First-line DMARD choice in early rheumatoid arthritis--do prognostic factors play a role?

The subjective components of the Disease Activity Score 28-joints (DAS28) in rheumatoid arthritis patients and coexisting fibromyalgia

To determine the contribution of fibromyalgia (FM) to the subjective components of the Disease Activity Score 28-joints (DAS28) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to analyse the discriminatory performance of the derived DAS28 patient-reported components (DAS28-P) to identify patients with fibromyalgic RA. Consecutive RA patients underwent clinical and clinimetric assessment. The DAS28-P index was derived from the components of the DAS28 scores by rearranging the DAS28-ESR formula. Patients were distinguished by the presence of FM. Student parametric t tests or Mann-Whitney non-parametric U tests were used to determine any between-group differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to test the ability of the DAS28-P index to distinguish patients with RA and those with fibromyalgic RA. The study involved 292 RA patients (80.5% females, mean age 63 years) with a mean disease duration of 11.6 ± 8.5 years. Forty-three patients (14.7%) had concomitant FM, and significantly higher tender joint count (p < 0.001), pain numerical rating scale, global health status (p = 0.007), and DAS28 scores (p = 0.006) than those without FM. The DAS28-P values were also significantly higher in the patients with FM (0.68 ± 0.09 vs 0.58 ± 0.06; p < 0.001). The discriminatory power of the DAS28-P was very good (area under the ROC of 0.858, optimal cut-off value of 0.631). The presence of FM strongly influences the DAS28 results. The assessment of patient-reported components to the DAS28 through the DAS28-P can be a useful way to identify patients with fibromyalgic RA.

Utilization patterns of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients

This study was conducted to investigate disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) utilization in Korean elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We used data from January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006 from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service claims database. The study subjects were defined as patients aged 65 yr or older with at least two claims with a diagnosis of RA. DMARD use was compared by the patients' age-group, gender, medical service, and geographic divisions. The patterns of DMARD use in mono- and combination therapy were calculated. RA medication use was calculated by the number of defined daily doses (DDD)/1,000 patients/day. A total of 166,388 patients were identified during the study period. DMARD use in RA patients was 12.0%. The proportion of DMARD use was higher in the younger elderly, females, and patients treated in big cities. Hydroxychloroquine was the most commonly used DMARD in monotherapy, and most of the combination therapies prescribed it with methotrexate. DMARD use in elderly RA patients was noticeably low, although drug prescriptions showed an increasing trend during the study period, clinicians may need to pay more attention to elderly RA patients.

Cost-minimisation analysis of subcutaneous methotrexate versus biologic therapy for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who have had an insufficient response or intolerance to oral methotrexate

This study aims to model the economic impact of subcutaneous methotrexate (SC MTX) or a biologic over a 12-month period using a hypothetical population of rheumatoid arthritis patients who failed to tolerate or respond to oral MTX and were suitable candidates for biologic therapy. A decision-based model was developed using current National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance to determine the management of this hypothetical UK population. Published data on the continuation rates of SC MTX and biologics were used to compare the costs of the two treatment options. The economic model used a cost-minimisation methodology from a UK National Health Service (NHS) perspective, with the cost of all drugs and resources being estimated on this basis. Sensitivity analyses were also performed to determine the effects of changing key assumptions on the mean cost differences. The routine use of SC MTX following oral MTX failure has the potential to save an estimated £7,197 per patient in the first year of therapy and £9.3m per year nationally in new patients. Sensitivity analyses support the robustness of the results. The results of this study suggest that routine use of SC MTX following oral MTX failure has the potential to provide considerable savings to the NHS through optimised use of MTX first-line therapy. It is proposed, therefore, that patients should start on oral MTX with a subsequent switch to SC MTX in the case of an insufficient response or tolerability issues, before introducing a biologic agent.

Baseline factors predicting change from the initial DMARD treatment during the first 2 years of rheumatoid arthritis: experience in the ERAN inception cohort

BACKGROUND

Outcomes in early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) may be improved by rapidly establishing a stable and effective disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment regimen. We aimed to investigate whether baseline factors and initial treatment strategies are associated with changes to the first DMARD treatment, due to either Lack of Efficacy (LoE) or Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) within 2 years of presentation.

