Retention rate and effectiveness of secukinumab vs TNF inhibitor in ankylosing spondylitis patients with prior TNF inhibitor exposure

Rotation or change of biotherapy after TNF blocker treatment failure for axial spondyloarthritis: the ROC-SpA study, a randomised controlled study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterised by inflammatory low back pain. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are recommended as a first treatment in axSpA. In case of inadequate response to NSAIDs, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) should be introduced according to the recommendations of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology. Until 2015, only bDMARD was recommended for axSpA in case of failure to anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF). The 2022 Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS)-EULAR recommendation proposed to start an alternative bDMARD but without advocating a switch in mode of action as proposed in rheumatoid arthritis. Since 2015, the inhibition of interleukin (IL)-17 has demonstrated efficacy in axSpA. Then, we designed a randomised multicentre clinical trial to identify the more effective treatment after a first anti-TNF failure in axSpA, comparing an anti-IL-17 to a second anti-TNF.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The ROC-SpA (Rotation Or Change of biotherapy after first anti-TNF treatment failure in axSpA patients) study is a prospective, randomised, multicentre, superiority open-label phase IV trial comparing an anti-IL-17 strategy (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to a second TNF blocker in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with an active axSpA (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index >4 or ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) >3.5) with inadequate 3 months response to a first anti-TNF and with a stable dose of conventional synthetic DMARDs, oral corticosteroids and/or NSAIDs for at least 1 month are included in 31 hospital centres in France and Monaco. The primary outcome is the ASAS40 response at week 24. The secondary outcomes are ASAS40 at weeks 12 and 52, other clinical scores (ASAS20, partial remission rate, ASDAS major improvement rate) at weeks 12, 24 and 52 with the drugs and anti-drugs concentrations at baseline, weeks 12, 24 and 52. The primary analysis is performed at the end of the study according to the intent-to-treat principle.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was obtained from the committee for the protection of persons (Comité de protection des personnes Ouest IV #12/18_1, 6 February 2018) and registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and in EudraCT. Results of this study, whether positive or negative, will be presented at national and international congresses, to national axSpA patient associations and published in a peer-reviewed journal. It could also impact the international recommendation to manage patients with axSpA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03445845 and EudraCT2017-004700-22.

Management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases after treatment failure with a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: A narrative review

The emergence of biologics with different modes of action (MoAs) and therapeutic targets has changed treatment patterns in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. While tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are often utilized as the first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, some patients may not respond adequately (primary failure), fail to sustain response over time (secondary failure), or experience intolerable adverse events. Whether these patients would benefit more from cycling to a different TNFi or switching to a biologic with a different MoA is still unclear. We discuss here treatment outcomes of TNFi cycling versus MoA switching after treatment failure with a first TNFi in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, focusing specifically on rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Treatment guidelines for these patients are ambiguous and, at times, contradictory in their recommendations. However, this is due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head data to definitively support cycling between TNFis after failure to a first-line TNFi over switching to a different MoA.

Drug Retention Rate and Factors Associated with Discontinuation of Interleukin-17 Inhibitors in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE

To assess the drug retention rate of interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17is) over long-term observation in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in whom treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) failed and to determine baseline factors associated with discontinuation of IL-17is.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 68 patients with axSpA started on IL-17is after an inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 TNFis. Drug retention rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were assessed. Baseline (i.e., at initiation of IL-17is) factors associated with discontinuation of IL-17is were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

RESULTS

Over 1933.9 person-months of observation in 68 patients, discontinuation of IL-17is occurred in 27 (39.7%) patients. Twenty (29.4%) patients discontinued IL-17is because of ineffectiveness, and 7 (10.3%) patients discontinued IL-17is because of adverse events. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year drug retention rates for IL-17is were 71.9%, 66.5%, and 62.0%, respectively. Current smoking was associated with a higher risk of IL-17is discontinuation [adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=2.256, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.053-4.831, p=0.036], while previous use of ≥3 TNFis (vs. 1) was significantly associated with a lower risk of IL-17is discontinuation (adjusted HR=0.223, 95% CI=0.051-0.969, p=0.045).

