Anti-RNPC-3 antibody predicts poor prognosis in patients with Interstitial Lung Disease associated to Systemic Sclerosis

Heterogeneity of determining disease severity, clinical course and outcomes in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a systematic literature review

Objective The course of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is highly variable and different from continuously progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Most proposed definitions of progressive pulmonary fibrosis or SSc-ILD severity are based on the research data from patients with IPF and are not validated for patients with SSc-ILD. Our study aimed to gather the current evidence for severity, progression and outcomes of SSc-ILD.Methods A systematic literature review to search for definitions of severity, progression and outcomes recorded for SSc-ILD was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library up to 1 August 2023.Results A total of 9054 papers were reviewed and 342 were finally included. The most frequent tools used for the definition of SSc-ILD progression and severity were combined changes of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC), isolated FVC or DLCO changes, high-resolution CT (HRCT) extension and composite algorithms including pulmonary function test, clinical signs and HRCT data. Mortality was the most frequently reported long-term event, both from all causes or ILD related.Conclusions The studies presenting definitions of SSc-ILD 'progression', 'severity' and 'outcome' show a large heterogeneity. These results emphasise the need for developing a standardised, consensus definition of severe SSc-ILD, to link a disease specific definition of progression as a surrogate outcome for clinical trials and clinical practice.PROSPERO registration number CRD42022379254.Cite Now.

Anti-U11/U12 Antibodies as a Rare but Important Biomarker in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis: A Narrative Review

Anti-nuclear (ANA) are present in approximately 90% of systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients and are key biomarkers in supporting the diagnosis and determining the prognosis of this disease. In addition to the classification criteria autoantibodies for SSc [i.e., anti-centromere, anti-topoisomerase I (Scl-70), anti-RNA polymerase III], other autoantibodies have been associated with important SSc phenotypes. Among them, anti-U11/U12 ribonucleoprotein (RNP) antibodies, also known as anti-RNPC-3, were first reported in a patient with SSc, but very little is known about their association and clinical utility. The U11/U12 RNP macromolecular complex consists of several proteins involved in alternative mRNA splicing. More recent studies demonstrated associations of anti-anti-U11/U12 antibodies with SSc and severe pulmonary fibrosis as well as with moderate to severe gastrointestinal dysmotility. Lastly, anti-U11/U12 autoantibodies have been strongly associated with malignancy in SSc patients. Here, we aimed to summarize the knowledge of anti-U11/U12/RNPC-3 antibodies in SSc, including their seroclinical associations in a narrative literature review.

Advanced Autoantibody Testing in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis is a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease characterized by immune abnormalities, leading to vasculopathy and fibrosis. Autoantibody testing has become an increasingly important part of diagnosis and prognostication. Clinicians have been limited to antinuclear antibody (ANA), antitopoisomerase I (also known as anti-Scl-70) antibody, and anticentromere antibody testing. Many clinicians now have improved access to an expanded profile of autoantibody testing. In this narrative review article, we review the epidemiology, clinical associations, and prognostic value of advanced autoantibody testing in people with systemic sclerosis.

Scleroderma autoantibodies in guiding monitoring and treatment decisions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

One of the key clinical challenges of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is diversity in clinical presentation, organ involvement and disease progression. Antinuclear autoantibodies (ANA) are central to the diagnosis of SSc. ANA specificities associated with distinct clinical patterns of organ and skin involvement. Understanding of the molecular differences and pathogenesis of scleroderma has helped further inform clinical acumen. Here, we provide an update on ANA on clinical profiling, management and future direction of SSc.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been further development in delineating clinical patterns in ANA, genetic susceptibility and antigen triggers predisposing to ANA subtypes. Sub-group analysis of recent clinical trials shows differing treatment responses to novel therapeutics.

SUMMARY

ANA subtyping is likely to be firmly embedded into future classification systems. Beyond informing current management and monitoring of scleroderma patients, ANA subsets have implication on future research and clinical trial design.