METHODS

Reasons for changes from initial DMARD therapy within 2 years of baseline, and associated factors, were examined using logistic regression in data from the Early RA Network (ERAN) inception cohort.

RESULTS

Data were available for 766 participants. 410 (54%) changed their initial DMARD regime within 2 years, including 230 (56%) due to Lack of Efficacy (LoE) and 139 (34%) due to Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR). The first DMARD was recorded as methotrexate monotherapy in 336 (44%), sulphasalazine monotherapy in 273 (36%), or combined methotrexate/sulphasalazine/hydroxychlorquine in 52 (7%).Baseline predictors of changing DMARD (for all reasons) were HAQ-disability (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.12 - 1.86), poor mental health (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16 - 1.78) and extra-articular disease (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.00 - 3.16). In this model, the triple combination therapy also predicted lower likelihood of DMARD change (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.12 - 0.79).Subgroup analyses showed that MTX monotherapy was associated with lower risk of change due to ADR. Combination therapy conferred lower risk of change due to LoE. Poor mental health was associated with change due to ADR, and extra-articular disease, HAQ-disability at baseline, and younger age predicted LoE.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that non-pharmacological interventions to improve disability and mental health, may reduce initial DMARD treatment failure.

Combination of MTX and LEF attenuates inflammatory bone erosion by down-regulation of receptor activator of NF-kB ligand and interleukin-17 in type II collagen-induced arthritis rats

The objectives of this study were to determine the effect of combination of methotrexate (MTX) and leflunomide (LEF) on type II collagen-induced arthritis rats and its mechanism. Curative effect was confirmed on CIA rats, which were randomized and divided into model, MTX, LEF and MTX + LEF group. Weights and joint swelling scores of rats were recorded. Interleukin (IL)-17, receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) concentration in serum were determined by ELISA. H&E dyeing of joint was used to estimate the inflammation and osteoclasia extent. The mechanism was investigated through fibroblast-like synoviocytes isolated from RA patients. The effect of MTX and LEF on cell viability, and RANKL and OPG expression were indicated through MTT and RT-PCR analysis, respectively. Combination therapy would be effective in treating CIA rats. Joint swelling scores and IL-17 and RANKL level in serum were decreased obviously (P < 0.05), while OPG level was elevated (P < 0.05). Anti-inflammatory and anti-osteoclasia effect would be indicated by H&E dyeing results. Moreover, FLS cell viability was inhibited by combination treatment in vitro (P < 0.05), and expression of osteoclasia-related genes (RANKL and OPG) was modified (P < 0.05). Combination therapy would relive the synovium hypertrophy through depressing cell viability and osteoclasia through decreasing RANKL and increasing OPG expression. Otherwise, combination was superior to monotherapy.

Predictors of change in bodily pain in early rheumatoid arthritis: an inception cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate possible predictors for lack of pain improvement after 1 year of treatment for early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

The Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network (ERAN) database was used for analysis of baseline and 1-year pain data. The ERAN is a hospital-based inception cohort of 1,189 people. Short Form 36 questionnaire bodily pain scores were used to calculate change in pain at 1 year as the outcome. The proportion of the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) attributable to patient-reported components (joint tenderness and visual analog scale score; DAS28-P) at baseline was derived as a predictor. Predictors of less improvement in pain were investigated using adjusted odds ratios (OR(adj) ) generated by logistic regression, adjusting for 14 additional clinical and demographic covariates.

RESULTS

Greater pain at baseline was associated with sex, high DAS28, worse mental health, and smoking. Most patients with early RA reported incomplete improvement in bodily pain after 1 year. The DAS28-P index did not significantly change in the patients whose disease remained active. Less improvement in pain was predicted by female sex (OR(adj) 3.41, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.35-8.64) and a high DAS28-P index at baseline (OR(adj) for tertiles 2.09, 95% CI 1.24-3.55). Other conventional RA risk factors did not predict pain changes.

CONCLUSION

The factors most likely to predict less improvement in pain in early RA are female sex and a high DAS28-P index. A high DAS28-P index may reflect greater contributions of noninflammatory factors, such as central sensitization, to pain. Strategies in addition to inflammatory disease suppression may be required to adequately treat pain.