CONCLUSION

In patients with axSpA in whom TNFis failed, the long-term drug retention rate of IL-17is appears to be acceptable, with a 3-year drug retention rate of approximately 60%. Current smoking was associated with a higher risk of discontinuing IL-17is, whereas previous use of ≥3 TNFis was associated with a lower risk of discontinuing IL-17is.

Treatment overview of axial spondyloarthritis in 2023

The treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is characterized by non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options. It may depend on the type and extent of musculoskeletal and extramusculoskeletal manifestations. Recent data on non-pharmacological treatment options, such as physical activity, physiotherapy, and modification of lifestyle factors, are summarized in this review. Moreover, we have provided an overview on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the ever-expanding number of biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and tsDMARDs, respectively). In addition to data on efficacy and safety, the review also encompasses data on switching/cycling, tapering, and treatment selection for specific patient subgroups to optimize treatment outcomes.

Factors associated with the retention of secukinumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in real-world practice: results from a retrospective study (FORSYA)

BACKGROUND

Secukinumab efficacy and retention data are emerging in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in real-world settings. However, limited data are available on the predictive factors that affect the retention rate. The key objective was to determine whether objective signs of inflammation (OSI) were predictive of secukinumab retention at 1 year.

METHODS

FORSYA is a French, multicentric, non-interventional, retrospective study in adult axSpA patients who received secukinumab treatment between its launch (11 August 2016) and 31 August 2018. The time to secukinumab discontinuation and retention were analysed using a Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis. OSI was predefined by at least one of the criteria: C reactive protein ≥5 mg/L or erythrocyte sedimentation rate ≥28 mm/hour at secukinumab initiation or MRI inflammation at the sacroiliac or spine level.

RESULTS

In total, 906 patients from 48 centres were included in the analysis, 42.2% of whom were men, with a mean age of 46.2±11.7 years and a mean disease duration of 9.3±9.1 years. The 1-year KM retention rate (95% CI) for secukinumab was 59% (55%-62%), whereas for patients with and without OSI, it was 58% (54%-62%) and 63% (53%-73%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, lack of prior exposure to tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), absence of OSI and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were associated with a better retention of secukinumab at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Following its approval in France, ~59% of axSpA patients retained secukinumab in daily practice, at 1 year. Prior exposure to TNFi, OSI and IBD were identified as risk factors for secukinumab discontinuation.

Clinical efficacy of alternative TNF inhibitor and secukinumab between primary non-responder and secondary non-responder of prior TNF inhibitor in ankylosing spondylitis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the drug retention times and clinical efficacy of alternative tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and secukinumab in primary and secondary non-responders with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

METHODS

AS patients treated with biologics and enrolled in the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics registry were examined. Patients who did not respond to previous TNFi treatment were defined as primary and secondary non-responders. Data regarding drug discontinuation and clinical efficacy were collected after 1 year. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to compare drug survival and associated factors. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare the clinical efficacy secukinumab with that of alternative TNFi.

RESULTS

In total, 124 patients (83 receiving alternative TNFi and 41 receiving secukinumab) had biologic changes due to clinical inefficacy. Drug retention rates in the alternative TNFi and secukinumab groups were similar (P = 0.096). However, subgroup analyses including only secondary non-responders revealed that secukinumab users showed a higher hazard ratio (HR) for drug discontinuation (HR = 3.77, P = 0.045). In addition, secukinumab was negatively associated with achieving BASDAI50 or a major improvement in the ASDAS.

CONCLUSION

Alternative TNFi showed better drug retention and clinical efficacy in AS patients experiencing previous TNFi failure, in secondary non-responders. Therefore, alternative TNFi may be a more suitable treatment for secondary non-responders.

Long-term persistence of second-line biologics in psoriatic arthritis patients with prior TNF inhibitor exposure: a nationwide cohort study from the French health insurance database (SNDS)

INTRODUCTION

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) agents are most often the first-choice biological treatment for patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). When their discontinuation is needed, a switch to another TNFi or to another therapeutic class may be considered. However, data supporting one approach over another are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term persistence of classes of biologics in PsA patients with prior TNFi exposure.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study involved the administrative healthcare database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database. We included all adults with PsA starting a second-line biological after discontinuing a TNFi during 2015-2020. Persistence was defined as the time from biological initiation to discontinuation and was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparison of persistence by biological class was performed with Poisson regression models with time divided into 6-month intervals.

