Definition of Low Disease Activity State based on the SLE-DAS: Derivation and validation in a multicentre real-life cohort

Real-world efficacy of belimumab in achieving remission or low-disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effect of belimumab (BEL) on achieving low disease activity (LDA) and remission as an additive molecular-targeting agent to standard of care (SoC) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

METHODS

Clinical information was retrospectively collected from patients with SLE who received BEL additive to SoC (BEL + SoC), and from patients treated with SoC alone as a control arm. Disease activity was measured by SLE-disease activity score (SLE-DAS). The proportion of patients in LDA and remission at 12 months was compared after propensity score matching. The factors contributing to LDA and remission achievement were identified by Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

BEL + SoC significantly reduced SLE-DAS at 6 months, with a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving LDA and remission at 12 months compared to SoC alone. The presence of arthritis at baseline was significantly associated with achieving LDA and remission. Additionally, both treatment groups experienced a significant reduction in daily glucocorticoid dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding BEL to SoC was beneficial for patients with arthritis, leading to higher proportion of achieving LDA and remission, while also reducing their glucocorticoid dose. Our results indicate the utility of BEL in a treat-to-target approach for SLE patients in a real-world setting.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score Remission and Low Disease Activity States Discriminate Drug From Placebo and Better Health-Related Quality of Life

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the ability of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) remission and low disease activity (LDA) to discriminate active drug from placebo and to discriminate outcomes in the patients' perspective (health-related quality of life [HR-QoL]) in SLE trials.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of the pooled Belimumab in Subjects With SLE (BLISS)-52 (NCT00424476) and BLISS-76 (NCT00410384) trials data. SLE-DAS remission and LDA attainment and discrimination between belimumab and placebo at 52 weeks were compared using chi-square tests. At week 52, 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) scores were compared between patients attaining SLE-DAS remission versus nonremission and SLE-DAS LDA versus non-LDA using the t-test and Mann-Whitney test. Mean changes from week 0 to 52 in SF-36 and FACIT-F scores were compared between groups using multivariate regression analysis adjusted for baseline scores.

RESULTS

At week 52, significantly more patients attained SLE-DAS LDA taking belimumab 1 mg/kg (17.9% vs 13.0%; P = 0.023; odds ratio [OR] 1.459; relative risk [RR] 1.377; number needed to treat [NNT] 20.4) and 10 mg/kg (21.7% vs 13.0%; P < 0.001; OR 1.853; RR 1.668; NNT 11.5) compared with placebo. Likewise, more patients attained SLE-DAS remission taking belimumab 10 mg/kg compared to placebo (14.7% vs 10.1%; P = 0.019; OR 1.532; RR 1.454; NNT 21.7). At week 52, patients attaining SLE-DAS remission and LDA presented higher SF-36 domain and summary scores (all P < 0.001) and FACIT-F scores (both P < 0.001). Mean improvements from baseline in SF-36 and FACIT-F scores were significantly higher in patients achieving SLE-DAS remission and LDA.

CONCLUSION

SLE-DAS remission and LDA showed discriminant ability for identifying patients receiving active drug in SLE clinical trials. Attainment of these SLE-DAS targets are associated with better HR-QoL.

The SLE-DAS provides an accurate and feasible flare tool in the clinical setting: a validation study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the criterion validity of the SLE disease activity score (SLE-DAS) flare tool and compare its performance in identifying flares against other instruments.

