1
|
Kimball JS, Woodard D, Gulbrandsen MT, Jobe CM, Phipatanakul WP, Syed HM. Patients With Intact Shoulder Superior Capsular Reconstruction Grafts on Ultrasound Show Significant Improvement in Functional Outcomes at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil 2024; 6:100857. [PMID: 38288033 PMCID: PMC10823090 DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the utility of using dynamic ultrasound for postoperative evaluation after superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) by evaluating graft integrity and its correlation with clinical outcomes at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent SCR between July 2015 and July 2020 with a minimum 2-year clinical and ultrasound follow-up. Clinical outcome measures included Simple Shoulder (SS) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) scores. Integrity of the SCR graft was evaluated by dynamic ultrasound. Results We evaluated 22 shoulders in 21 patients with a mean follow-up of 44.8 months (range, 24-71 months). The graft was found to be intact by ultrasound evaluation in 82% (18/22). Patients with intact grafts had higher mean SS (11.6 vs 7.8, P = .00079) and ASES (91.2 vs 64.1, P = .0296) scores at latest follow-up compared to those with failed grafts. Those with intact grafts also had significant improvement in SS (3.7 vs 11.6, P < .00001) and ASES (23.2 vs 91.2, P < .00001) scores at latest follow-up compared to their preoperative scores. In contrast, patients with graft failure had no significant improvement in SS (6.3 vs 9.0, P = .123) and ASES (40.4 vs 58.3, P = .05469) scores at latest follow-up compared to their preoperative scores. There was no difference between clinical outcomes at 6 to 12 months vs latest follow-up for both SS (P = .11, P = .5) and ASES (P = .27, P = .21) scores. Conclusions SCR grafts were found by ultrasound to be intact in 82% of cases. Patients with intact grafts on ultrasound had significant improvement in functional outcome scores while those with graft failure did not. Functional outcome scores suggest that maximal recovery from this procedure occurs by 6 to 12 months. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeff S. Kimball
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, U.S.A
| | - David Woodard
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, U.S.A
| | - Matthew T. Gulbrandsen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, U.S.A
| | - Christopher M. Jobe
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, U.S.A
- Veterans Administration Loma Linda, Loma Linda, California, U.S.A
| | - Wesley P. Phipatanakul
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, U.S.A
| | - Hasan M. Syed
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, California, U.S.A
- Veterans Administration Loma Linda, Loma Linda, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Page P, Manske RC, Voight M, Wolfe C. MSK Ultrasound - An IJSPT Perspective. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2023; 18:1-10. [PMID: 36793557 PMCID: PMC9897034 DOI: 10.26603/001c.68184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
MSK ultrasound is a valuable imaging technique which has become increasingly popular in recent years. This efficient technique proves beneficial in a variety of ways. MSK ultrasound effectively streamlines the process by enabling practitioners to securely and accurately image and assess structures all in one simple step. By allowing healthcare providers to access critical information quickly and conveniently, MSK ultrasound can help identify conditions early when interventions are most effective. Moreover, it may be able to shorten diagnostic times and reduce costs through more cost-effective use of resources such as imaging and laboratory testing. Furthermore, MSK ultrasound can provide additional insights into musculoskeletal anatomy and help improve patient care and outcomes. In addition, utilizing this method reduces exposure to radiation and provides enhanced patient comfort with its quick scan duration. MSK ultrasound has a high potential to provide quick and accurate diagnosis of MSK disturbances when used correctly. As clinicians become more comfortable and familiar with this technology, we will continue to see its use expand for various MSK assessments. In this commentary we'll explore how ultrasound can be used in physical therapy, specifically for musculoskeletal assessment. We'll also look at some of the potential benefits and limitations of using ultrasound in PT practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phil Page
- Doctor of Physical Therapy Program Franciscan University
| | | | | | - Chris Wolfe
- School of Physical Therapy Belmont University
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dando C, Ellis R, Carroll M, Molyneux P, Gijon-Nogueron G, Siddle HJ, Cherry L, Gatt A, Bowen C. Exploring the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound imaging by podiatrists: an international survey. J Foot Ankle Res 2021; 14:39. [PMID: 33980274 PMCID: PMC8114514 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-021-00478-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Podiatrists, in musculoskeletal services, are demonstrating an expansion of their practice skills through the use of ultrasound imaging. There is an assumption that this practice is beneficial within the context of patient care and health systems. The aim of this research was to further investigate the use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) by podiatrists within their clinical setting and gain additional insights into the impact that they perceive use of MSUS has on their approaches to management of musculoskeletal foot and ankle problems. Method An international study utilising a cross-sectional design and an internet-based platform was undertaken. The survey was developed and implemented through three phases: 1. survey development, 2. face validity agreement via questionnaire review, and 3. survey distribution and data collection. Twenty-two survey questions were developed and set as a two-step approach collecting quantitative data (part 1) and qualitative free text data (part 2). Data was exported from SurveyMonkey and analysed using Microsoft Excel software. Counts and frequencies were calculated for responses to all twenty closed questions. Responses to the two final open-ended questions were analysed using thematic analysis to search for patterns related to podiatrists’ perceptions of impact. Results Two hundred and thirty-two eligible participants consented to complete the survey. The majority (n = 159) of respondents were from the UK and Spain. Commonly MSUS has been used in practice for (i) diagnosing pathology, (ii) supporting rehabilitation, (iii) supporting interventions or (iv) research purposes. Most frequently, MSUS was used to assist in the diagnosis of injury/pathology (84%). A range of free text comments were received from the participants in response to the question relating to their thoughts on the impact of using MSUS imaging in their practice (n = 109) and on their perceptions of how the use of MSUS has influenced their approaches to management of their patients’ musculoskeletal foot and ankle problems (n = 108). Thematic analysis of the free text comments generated four themes: (i) diagnosis, (ii) delivery and access of care, (iii) patient education and engagement, and (iv) patient empowerment. Conclusion The perceived benefit podiatrists indicated in using MSUS as part of their practice is the perceived improvement in patient journeys through tighter, focused management plans and reduced waiting times. An additional novel finding was that MSUS provided the capacity for podiatrists to better inform patients of their diagnosis, which they believed led to improved engagement and consequent empowerment of patients in their treatment plans. We propose further investigation of patient experiences as well as testing of the model that embeds podiatrists’ use of MSUS as a key skill in musculoskeletal foot and ankle services. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-021-00478-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Dando
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus Building 67, University Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.
| | - Richard Ellis
- School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NZ, New Zealand.,Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
| | - Matthew Carroll
- School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NZ, New Zealand.,Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
| | - Prue Molyneux
- School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NZ, New Zealand.,Active Living and Rehabilitation: Aotearoa New Zealand, Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NZ, New Zealand
| | | | - Heidi J Siddle
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic & Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Lindsey Cherry
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus Building 67, University Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.,The Academy of Research and Improvement, Solent NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Alfred Gatt
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - Catherine Bowen
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus Building 67, University Road, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, UK.,Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|