MRI of the sacroiliac joints in athletes: recognition of non-specific bone marrow oedema by semi-axial added to standard semi-coronal scans

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Topography of Bone Marrow Edema in the Sacroiliac Joint of Postpartum Women

OBJECTIVE

A traditional monoplanar semicoronal and a biplanar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment method were used to compare the topographical distribution of postpartum strain-related bone marrow edema (BME) at the sacroiliac joint (SIJ).

METHODS

The presence and topographical location of SIJ BME were assessed independently by three readers in 71 women 12 months postpartum. A traditional monoplanar semicoronal and a biplanar BME evaluation by 8 (upper and lower) and 12 joint (upper, middle, and lower) regions, respectively, was performed with >4 weeks between the two assessments. Descriptive results were reported as mean ± SD and ranges, and interreader agreement by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

By semicoronal assessment, 38 (53.5%) women had BME with a mean ± SD SPARCC score of 2.3 ± 4.0 (range 0-22; ICC 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-0.94). Forty-one (57.8%) had BME by biplanar assessment with a mean ± SD sum score of 2.9 ± 5.8 (range 0-32.7; ICC 0.89, 95% CI 0.88-0.91). By semicoronal assessment, the highest frequency and mean SPARCC scores were in the anterior upper regions of ilium (24%, mean 0.6) and sacrum (21%, mean 0.3) followed by the posterior upper sacral (20%, mean 0.4) and posterior lower iliac (20%, mean 0.3) regions. By biplanar assessment, the anterior middle joint regions had highest BME frequency and sum scores, sacral side (32%, mean 1.9) and iliac side (27%, mean 2.0), respectively; frequencies and sum scores were generally higher in the anterior compared to the posterior joint regions.

CONCLUSION

The 12-region biplanar assessment revealed a predominantly anterior middle location of postpartum SIJ BME whereas the 8-region monoplanar approach did not demarcate distinct strain-prone SIJ regions. Complementing traditional monoplanar semicoronal SIJ MRI evaluation by a semiaxial assessment may facilitate discrimination of strain-related conditions from early axial spondyloarthritis.

The value of a repeat MRI examination of the sacroiliac joints following an inconclusive initial examination

OBJECTIVE

Assess the diagnostic utility of repeat sacroiliac joint (SIJ) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations following an inconclusive initial examination performed for suspected sacroiliitis.

METHOD

Subjects with > 1 SIJ MRI examinations, an inconclusive first scan and at least 6 months interval between scans, were included. All scans were evaluated for the presence of structural/active SIJ lesions as well as any other pathology. Clinical data was extracted from the patients' clinical files, and any missing data was obtained by a telephone interview. Diagnosis and active/structural scores were compared between first and follow-up examinations (t test).

RESULTS

Seventy-one subjects were included in the study, 77.4% females, mean age 41.0 ± 15 years, mean time interval between exams 30.4 ± 25.24 months. Twelve subjects performed > 2 scans. In only two subjects (2.81%), both females, MRI diagnosis changed from inconclusive to definite sacroiliitis. None of the subjects with > 2 scans had evidence of sacroiliitis in any of the following MRI examinations. Significant differences were observed between the scores of active SIJ lesion of the first and follow-up MRI (1.51/1.62, p = 0.02) but not for scores of structural lesions (1.22/1.68, p = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat SIJ MRI when the first MRI is inconclusive for sacroiliitis is more valuable in ruling out than in securing diagnosis of sacroiliitis. We suggest that when MRI findings are inconclusive, decision-making should be based on clinical data.

The sacroiliac joint across ages - what is normal?

The anatomy of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is complex with wide variations inter-individually as well as intra-individually (right versus left) and a frequent occurrence of anatomical variants. Besides, the joints are subject to strain, which may elicit non-inflammatory subchondral changes such as bone marrow edema (BME), sclerosis, and fat deposition simulating inflammatory SIJ changes. Furthermore, normal physiological changes during skeletal maturation can make interpretation of SIJ magnetic resonance imaging in children challenging. Knowledge about the wide range of normal findings is therefore important to avoid misinterpretation of findings as pathological. This review describes the current knowledge about normal SIJ findings across all ages.