RESULTS

We included 2975 patients: 1580 (53%) initiating a second TNFi, 426 (14%) an interleukin 12/23 inhibitor (IL-12/23i) and 969 (33%) an IL-17 inhibitor (IL-17i). Overall, 1-year and 3-year persistence rates were 42% and 17%, respectively. After adjustment, persistence was associated with treatment with an IL-17i (adjusted relative risk (RR_a) 0.79, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.87) or IL-12/23i (RR_a 0.69, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.79) vs a TNFi, with no significant difference between IL-12/23 and IL-17 inhibitors (RR_a 0.88, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this real-life study shows low persistence for all biologics at 3 years in PsA patients previously exposed to a TNFi. However, persistence was higher with an IL-17i or IL-12/23i than a TNFi.

Measurement of pre-treatment inflammatory cytokine levels is valuable for prediction of treatment efficacy to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor in axial spondyloarthritis patients

Aim

To evaluate the correlation of inflammatory cytokines with the treatment response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients.

Methods

This study enrolled 86 axSpA patients and 20 healthy controls (HCs). Inflammatory cytokines including tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), interleukin (IL)‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐12, IL‐17A, IL‐21, IL‐23, and IL‐32 were determined in serum samples of axSpA patients before treatment and in HCs after enrollment. All patients received 40 mg adalimumab every 2 weeks for 12 weeks; meanwhile, ASAS40 (40 criteria of the Assessment by the SpondyloArthritis International Society) response rates were evaluated at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

Results

Most inflammatory cytokines were elevated in axSpA patients compared with HCs (all P < 0.05) except for IL‐32 (P = 0.101). In axSpA patients, ASAS40 response rates were 0%, 19.5%, 34.5%, 47.1%, and 56.3% at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12, respectively. Baseline [interquartile range] IL‐6 (47.3 [32.5‐53.4] pg/mL vs 31.7 [23.0‐50.9] pg/mL, P = 0.005) and IL‐17A (127.9 [90.7‐149.5] pg/mL vs 96.6 [56.1‐112.6] pg/mL, P < 0.001) were higher in axSpA patients with ASAS40 response compared with those without ASAS40 response, while baseline TNF‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐12, IL‐21, IL‐23, and IL‐32 were not different between them (all P > 0.050). Multivariate logistic regression analysis disclosed that baseline IL‐17A (P = 0.037), C‐reactive protein (P = 0.012), and history of TNF inhibitor (P = 0.029) were independently associated with ASAS40 response. Furthermore, baseline IL‐17A, C‐reactive protein, history of TNFi, and their combination had an acceptable to good ability for predicting ASAS40 response.

Conclusion

Measurement of pre‐treatment inflammatory cytokine levels is valuable for predicting treatment efficacy of TNFi in axSpA patients.

Evidence for the Use of Secukinumab in Patients with Radiographic and Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis in the Last 5 Years

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is an inflammatory rheumatic disorder that causes chronic pain, primarily in the spine and sacroiliac joints. It is characterized by the presence of type 1 major histocompatibility complex HLA-B27 genetic marker, arthritis in peripheral joints, enthesitis and/or dactylitis and extra-articular manifestations. Current guidelines recommend biological therapy when first-line therapy is not sufficiently effective. The finding that the interleukin (IL)-17 axis is vital for the pathogenesis of axSpA propelled the development of secukinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody directed against IL-17A. The present review provides evidence on the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in the treatment of radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA from nine randomized controlled phase III trials, as well as evidence from real-world observational analyses. The primary endpoint in six clinical trials was the proportion of patients meeting the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society criteria for either 20% or 40% improvement (ASAS20, ASAS40) at week 16. Significantly more patients achieved the primary endpoint with secukinumab compared with placebo in all the studies except MEASURE 4. Both clinical trials and real-world studies showed significant improvements in the secondary endpoints of disease activity, quality of life, and pain and fatigue relative to placebo. The benefits of secukinumab were generally sustained during longer-term (up to 5 years) treatment. Overall, secukinumab was well tolerated with a low frequency of adverse events and treatment persistence was high in the real-world setting. Although indirect comparisons suggest that secukinumab and adalimumab have comparable efficacy and safety, they are being directly compared in the ongoing SURPASS study. During the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, it is advisable to continue biological therapy in patients who do not have severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) infection, but interrupt treatment during an infection, reinitiating once the patient has recovered from the infection. In conclusion, secukinumab is a largely safe and effective treatment for radiographic and non-radiographic axSpA.