METHODS

Patients with SLE fulfilling SLE-DAS low disease activity at baseline were included from two academic lupus clinics. During follow-up, flares were identified by the senior attending clinician, applying the expert-consensus-based definition as gold-standard. The first clinical flare from flaring patients, and the first visit after baseline in patients without flares were analysed. In each no flare/flare visits, we assessed flares by SLE-DAS (score increase ≥1.72), classic-SELENA Flare Index (c-SELENA FI), revised-SELENA FI (r-SELENA FI), and SLEDAI-2K (score increase ≥4). We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen's Kappa agreement of each flare tool against the gold-standard.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients were included and followed-up for 22.9 (14.2) months. Incidence of flares was 8.19/100 patient-years, with 69 patients experiencing flares. The SLE-DAS identified 96.6% of the expert-defined flares implying a treatment change and classified 28.0% of those as moderate/severe. Sensitivity and specificity for the gold-standard flare definition were: SLE-DAS 97.1% and 97.3%, c-SELENA FI 88.4% and 98.1%, r-SELENA FI 88.4% and 96.8%, SLEDAI-2K 56.5% and 99.2%, respectively. Kappa coefficients of these instruments were 0.902 (95% CI: 0.847, 0.957), 0.870 (95% CI: 0.805, 0.935), 0.832 (95% CI: 0.761, 0.903), and 0.663 (95% CI: 0.557, 0.769), respectively. The number of flare misclassifications was lowest with the SLE-DAS, and highest with the SLEDAI-2K.

CONCLUSION

The SLE-DAS accurately identifies and categorizes flares as mild or moderate/severe. It is feasible and, thus, may help the physicians' treatment decisions in the clinical practice setting.

Controversies in in rheumatology and autoimmunity: Is CORA meeting a good educational tool to increase the scientific knowledge?

Rheumatology and Autoimmunity are closely related fields and are among the most exciting areas in Medicine. Many conditions once regarded as mysterious and incurable are better understood and managed nowadays. Part of the great interest in these subjects derives from the fact that many controversial issues have arisen due to the rapid progression of knowledge, which means they are debatable. Over the years, the Controversies in Rheumatology and Autoimmunity (CORA) meetings promoted critical discussions not as an end but as a tool to increase the scientific knowledge of Rheumatologists and Clinical Immunologists. Beyond pursuing knowledge, being critical means questioning our inveterate beliefs and evaluating new conjectures and hypotheses. Thus, the approach to the debates in Medicine should be done with an open mind and free from all prejudices. Freedom of thought and speech are the fundamental values of our University, as exemplified by the motto "Universa Universis Patavine Libertas" which means "Padua freedom is universal for everyone". Patavine libertas initially referred to freedom from political and religious power but also freedom in research and teaching. For these reasons, Galileo Galilei moved to Padua in 1592, where he spent the most prosperous years of his life before being accused of heresy by the catholic church. We aim for the CORA congress to be an open-minded forum where active participation and exchange of ideas are promoted without prejudice. This special Issue of Autoimmunity Reviews is devoted to some controversies debated during the 7th CORA conference held in Turin, Italy, on March 16-18, 2023. Here we will discuss controversial entities, the use of old and new drugs, and insights into the classification, assessment of disease activity, and management of rheumatic diseases.

What is the best instrument to measure disease activity in SLE? - SLE-DAS vs Easy BILAG

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous condition making assessment of disease activity challenging. However, thorough assessment is essential to evaluate patients longitudinally, to guide therapeutic decisions, and for clinical trials. Currently, the most popular disease activity index in clinical practice and trials is SLEDAI-2K. Its main advantage is ease of use, but significant weaknesses of SLEDAI-2K are omission of several serious manifestations, inability to capture change within an organ system, and fixed severity weightings that are often inappropriate. Recently several groups have developing improved tools. We report here the debate held at CORA meeting on this issue. SLE-DAS includes 17 weighted clinical and laboratory parameters including continuous measures in 4 items with an online calculator. A higher sensitivity to change compared to SLEDAI-2K has been demonstrated in its validation studies. Easy BILAG is an improved format of the BILAG-2004 that retains its content but greatly simplified. Its scoring using a single-page form that incorporates concise definitions for key terms next to clinical items. Easy-BILAG demonstrates higher accuracy and less variability and increased and better user feedback compared to the standard BILAG-2004 format. Both the indices discussed at CORA showed an advantage in measuring disease activity compared to SLEDAI.

