosis, and Under-diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to review the challenges in axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis and identify the possible contributing factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The inability to reach an accurate diagnosis in a timely fashion can lead to treatment delays and worse disease outcomes. The lack of validated diagnostic criteria and the misuse of the currently available classification criteria could be contributing. There is also significant inter-reader variability in interpreting images, and the radiologic definitions of axial spondyloarthritis continue to be re-defined to improve their positive predictive value. The role of inflammatory back pain features, serologic biomarkers, genetics, and their diagnostic contribution to axial spondyloarthritis continues to be investigated. There is still a significant amount of delay in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. Appreciating the factors that contribute to this delay is of utmost importance to close the gap. It is similarly important to recognize other conditions that may present with symptoms that mimic axial spondyloarthritis so that misdiagnosis and wrong treatment can be avoided.

Awareness and knowledge of the common features of inflammatory back pain among primary care physicians in the western region of Saudi Arabia

Often, there is a delay in the diagnosis of inflammatory back pain (IBP) in the primary care setting. This may be attributed to the inability of healthcare providers to distinguish between inflammatory and mechanical back pain. This study aimed to evaluate primary care physicians' current practices for assessing patients with IBP using clinical, radiographic, and laboratory tests. A questionnaire-based survey was emailed to all primary care physicians in the western region of Saudi Arabia by the Saudi Commission of Health Specialists from February to May 2021. The questionnaire included data about axial spondyloarthropathy based on the Calin, Berlin, and European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group criteria. A total of 103 primary care physicians responded who represented around 24% of primary care physicians at primary healthcare. The most often perceived IBP symptoms include a response to NSAIDs, morning stiffness lasting >30 minutes, age of onset <45 years old, duration of back pain >3 months, and improvement with exercise. The most frequently questioned patient or family history conditions were peripheral arthritis (92.2%), family history of spondyloarthritis (83.5%), and inflammatory bowel disease (97.6%). The most-reported investigations were CRP/ESR (86.4%) and spinal radiography (66%). For treatment of IBP, NSAIDs were most prescribed (48.6%), followed by physiotherapy (45.6%) and disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (41.7%). Primary care physicians were more confident in management of mechanical back pain than IBP (P < .001). Primary care physicians have good knowledge of IBP symptoms but not of disease-specific features and modest confidence in evaluating patients with IBP, indicating the need for educational programs and a more effective, feasible referral strategy.

Development and test–retest reliability of a screening tool for axial spondyloarthritis

Background

People with axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) suffer from lengthy diagnostic delays of ~7 years. The usage of screening tools to identify axSpA patients in primary care can reduce diagnostic delays by facilitating early referral to rheumatologic care. The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a potential screening tool for patients with axSpA.

Method

Content validity was evaluated by soliciting feedback from 7 rheumatologists regarding the relevance and content representativeness of the proposed screening questions. For the test-retest study, participants ≥18 years of age with chronic back pain (≥3 months) without a diagnosis of mechanical or inflammatory back pain (n = 91) were e-recruited through ResearchMatch. Participation included completing identical baseline and follow-up questionnaires ~14 days apart. Weighted quadratic kappa was used to measure test-retest reliability between the two ratings of the ordinal scales. Construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and items with factor loadings ≥0.6 were extracted. Scale dimensionality and simplified factorial solutions were measured using Kaiser’s criteria (Eigenvalue >1). Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure internal consistency.

Results

Most participants were women, non-Hispanic white, and had at least some college education, with a mean age of 45 years. On average, the age at onset of back pain was 31 years. Eleven questions yielded test–retest reliabilities ranging from 0.6 to 0.76. Results from EFA extracted two factors relating to: 1) how pain affects daily life functioning and 2) whether pain improves with movement. Internal consistency was high for questions evaluating how pain affects life, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.81. Following assessment for validity and reliability, the questionnaire was revised to create the 6-item screening tool.

Conclusions

The 6-item SpA-SED screening tool designed to identify potential cases of axSpA was found to have good test–retest reliability and high internal consistency.

The impact of gender and sex on diagnosis, treatment outcomes and health-related quality of life in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic condition, historically considered a predominantly male disease. However, increasing evidence suggests a more equal prevalence between men and women. Of the limited research conducted to date, it is apparent that gender differences exist in terms of time to diagnosis, treatment outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Despite this, women are underrepresented in clinical trials and most studies do not stratify by gender to identify potential differences in terms of disease manifestations and treatment response. In this perspectives article, we reflect on the potential biological and social factors contributing to these differences and propose three key areas of education and research that should be prioritised in order to address the unmet needs of female patients with axSpA, namely: (1) to identify ways to increase awareness of disease occurrence in female patients among healthcare professionals (HCPs), (2) to improve understanding of gender differences in disease manifestation and outcomes, and (3) to conduct gender-stratified clinical trials with a representative sample of female patients.

Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis: expanding the spectrum of an old disease: A narrative review

Nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) represents a distinct phenotype within the spectrum of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), which is characterized by a range of clinical manifestations. Despite a high disease burden that is comparable to ankylosing spondylitis (also known as radiographic axSpA), there is an unmet need to recognize and effectively manage patients with active nr-axSpA.A targeted literature search was conducted in OVID (MEDLINE and Embase databases) to identify articles on nr-axSpA, including its definition, demographics, epidemiology, burden, diagnosis, clinical presentation, and treatment guidelines.The lack of adequate epidemiological data and incomplete understanding of nr-axSpA among rheumatologists and nonrheumatologists contributes to delayed referrals and diagnosis. This delay results in a substantial burden on patients, physically and psychologically, and the healthcare system. Targeted therapies, such as biologics, including inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor or interleukin-17A, have been approved and utilized for the management of nr-axSpA, and other novel therapeutics with different mechanisms of action are in development. Raising awareness among US internists regarding the prevalence of nr-axSpA, disease burden, clinical presentation, diagnostic tools, and available treatments is important for improved disease management.Future clinical investigations focusing on the development of markers that aid early diagnosis and predict treatment response may also improve the management of nr-axSpA. This review provides an overview of nr-axSpA with the aim of raising awareness of the disease among US internists, with an overarching goal to contribute toward the improved recognition and timely referral of these patients to rheumatologists for diagnosis and management.

A Survey of Diagnostic Delay in Axial Spondyloarthritis Across Two National Health Service (NHS) Rheumatology Services

Introduction

Diagnostic delay is an ongoing challenge in axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA). A recent, comprehensive literature review has found a mean average of 8.7 years of delay between symptom onset and formal diagnosis in the United Kingdom (UK). The primary aim of this study was to identify delays to diagnosis experienced by patients with axial SpA under the ongoing care of two urban National Health Service (NHS) rheumatology services. The secondary aims were (a) to count healthcare professional (HCP) interactions after symptom onset but prior to the diagnosis, (b) to compare our data to published delay to diagnosis research and (c) to explore contributing factors locally and the variation between the two UK rheumatology services.

Methods

A 14-question survey was created to identify the delay to diagnosis and contributing factors across two urban NHS axial SpA services, from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis and commencement of treatment. Participants were recruited from clinic visits between August and November 2021 and completed the survey either on paper or via online survey software, both with HCP support.

Results

Those completing the survey formed a cohort of 106 participants with an established diagnosis of axial SpA who attended the axial SpA services at either Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust or Salford Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust. The mean time from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis of axial SpA was similar across centres despite the differences in demographics, with Royal Free at 5.72 years and Salford Royal at 5.96 years. When reviewing via median diagnostic delay, there was a notable difference with Royal Free at 6.09 years and Salford Royal at 4.27 years.

Across the two sites, between the onset of symptoms and the diagnosis of axial SpA, 90% of the participants saw a general practitioner (GP), of which 63% of the patients saw a GP 1-5 times, 23% saw 5-10 times and 14% saw more than 10 times. Many participants also saw other HCPs, including physiotherapists, other manual therapists and hospital specialists prior to diagnosis. In addition, 32% saw one other HCP, 18% two other HCPs, 9% three, 7% four and 2.7% five other HCPs prior to diagnosis. Close to 80% of the patients stated that they had received adequate axial SpA education at diagnosis, and 76% of the patients were aware of who to contact in the event of a flare.

Conclusions

These data highlight that the mean average time to diagnosis for both trusts was between five and six years, somewhat lower than the 8.7-year national UK average. However, despite being specialist centres, these data are a long way from the National Axial Spondyloarthritis Society (NASS) “Gold Standard” of one year time to diagnosis. The contributors to this include lack of HCP and community awareness about axial SpA, its recognition and appropriate onwards referral. There is a need for concerted ways of working for the development of patient pathways and public and HCP education to reduce this delay to allow the ambitious NASS Gold Standard of one year time to diagnosis to be achieved.

