A novel grey Scale and Power Doppler ultrasonographic score for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: Siena Myositis Ultrasound Grading Scale

The longitudinal study of muscle changes with ultrasound: differential changes in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy subgroups

OBJECTIVES

We investigated shear wave elastography (SWE), B mode US and power Doppler (PDUS) as imaging biomarkers for longitudinal follow-up in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), with a particular focus on immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) and DM.

METHODS

Participants had serial SWE, PDUS on the deltoid (D) and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles on four occasions at intervals of 3-6 months. Clinical assessments included manual muscle testing, and patient- and physician-reported outcome scales.

RESULTS

Thirty-three participants were included: IMNM = 17, DM = 12, overlap myositis = 3, PM = 1. Twenty were in a prevalent clinic group, and 13 were recently treated cases in an incident group. Differential changes in SWS and US domains occurred with time in both the prevalent and incident groups. In the VL-prevalent subgroup, echogenicity increased over time (P = 0.040), while in the incident cases there was a trend for reduction to normal over time (P = 0.097) with treatment. Muscle bulk reduced in the D-prevalent subgroup over time (P = 0.096), suggesting atrophy. SWS also reduced in the VL-incident subgroup over time (P = 0.096), suggesting a trend towards improvement in muscle stiffness with treatment.

CONCLUSION

SWE and US appear promising as imaging biomarkers for patient follow-up in IIM and indicate changes over time, especially with echogenicity, muscle bulk and SWS in the VL. Due to the limitations of the participant numbers, additional studies with a larger cohort are needed to help evaluate these US domains further and outline specific characteristics within the IIM subgroups.

Could ultrasound and muscle elastography be associated with clinical assessment, laboratory and nailfold capillaroscopy in juvenile dermatomyositis patients?

BACKGROUND

Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) is the most common idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in children. Imaging exams are useful for muscle assessment, with ultrasonography (US) being a promising tool in detecting disease activity and tissue damage. There are few studies about muscle elastography.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to associate clinical, laboratory, and nailfold capillaroscopy (NC) assessments with US in JDM patients; and to compare the findings of US and Strain Elastography (SE) from patients and healthy controls.

METHODS

An analytic cross-sectional study was performed with JDM patients and healthy controls. Patients underwent clinical exam to access muscle strength and completed questionnaires about global assessment of the disease and functional capacity. Patients were submitted to NC and measurement of muscle enzymes. All subjects underwent US assessment, using gray scale, Power Doppler (PD), and SE.

RESULTS

Twenty-two JDM patients and fourteen controls, aged between 5 and 21 years, matched for age and sex were assessed. In qualitative and semi-quantitative gray scale, we observed a higher frequency of alterations in patients (p < 0.001), while in PD, there was a higher frequency of positivity in patients' deltoids and anterior tibialis (p < 0.001). Active disease was associated with an important change in the semi-quantitative gray scale in deltoids (p = 0.007), biceps brachii (p = 0.001) and quadriceps femoris (p = 0.005). The SE demonstrated a high negative predictive value of 87.2.

CONCLUSION

US was able, through gray scale, to differentiate JDM patients from controls, while PD achieved such differentiation only for deltoids and anterior tibialis. The semi-quantitative gray scale showed disease activity in proximal muscles. SE was not able to differentiate patients from controls.

Accuracy of power Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis and monitoring of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVES

No clear-cut guidelines exist for the use of imaging procedures for the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) score in IIM patients compared with a control group and its usefulness during follow-up.

METHODS

All patients evaluated in the Vasculitis and Myositis Clinic, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena were prospectively collected. All patients underwent US examination of both thighs in axial and longitudinal scans, which were also performed twice (T1) or three times (T2).

RESULTS

Forty-five patients with IIM (median [interquartile range] age 55 [45-66] years; 35 female) were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic curves distinguished patients and controls based on ∑power Doppler (PD), ∑oedema, ∑atrophy and CRP. The best cut-off value for ∑PD was 0.5, ∑oedema 1.5, ∑atrophy 0.5 and CRP 0.22 mg/dl. In a logistic regression analysis, the variables that most influenced diagnosis of IIM were ∑PD and ∑oedema (P = 0.017 and P = 0.013, respectively). ∑Oedema was lower at T1 (P = 0.0108) and T2 (P = 0.0012) than at T0. Likewise, ∑PD was lower at T1 (P = 0.0294) and T2 (P = 0.0420) than at T0. Physician global assessment was lower at T1 (P = 0.0349) and T2 (P = 0.0035) than at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that PDUS is a reliable diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis between inflammatory and non-inflammatory myopathies. Moreover, PDUS can be employed also during the follow-up of patients with IIM. A reduction in disease activity, measured by physician global assessment, led to a concomitant decrease in both oedema and PD, which was directly correlated with their rate of change. This underlines the close link between clinical assessment and PDUS findings, not only at diagnosis but also during monitoring.

