1
|
Oddsson LIE, Bisson T, Cohen HS, Iloputaife I, Jacobs L, Kung D, Lipsitz LA, Manor B, McCracken P, Rumsey Y, Wrisley DM, Koehler-McNicholas SR. Extended effects of a wearable sensory prosthesis on gait, balance function and falls after 26 weeks of use in persons with peripheral neuropathy and high fall risk—The walk2Wellness trial. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14:931048. [PMID: 36204554 PMCID: PMC9531134 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.931048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We recently reported that individuals with impaired plantar sensation and high fall risk due to sensory peripheral neuropathy (PN) improved gait and balance function following 10 weeks of use of Walkasins®, a wearable lower limb sensory prosthesis that provides directional specific mechanical tactile stimuli related to plantar pressure measurements during standing and walking (RxFunction Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, United States). Here, we report 26-week outcomes and compare pre- and in-study fall rates. We expected improvements in outcomes and reduced fall rates reported after 10 weeks of use to be sustained. Materials and methods Participants had clinically diagnosed PN with impaired plantar sensation, high fall risk (Functional Gait Assessment, FGA score < 23) and ability to sense tactile stimuli above the ankle at the location of the device. Additional outcomes included 10 m Gait Speed, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Four-Stage Balance Test, and self-reported outcomes, including Activities-Specific Balance Confidence scale and Vestibular Disorders Activities of Daily Living Scale. Participants tracked falls using a calendar. Results We assessed falls and self-reported outcomes from 44 individuals after 26 weeks of device use; 30 of them conducted in-person testing of clinical outcomes. Overall, improvements in clinical outcomes seen at 10 weeks of use remained sustained at 26 weeks with statistically significant increases compared to baseline seen in FGA scores (from 15.0 to 19.2), self-selected gait speed (from 0.89 to 0.97 m/s), and 4-Stage Balance Test (from 25.6 to 28.4 s), indicating a decrease in fall risk. Non-significant improvements were observed in TUG and fast gait speed. Overall, 39 falls were reported; 31 of them did not require medical treatment and four caused severe injury. Participants who reported falls over 6 months prior to the study had a 43% decrease in fall rate during the study as compared to self-report 6-month pre-study (11.8 vs. 6.7 falls/1000 patient days, respectively, p < 0.004), similar to the 46% decrease reported after 10 weeks of use. Conclusion A wearable sensory prosthesis can improve outcomes of gait and balance function and substantially decreases incidence of falls during long-term use. The sustained long-term benefits in clinical outcomes reported here lessen the likelihood that improvements are placebo effects. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier #NCT03538756.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars I. E. Oddsson
- RxFunction Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, United States
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Recanati School for Community Health Professions, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
- *Correspondence: Lars I. E. Oddsson,
| | - Teresa Bisson
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- M Health Fairview, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - Ikechukwu Iloputaife
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Roslindale, MA, United States
| | - Laura Jacobs
- RxFunction Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, United States
| | - Doris Kung
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lewis A. Lipsitz
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Roslindale, MA, United States
- Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Brad Manor
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Roslindale, MA, United States
- Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Patricia McCracken
- Minneapolis Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Sara R. Koehler-McNicholas
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical School, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Minneapolis Department of Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Coste J, Medkour T, Maigne JY, Pérez M, Laroche F, Perrot S. Osteopathic medicine for fibromyalgia: a sham-controlled randomized clinical trial. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2021; 13:1759720X211009017. [PMID: 33948127 PMCID: PMC8053754 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x211009017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients with fibromyalgia (FM) frequently resort to osteopathic or chiropractic treatment, despite very weak supporting evidence. We aimed to assess the efficacy of osteopathic manipulation in FM in a properly controlled and powered randomized clinical trial. Methods: Patients were randomized to osteopathic or sham treatment. Treatment was administered by experienced physical medicine physicians, and consisted of six sessions per patient, over 6 weeks. Treatment credibility and expectancy were repeatedly evaluated. Patients completed standardized questionnaires at baseline, during treatment, and at 6, 12, 24, and 52 weeks after randomization. The primary outcome was pain intensity (100-mm visual analog scale) during the treatment period. Secondary outcomes included fatigue, functioning, and health-related quality of life. We performed primarily intention-to-treat analyses adjusted for credibility, using multiple imputation for missing data. Results: In total, 101 patients (94% women) were included. Osteopathic treatment did not significantly decrease pain relative to sham treatment (mean difference during treatment: −2.2 mm; 95% confidence interval, −9.1 to 4.6 mm). No significant differences were observed for secondary outcomes. No serious adverse events were observed, despite a likely rebound in pain and altered functioning at week 12 in patients treated by osteopathy. Patient expectancy was predictive of pain during treatment, with a decrease of 12.9 mm (4.4–21.5 mm) per 10 points on the 0–30 scale. Treatment credibility and expectancy were also predictive of several secondary outcomes. Conclusion: Osteopathy conferred no benefit over sham treatment for pain, fatigue, functioning, and quality of life in patients with FM. These findings do not support the use of osteopathy to treat these patients. More attention should be paid to the expectancy of patients in FM management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joël Coste