Association of Gender, Diagnosis, and Obesity With Retention Rate of Secukinumab in Spondyloarthropathies: Results Form a Multicenter Real-World Study

Background: Secukinumab has been shown effective for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondylarthritis (AxSpA) in randomized trials. The aim of this study was to analyze baseline patient and disease characteristics associated with a better retention rate of secukinumab under real-world conditions. Patients and Methods: Real-life, prospective multicenter observational study involving 138 patients, 61 PsA and 77 AxSpA, who were analyzed at baseline, 6, 12 months and subsequently every year after starting secukinumab regardless of the line of treatment. Demographics and disease characteristics, measures of activity, secukinumab use, and adverse events were collected. Drug survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and factors associated with discontinuation were evaluated using Cox regression. The machine-learning J48 decision tree classifier was also applied. Results: During the 1st year of treatment, 75% of patients persisted with secukinumab, but accrued 71% (n = 32) in total losses (n = 45). The backward stepwise (Wald) method selected diagnosis, obesity, and gender as relevant variables, the latter when analyzing the interactions. At 1 year of follow-up, the Cox model showed the best retention rate in the groups of AxSpa women (95%, 95% CI 93-97%) and PsA men (89%, 95% CI 84-93%), with the worst retention in PsA women (66%, 95% CI 54-79%). The J48 predicted secukinumab retention with an accuracy of 77.2%. No unexpected safety issues were observed. Conclusions: Secukinumab shows the best retention rate at 1 year of treatment in AxSpA women and in PsA men, independently of factors such as the time of disease evolution, the line of treatment or the initial dose of the drug.

Effectiveness and drug retention of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in Korean patients with late onset ankylosing spondylitis

The clinical data on the biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) use in late-onset ankylosing spondylitis (LOAS) is limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the drug efficacy and retention rate of bDMARDs in LOAS and compare it to young-onset ankylosing spondylitis (YOAS). Data of patients with AS receiving bDMARDs were extracted from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics and Targeted Therapy registry. Patients whose age of onset was > 50 years and ≤ 50 years were classified as having LOAS and YOAS, respectively. Their baseline characteristics and disease-associated parameters were evaluated. Drug efficacy [Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-clinically important improvement (CII), ASDAS-major improvement (MI), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 20, and ASAS 40] at 1-year follow-up and drug retention rates were assessed. A total of 1708 patients (comprising 1472 patients with YOAS and 236 patients with LOAS) were included in this analysis. The LOAS group had a lower prevalence among males, lower HLA-B27 positivity and a higher prevalence of peripheral arthritis. Patients with LOAS were more likely to have higher disease-associated parameters (inflammatory reactants, patient global assessment, ASDAS-erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and ASDAS-C-reactive protein). LOAS was negatively associated with achieving ASDAS-CII, ASAS 20, and ASAS 40. The drug retention rate was lower in LOAS; however, the propensity score-matched and covariate-adjusted hazard ratios for bDMARD discontinuation were comparable to YOAS. There were no differences in the drug retention rates based on the type of bDMARD used in LOAS. Inferior clinical efficacy and shorter drug retention time were found in patients with LOAS receiving bDMARDs using real-world nationwide data. There were no differences among each bDMARD type.

KOBIO, the First Web-based Korean Biologics Registry Operated With a Unified Platform Among Distinct Disease Entities

The KOrean College of Rheumatology BIOlogics and targeted therapy (KOBIO) registry is a nationwide observational cohort that captures detailed data on exposure of patients to biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). This registry was launched in December 2012 with an aim to prospectively investigate clinical manifestations and outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis who initiated a biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD or switched to another. Demographic data, disease activity, current treatment, adverse events, terms based on Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, and so on are registered for patients who are then followed up annually in a web-based unified platform. The KOBIO registry also recruits and collects data of patients with RA on conventional DMARDs for comparison. As of today, more than 5,500 patients were enrolled from 47 academic and community Rheumatology centers across Korea. The KOBIO registry has evolved to become a powerful database for clinical research to improve clinical outcomes and quality of treatment.