MRP8/14 and neutrophil elastase for predicting treatment response and occurrence of flare in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Diagnostic accuracy of serum calprotectin measured by CLIA and EIA in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a proof-of-concept study

Objective

C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) are used to assess disease activity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, because these biomarkers do not always differentiate between active and inactive disease, there is a need for alternative markers such as serum calprotectin (sCal). The main aim of this proof-of-concept study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of sCal in patients with JIA. Secondary aims were to identify the optimal sCal cut-off levels to define active disease and evaluate the association between these biomarkers and disease activity status.

Methods

Serum samples were obtained from 25 pediatric patients with JIA. Serum calprotectin levels were determined by two different assays, the QUANTA FLASH chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) from Inova Diagnostics and the solid-phase enzyme immunoassay (EIA) from Bühlmann Laboratories. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed for sCal CLIA, sCal EIA, CRP, and ESR. The results obtained by the CLIA and EIA methodologies were compared. We also evaluated the association between the individual each biomarkers (sCal CLIA, sCal EIA, CRP, and ESR) and disease activity (according to JADAS-27 criteria and the ACR criteria modified by Anink and colleagues).

Results

For both sCal assays (CLIA and EIA), the optimal cut-off level (ROC analysis) was the same (2.3 µg/ml). Serum calprotectin levels measured by CLIA and EIA were strongly correlated with each other (Kendall's tau-b, 0.71; p < 0.001). Compared to ESR and CRP, sCal CLIA and EIA were both more accurate (i.e., greater sensitivity) in identifying patients with active disease. By contrast, ESR and CRP were more effective in identifying patients in remission (i.e., better specificity).

Conclusion

This proof-of-concept study shows that determination of serum calprotectin levels with CLIA or EIA can accurately identify the presence of active disease in patients with JIA.

Pre-treatment calprotectin (MRP8/14) provides no added value to testing CRP alone in terms of predicting response to TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis in a post hoc analysis

OBJECTIVES

The inflammatory protein calprotectin (MRP8/14) has been identified as a promising biomarker of treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Our aim was to test MRP8/14 as a biomarker of response to tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitors in the largest RA cohort to date and to compare with C-reactive protein (CRP).

METHODS

Serum MRP8/14 was measured in 470 patients with RA about to commence treatment with adalimumab (n=196) or etanercept (n=274). Additionally, MRP8/14 was measured in the 3-month sera of 179 adalimumab-treated patients. Response was determined using European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria calculated using the traditional 4-component (4C) DAS28-CRP and alternate validated versions using 3-component (3C) and 2-component (2C), clinical disease activity index (CDAI) improvement criteria and change in individual outcome measures. Logistic/linear regression models were fitted for response outcome.

RESULTS

In the 3C and 2C models, patients with RA were 1.92 (CI: 1.04 to 3.54) and 2.03 (CI: 1.09 to 3.78) times more likely to be classified as EULAR responders if they had high (75th quartile) pre-treatment levels of MRP8/14 compared with low (25th quartile). No significant associations were observed for the 4C model. When only using CRP as a predictor, in the 3C and 2C analyses, patients above the 75th quartile were 3.79 (CI: 1.81 to 7.93) and 3.58 (CI: 1.74 to 7.35) times more likely to be EULAR responders and addition of MRP8/14 did not significantly improve model fit (p values=0.62 and 0.80, respectively). No significant associations were observed in the 4C analysis. Exclusion of CRP from the outcome measure (CDAI) did not result in any significant associations with MRP8/14 (OR 1.00 (CI: 0.99 to 1.01), suggesting that the associations were due to the correlation with CRP and that there is no additional utility of MRP8/14 beyond use of CRP in patients with RA starting TNFi therapy.

CONCLUSION

Beyond correlation with CRP, we found no evidence to suggest that MRP8/14 explains additional variability in response to TNFi in patients with RA over and above CRP alone.

The Role of Serum Calprotectin in Defining Disease Outcomes in Non-Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Pilot Study