Comparisons of SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2K and classification of disease activity based on the SLE-DAS with reference to patient-reported outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Although the SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) and its definitions to classify disease activity have been recently developed to overcome the drawbacks of the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), the performance of the SLE-DAS for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has not been fully examined. We aimed to compare SLE-DAS with SLEDAI-2K and validate the classifications of disease activity based on SLE-DAS in terms of PROs.

METHODS

We assessed generic quality of life (QoL) using the Medical Outcome Survey 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), disease-specific QoL using the lupus patient-reported outcome tool (LupusPRO), burden of symptoms using the SLE Symptom Checklist (SSC), patient global assessment (PtGA) and physician global assessment (PhGA).

RESULTS

Of the 335 patients with SLE, the magnitudes of the mean absolute error, root mean square error, Akaike information criterion, and Bayesian information criterion were comparable for most PROs between the SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2K. In contrast, SLEDAI-2K had a higher predictive value for health-related QoL of LupusPRO and PtGA than SLE-DAS. Low disease activity, Boolean and index-based remission and categories of disease activity (remission, mild and moderate/severe activity) were significantly associated with health-related QoL in LupusPRO, SSC and PhGA, but not SF-36 or PtGA.

CONCLUSION

No clear differences were identified in the use of the SLE-DAS over the SLEDAI-2K in assessing PROs in patients with SLE. The classification of disease activity based on the SLE-DAS was validated against several PROs. SLE-DAS and its categories of disease activity effectively explain some of the PROs.

Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE: Are we there yet?

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by a great heterogenicity in course and clinical manifestations. Although prognosis improved in the last decades of the 20th century, mortality remains higher than in the general population and uncontrolled disease activity and therapy-related adverse effects have been identified as major contributors to damage accrual and poor outcomes. Assessment of disease activity and damage in SLE represents a great challenge even to the expert rheumatologist. Global disease activity indices are tools developed to assess activity across multiple organ systems. Several disease activity indices have been developed over the years, each with its own strengths and weaknesses, and knowing them is essential for understanding research studies, such as clinical trials, in which they are used. Organ-specific activity indices have been developed concurrently to represent organ involvement such as glomerulonephritis, cutaneous and musculoskeletal lupus manifestations. Regarding damage, the SLICC/ACR damage index has proven to be an effective tool for damage accrual assessment, yet not devoid of drawbacks. This review provides an overview of the most frequently utilized indices developed for the assessment of activity and damage in SLE highlighting their pros and cons when applied to the research and clinical setting.

Performance of a New Instrument for the Measurement of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity: The SLE-DAS

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic systemic autoimmune disease that affects multiple organ systems and manifests in a relapsing-remitting pattern. Consequently, it is paramount for rheumatologists to assess disease activity, identify flare-ups, and establish treatment goals for patients with SLE. In 2019, the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) was introduced as a novel tool for measuring disease activity. This tool refines the parameters of the established SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) to enhance the assessment process. This review aims to provide an introduction to the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS) and summarizes research on its development, its comparison with existing disease activity measures, and its performance in clinical settings. Literature searches on PubMed using the keyword "SLE-DAS" were conducted, covering publications from March 2019 to September 2023. Studies that compared SLE-DAS with other SLE disease activity measurement tools were reviewed. Findings indicated that SLE-DAS consistently performs on par with, and sometimes better than, traditional measures in assessing clinically meaningful changes, patient improvement, disease activity, health-related quality of life, hospitalization rates, and disease flare-ups. The association between SLE-DAS and mortality rates among patients with SLE, however, remains to be further explored. Although SLE-DAS is a promising and potentially effective tool for measuring SLE disease activity, additional research is needed to confirm its effectiveness and broaden its clinical use.

