Changes in rheumatology out-patient workload over 12 years in the South West of England

Prevalence, impact and care of foot problems in people with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a United Kingdom based cross-sectional survey

Background

Foot symptoms in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) derive from a combination of inflammation, altered foot mechanics, deformity and secondary skin lesions. Guidelines recommend regular review of patients’ feet, but the extent to which the general population of RA patients report foot symptoms and access foot care has not been established. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence, impact and care of foot problems in all patients with RA in one geographical area and identify factors associated with accessing foot care.

Methods

Cross-sectional survey of a random sample of patients with RA, who resided within a single community-based National Health Service (NHS) podiatry service. The questionnaire collected demographic data (age, gender, local deprivation score), clinical data (disease duration, arthritis medications, disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)), current foot problems, foot care accessed (podiatry, orthotics and/or orthopaedics) and care received, measures of impact (Foot Impact Scale) and ability to work.

Results

Of 1003 total eligible patients in the target population, 739 were posted survey packs. Of these 413 (56%) replied. Responders and non-responders had similar age (63.5 yr. vs.61.5 yr), gender (74.1%F vs. 75.2%F), and highest deprivation category (13.3% vs.15.9%). Of the responders 92.1% reported current foot problems: articular 73.8%, cutaneous lesions 65.4%, structural 57.6%, extra-articular 42.6%. Responders’ median (IQR) disease duration 10 (5–20) years, HAQ 1.5 (0.75–2.0), FIS_IF 10 (6–14) and FIS_AP 16 (7–23) and 37.8% reported impacts on work. While 69.5% had accessed foot care there were differences in the route of access (by gender and whether independent or NHS provision) and were older (64.9 yr. vs 60.4 yr. p = 0.001), had longer disease duration (12 yr. vs 7 yr. p < 0.001) and had a greater proportion of females (72.2% vs 61.7% p = 0.04) than those who had not accessed care.

Conclusions

Current foot problems were reported by 92.1% of the study sample and substantially impacted on life and work. While overall access to foot care was higher than anticipated, routes of access differed and extent of current problems suggests the provision of effective, timely and targeted care is a pressing need.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13047-017-0229-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Patterns of analgesic use, pain and self-efficacy: a cross-sectional study of patients attending a hospital rheumatology clinic

BACKGROUND

Many people attending rheumatology clinics use analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatories for persistent musculoskeletal pain. Guidelines for pain management recommend regular and pre-emptive use of analgesics to reduce the impact of pain. Clinical experience indicates that analgesics are often not used in this way. Studies exploring use of analgesics in arthritis have historically measured adherence to such medication. Here we examine patterns of analgesic use and their relationships to pain, self-efficacy and demographic factors.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were approached in a hospital rheumatology out-patient clinic. Pattern of analgesic use was assessed by response to statements such as 'I always take my tablets every day.' Pain and self-efficacy (SE) were measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES). Influence of factors on pain level and regularity of analgesic use were investigated using linear regression. Differences in pain between those agreeing and disagreeing with statements regarding analgesic use were assessed using t-tests.

RESULTS

218 patients (85% of attendees) completed the study. Six (2.8%) patients reported no current pain, 26 (12.3%) slight, 100 (47.4%) moderate, 62 (29.4%) severe and 17 (8.1%) extreme pain. In multiple linear regression self efficacy and regularity of analgesic use were significant (p < 0.01) with lower self efficacy and more regular use of analgesics associated with more pain.Low SE was associated with greater pain: 40 (41.7%) people with low SE reported severe pain versus 22 (18.3%) people with high SE, p < 0.001. Patients in greater pain were significantly more likely to take analgesics regularly; 13 (77%) of those in extreme pain reported always taking their analgesics every day, versus 9 (35%) in slight pain. Many patients, including 46% of those in severe pain, adjusted analgesic use to current pain level. In simple linear regression, pain was the only variable significantly associated with regularity of analgesic use: higher levels of pain corresponded to more regular analgesic use (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms that there is a strong inverse relationship between self-efficacy and pain severity. Analgesics are often used irregularly by people with arthritis, including some reporting severe pain.

Changing structure and resources in a rheumatology combined unit during 1977–1999

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to study the changing structure and resources in a rheumatism hospital during the period 1977-1999 when rheumatology care was decentralized and new treatment strategies were introduced.

METHODS

Data on hospital management and production were retrieved retrospectively.