Magnetic resonance imaging in spondyloarthritis: Friend or Foe?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a valuable tool for early detection and of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). A standardized imaging acquisition protocol, aligned with the current state-of-the-art, is crucial to obtain MRI scans that meet the diagnostic quality requirements. It is important to note that certain lesions, particularly bone marrow edema (BME), can be induced by mechanical stress or be a manifestation of another non-inflammatory disorder and may mimic the characteristic findings of axSpA on MRI. Therefore, a thorough assessment of MRI lesions, considering their localization and presence of highly specific features such as erosions and backfill, becomes imperative. Additionally, the application of additional imaging modalities, when necessary, can contribute to the differentiation of axSpA from other conditions that may exhibit similar MRI findings. This review provides recommendations on how to perform MRI in daily clinical practice and how to interpret finding from the differential diagnostic point of view.

Is it time to move on from pelvic radiography as the first-line imaging modality for suspected sacroiliitis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pelvic radiography in which structural lesions characteristic of sacroiliitis can be detected, is recommended as the first imaging modality when axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is suspected clinically. However, cross-sectional modalities like computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are superior to radiographs for diagnosing sacroiliitis. Thus, we currently debate the role of radiography as first imaging modality in the diagnostic workup of axSpA.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnosing sacroiliitis on pelvic radiographs is challenging with large interobserver and intraobserver variation. Low-dose CT (ldCT) of the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) was proved to be more sensitive and reliable than radiographs with comparable ionizing radiation exposure. MRI is the preferred modality for detecting early SIJ inflammation, well before structural lesions evolve. New, promising MRI sequences sensitive to cortical bone improve erosion detection, making MRI a one-stop shop for the diagnosis of sacroiliitis.

SUMMARY

Given the debatable additive value of pelvic radiographs for the detection of sacroiliitis, and the presence of excellent alternatives for imaging the bony cortex of the SIJs such as ldCT and MRI with state-of-the-art sequences sensitive to cortical bone, it is high time to discuss the use of these more accurate modalities instead of radiographs.

Axial Spondyloarthritis and Diagnostic Challenges: Over-diagnosis, Misdiagnosis, and Under-diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to review the challenges in axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis and identify the possible contributing factors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The inability to reach an accurate diagnosis in a timely fashion can lead to treatment delays and worse disease outcomes. The lack of validated diagnostic criteria and the misuse of the currently available classification criteria could be contributing. There is also significant inter-reader variability in interpreting images, and the radiologic definitions of axial spondyloarthritis continue to be re-defined to improve their positive predictive value. The role of inflammatory back pain features, serologic biomarkers, genetics, and their diagnostic contribution to axial spondyloarthritis continues to be investigated. There is still a significant amount of delay in the diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis. Appreciating the factors that contribute to this delay is of utmost importance to close the gap. It is similarly important to recognize other conditions that may present with symptoms that mimic axial spondyloarthritis so that misdiagnosis and wrong treatment can be avoided.

Diagnostics of Sacroiliac Joint Differentials to Axial Spondyloarthritis Changes by Magnetic Resonance Imaging

The diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is usually based on a pattern of imaging and clinical findings due to the lack of diagnostic criteria. The increasing use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) to establish the diagnosis early in the pre-radiographic phase has resulted in a shift in the paradigm with an increasing frequency of axSpA diagnoses and a changed sex distribution. Non-radiographic axSpA affects males and females nearly equally, whereas ankylosing spondylitis predominantly occurs in males. The MRI-based increasing frequency of axSpA in women is mainly due to the presence of subchondral bone marrow edema (BME) on fluid-sensitive MR sequences, which may be a non-specific finding in both women and men. Due to the somewhat different pelvic tilt and SIJ anatomy, women are more prone than men to develop strain-related MRI changes and may have pregnancy-related changes. Awareness of non-specific subchondral BME at the SIJ is important as it can imply a risk for an incorrect SpA diagnosis, especially as the clinical manifestations of axSpA may also be non-specific. Knowledge of relevant MRI and clinical features of differential diagnoses is needed in the diagnostic workout of patients with suspected axSpA considering that non-SpA-related SIJ conditions are more common in patients with low back or buttock pain than axSpA sacroiliitis. The purpose of this review was to present current knowledge of the most frequent differential diagnoses to axSpA sacroiliitis by MRI taking the clinical characteristics into account.

Magnetic resonance imaging findings related to sacroiliac joint pain in high-performance athletes

BACKGROUND

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in athletes affects competitiveness. However, the pathology and imaging features have not been clarified.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the association between SIJ pain and MRI findings in high-performance athletes.

METHODS

Fifty-two Japanese high-performance athletes with or without SIJ pain were recruited. MRI short tau inversion recovery (STIR) semi-coronal and semi-axial images of their SIJs were taken. The relationships between high-signal changes in MRI-STIR and SIJ pain and pain duration were investigated. Six athletes with continuous SIJ pain were prospectively followed.

RESULTS

The proportion of athletes with high-signal changes in the SIJ was significantly higher among athletes with SIJ pain for one month or more (76.9%, 10/13) than among athletes with SIJ pain for less than one month (18.2%, 2/11) and among athletes without SIJ pain (28.6%, 8/28). High-signal changes on painful SIJs were most often present in the sacrum. In three of the six athletes who were prospectively followed, the high-signal area and intensity on MRI both diminished as their symptoms improved.

CONCLUSIONS

High-signal changes of the SIJ on MRI-STIR images in high-performance athletes may reflect their SIJ pain.

Frequency and anatomic distribution of magnetic resonance imaging lesions in the sacroiliac joints of spondyloarthritis and non-spondyloarthritis patients

Background

Lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac joints are critical to the diagnosis of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. However, inflammatory and structural lesions may be encountered in other conditions.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the frequency and localization of inflammatory and structural lesions on MRIs of the sacroiliac joint of spondyloarthritis (SpA) and non-spondyloarthritis (non-SpA) patients.

Design

This is a retrospective study including 200 patients, each having undergone an MRI of the sacroiliac joints.

Methods

Two experienced readers evaluated the whole set of images to detect erosions, subchondral sclerosis, fatty lesions, bone marrow edema (BME) and ankylosis according to the definitions established by the ASAS MRI working group. We divided sacroiliac joints into five segments: upper, antero-middle, intermediate-middle, postero-middle and lower.

Results

A total of 96 subjects with SpA (mean age 37.4 ± 11.8 years) and 104 without SpA (mean age 39.9 ± 11.6 years) were included. Of the 96 SpA patients, 65% had inflammatory buttock pain compared with 25% in the non-SpA group. BME was seen in 65% of SpA patients, mainly in the intermediate-middle segment, and in 20% of non-SpA patients, predominantly in the antero-middle segment. Subchondral sclerosis occurred in 44% of non-SpA patients, mostly in the antero-middle segment, and in 36% of SpA patients. Fatty lesions were present in 34% of SpA and in 21% of non-SpA patients. Erosions were seen in 25% of non-SpA and in 60% of SpA patients. BME and structural lesions were minimally observed in the postero-middle segment in non-SpA patients.

Conclusion

Inflammatory and structural lesions were observed in all segments of the joint in SpA, mainly in the middle segments, while lesions predominantly affected the antero-middle segment in non-SpA, and were uncommon in the postero-middle segment.