Muscle B mode ultrasound and shear-wave elastography in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (SWIM): criterion validation against MRI and muscle biopsy findings in an incident patient cohort

Background

B mode ultrasound (US) and shear wave elastography (SWE) are easily accessible imaging tools for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) but require further validation against standard diagnostic procedures such as MRI and muscle biopsy.

Methods

In this prospective cross-sectional study we compared US findings to MRI and muscle biopsy findings in a group of 18 patients (11 F, 7 M) with active IIM (dermatomyositis 6, necrotising autoimmune myopathy 7, inclusion body myositis 4, overlap myositis 1) who had one or both procedures on the same muscle. US domains (echogenicity, fascial thickness, muscle bulk, shear wave speed and power doppler) in the deltoid and vastus lateralis were compared to MRI domains (muscle oedema, fatty infiltration/atrophy) and muscle biopsy findings (lymphocytic inflammation, myonecrosis, atrophy and fibro-fatty infiltration). A composite index score (1–4) was also used as an arbitrary indicator of overall muscle pathology in biopsies.

Results

Increased echogenicity correlated with the presence of fatty infiltration/atrophy on MRI (p = 0.047) in the vastus lateralis, and showed a non-significant association with muscle inflammation, myonecrosis, fibrosis and fatty infiltration/atrophy (p > 0.333) Severe echogenicity also had a non-significant association with higher composite biopsy index score in the vastus lateralis (p = 0.380). SWS and US measures of fascial thickness and muscle bulk showed poor discrimination in differentiating between pathologies on MRI or muscle biopsy. Power Doppler measures of vascularity correlated poorly with the presence of oedema on MRI, or with inflammation or fatty infiltration on biopsy. Overall, US was sensitive in detecting the presence of muscle pathology shown on MRI (67–100%) but showed poorer specificity (13–100%). Increased echogenicity showed good sensitivity when detecting muscle pathology (100%) but lacked specificity in differentiating muscle pathologies (0%). Most study participants rated US as the preferred imaging modality.

Conclusions

Our findings show that US, in particular muscle echogenicity, has a high sensitivity, but low specificity, for detecting muscle pathology in IIM. Traditional visual grading scores are not IIM-specific and require further modification and validation. Future studies should continue to focus on developing a feasible scoring system, which is reliable and allows translation to clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00276-w.

Muscle imaging in myositis: MRI, US, and PET

Imaging is an important tool in the evaluation of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. It plays a role in diagnosis, assessment of disease activity and follow-up, and as a non-invasive biomarker. Among the different modalities, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasound (US), and positron emission tomography (PET) may have the most clinical utility in myositis. MRI is currently the best modality to evaluate skeletal muscle and provides excellent characterization of muscle edema and fat replacement through the use of T1-weighted and T2-weighted fat suppressed/STIR sequences. Although MRI can be read qualitatively for the presence of abnormalities, a more quantitative approach using Dixon sequences and the generation of water T2 parametric maps would be preferable for follow-up. Newer protocols such as diffusion-weighted imaging, functional imaging measures, and spectroscopy may be of interest to provide further insights into myositis. Despite the advantages of MRI, image acquisition is relatively time-consuming, expensive, and not accessible to all patients. The use of US to evaluate skeletal muscle in myositis is gaining interest, especially in chronic disease, where fat replacement and fibrosis are detected readily by this modality. Although easily deployed at the bedside, it is heavily dependent on operator experience to recognize disease states. Further, systematic characterization of muscle edema by US is still needed. PET provides valuable information on muscle function at a cellular level. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) has been the most common application in myositis to detect pathologic uptake indicative of inflammation. The use of neurodegenerative markers is now also being utilized for inclusion body myositis. These different modalities may prove to be complementary methods for myositis evaluation.

Imaging of Joint and Soft Tissue Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight the potential uses and applications of imaging in the assessment of the most common and relevant musculoskeletal (MSK) manifestations in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

RECENT FINDINGS

Ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are accurate and sensitive in the assessment of inflammation and structural damage at the joint and soft tissue structures in patients with SLE. The US is particularly helpful for the detection of joint and/or tendon inflammation in patients with arthralgia but without clinical synovitis, and for the early identification of bone erosions. MRI plays a key role in the early diagnosis of osteonecrosis and in the assessment of muscle involvement (i.e., myositis and myopathy). Conventional radiography (CR) remains the traditional gold standard for the evaluation of structural damage in patients with joint involvement, and for the study of bone pathology. The diagnostic value of CR is affected by the poor sensitivity in demonstrating early structural changes at joint and soft tissue level. Computed tomography allows a detailed evaluation of bone damage. However, the inability to distinguish different soft tissues and the need for ionizing radiation limit its use to selected clinical circumstances. Nuclear imaging techniques are valuable resources in patients with suspected bone infection (i.e., osteomyelitis), especially when MRI is contraindicated. Finally, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry represents the imaging mainstay for the assessment and monitoring of bone status in patients with or at-risk of osteoporosis. Imaging provides relevant and valuable information in the assessment of MSK involvement in SLE.