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Unit, Cochin Hospital, Paris University, 27 rue du faubourg Saint-Jacques, Paris, 75014, France
| | - Terkia Medkour
- Pain Center, Cochin Hospital, Paris University, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Maigne
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marc Pérez
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Françoise Laroche
- Pain Department, Saint-Antoine University Hospital and Medical University Sorbonne, Paris, France
| | - Serge Perrot
- Pain Center, Cochin Hospital, Paris University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oddsson LIE, Bisson T, Cohen HS, Jacobs L, Khoshnoodi M, Kung D, Lipsitz LA, Manor B, McCracken P, Rumsey Y, Wrisley DM, Koehler-McNicholas SR. The Effects of a Wearable Sensory Prosthesis on Gait and Balance Function After 10 Weeks of Use in Persons With Peripheral Neuropathy and High Fall Risk - The walk2Wellness Trial. Front Aging Neurosci 2020; 12:592751. [PMID: 33240077 PMCID: PMC7680959 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.592751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sensory peripheral neuropathy (PN) is associated with gait, balance problems and high fall risk. The walk2Wellness trial investigates effects of long-term, home-based daily use of a wearable sensory prosthesis on gait function, balance, quality of life and fall rates in PN patients. The device (Walkasins®, RxFunction Inc., MN, United States) partially substitutes lost nerve function related to plantar sensation providing directional tactile cues reflecting plantar pressure measurements during standing and walking. We tested the null hypothesis that the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) score would remain unchanged after 10 weeks of use. METHODS Participants had PN with lost plantar sensation, gait and balance problems, an FGA score < 23 (high fall risk), and ability to sense tactile stimuli above the ankle. Clinical outcomes included FGA, Gait Speed, Timed Up&Go (TUG) and 4-Stage Balance Test. Patient-reported outcomes included Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, Vestibular Disorders Activities of Daily Living Scale, PROMIS participation and satisfaction scores, pain rating, and falls. Evaluations were performed at baseline and after 2, 6, and 10 weeks. Subjects were not made aware of changes in outcomes. No additional balance interventions were allowed. RESULTS Forty-five participants of 52 enrolled across four sites completed in-clinic assessments. FGA scores improved from 15.0 to 19.1 (p < 0.0001), normal and fast gait speed from 0.86 m/s to 0.95 m/s (p < 0.0001) and 1.24 m/s to 1.33 m/s (p = 0.002), respectively, and TUG from 13.8 s to 12.5 s (p = 0.012). Four-Stage Balance Test did not improve. Several patient-reported outcomes were normal at baseline and remained largely unchanged. Interestingly, subjects with baseline ABC scores lower than 67% (high fall risk cut-off) increased their ABC scores (49.9% to 59.3%, p = 0.01), whereas subjects with ABC scores above 67% showed a decrease (76.6% to 71.8%, p = 0.019). Subjects who reported falls in the prior 6 months (n = 25) showed a decrease in the number of fall-risk factors (5.1 to 4.3, p = 0.023) and a decrease in fall rate (13.8 to 7.4 falls/1000 days, p = 0.014). Four pre-study non-fallers (n = 20) fell during the 10 weeks. CONCLUSION A wearable sensory prosthesis presents a new way to treat gait and balance problems and manage falls in high fall-risk patients with PN. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT03538756).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars I. E. Oddsson
- RxFunction Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, United States
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Recaniti School for Community Health Professions, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheba, Israel
| | - Teresa Bisson
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- M Health Fairview, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | | | - Laura Jacobs
- RxFunction Inc., Eden Prairie, MN, United States
| | - Mohammad Khoshnoodi
- The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Doris Kung
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lewis A. Lipsitz
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Roslindale, MA, United States
- Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Brad Manor
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Roslindale, MA, United States
- Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | | | | | | | - Sara R. Koehler-McNicholas
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
- Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bechman K, Yates M, Norton S, Cope AP, Galloway JB. Placebo Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. J Rheumatol 2019; 47:28-34. [PMID: 31043548 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.190008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Understanding the placebo response is critical to interpreting treatment efficacy, particularly for agents with a ceiling to their therapeutic effect, where an increasing placebo response makes it harder to detect potential benefit. The objective of this study is to assess the change in placebo responses over time in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCT) for drug licensing authorization. METHODS The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register database was searched to identify RCT of biological or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in RA. Studies were excluded if patients were conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD)-naive, not receiving background csDMARD therapy, or were biologic experienced. Metaregression model was used to evaluate changes in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20, ACR50, and ACR70 treatment response over time. RESULTS There were 32 trials in total: anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy (n = 15), tocilizumab (n = 4), abatacept (n = 2), rituximab (n = 2), and Janus kinase inhibitors (n = 9). From 1999 to 2018, there was no significant trend in the age or sex of patients in the placebo arm. Disease duration, swollen joint count, and 28-joint count Disease Activity Score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate at baseline all significantly declined over time. There was a statistically significant increase in placebo ACR50 and ACR70 responses (ACR50 β = 0.41, 95% CI 0.09-0.74, p = 0.01; ACR70 β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.04-0.31, p = 0.01) that remained significant after controlling for potential confounders. CONCLUSION There has been a rise in the placebo response in RA clinical trials over the last 2 decades. Shifting RA phenotype, changes in trial design, and expectation bias are possible explanations for this phenomenon. This observation has important implications when evaluating newer novel agents against established therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Bechman
- From the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK. .,K. Bechman, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; M. Yates, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; S. Norton, PhD, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London; A. Cope, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; J.B. Galloway, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London.
| | - Mark Yates
- From the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.,K. Bechman, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; M. Yates, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; S. Norton, PhD, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London; A. Cope, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; J.B. Galloway, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London
| | - Sam Norton
- From the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.,K. Bechman, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; M. Yates, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; S. Norton, PhD, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London; A. Cope, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; J.B. Galloway, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London
| | - Andrew P Cope
- From the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.,K. Bechman, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; M. Yates, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; S. Norton, PhD, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London; A. Cope, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; J.B. Galloway, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London
| | - James B Galloway
- From the Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, and Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK.,K. Bechman, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; M. Yates, MBCHB, BSC, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; S. Norton, PhD, Psychology Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London; A. Cope, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London; J.B. Galloway, PhD, Department of Inflammation Biology, Academic Rheumatology, King's College London
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rossettini G, Carlino E, Testa M. Clinical relevance of contextual factors as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects in musculoskeletal pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19:27. [PMID: 29357856 PMCID: PMC5778801 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-1943-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Placebo and nocebo effects are embodied psycho-neurobiological responses capable of modulating pain and producing changes at different neurobiological, body at perceptual and cognitive levels. These modifications are triggered by different contextual factors (CFs) presented in the therapeutic encounter between patient and healthcare providers, such as healing rituals and signs. The CFs directly impact on the quality of the therapeutic outcome: a positive context, that is a context characterized by the presence of positive CFs, can reduce pain by producing placebo effects, while a negative context, characterized by the presence of negative CFs, can aggravate pain by creating nocebo effects. Despite the increasing interest about this topic; the detailed study of CFs as triggers of placebo and nocebo effects is still lacked in the management of musculoskeletal pain. Increasing evidence suggest a relevant role of CFs in musculoskeletal pain management. CFs are a complex sets of internal, external or relational elements encompassing: patient’s expectation, history, baseline characteristics; clinician’s behavior, belief, verbal suggestions and therapeutic touch; positive therapeutic encounter, patient-centered approach and social learning; overt therapy, posology of intervention, modality of treatment administration; marketing