Pregnancy-related sacroiliac joint findings in females with low back pain: a four-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy-related pain may be associated with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) changes, detectable by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PURPOSE

To analyze the prevalence and course of SIJ MRI and clinical findings in women referred with low back pain and relate these to pregnancy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective follow-up study from a longitudinally collected cohort comprising 328 women.

RESULTS

Women reporting debut of pain in relation to a pregnancy (PP group) tended to have a higher baseline prevalence of all investigated MRI findings, cumulated positive SIJ tests, and a potential fulfilment of the spondyloarthritis diagnosis compared to remainders. The prevalence of subchondral bone marrow edema (BME), any SIJ MRI finding, and potential fulfilment of the spondyloarthritis diagnosis were significantly higher in the PP group compared to women who had not been pregnant. In the total study group, the prevalence of ≥1 MRI finding increased over the four-year study period from 34% to 47% (P<0.001), driven by increasing prevalence of BME (25% to 32%; P=0.008) and fatty marrow deposition (FMD) (20% to 25%; P=0.020). In addition, the BME volume score increased. Over time, the PP group had persisting high prevalence of buttock pain and total MRI findings and their FMD volume score increased, but there were no between-group differences in MRI variables at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the prevalence of MRI findings increased over time. Although the PP group had different clinical and SIJ MRI characteristics cross-sectional at baseline compared to remainders, longitudinal analyses revealed that these diminished over time.

Prevalence of sacroiliitis among patients referred for hip MR arthrography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of sacroiliitis among patients who have been referred for MR arthrography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective search identified 130 consecutive MR arthrograms of the hip performed on a 1.5T Siemens Avanto at our institution from August 2013 to August 2014. Four studies were excluded due to the absence of a coronal short tau inversion recovery sequence of the pelvis, leaving 126 studies for analysis. A musculoskeletal radiology fellow and three attending musculoskeletal radiologists reviewed the images for the presence of bone marrow edema affecting the sacroiliac joints. Only cases of bone marrow edema meeting the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society definition were considered positive. The two-tailed Fisher's exact test was used to compare the prevalence of positive MRI findings among age and gender groups. GraphPad InStat (GraphPad Software) was used for statistical calculations.

RESULTS

Patients less than 40 years of age demonstrated a statistically higher prevalence of positive MRI findings of sacroiliitis when compared to patients older than 40 (p = 0.0082). No difference in prevalence was found between genders. Overall prevalence of MRI signal alteration suggestive of sacroiliitis as defined by the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society was 4.8%. Among the six patients with positive findings, two were subsequently diagnosed with spondyloarthritis.

CONCLUSION

Hip pain may be a presenting symptom of spondyloarthritis and attention should be paid to the sacroiliac joints during screening examinations, particularly in patients less than 40 years of age.

Differences in topographical location of sacroiliac joint MRI lesions in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis and mechanical back pain

Background

Early diagnostics of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) remains a challenge. Traditional imaging one-plane sacroiliac joint (SIJ) MRI assessment is used. By introducing a two-plane assessment system, the objective was to analyse the differences in SIJ MRI changes in early axSpA compared with changes in patients with mechanical back pain (MBP) by exploring the differences in volume and location.

Methods

MRIs in the early diagnostic state of 25 axSpA patients (mean age 31.3 years) and 59 MBP patients (mean age 32.3 years) were included. The MRIs were assessed by two readers regarding the distribution of bone marrow edema (BME) in 14 joint portions and structural changes in six joint portions in addition to SIJ anatomical variations and lumbar spine disc degeneration.

Results

AxSpA patients had a significantly higher overall BME sumscore (volume) of 25.1 compared to MBP patients 6.8, p < 0.005. The MBP group had the highest prevalence (66%) and sumscore (5.7) in the middle anterior sacrum. The axSpA group had significantly higher prevalence and sumscores in all joint portions except the three cartilaginous anterior sacral joint portions, including the ligamentous compartments (prevalence 40–60% compared to 8–15%, p both < 0.005). The axSpA group had also a significantly higher prevalence of erosions and fatty marrow disposition, but there were no differences in the prevalence of anatomical variations except the bipartite iliac bony plate.

