Measuring the impact of steroid therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatic diseases: international development of a glucocorticoid treatment-specific patient-reported outcome measure

Impact of glucocorticoids on patients' quality of life: a qualitative study assessing face validity and feasibility of the Steroid PRO in patients with inflammatory gastroenterology, respiratory and dermatology conditions

OBJECTIVES

The Steroid PRO is a treatment-specific patient-reported outcome questionnaire which measures the impact of glucocorticoids on health-related quality of life. It has 15 items grouped into 4 domains (Social impact, Impact on Appearance, Psychological Impact and Treatment Concerns). Initially developed and validated in rheumatic diseases, the Steroid PRO demonstrates potential for broader application in patients with other inflammatory conditions. The objective of this study was to assess face validity, content validity and feasibility of the Steroid PRO in (1) patients treated with glucocorticoids for inflammatory respiratory, dermatological and gastroenterological conditions and (2) clinicians working within these specialties in the UK and USA.

DESIGN

Qualitative study with semistructured cognitive interview methods.

SETTING

Online or face-to-face interviews with participants from seven departments across three secondary care hospitals in the UK and USA.

PARTICIPANTS

Inclusion criteria: (1) Adult patients with inflammatory respiratory, gastroenterological and dermatological conditions treated with glucocorticoids and (2) healthcare professionals (HCPs) working in respiratory, dermatology and gastroenterology departments in the UK and USA.

RESULTS

Purposive sampling to ensure a range of patient and HCP participants. A total of 42 patient participants were recruited, from respiratory/pulmonology (n=14, 33.3%), dermatology (n=13, 31.0%) and gastroenterology (n=15, 35.8%) medical departments; 32 in the UK and 10 from the USA. Mean age 48.2 years (range 22-71) and 19 (45.2%) were female. Patient participants had a range of inflammatory lung, skin and bowel conditions, with a spectrum of demographics and patterns of glucocorticoid use. 14 HCPs participated from the UK (9) and USA (5). Face validity: 97% (30/31) patients and 100% (14/14) HCPs reported the Steroid PRO was 'relevant or very relevant' to them and their disease.

FEASIBILITY

97% (30/31) patients and 100% (14/14) HCPs reported the Steroid PRO was 'easy or very easy to complete'. Patients reported that the four domains of the Steroid PRO had relevance to them and that it was validating to see their concerns represented: 'It's obvious you guys know what you're talking about-these are my issues. It's very validating when you realise it's not just you. These problems are real and they matter.… These are not questions my doctor asks me about. Doctors never ask about psychosocial aspects. It would be really great if they used this' (female patient with asthma). Patients and clinicians felt the Steroid PRO would be suitable for use in clinical practice within their specialties and would aid in understanding of the impact of glucocorticoids.

CONCLUSIONS

The Steroid PRO demonstrated face validity and content validity for assessing the impact of glucocorticoids in patients with inflammatory respiratory, gastroenterological and dermatological conditions. Additionally, the feasibility of using the Steroid PRO with both patients and HCPs has been established. Future work should include quantitative testing of the Steroid PRO as an outcome measure within clinical trials in these conditions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06314451.

The DANIsh VASculitis cohort study: protocol for a national multicenter prospective study including incident and prevalent patients with giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica

The DANIsh VASculitis cohort study, DANIVAS, is an observational national multicenter study with the overall aim to prospectively collect protocolized clinical data and biobank material from patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) diagnosed and/or followed at Danish rheumatology departments. A long-term key objective is to investigate whether the use of new clinically implemented diagnostic imaging modalities facilitates disease stratification in the GCA-PMR disease spectrum. In particular, we aim to evaluate treatment requirements in GCA patients with and without large-vessel involvement, treatment needs in PMR patients with and without subclinical giant cell arteritis, and the prognostic role of imaging with respect to aneurysm development. Hence, in GCA and PMR, imaging stratification is hypothesized to be able to guide management strategies. With an established infrastructure within rheumatology for clinical studies in Denmark, the infrastructure of the Danish Rheumatologic Biobank, and the possibility to cross-link data with valid nationwide registries, the DANIVAS project holds an exceptional possibility to collect comprehensive real-world data on diagnosis, disease severity, disease duration, treatment effect, complications, and adverse events. In this paper, we present the research protocol for the DANIVAS study. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT05935709.