features of treatment and health care setting. Different explanatory models such as classical conditioning and expectancy can explain how CFs trigger placebo and nocebo effects. CFs act through specific neural networks and neurotransmitters that were described as mediators of placebo and nocebo effects. Available findings suggest a relevant clinical role and impact of CFs. They should be integrated in the clinical reasoning to increase the number of treatment solutions, boosts their efficacy and improve the quality of the decision-making. From a clinical perspective, the mindful manipulation of CFs represents a useful opportunity to enrich a well-established therapy in therapeutic setting within the ethical border. From a translational perspective, there is a strong need of research studies on CFs close to routine and real-world clinical practice in order to underline the uncertainty of therapy action and help clinicians to implement knowledge in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Rossettini
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona. Via Magliotto, 2, 17100, Savona, Italy
| | - Elisa Carlino
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona. Via Magliotto, 2, 17100, Savona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beauvais F. Possible contribution of quantum-like correlations to the placebo effect: consequences on blind trials. THEORETICAL BIOLOGY & MEDICAL MODELLING 2017; 14:12. [PMID: 28578662 PMCID: PMC5457621 DOI: 10.1186/s12976-017-0058-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2017] [Accepted: 05/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Background Factors that participate in the biological changes associated with a placebo are not completely understood. Natural evolution, mean regression, concomitant procedures and other non specific effects are well-known factors that contribute to the “placebo effect”. In this article, we suggest that quantum-like correlations predicted by a probabilistic modeling could also play a role. Results An elementary experiment in biology or medicine comparing the biological changes associated with two placebos is modeled. The originality of this modeling is that experimenters, biological system and their interactions are described together from the standpoint of a participant who is uninvolved in the measurement process. Moreover, the small random probability fluctuations of a “real” experiment are also taken into account. If both placebos are inert (with only different labels), common sense suggests that the biological changes associated with the two placebos should be comparable. However, the consequence of this modeling is the possibility for two placebos to be associated with different outcomes due to the emergence of quantum-like correlations. Conclusion The association of two placebos with different outcomes is counterintuitive and this modeling could give a framework for some unexplained observations where mere placebos are compared (in some alternative medicines for example). This hypothesis can be tested in blind trials by comparing local vs. remote assessment of correlations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Reginster JY, Dudler J, Blicharski T, Pavelka K. Pharmaceutical-grade Chondroitin sulfate is as effective as celecoxib and superior to placebo in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: the ChONdroitin versus CElecoxib versus Placebo Trial (CONCEPT). Ann Rheum Dis 2017; 76:1537-1543. [PMID: 28533290 PMCID: PMC5561371 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2016] [Revised: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 03/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Chondroitin sulfate 800 mg/day (CS) pharmaceutical-grade in the management of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis consistent with the European Medicines Agency guideline. Methods A prospective, randomised, 6-month, 3-arm, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo and celecoxib (200 mg/day)-controlled trial assessing changes in pain on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and in the Lequesne Index (LI) as coprimary endpoints. Minimal-Clinically Important Improvement (MCII), Patient-Acceptable Symptoms State (PASS) were used as secondary endpoints. Results 604 patients (knee osteoarthritis) diagnosed according to American College of Rheumalogy (ACR) criteria, recruited in five European countries and followed for 182 days. CS and celecoxib showed a greater significant reduction in pain and LI than placebo. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, pain reduction in VAS at day 182 in the CS group (−42.6 mm) and in celecoxib group (−39.5 mm) was significantly greater than the placebo group (−33.3 mm) (p=0.001 for CS and p=0.009 for celecoxib), while no difference observed between CS and celecoxib. Similar trend for the LI, as reduction in this metric in the CS group (−4.7) and celecoxib group (−4.6) was significantly greater than the placebo group (−3.7) (p=0.023 for CS and p=0.015 for celecoxib), no difference was observed between CS and celecoxib. Both secondary endpoints (MCII and PASS) at day 182 improved significantly in the CS and celecoxib groups. All treatments demonstrated excellent safety profiles. Conclusion A 800 mg/day pharmaceutical-grade CS is superior to placebo and similar to celecoxib in reducing pain and improving function over 6 months in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients. This formulation of CS should be considered a first-line treatment in the medical management of knee OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Yves Reginster
- Department of Public Health, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Liège State University, Liège, Belgium
| | - Jean Dudler
- HFR Fribourg, Hôpital Cantonal, Fribourg, Switzerland
| | | | - Karel Pavelka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|