Conclusions

AxSpA patients demonstrated a widespread distribution of both inflammatory and structural changes, including high BME occurrence in the ligamentous joint portions whereas patients with MBP had the highest occurrence of BME in the middle anterior sacrum. These findings may help differentiate axSpA patients from other back pain conditions in the early diagnostic phase.

Anatomical variation at the sacroiliac joints in young adults: estimated prevalence by CT and concomitant diagnostics by MRI

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of atypical anatomical morphologies at the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) in young adults by CT and analyze the diagnostic ability of MRI to detect the variations in addition to concomitant MRI findings that could be misdiagnosed as inflammatory changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample constituted CT examinations of 155 individuals aged 18-40 years and prospectively collected comparative SIJ MRI examinations of 49, who also filled out a questionnaire on back and buttock pain. The CT and MRIs were analyzed by two musculoskeletal radiologists regarding seven SIJ variations and additional subchondral bone marrow edema (BME) by MRI.

RESULTS

CT and MRI interobserver agreements were good or very good for most variations. Mean age of the 155 individuals was 28 years, 99 (64%) were males; 88 (57%) had at least one SIJ variation, and most frequent were dysmorphic cartilaginous joint facets (n = 33, 21%), bipartite iliac bony plate (n = 27, 17%), accessory SIJ (n = 24, 16%), and iliosacral complex (n = 18, 12%), with a female predominance of all variations. The ability of MRI to detect the frequent variations was satisfying. Dysmorphic cartilaginous joint facets, accessory SIJ, and iliosacral complex were frequently observed in individuals reporting symptoms and were accompanied by BME, often located anteriorly in sacrum/inferiorly in ilium.

CONCLUSION

Atypical SIJ morphology is frequent in young adults, especially females, demanding further research into the anatomical natural variation. Most of the variations were detectable by MRI and three variations warrant further exploration as they often were accompanied by symptoms and/or BME.

MRI in axial spondyloarthritis: understanding an 'ASAS-positive MRI' and the ASAS classification criteria

In 2009, the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) published a definition of 'active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis'. This new definition of an 'ASAS-positive MRI' was integral to new classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis that were published in the same year. The ASAS MRI definition had the considerable advantage of simplicity and the definition gained popularity as guidance for interpreting MRI of the sacroiliac joints in clinical practice. However, classification criteria are not designed for use in clinical practice with the consequence that overreliance on the presence of bone marrow edema, which is the principal determinant of an 'ASAS-positive MRI', may result in a tendency to overcall inflammatory sacroiliitis in the clinical setting. This article aims to inform the reader about the rationale behind the ASAS definition of a positive MRI and ASAS classification criteria, their proper use in research and why they should not be used in clinical practice. The article also contains guidance for an updated imaging protocol and interpretation of images including typical imaging findings, differential diagnosis, and common pitfalls.

Inflammatory Arthropathy in the Elite Sports Athlete

ABSTRACT

Elite athletes commonly present with joint pains that are attributed to overuse injuries though on occasion it can be due to an inflammatory arthropathy. The diagnostic challenge is that presenting symptoms of benign injuries are similar to inflammatory arthropathies. A holistic review of the athlete can provide clues suggestive of inflammatory arthropathy, before requesting further investigations to confirm the diagnosis. Current imaging modalities are not specific in differentiating inflammatory arthritis with other causes of joint inflammation. Prompt treatment is required to restore the athlete to an optimum level of activity and prevent career ending disability, all in adherence to the regulations of the sporting governing bodies. This review aims to highlight the importance of inflammatory arthropathy in the differentials for an athlete presenting with joint pains.