RESULTS

The number of beds was stepwise reduced from 133 to 44 and the average length of stay declined from 48 to 16 days. The combined unit and multidisciplinary team organization was kept, ensuring the combined effort of rheumatologists, rheumasurgeons, registered nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and social workers. One-third of the total staff was rheumateam members in 1977 compared to one-half in 1999. The proportions of physicians and registered nurses increased while the proportion of physiotherapists was stable. The number of discharges remained relatively unchanged and the number of outpatient consultations increased. Inflammatory rheumatic diseases remained the largest diagnostic group of in- and outpatients. Hospitalized care was received primarily by patients with arthritis and spondylitis. Patients with vasculitis and diffuse disorders of connective tissue accounted for an increasing proportion of the outpatient clinic production. Surgical procedures became more prevalent. Since 1995 approximately 50 large joint replacements have been performed annually.

CONCLUSION

The length of stay declined and patient care was shifted towards the outpatient clinic. The multidisciplinary team was strengthened. More resources were dedicated to physician-led and nurse-dependent procedures, but physiotherapy and rehabilitation remained part of inpatient care throughout the period. The expertise concentrated on inflammatory rheumatic disorders. The modesty of the large joint replacement caseload may challenge decentralized care.

Priority-setting tools for rheumatology disease referrals: a review of the literature

As part of a larger body of work to develop a rheumatology priority referral score, a literature review was conducted. The objective of the literature review was to identify preexisting priority-setting, triage, and referral tools/scales developed to guide referrals from primary care to specialist care/consultation usually provided by a rheumatologist. Using a combination of database, citation, Internet, and hand-searching, 20 papers were identified that related to referral prioritization in three areas: rheumatoid arthritis (RA; 5), musculoskeletal (MSK) diseases other than RA (3), and MSK diseases in general (12). No single set of priority-setting criteria was identified for rheumatologic disorders across the spectrum of patients who may be referred from primary care providers (PCPs) to rheumatologists. There appears to be more congruence on conditions at either end of the urgency spectrum with conditions such as suspected cranial arteritis or systemic vasculitis deemed to be emergency referrals and fibromyalgia and other soft-tissue syndromes deemed to be more routine referrals. Between these two extremes, there is a divergence of opinion about urgency and few papers on the issue. The exception to this is referral for early RA for which several criteria have been established. Despite the inherent complexities in developing a tool to prioritize patients referred by PCPs to rheumatologists, there are compelling reasons to proceed. With the aging of the population, the number of patients being referred to rheumatologists is expected to increase. With pharmaceutical advances, there are demonstrable benefits in early referral for some conditions. These trends have led to increased pressure on scarce rheumatological human resources. A tool to prioritize referrals is a critical component of improving access and the referral process.

The management of knee pain in primary care: factors associated with consulting the GP and referrals to secondary care

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the treatment of knee pain in primary care and the factors associated with consulting general practitioners (GPs) and referrals to specialist services.

METHODS

Individuals with knee pain were identified through postal questionnaires sent to patients aged 50 and over from two GP practices in southeast London. Patients with knee pain were then invited to the department, where demographic, clinical and service use data were collected. Participants also completed measures of pain, function, handicap and illness beliefs.

RESULTS

From the 2940 questionnaires that were sent out, the response rate was 34%. Of these, 49% reported experiencing knee pain in the previous 12 months. Two hundred and thirty-one patients with knee pain attended the department. One hundred and thirty-four (58%) had seen their GP about their knee pain, with 50 (37%) referred on to specialist services. Compared with non-consulters, consulters had more severe disease and higher levels of disability and handicap, and believed the condition was more severe and had major consequences on their lives. Those referred to specialist care had higher levels of handicap and also believed the condition was more severe, with major consequences on their lives, than those not referred.

CONCLUSION

In this sample nearly half of those who reported knee pain had not seen their GP and were self-managing their condition. A mixture of physical, social and psychological factors predicted visits to GPs and rates of referral to secondary care. Patient perceptions about knee pain were important predictors of both consultations and referrals, highlighting the need to address both physical and psychosocial factors in relation to help-seeking.

New modes of practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The practice of rheumatology needs to adapt to the changing pressures of modern medicine. This review looks at reports of how rheumatologists work and seeks new evidence of how rheumatologists might work in the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surveys of rheumatologist opinion and of outpatient practice show that demand outstrips supply when it comes to care provision. However, differences in case mix will determine which strategies are best to improve care at particular rheumatologic centers. Educating general practitioners by collaborative consultations may help to improve referral patterns when they are inappropriate, but will not allow a reduction in long-term follow-up. Changing the underlying systems of care, and including nonphysicians in care pathways and processes, is a likely route to improvement, and a new way of running "direct access" clinics may prove to be an important step forward. Involving patients in decisions about their treatment is a fashionable objective but is more difficult to achieve than might be imagined.

SUMMARY

Service developments to improve rheumatologic care will be specific to local circumstances, but will rest on the introduction of patterns of work that are structured and address the issue of long-term follow-up. Patients' educational needs and decision support systems need a lot more research.