Non-adherence in difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis from the perspectives of patients and rheumatologists: a concept mapping study

Characteristics of difficult-to-treat axial spondyloarthritis: Results of a real-world multicentric study

OBJECTIVE

The EULAR task force recently published the difficult-to-treat RA (D2T RA) definition, however, a definition of D2T axSpA is still lacking and limitations in this definition exist. The objectives were to study the characteristics of D2T axSpA patients using the EULAR definition and to study a subgroup of patients with a predefined more stringent definition including a temporal criterion.

METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study was performed. D2T axSpA was defined as failure of≥2 b/tsDMARDs with different mechanism of action. Very D2T axSpA was defined as failure of≥2 b/tsDMARDs in less than 2 years of follow-up. D2T and Very D2T axSpA patients were compared to non-D2T (nD2T) axSpA patients.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eleven axSpA patients were included: 88 D2T axSpA (28.3%) and 223 non-D2T (nD2T) axSpA (71.7%). Peripheral involvement was more prevalent in the D2T group (34.9 vs. 21.4%; P=0.015). BASDAI level at baseline was higher in the D2T group (63.7±16.5 vs. 58.8±14.7; P=0.015). Fibromyalgia was found to be more frequent in the D2T group vs nD2T group (P<0.001). Twelve patients (3.8%) were categorized as very D2T axSpA. Compared to nD2T, Very D2T patients had a higher CRP level at baseline (42.0±31.3 vs. 17.8±23.1; P=0.010). IBD prevalence at baseline was higher in the very D2T group (41.7 vs. 3.1%; P<0.001). None of the very D2T patients presented a fibromyalgia.

CONCLUSION

D2T axSpA was associated with higher disease activity, peripheral involvement, extra-musculoskeletal manifestations and fibromyalgia. Very D2T patients represented a minim proportion of patients after applying a more stringent definition including a temporal criterion of 2 years and might be independent from fibromyalgia.

Exploring the influence of baseline rheumatoid factor levels on TNF inhibitor retention rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicentre and retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the retention rate of certolizumab pegol (CZP) was longer than that of other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) based on baseline rheumatoid factor (RF) levels.

METHODS

Longitudinal, retrospective and multicentre study including patients with RA who were treated with any TNFi (monoclonal antibodies (mAB), etanercept (ETA) or CZP). Log-rank test and Cox regressions were conducted to evaluate the retention rate in the three groups according to the level of RF, with the third quartile of the baseline levels used as cut-off: <200 (

RESULTS

A total of 638 individuals and 752 treatments (132 CZP, 439 mAB and 181 ETA) were included. In non-naïve patients with ≥200 IU/mL of RF, those treated with CZP showed a significantly longer retention rate in comparison with mAB and ETA. After matching using the propensity score, patients with ≥200 IU/mL RF levels exhibited longer retention rates with CZP than with mAB (HR 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.3), or ETA (HR 2.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.2). No differences were found between groups in patients with <200 UI/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

CZP showed a longer retention rate than mAB and ETA in patients with very high RF levels (≥200 IU/mL), while these differences were absent in patients with <200 IU/mL levels. The results suggest the potential effect of RF on binding the fragment crystallisable portion of certain TNFi.

Collapse

Key Words

• Arthritis, Rheumatoid
• Biological Therapy
• Rheumatoid Factor

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Retrospective Studies
• Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/therapeutic use
• Rheumatoid Factor
• Treatment Outcome
• Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy
• Certolizumab Pegol/therapeutic use
• Etanercept/therapeutic use
• Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Clementina López-Medina Rheumatology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain GC05, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
Jerusalem Calvo-Gutiérrez Rheumatology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain GC05, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
M Carmen Ábalos-Aguilera GC05, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
Francisco Cepas Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
Chamaida Plasencia-Rodríguez Rheumatology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
Ana Martínez-Feito Rheumatology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
Alejandro Balsa Rheumatology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
Regina Faré-García Rheumatology, Son Llatzer University Hospital, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Antoni Juan-Mas Rheumatology, Son Llatzer University Hospital, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Virginia Ruiz-Esquide Rheumatology, Clinic Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
Luis Sainz Rheumatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
César Díaz-Torné Rheumatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
Francisco Javier Godoy-Navarrete Rheumatology, University Hospital of Jaen, Jaén, Spain
Isabel Añón-Oñate Rheumatology, University Hospital of Jaen, Jaén, Spain
Natalia Mena-Vázquez Rheumatology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
Sara Manrique-Arija Rheumatology, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Málaga, Spain Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain Medicina, Univeristy of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
Marina Soledad Moreno-García Rheumatology, Miguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain
Rafaela Ortega-Castro Rheumatology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain GC05, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
Alejandro Escudero-Contreras Rheumatology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain GC05, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain

Collapse

Impact of multimorbidity on the first ts/bDMARD effectiveness and retention rate after two years of follow-up in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the BIOBADASER registry

BACKGROUND

Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) have a higher prevalence of comorbidities compared to the general population. However, the implications of multimorbidity on therapeutic response and treatment retention remain unexplored.

OBJECTIVES

(a) To evaluate the impact of multimorbidity on the effectiveness of the first targeted synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (ts/bDMARD), in patients with RA after 2-year follow-up; (b) to investigate the influence of multimorbidity on treatment retention rate.