Systemic Sclerosis-Specific Antibodies: Novel and Classical Biomarkers

Disease-specific autoantibodies are considered the most important biomarkers for systemic sclerosis (SSc), due to their ability to stratify patients with different severity and prognosis. Anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), occurring in subjects with isolated Raynuad's phenomenon, are considered the strongest independent predictors of definite SSc and digital microvascular damage, as observed by nailfold videocapillaroscopy. ANA are present in more than 90% of SSc, but ANA negativity does not exclude SSc diagnosis: a little rate of SSc ANA negative exists and shows a distinct subtype of disease, with less vasculopathy, but more frequent lower gastrointestinal involvement and severe disease course. Anti-centromere, anti-Th/To, and anti-Topoisomerase I antibodies could be considered as classical biomarkers, covering about 60% of SSc and defining patients with well-described cardio-pulmonary complications. In particular, anti-Topoisomerase I represent a risk factor for development of diffuse cutaneous involvement and digital ulcers in the first 3 years of disease, as well as severe interstitial lung disease (ILD). Anti-RNA polymerase III is a biomarker with new clinical implications: very rapid skin thickness progression, gastric antral vascular ectasia, the occurrence of synchronous cancers, and possible association with silicone breast implants rupture. Moreover, novel SSc specific autoantibodies have been globally described in about 10% of "seronegative" SSc patients: anti-elF2B, anti-RuvBL1/2 complex, anti-U11/U12 RNP, and anti-BICD2 depict specific SSc subtypes with severe organ complications. Many autoantibodies could be considered markers of overlap syndromes, including SSc. Anti-Ku are found in 2-7% of SSc, strictly defining the PM/SSc overlap. They are associated with synovitis, joint contractures, myositis, and negatively associated with vascular manifestation of disease. Anti-U3RNP are associated with a well-defined clinical phenotype: Afro-Caribbean male patients, younger at diagnosis, and higher risk of pulmonary hypertension and gastrointestinal involvement. Anti-PM/Scl define SSc patients with high frequency of ILD, calcinosis, dermatomyositis skin changes, and severe myositis. The accurate detection of autoantibodies SSc specific and associated with overlap syndromes is crucial for patients' stratification. ANA should be correctly identified using indirect immunofluorescent assay and a standardized way of patterns' interpretation. The gold-standard technique for autoantibodies' identification in SSc is still considered immunoprecipitation, for its high sensitivity and specificity, but other assays have been widely used in routine practice. The identification of SSc autoantibodies with high diagnostic specificity and high predictive value is mandatory for early diagnosis, a specific follow-up and the possible definition of the best therapy for every SSc subsets. In addition, the validation of novel autoantibodies is mandatory in wider cohorts in order to restrict the gap of so-called seronegative SSc patients.

Insights into origins and specificities of autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Autoantibodies are hallmark findings in systemic sclerosis (SSc), often present prior to disease onset. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis of SSc have long relied on the antitopoisomerase - anticentromere - anti-RNA polymerase antibody trichotomy. However, many more autoantibodies found in SSc are being actively investigated for insights into triggering events, mechanisms of tolerance break, and connections to tissue damage. This review examines recent studies on SSc autoantibodies and the early events that lead to their development.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent work has elucidated potential connections between human cytomegalovirus infection, silicone breast implants, and malignancy to SSc autoantibody development. At the level of the dendritic cell:T cell interaction, where tolerance is broken, new studies identified shared motifs in the peptide-binding domains of SSc-associated human leukocyte antigen alleles. Immunological analysis of SSc patient B cells has uncovered several anomalies in the regulatory capacities of SSc naïve and memory B cell populations. Expanding efforts to uncover new SSc autoantibodies revealed anti-CXCL4, anticollagen V, and other autoantibodies as potential players in disease pathogenesis.

SUMMARY

Further research into the role of autoantibodies in SSc development may uncover new mechanism-guided therapeutic targets. In addition, a better understanding of autoantibody associations with SSc disease outcomes will improve clinical care.