Advances in treatment of axial spondyloarthritis are associated with improved patient outcomes: data from the Ankylosing Spondylitis Registry of Ireland (ASRI)

The Ankylosing Spondylitis Registry of Ireland (ASRI) captures both radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in a large, well characterised cohort. This is a valuable resource for studies in therapeutics and burden of disease, following a period of rapid change in the field of axSpA. This study aims to perform a focused analysis on patient outcomes and pattern of medication usage in axSpA. This is a cross-sectional study of registry data on 885 patients with confirmed axSpA as per the ASAS criteria for axSpA, as diagnosed by a Rheumatologist. Analysis was performed using IBM SPSS version 26. Patients were analysed on the basis of treatment categorised as: no medication, NSAIDs, biologics or combination therapy. Statistical significance was indicated by p value of < 0.05. Currently 885 patients are enrolled in the ASRI, made up of 72.5% (642) males and 26.9% (238) females. The majority of the cohort was categorized as radiographic axSpA 78.3% (693), with 21.7% (192) meeting criteria for non-radiographic disease. Overall 40.6% (359) reported at least one comorbidity. Older age was associated with no medications compared to those on biologic therapy (50.3 vs 45, p = 0.01). Lower levels of disease activity and higher quality of life were noted in those on biologics as compared to NSAIDs alone. This analysis provides detailed epidemiological data on axSpA from a large national registry. These results detail significant differences in prescribing patterns and impact on patient outcomes in axSpA. Ongoing development of registries provides a valuable insight into the real-world effects of axSpA.

Differential diagnosis of back pain

Back pain (BP) is among the most common reasons for seeking medical attention worldwide. The nature of BP depends on the causative stimulus and its anatomical location. Clinically, BP is manifested by pain, muscle tension, and stiffness. The development of BP is a very complex, multifactorial process in which not only somatic stimuli (anatomical structures), but also psychosocial effects are involved. Using a variety of criteria, BP can be divided into specific where the cause of pain is known, nonspecific wherein the cause remains unclear, or according to its duration (i.e., acute, subacute, and chronic back pain). Simple low back pain must be distinguished from inflammatory BP. Inflammatory BP is one of the symptoms of spondyloarthritides. It is typically a resting pain of insidious onset, peaking at night or in the morning associated with morning stiffness, improved with exercise, and responding to non-steroidal antirheumatic drugs. A red-flag system was developed for the early identification of at-risk patients with a potentially severe disease presenting with BP. Early diagnosis and identification of the cause of complaints often requires multidisciplinary cooperation. The treatment involves pharmacological agents (analgesic and muscle relaxation therapies) and nonpharmacological approaches (rehabilitation, surgical intervention, etc.).

Patient perspectives on health care provider practices leading to an axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis: an exploratory qualitative research study

BACKGROUND

The average time to a diagnosis for people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is 7-10 years. Delayed diagnosis may result in increased structural damage, worse physical function, and worse quality of life relative to patients with a timely axSpA diagnosis. Understanding patient experiences may provide insights for how to reduce diagnostic delays.

OBJECTIVE

To provide foundational knowledge about patient experiences with healthcare providers leading to an axSpA diagnosis.

METHODS

We conducted an exploratory qualitative research study with six focus groups interviews with participants recruited from three rheumatology clinics within the United States (MA (n = 3); CO (n = 2); PA (n = 1)) that included a total of 26 adults (10 females, 16 males) with rheumatologist confirmed diagnosis of axSpA in 2019. Focus groups were ~ 2 h, audio recorded, transcribed, and subject to dual coding. The codes reviewed were in relation to the patients' diagnostic experiences.

RESULTS

Patients described frustrating and lengthy diagnostic journeys. They recognized that the causes of diagnostic delays in axSpA are multifactorial (e.g., no definitive diagnostic test, disease characteristics, lack of primary care provider's awareness about axSpA, trust). Patients described how doctors minimized or dismissed complaints about symptoms or told them that their issues were psychosomatic. Patients believed the healthcare system contributed to diagnostic delays (e.g., lack of time in clinical visits, difficulty accessing rheumatologists, health insurance challenges). Advice to physicians to reduce the diagnostic delay included allowing time for patients to give a complete picture of their illness experience, listening to, and believing patients, earlier referral to rheumatology, provision of HLA-B27 gene testing, and that physicians need to partner with their patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients desire a definitive test that could be administered earlier in the course of axSpA. Until such a test is available, patients want clinicians who listen to, believe, and partner with them, and who will follow them until a diagnosis is reached. Educating primary care clinicians about guidelines and referral for diagnosis of axSpA could reduce diagnostic delay.

Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What is Relevant for Diagnosis in Daily Practice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore how imaging may assist diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis in rheumatology practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

A diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis is based on pattern recognition by synthesizing clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. In health care settings providing low threshold access to advanced imaging, sacroiliac joint MRI is the preferred imaging modality in clinically suspected axial spondyloarthritis. In daily routine, the optimum protocol to assess suspected inflammatory back pain combines sacroiliac joint and spine MRI fitting a 30-min slot. Contextual assessment of concomitant structural and active MRI lesions is key to enhance diagnostic utility. In women with postpartum back pain suggestive of axial spondyloarthritis, recent reports advocate waiting 6-12 months after delivery before acquiring sacroiliac joint MRI. Major unmet needs are consistent MRI protocols, standardized training modules on how to evaluate axial MRI, and timely dissemination of imaging advances into mainstream practice both in rheumatology and in radiology. In rheumatology practice, MRI has become indispensable to help diagnose early axial spondyloarthritis. However, major gaps in training and knowledge transfer to daily care need to be closed.

Inflammatory back pain: a concept, not a diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The concept of inflammatory back pain (IBP) describes a cohort of patients with chronic back pain (CBP) who have distinct clinical characteristics, rather than being a diagnosis in and of itself. IBP is a common and important feature of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) but this is not the only differential. This review examines the utility of IBP in both primary and secondary care settings.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are a number of suggested referral strategies for patients with suspected axSpA that include IBP. These strategies attempt to strike a balance between ensuring potential axSpA patients are not overlooked, whilst simultaneously not overwhelming secondary care services. Their success relies on the clinicians who first encounter these patients being familiar with IBP as a concept; however, it is still poorly recognized by many healthcare professionals. IBP may be helpful as part of a referral strategy; however, other clinical features, laboratory investigations and radiology must be incorporated for the final diagnostic outcome in axSpA.

SUMMARY

Delayed diagnosis is a major clinical problem in axSpA and is associated with worse clinical outcomes. When recognized and utilized correctly, IBP can be a useful tool to promote prompt referral to rheumatology services.

Diagnostic delay is common for patients with axial spondyloarthritis: results from the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit

Objectives

Updated guidelines for patients with axial SpA (axSpA) have sought to reduce diagnostic delay by raising awareness among clinicians. We used the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit (NEIAA) to describe baseline characteristics and time to diagnosis for newly referred patients with axSpA in England and Wales.

Methods

Analyses were performed on sociodemographic and clinical metrics, including time to referral and assessment, for axSpA patients (n = 784) recruited to the NEIAA between May 2018 and March 2020. Comparators were patients recruited to the NEIAA with RA (n = 9270) or mechanical back pain (MBP; n = 370) in the same period.

Results

Symptom duration prior to initial rheumatology assessment was longer in axSpA than RA patients (P < 0.001) and non-significantly longer in axSpA than MBP patients (P = 0.062): 79.7% of axSpA patients had symptom durations of >6 months, compared with 33.7% of RA patients and 76.0% of MBP patients. Following referral, the median time to initial rheumatology assessment was longer for axSpA than RA patients (36 vs 24 days; P < 0.001) and similar to MBP patients (39 days; P = 0.30). Of the subset of patients deemed eligible for early inflammatory arthritis pathway follow-up, fewer axSpA than RA patients had disease education provided (77.5% vs 97.8%) and RA patients reported a better understanding of their condition and treatment.

Conclusion

Diagnostic delay in axSpA remains a major challenge despite improved disease understanding and updated referral guidelines. Disease education is provided to fewer axSpA than RA patients, highlighting the need for specialist clinics and support programmes for axSpA patients.

Value-Based Healthcare in Rheumatology: Axial Spondyloarthritis and Beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review examines axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and the wider field of rheumatology through a value-based healthcare (VBHC) lens. VBHC is focused on ensuring patients receive high quality care to improve outcomes and reduce unnecessary costs.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are many opportunities to apply the principles of VBHC in axSpA. These include the appropriate utilization of diagnostic investigations, such as HLA-B27 and magnetic resonance imaging, assessing outcomes meaningful to patients, and optimizing care pathways. Multidisciplinary care may improve value, and reduced specialist review and medication tapering may be appropriate. Increasing the value of the care we provide to patients can occur across domains and directly and indirectly improves patient outcomes. Taking the time to integrate principles of VBHC into our practice will allow us to justifiably gain and maintain access to diagnostic and therapeutic advances for the benefit of all our patients.