Main Diagnostic Pitfalls in Reading the Sacroiliac Joints on MRI

Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints is now frequently performed to help identify patients with early axial spondyloarthritis. However, differential diagnoses exist and should be recognized. The aim of this article is to review the most frequent differential diagnoses that may mimic inflammatory sacroiliitis in clinical practice.

Recent Updates in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis

Spondyloarthritis represents a group of disorders characterized by enthesitis and axial skeletal involvement. Juvenile spondyloarthritis begins before age 16. Joint involvement is usually asymmetric. Bone marrow edema on noncontrast MRI of the sacroiliac joints can facilitate diagnosis. The most significant risk factor for axial disease is HLA-B27. Most patients have active disease into adulthood. Enthesitis and sacroiliitis correlate with greater pain intensity and poor quality-of-life measures. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors are the mainstay of biologic therapy. Although other biologics such as IL-17 blockers have shown benefit in adult spondyloarthritis, none are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

Quantification of Bone Marrow Edema by MRI of the Sacroiliac Joints in Patients Diagnosed with Axial Spondyloarthritis: Results from the ESPeranza Cohort

Objective: To evaluate whether the quantification of bone marrow edema (BMO) of the sacroiliac (SI) joints by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) improves capacity for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) classification in comparison with the assessment of sacroiliitis by Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria.Method: This prospective study from the ESPeranza cohort involved 66 subjects with an available MRI of the SI joints at baseline. This subgroup includes patients with axSpA (n = 28), peripheral spondyloarthritis (n = 10), and other diagnoses that were not spondyloarthritis (n = 28). Measures of diagnostic usefulness [area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, Youden's J statistic, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-)] were calculated for MRI of the SI joints according to ASAS criteria and for MRI quantified by means of SCAISS (Spanish tool for semi-automatic quantification of sacroiliac inflammation by MRI in spondyloarthritis). This analysis was stratified in patients who were human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 positive and negative.Results: The AUC value with BMO quantification was 0.919 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.799-1] for HLA-B27-positive patients and 0.884 (95% CI 0.764-1) for HLA-B27-negative patients. A SCAISS cut-off point of 80 units obtained a specificity of 94.4% and LR+ 7.5, while assessment by ASAS criteria showed a specificity value of 90% and LR+ 6.4.Conclusion: For patients with suspected axSpA, quantification of BMO improves the predictive capacity of MRI of the SI joints, for both HLA-B27-positive and HLA-B27-negative patients.Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) has a dramatic impact on physical function and quality of life (1). Despite its significant impact, patients with axSpA are normally diagnosed several years after presenting symptoms (2). In this respect, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the sacroiliac (SI) joints has gained significance over the past decade, particularly in the early stages of the disease. Nowadays, imaging tests and human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-B27 testing are among the most important diagnostic procedures for patients with suspected axSpA.

Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis: What is Relevant for Diagnosis in Daily Practice?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore how imaging may assist diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis in rheumatology practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

A diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis is based on pattern recognition by synthesizing clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. In health care settings providing low threshold access to advanced imaging, sacroiliac joint MRI is the preferred imaging modality in clinically suspected axial spondyloarthritis. In daily routine, the optimum protocol to assess suspected inflammatory back pain combines sacroiliac joint and spine MRI fitting a 30-min slot. Contextual assessment of concomitant structural and active MRI lesions is key to enhance diagnostic utility. In women with postpartum back pain suggestive of axial spondyloarthritis, recent reports advocate waiting 6-12 months after delivery before acquiring sacroiliac joint MRI. Major unmet needs are consistent MRI protocols, standardized training modules on how to evaluate axial MRI, and timely dissemination of imaging advances into mainstream practice both in rheumatology and in radiology. In rheumatology practice, MRI has become indispensable to help diagnose early axial spondyloarthritis. However, major gaps in training and knowledge transfer to daily care need to be closed.