Predictors of flare in SLE patients fulfilling lupus low disease activity state: a cohort study of 292 patients with 36-month follow-up

OBJECTIVES

The treatment target in SLE should be maintained stable by preventing flares. The objectives were to identify predictors of flare in patients attaining lupus low disease activity state (LLDAS), and to assess whether remission with no glucocorticoids is associated with lower risk of flares.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of SLE patients followed in a referral centre over 3 years. Baseline was the first visit where each patient attained LLDAS. Flares up to 36 months' follow-up were identified by three instruments: revised Safety of Estrogen in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment (SELENA) Flare Index (r-SFI), SLEDAI-2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and SLE Disease Activity Score (SLE-DAS). Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters at baseline were evaluated as predictors of flare, with distinct models for each flare instrument, using survival analysis with univariate followed by multivariate Cox regression. Hazard ratios (HR) were determined with 95% CI.

RESULTS

A total of 292 patients fulfilling LLDAS were included. Over follow-up, 28.4%, 24.7% and 13.4% of the patients developed one or more flare, according to r-SFI, SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2K definitions, respectively. After multivariate analysis, the predictors of SLE-DAS flares were presence of anti-U1-ribonucleoprotein (anti-U1RNP) (HR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.30, 3.59), SLE-DAS score at baseline (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.04, 1.54) and immunosuppressants (HR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.43, 4.09). These predictors were equally significant for r-SFI and SLEDAI-2K flares. Remitted patients with no glucocorticoids presented a lower risk of SLE-DAS flares (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.37, 0.98).

CONCLUSION

In patients with LLDAS, anti-U1RNP, disease activity scored by SLE-DAS and SLE requiring maintenance immunosuppressants predict higher risk of flare. Remission with no glucocorticoids is associated with lower risk of flares.

[Assessment tools for systemic lupus erythematosus]

A systematic assessment is critical for taking advantage of the current options for optimizing systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) management. Without regular SLE activity measurements, treat to target and remission are empty words, and the EULAR recommendations therefore insist on these assessments. They rely on activity scores, such as SLEDAI, ECLAM and BILAG or more recently, EasyBILAG and SLE-DAS. Assessment is completed by organ-specific measurement methods and the evaluation of damage. In the study setting the classification criteria and combined endpoints for clinical testing are crucial, as is measurement of the quality of life. This review article provides an overview of the current state of SLE assessments.

Meeting report: the ALPHA project: a stakeholder meeting on lupus clinical trial outcome measures and the patient perspective

Drug development in lupus has improved over the past 10 years but still lags behind that of other rheumatic disease areas. Assessment of prospective lupus therapies in clinical trials has proved challenging for reasons that are multifactorial including the heterogeneity of the disease, study design limitations and a lack of validated biomarkers which greatly impacts regulatory decision-making. Moreover, most composite outcome measures currently used in trials do not include patient-reported outcomes. Given these factors, the Addressing Lupus Pillars for Health Advancement Global Advisory Committee members who serve on the drug development team identified an opportunity to convene a meeting to facilitate information sharing on completed and existing outcome measure development efforts. This meeting report highlights information presented during the meeting as well as a discussion on how the lupus community may work together with regulatory agencies to simplify and standardise outcome measures to accelerate development of lupus therapeutics.

Improving measures of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

INTRODUCTION

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem disease with varied manifestations and course. Variation in presentation among patients, and within the same patient, there may be varied manifestations over time. It has been difficult to measure the extent of disease activity accurately. Several investigators and groups have developed definitions of disease activity and methods to measure it. Consequently, there are currently several instruments to measure disease activity as well as damage in patients with SLE.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers currently available evidence on measures of disease activity in SLE. It discusses potential avenues for further development of new measures and the refinement of existing tools to improve disease activity measures in research and clinical care settings.

EXPERT OPINION

Given the complexity and heterogeneity of the disease, further work and tools are needed to assess disease activity better. Organ-specific measures for cutaneous, renal, and joint manifestations are needed for a detailed assessment of disease activity in conjunction with the use of disease generic tools (e.g. SLEDAI). New tools such as the SLE Disease Activity Index-Glucocorticoid Index (SLEDAI-2 KG) incorporating glucocorticoid doses to describe disease activity, SLE-DAS and SLEDAI-2 K RI-50 to record partial improvements could also be helpful.