Complex relationships between inflammatory manifestations/type 1 and type 2 symptoms in systemic lupus erythematosus: A narrative literature review

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have highlighted that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by different types of symptoms: type 1 symptoms related to inflammation and disease activity and type 2 symptoms such as fatigue, anxiety-depression, and pain. Our aim was to investigate the relation between type 1 and type 2 symptoms, and their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in SLE.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted about disease activity/type1 and type 2 symptoms. Articles in English published after 2000 were located on Medline via Pubmed. The articles chosen evaluated at least one type 2 symptom or HRQoL using a validated scale in adult patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 182 articles were analyzed and 115 were retained including 21 randomized, controlled trials and corresponding to 36 831 patients. We found that in SLE, inflammatory activity/type 1 symptoms were mostly uncorrelated with type 2 symptoms and/or HRQoL. Several studies even showing an inverse relationship. No or weak correlation was observed in 85, 3% (92, 6%), 76, 7% (74, 4%) and 37, 5% (73, 1%) of studies (patients) for fatigue, anxiety-depression, and pain, respectively. For HRQoL, no or weak correlation was observed in 77, 5% of studies (88% of patients).

CONCLUSION

Type 2 symptoms are poorly correlated with inflammatory activity/type 1 symptoms in SLE. Possible explanations and implications for clinical care and therapeutic evaluation are discussed.

Categorization of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using disease activity, patient-reported outcomes, and transcriptomic signatures

OBJECTIVE

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) display symptoms that are not always related to disease activity and may distort clinical trial results. Recently, a clinical categorization based on the presence of type 1 (inflammatory manifestations) and/or type 2 (widespread pain, fatigue, depression) symptoms has been proposed in SLE. Our aim was to develop a type 2 score derived from the Short-Form health survey (SF-36) to categorize SLE patients and to compare immunological and transcriptomic profiles between groups.

METHOD

Seventeen items from the SF-36 were selected to build a type 2 score for 50 SLE patients (100 visits; LUPUCE cohort), and the SLEDAI was used to define type 1 symptoms. Patients were categorized into four groups: minimal (no symptoms), type 1, type 2, and mixed (both type 1 and type 2 symptoms). Clinical, immunological, and transcriptomic profiles were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Type 2 scores ranged from 0 to 31, with a cutoff value of 14 (75th percentile). The sample categorization was minimal in 39%, type 1 in 37%, and type 2 in 9%, and mixed in 15%. Type 2 patients were older than minimal patients and had a longer disease duration than type 1 and mixed patients. Immunological data and modular interferon signatures did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients with SLE can be categorized into four clinical groups using the SLEDAI score and our SF-36-derived type 2 score. This categorization is non-redundant with immunological or transcriptomic profiles and could prove useful to stratify patients in clinical trials. Key Points • A score derived from selected items of the SF-36 can be used to identify SLE patients with type 2 symptoms according to the Duke University categorization. • Using the SLEDAI and this type 2 score, SLE patients can be categorized into four clinical groups. • This categorization is not related to immunological activity or blood transcriptome profiles (and not to the interferon signature in particular). • This categorization could be useful in the daily care of patients as well as in clinical trials, for upstream patient stratification or for the interpretation of results.

Quality of life measures in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A systematic review

In this study we systematically investigated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) tools, which have been most often used over the last five years to evaluate the QoL in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), focusing on their items and applications. A detailed literature search was conducted: the inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) studies including at least 50 patients; 2) studies including at least 25 patients with SLE; 3) quality of life testing with validated measures. The systematic review was based on 119 studies for a total of 32,449 SLE patients and 3092 controls. A total of 35 different patients-reported quality of life measures, applied in cohorts of patients with SLE, were retrieved with the 36-item Medical Outcome Short Form (SF-36) (63 studies of 119 =52.95%), Lupus Quality of Life (LupusQoL) (17 studies =14.3%) and Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome (LupusPRO) (12 studies =10%) being the most commonly used tools. Overall, this systematic review of the literature indicated that quality of life in patients with SLE appears to be poor and generally lower compared to both the general population and patients with other chronic conditions, as was shown by a few studies that used SF-36 and LupusPRO. The use of HRQoL scoring in SLE is gaining increasing interest and is used both in randomized controlled trials and in real-life. Future efforts are needed to improve the understanding of the impact of the disease burden on quality of life from the patient’s perspective.

Serum IgG2 antibody multicomposition in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis (Part 1): cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVES

Serum anti-dsDNA and anti-nucleosome IgGs have been proposed as signatures for SLE and LN in limited numbers of patients. We sought to show higher sensitivity and specificity of the same antibodies with the IgG2 isotype and included IgG2 antibodies vs specific intracellular antigens in the analysis.

METHODS

A total of 1052 SLE patients with (n = 479) and without (n = 573) LN, recruited at different times from the beginning of symptoms, were included in the study. Patients with primary APS (PAPS, n = 24), RA (RA, n = 24) and UCTD (UCTD, n = 96) were analysed for comparison. Anti-nucleosome (dsDNA, Histone2A, Histone3), anti-intracellular antigens (ENO1), anti-annexin A1 and anti-C1q IgG2 were determined by non-commercial techniques.

RESULTS

The presence in the serum of the IgG2 panel was highly discriminatory for SLE/LN vs healthy subjects. Serum levels of anti-dsDNA and anti-C1q IgG2 were more sensitive than those of IgGs (Farr radioimmunoassay/commercial assays) in identifying SLE patients at low-medium increments. Of more importance, serum positivity for anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A IgG2 discriminated between LN and SLE (ROC T0-12 months), and high levels at T0-1 month were detected in 63% and 67%, respectively, of LN, vs 3% and 3%, respectively, of SLE patients; serum positivity for each of these was correlated with high SLEDAI values. Minor differences existed between LN/SLE and the other rheumatologic conditions.

CONCLUSION

Nephritogenic IgG2 antibodies represent a specific signature of SLE/LN, with a few overlaps with other rheumatologic conditions. High levels of anti-ENO1 and anti-H2A IgG2 correlated with SLE activity indexes and were discriminatory between SLE patients limited to the renal complication and other SLE patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Zeus study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02403115.

Relationship between disease activity, organ damage and health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: A systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a common systemic autoimmune disease that may lead to considerable physical, psychological, and socioeconomical burden. In previous studies, inconsistent results were reported for the association of disease activity and organ damage with health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This paper aimed to explore the relationship between disease activity, organ damage, and HRQoL measured by SF-36, EQ-5D, LupusQoL, and LupusPRO and investigate whether the correlation is region-specific.

METHODS

We systematically searched for studies reporting the association between SLE disease activity, organ damage, and HRQoL in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, World of Science, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL from inception to December 2019. A meta-analysis and region subgroup analysis were performed with a random-effects model to estimate pooled correlation coefficients and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Forty articles were included representing of 6079 adult SLE patients. The meta-analysis of SF-36 and LupusPRO studies revealed mild to moderate negative correlations between disease activity and domains of these HRQoL measurements (correlation coefficient r ranging from -0.27 to -0.07). Likewise, negative correlations were found between organ damage and domains of SF-36 and LupusPRO (r ranging from -0.25 to -0.08). The pooled correlation coefficient is relatively higher in physical functioning related domains than mental health. In the region subgroup analysis, disease activity had strong negative correlations with SF-36 domains in African and European SLE patients, while organ damage had the strongest negative correlation with SF-36 domains in Asian SLE patients (p < 0.010).

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of the relationship between disease activity, organ damage, and four popular HRQoL instruments, which provides useful insight into the target therapy in SLE management.