Axial Spondyloarthritis: Mimics and Pitfalls of Imaging Assessment

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disorder that predominantly involves the axial skeleton. Imaging findings of axSpA can be divided into active changes, which include bone marrow edema, synovitis, enthesitis, capsulitis, and intra-articular effusion, and structural changes, which include erosions, sclerosis, bone fatty infiltration, fat deposition in an erosion cavity, and bone bridging or ankylosis. The ability to distinguish between imaging lesions suggestive of axSpA and artifacts or lesions suggestive of other disorders is critical for the accurate diagnosis of axSpA. Diagnosis may be challenging, particularly in early-stage disease and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a key role in the detection of subtle or inflammatory changes. MRI also allows the detection of structural changes in the subchondral bone marrow that are not visible on conventional radiography and is of prognostic and monitoring value. However, bone structural changes are more accurately depicted using computed tomography. Conventional radiography, on the other hand, has limitations, but it is easily accessible and may provide insight on gross changes as well as rule out other pathological features of the axial skeleton. This review outlines the imaging evaluation of axSpA with a focus on imaging mimics and potential pitfalls when assessing the axial skeleton.

Influence of pregnancy/childbirth on long-term bone marrow edema and subchondral sclerosis of sacroiliac joints

OBJECTIVE

To investigate long-term effects of pregnancy/childbirth on bone marrow edema (BME) and subchondral sclerosis of sacroiliac joints (SIJ) in comparison to MRI changes caused by spondyloarthritis (SpA) and assess the influence of birth method and number of children on SIJ-MRI changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study with 349 women (mean age 47 ± 14 years) suffering low back pain. Four subgroups were formed based on SpA diagnosis and childbirth (CB) history. Two musculoskeletal radiologists scored the presence of BME and sclerosis on SIJ-MRI using the Berlin method. Further, an 11-point "global assessment score" representing the overall confidence of SpA diagnosis based on MRI was evaluated in addition to the ASAS (Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society) criterion of "positive MRI" for sacroiliitis.

RESULTS

CB did not correlate with BME score (p = 0.38), whereas SpA diagnosis was associated with a higher BME score (r = 0.31, p < 0.001). Both CB (r = 0.21, p < 0.001) and SpA diagnosis (r = 0.33, p < 0.001) were correlated with a higher sclerosis score. CB was not associated with a higher confidence level in diagnosing SpA based on MRI (p = 0.07), whereas SpA diagnosis was associated with a higher score (r = 0.61, p < 0.001). Both CB (phi = 0.13, p = 0.02) and SpA diagnosis (phi = 0.23, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with a positive ASAS criterion for sacroiliitis. In non-SpA patients with CB, number of children (p = 0.001) was an independent predictor of sclerosis score, while birth method yielded no significant effect (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy/CB has no impact on long-term BME on SIJ, however, may cause long-term subchondral sclerosis-similar to SpA-associated sclerosis. Number of children is positively correlated with SIJ sclerosis. Birth method yields no effect on SIJ sclerosis.

Axial spondyloarthritis: concept, construct, classification and implications for therapy

The axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) disease concept has undergone substantial change from when the entity ankylosing spondylitis was defined by the modified New York criteria in 1984. Developments in imaging, therapy and genetics have all contributed to changing the concept of axSpA from one of erosions in the sacroiliac joints to a spectrum of disease with and without changes evident on plain radiographs. Changes to the previously held concept and construct of the disease have also necessitated new classification criteria. The use of MRI, primarily of the sacroiliac joints, has substantially altered the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of axSpA. Many in the axSpA community believe that the current classification criteria lack specificity, and the CLASSIC study is underway to examine this area. Although much about the evolving axSpA disease concept is universally agreed, there remains disagreement about operationalizing aspects of it, such as the requirement for the objective demonstration of axial inflammation for the classification of axSpA. New imaging technologies, biomarkers and genetics data will probably necessitate ongoing revision of axSpA classification criteria. Advances in our knowledge of the biology of axSpA will settle some differences in opinion as to how the disease concept is applied to the classification and diagnosis of patients.