METHODS

Patients with RA from the BIOBADASER registry exposed to a first ts/bDMARDs were included. Patients were categorized based on multimorbidity status at baseline, defined as a Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) score ≥ 3. A linear regression model, adjusted for sex and age, was employed to compare the absolute DAS28 score over time after ts/bDMARD initiation between the two groups. The Log-Rank test and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to compare the retention rates of the first ts/bDMARD between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 1128 patients initiating ts/bDMARD were included, with 107 (9.3%) exhibiting multimorbidity. The linear regression model showed significantly higher DAS28 (beta coefficient 0.33, 95%CI:0.07-0.58) over a two-year period in patients with multimorbidity, even after adjusting for age and sex. Finally, no differences in the ts/bDMARD retention rate were found between groups (median 6.94-6.96 years in CCI < 3 vs. 5.68-5.62 in CCI ≥ 3; p = 0.610).

CONCLUSIONS

Multimorbidity in patients with RA was associated with greater DAS28 scores within the first two years after ts/bDMARD initiation, in comparison with patients without multimorbidity. A slightly shorter retention rate was found in patients with multimorbidity, although the difference was non-significant.

A Review of Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis: Definition, Clinical Presentation, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A subset of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail multiple biologic therapies are deemed to have "difficult-to-treat" (D2T) RA. In 2021, a European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) task force proposed a clinical definition of D2T RA. Here we review RA phenotypes and clinical assessment of RA, propose a different definition of D2T RA, discuss possible D2T RA risk factors, and summarize existing literature on the management of D2T RA.

RECENT FINDINGS

High disease activity at the time of diagnosis or prior to treatment with a biologic is associated with the development of D2T RA. Prolonged time from diagnosis to beginning treatment has been consistently associated with the development of D2T RA. Other clinical factors such as burden of disease, extraarticular disease, obesity, smoking, pain, fatigue, and psychological conditions have inconsistent associations with D2T RA according to current literature. D2T RA is a relatively new concept that represents an area of great need for research regarding the characterization of those with the disease as well as how best to treat the disease. With this gained knowledge, rheumatologists will be able to better identify patients at the time of diagnosis that are likely to develop D2T RA to help guide management.

Characteristics Of Difficult-To-Treat Psoriatic Arthritis: A Comparative Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The EULAR task force recently published the difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2T RA) criteria, however, a definition of D2T patients in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is still lacking. To date, we have little data concerning D2T PsA, especially in real-world. One of the limitations of the D2T RA EULAR definition is the absence of a temporal criterion. The primary endpoint of this work was to study the characteristics of D2T PsA patients using the EULAR definition. The second objective was to study a sub-group of patients with a predefined more stringent definition including a temporal criterion.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in a tertiary center. D2T PsA was defined as failure of ≥ 2 b/tsDMARDs with different mechanism of action. Very D2T PsA was defined as failure of ≥ 2 b/tsDMARDs in less than 2 years of follow-up. D2T and Very D2T PsA patients were compared to nD2T PsA patients using statistical tests.

RESULTS

150 PsA patients were included (from 2004 to 2015): 49 D2T PsA and 101 nD2T PsA. D2T PsA was associated with a higher prevalence of axial involvement (p=0.030), axial and/or peripheral structural damage (p=0.007) at baseline and more bDMARDs discontinuation due to poor dermatological control (p=0.005). There was no significant difference regarding comorbidities such as obesity, smoking status, fibromyalgia or depression. In multivariate analysis, peripheral structural damage at baseline was found to be a predictive factor for D2T PsA with an OR of 2.57 (1.16 to 5.69; p=0.020). 17 PsA (11.3%) patients were categorized as Very D2T PsA. When compared to nD2T group, proportion of obesity was higher (p=0.015) and axial involvement was more prevalent in the Very D2T group (p=0.020).

CONCLUSION

D2T PsA patients had a higher prevalence of axial involvement, peripheral structural damage and therapeutic discontinuation due to poor dermatological control whereas Very D2T PsA patients were more likely obese with axial involvement. Very D2T PsA represent a minim proportion among patients when applying a more stringent definition. Pending the PsA D2T definition by the European and American societies, this study highlights some characteristics that may help practitioners better identify D2T patients.

Healthcare professionals’ perceptions on barriers and facilitators to DMARD use in rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the cornerstone of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment. However, the full benefits of DMARDs are often not realized because many patients are sub-optimally adherent to their medication. In order to optimize adherence, it is essential that healthcare professionals (HCPs) understand patients’ barriers and facilitators for medication use. Insight in these barriers and facilitators may foster the dialogue about adequate medication use between HCPs and patients. What HCPs perceive as barriers and facilitators has, so far, scarcely been investigated. This study aimed to identify the perceptions of HCPs on patients’ barriers and facilitators that might influence their adherence.

Methods

This qualitative study was performed using semi structured in-depth interviews with HCPs. An interview guide was used, based on an adjusted version of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Thematic analysis was conducted to identify factors that influence barriers and facilitators to DMARD use according to HCPs.

Results

Fifteen HCPs (5 rheumatologists, 5 nurses and 5 pharmacists) were interviewed. They mentioned a variety of factors that, according to their perceptions, influence DMARD adherence in patients with RA. Besides therapy-related factors, such as (onset of) medication effectiveness and side-effects, most variation was found within patient-related factors and reflected patients’ beliefs, ways of coping, and (self-management) skills toward medication and their condition. In addition, factors related to the condition (e.g., level of disease activity), healthcare team and system (e.g., trust in HCP), and social and economic context (e.g. support, work shifts) were reported.

Conclusions

This study provided insights in HCPs’ perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to DMARD use patients with RA. Most factors that were mentioned were patient-related and potentially modifiable. When physicians understand patients’ perceptions on medication use, adherence to DMARDs can probably be optimized in patients with RA leading to more effectiveness of treatment outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07459-0.