Effectiveness of sulfasalazine and methotrexate in 1102 DMARD-naive patients with early RA

OBJECTIVE

To compare baseline characteristics, responses and drug survival in patients with early RA starting SSZ or MTX in a real-life setting.

METHODS

The analyses included DMARD-naïve patients with RA (disease duration ≤ 1 year) starting SSZ or MTX. Three- and 6-month effectiveness was compared by unadjusted analysis and with adjustment for propensity score quintile. In addition, effectiveness in SSZ- and MTX-treated patients matched for RF status and baseline DAS-28 was compared.

RESULTS

SSZ-treated patients (n = 175) had lower baseline disease activity than patients treated with MTX (n = 927) [mean 28-joint DAS (DAS-28) 4.4 vs 5.0, P < 0.001], and were less often RF positive (50 vs 61%, P = 0.006). Six-month mean ΔDAS-28 was smaller with SSZ than MTX (-1.0 vs -1.5, P = 0.003); the difference was not significant after adjustment for propensity score quintile (P = 0.36). For SSZ/MTX, 3-month ACR50 and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) good responses were 9/23% (P < 0.001) and 24/31% (P = 0.14), respectively. Three-year drug survival was superior for MTX (P < 0.001) and estimated 1-year survival rates were 42/75% for SSZ/MTX. In patients matched for baseline DAS-28 and RF, mean ΔDAS-28 (MTX -1.2, P = 0.55 vs SSZ) and EULAR good responses (39 vs 37%, P = 0.74) were similar at 6 months; drug survival was superior for MTX (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with SSZ as first DMARD were more often RF negative and had lower baseline disease activity. Drug survival was superior for MTX, and effectiveness was greater with MTX than with SSZ although the difference was reduced when adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics.

[Combination therapy using methotrexate with DMARDs or biologics--current status]

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most frequently used drug in combination treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologics in rheumatoid arthritis. DMARD combinations are usually the second step after unsuccessful MTX monotherapy. Evidence-based combinations of MTX+leflunomide, MTX+cyclosporine and triple combination MTX+sulphasalazine+hydroxychloroquine (complemented by glucocorticoids) showed the best results.In the case of insufficient response to the DMARD combination, MTX should be used in combination with a biologic. To date, the most frequent biologic treatment is with TNF inhibitors, but studies have shown that all biologics (with the exception of Anakinra) have comparable success rates. The combination of MTX plus abatacept, MTX plus rituximab and MTX plus tocilizumab are very promising, both clinically and in terms of blocking radiological progression. The efficacy of biological therapy is generally better using MTX combination than monotherapy.The safety of MTX combination treatment with DMARDs is not significantly lower than that of the individual substances; therefore, the required safety controls are also the same.

An evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of a register of newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis, 1986-2010

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of a register of management and outcomes of recently diagnosed RA, and allow comparisons between rheumatology centres on good clinical practice and guidelines.

METHODS

A register of newly diagnosed RA was initiated in 1986 in nine different regions of England, later expanded to UK-wide membership in 2002. Standardized data collection includes disease activity, function, radiological damage, therapy, hospitalizations, major comorbidity and mortality. A centralized database generates individual reports and comparative data for each centre yearly. Aims have been compared with actual achievements and any changes over 25 years.

RESULTS

Thirty rheumatology centres have recruited 2866 patients. Study outputs have included peer-reviewed scientific publications and contributions to the recent National Audit Office report on RA. Referral times into secondary care have changed little over 25 years, but time to initiation of drug therapies has decreased. Delays between publication of clinical trial evidence and management guidelines and their implementation in normal clinical practice are illustrated by relatively infrequent use of combination therapies at diagnosis. Consecutive case recruitment, centre participation and follow-up were reportedly compromised by local funding issues. Centre participants report a benefit from feedback of actual clinical practice compared with recommended standards of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the original objectives have been achieved. Cohort studies based predominantly in District General Hospitals provide unique insights into the natural history and impact of RA, its management, the translation of research findings into clinical practice and provide participating centres with important clinical governance and professional development opportunities.