Validation of a new glucocorticoid-specific Patient-Reported Outcome Questionnaire (the Steroid PRO)

OBJECTIVES

Glucocorticoids used in the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic conditions can impact on health-related quality of life. An underpinning qualitative study developed a long-list of candidate items for a treatment-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure. The objective of this paper is to determine scale structure and psychometric properties of the Steroid PRO.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of adults from the UK, USA, Australia and New Zealand, taking glucocorticoids for a rheumatic disease. Initial survey collected demographics, clinical information, 40 Steroid PRO candidate items and EuroQol-5 Dimensions- 5 levels (EQ-5D-5L). Follow-up, 3-5 days later, collected Steroid PRO candidate items and a condition-change ('transition') question. Analysis included Rasch measurement model, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and hypothesis testing for discriminative validity, convergence validity and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS

Total responses 946: UK n=743 (79%); USA n=139 (15%); Australia/New Zealand n=64 (7%); mean age 57.6 (SD=13.6); 833 (88%) women. Participants with inflammatory arthritis n=197 (21%), connective tissue disease and/or vasculitis n=402 (42%), giant cell arteritis and/or polymyalgia rheumatica n=347 (37%). Twenty-five items were removed due to lack of fit to Rasch model. Of the remaining items, EFA suggested four subscales: Social impact (4 items); Impact on appearance (3 items); Psychological impact (5 items); Treatment concerns (3 items). Rasch modelling supported a four-subscale structure and total score, confirming construct validity and reliability. Hypothesis testing confirmed discriminant and convergence validity. Intraclass correlation coefficient (total score) was 0.809 demonstrating excellent (test-retest) reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The Steroid PRO is a 15-item, valid and reliable scale for measuring the impact of glucocorticoid therapy in people with rheumatic diseases.

Consensus of the definitions of the OMERACT glucocorticoid impact core domain set for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases

BACKGROUND

The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Glucocorticoid (GC) Impact Working Group has been working to develop a core domain set to measure the impact of GCs on patients living with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. The mandatory domains previously identified for inclusion in all clinical trials measuring the GC effects include infection, bone fragility, mood disturbance, hypertension, diabetes, weight, fatigue, and mortality. Before progressing to instrument selection, the Working Group sought to establish precise definitions of all mandatory domains within the core domain set.

METHODS

OMERACT methodology was applied with the use of evidence and consensus-based decision making of all stakeholder groups (patient research partners, health care professionals, clinician researchers, industry members and methodologists) to develop detailed definitions for the broad domain, target domain and domain components, taking into consideration sources of variability that could affect measurement of the domain.  The working group synthesized prior qualitative studies, quantitative work, and results from Delphi rounds, to develop a rich definition of 'what' is to be measured.

RESULTS

Between 2021 and 2023, the OMERACT Working Group on GC Impact conducted virtual meetings to establish domain definitions. First, we mapped each domain onto an OMERACT Core Area. All domains were primarily represented within the Pathophysiological Manifestations Core Area, except from Fatigue which was primarily Life Impact and Weight which spanned both Core Areas. Sources of variability included cultural factors, age, gender, education level, socioeconomic status, personal experiences, emotional state, and language barriers. The domain definitions will form the foundation for instrument selection and the initial step of domain / concept match and content validity in the OMERACT pillar of 'truth' before moving on to feasibility and discrimination.

CONCLUSION

The OMERACT GC Impact Working Group has developed and agreed upon detailed domain definitions for core domains. Future steps of the working group are to select instruments and develop the core outcome measurement set for clinical trials measuring the impact of GC on patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.