Whole blood drug levels do not correlate with QTc intervals in hydroxychloroquine-treated systemic lupus erythematosus patients

Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine-Induced Cardiac Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) are foundational treatments for several systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Concerns regarding the risk of cardiac arrhythmia and death have been raised, yet the burden of HCQ and CQ-related cardiac toxicities remains unclear. A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE and Embase databases for articles published between the earliest date and April 2023 reporting cardiac conduction abnormalities in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases taking HCQ or CQ. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the difference in mean corrected QT (QTc) interval and odds ratio of prolonged QTc interval in those taking HCQ or CQ versus not. Of 2673 unique records, 34 met the inclusion criteria, including 70,609 subjects. Thirty-three studies reported outcomes in HCQ and 9 in CQ. Five studies reported outcomes in RA, 11 in SLE, and 18 in populations with mixed rheumatic diseases. Eleven studies reported mean QTc and OR for prolonged QTc for meta-analysis, all reporting outcomes in HCQ. There was a significant increase in mean QTc (10.29 ms,  P  = 0.458) among HCQ users compared to non-HCQ users in patients with RA. There was no difference in mean QTc between HCQ and non-HCQ users in other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. When rheumatic diseases were pooled, HCQ users were more likely to have prolonged QTc compared to non-HCQ users (odds ratio 1.57, 95% CI, 1.19, 2.08). The results of this study suggest that clinicians should be aware of potential adverse cardiac events of HCQ and consider QTc monitoring for patients on HCQ for the treatment of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Recent findings about antimalarials in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: What dermatologists should know

Antimalarials (AMs), particularly hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ), are the cornerstone of the treatment for both systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE). HCQ and CQ are recommended as first-line oral agents in all CLE guidelines. Initially thought to have potential therapeutic effects against COVID-19, HCQ has drawn significant attention in recent years, highlighting concerns over its potential toxicity among patients and physicians. This review aims to consolidate current evidence on the efficacy of AMs in CLE. Our focus will be on optimizing therapeutic strategies, such as switching from HCQ to CQ, adding quinacrine to either HCQ or CQ, or adjusting HCQ dose based on blood concentration. Additionally, we will explore the potential for HCQ dose reduction or discontinuation in cases of CLE or SLE remission. Our review will focus on the existing evidence regarding adverse events linked to AM usage, with a specific emphasis on severe events and those of particular interest to dermatologists. Last, we will discuss the optimal HCQ dose and the balance between preventing CLE or SLE flares and minimizing toxicity.

Multidisciplinary consensus on the use of hydroxychloroquine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is the first-line treatment for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, there is heterogeneity in its clinical use. This consensus aims to bridge the gap in SLE treatment by providing practical and valuable recommendations for health professionals.

METHODS

The methodology used is based on a systematic literature review and a nominal group technique (NGT). A ten-member scientific committee formulated eight clinically relevant questions. First, a systematic review was conducted to identify the available evidence, which the scientific committee evaluated to developed recommendations based on their expertise, achieving consensus through NGT.

RESULTS

1673 titles and abstracts were screened, and 43 studies were included for meeting the inclusion criteria. The scientific committee established 11 recommendations for HCQ use in initiation, maintenance, and monitoring, considering benefits and potential adverse effects of HCQ. Unanimous agreement was achieved on all recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence supports HCQ's effectiveness and safety for SLE. Individualized assessment of the initial HCQ dose is important, especially in situations requiring dose reduction or discontinuation. This risk-benefit assessment, specifically focusing on the balance between retinal toxicity and the risk of SLE relapse, should guide decisions regarding medication withdrawal, considering disease activity, risk factors, and HCQ potential benefits. Close monitoring is essential for optimal disease management and minimize potential risks, such as QT prolongation or retinal toxicity.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Utility and Gaps

Despite advances in the treatment of patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), outcomes have remained suboptimal. Persistent disease activity, patient comorbidities and drug toxicities contribute to the accrual of progressive irreversible damage and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Currently, similar drug doses and regimens are promulgated in the treatment guidelines for all SLE patients, despite the vast differences in patient and environmental factors that affect the drugs' metabolism and blood concentrations. This causes a disconnect between drug dosing and drug blood concentrations, which can then result in unpredictability in drug toxicities and therapeutic effects. In this review, we discuss commonly used oral immunosuppressive medications in SLE, their pharmacogenomics, and factors affecting their metabolism and blood concentrations. Further, we highlight the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in SLE, which is the first accessible step to individualising therapy.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and COVID-19

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the current state of knowledge regarding COVID-19 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We focus on (i) SARS-CoV-2 vaccination uptake, immunogenicity and safety, and (ii) outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with SLE and pertinent risk factors for adverse sequelae.

RECENT FINDINGS

Notwithstanding the potential concern of patients about possible post-vaccination side-effects, the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with SLE has been undisputedly confirmed in numerous studies. Humoral immunogenicity is generally attained in SLE, although affected by the use of background immunosuppressive drugs, especially rituximab. The latter has also clearly been implicated with adverse COVID-19 outcomes in SLE, including need for hospitalization, mechanical ventilation and death. Although the wide adoption of vaccination has significantly improved COVID-19 outcomes, patients with SLE continue to pose challenges during the pandemic, mainly owing to administered immunosuppressive medications.