Serum calprotectin (MRP8/14) is currently being studied as a promising biomarker of disease activity and outcome in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) but the data in the literature are conflicting. The aim of our study was to investigate the potential role of serum calprotectin as biomarker of disease activity and flare/remission in a group of nsJIA patients during a follow-up period of 18 months. In this prospective longitudinal study, two groups of patients with ns-JIA (55 active patients and 56 patients in remission according to Wallace's criteria) and a control group (50 children) were recruited at baseline from January 2020 to September 2021. JIA patients were followed for up to 18 months at four timepoints: 3 months (T1), 6 months (T2), 12 months (T3) and 18 months (T4). At each timepoint, the following were recorded: JADAS27, blood counts, ESR, CRP, albumin, ferritin and serum calprotectin. To illustrate the performance of calprotectin, Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed from baseline to relapse/remission, dichotomizing patients at baseline in positive/negative on the basis progressive calprotectin cut-offs. Associations between baseline factors and relapse were determined using Cox regression models. Multivariate models were constructed to analyze the effect of covariates. Comparing baseline clinical and laboratory data of the three groups (active vs. inactive JIA vs. controls), only serum calprotectin reached statistical significance (active patients vs. inactive (p = 0.0016) and vs. controls (p = 0.0012)). In the inactive group, during the 18 months of follow up, 31 patients (55.3%) had a relapse. Comparing the baseline data of relapsers vs. non-relapsers, serum calprotectin showed higher levels (p = 0.001) in relapsers. In survival analysis, a log rank test showed significant differences of up to 12 ng/mL (p = 0.045). Multivariate Cox regression confirmed that only baseline calprotectin levels were independently associated with disease recurrence. In the active group, in the 12 months of follow-up, 19 patients (38%) entered remission of the disease. In addition, in this group, the only statistical difference at the baseline was the value of MPR8/14 (p = 0.0001). Log rank test showed significant differences up to 10 ng/mL (p = 0.003). In the multivariate Cox regression, serum calprotectin levels at baseline were independently associated with remission. In conclusion, our study would suggest a dual role for calprotectin in predicting future relapse and treatment response in patients with nsJIA, thus influencing therapeutic decisions and management of these patients during follow up.

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor serum levels facilitate prediction of relapses in subgroups of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

OBJECTIVES

JIA is characterised by a chronic disease course. Once patients achieve a state of inactive disease, there are no established biomarkers to predict the further course of inflammation for these patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to quantify serum biomarkers during quiescent disease to evaluate their use in identifying JIA patients at risk for future disease flare.

METHODS

Patients with non-systemic JIA reaching inactive disease status were divided into two groups: 92 patients with future active disease after a median period of 6 months (range 3-9) and 80 patients with persistent inactive disease for the following period (median 11 months, range 7-16) according to the juvenile arthritis DAS (JADAS). Clinical parameters and serum levels of various biomarkers were measured in the state of inactive disease using immunoassays in both groups and were analysed for their potential to predict the further course of disease.

RESULTS

Soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) serum levels were significantly higher in patients with future active disease (P = 0.021), which especially applied to patients with RF-negative polyarticular and extended oligoarticular JIA (P < 0.001). Higher sIL-2R serum levels during inactive disease were associated with a greater number of active joints at future active disease.

CONCLUSION

Patients without clinical signs of disease activity already presented with increased sIL-2R serum levels several months before disease relapses, whereas conventional inflammation parameters were not elevated. Determination of sIL-2R serum levels during inactive disease may facilitate identifying patients with subclinical disease activity at risk for future active disease.

Immunometabolic Analysis of Synovial Fluid from Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is an inflammatory rheumatic disorder. Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) are present in JIA synovial fluid (SF), but with variable frequency. SF PMNs in JIA were previously shown to display high exocytic but low phagocytic and immunoregulatory activities. To further assess whether the degree of SF neutrophilia associated with altered immune responses in JIA, we collected SF and blood from 16 adolescent JIA patients. SF and blood leukocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry. SF and plasma were used for immune mediator quantification and metabolomics. Healthy donor blood T cells were cultured in SF to evaluate its immunoregulatory activities. PMN and T cell frequencies were bimodal in JIA SF, delineating PMN high/T cell low (PMNHigh) and PMN low/T cell high (PMNLow) samples. Proinflammatory mediators were increased in SF compared with plasma across patients, and pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators were further elevated in PMNHigh SF. Compared to blood, SF PMNs showed increased exocytosis and programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 expression, and SF PMNs and monocytes/macrophages had increased surface-bound arginase-1. SPADE analysis revealed SF monocyte/macrophage subpopulations coexpressing programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1, with higher expression in PMNHigh SF. Healthy donor T cells showed reduced coreceptor expression when stimulated in PMNHigh versus PMNLow SF. However, amino acid metabolites related to the arginase-1 and IDO-1 pathways did not differ between the two groups. Hence, PMN predominance in the SF of a subset of JIA patients is associated with elevated immune mediator concentration and may alter SF monocyte/macrophage phenotype and T cell activation, without altering immunoregulatory amino acids.

Myeloid-related protein 8/14 in plasma and serum in patients with new-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis in real-world setting in a single center

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the usefulness of myeloid-related protein 8/14 (MRP8/14) in the prediction of disease course in a real-world setting for patients with new-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), to identify the relationship between MRP8/14 and disease activity using the physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA), and determine whether the MRP8/14 levels measured in serum and plasma are equally useful.

METHODS

In this prospective follow-up study, 87 new-onset non-systemic JIA patients were studied. Blood and synovial fluid samples were collected prior to any antirheumatic medication use. MRP8/14 was measured from serum (S-MRP8/14), plasma (P-MRP8/14), and synovial fluid samples using ELISA.

RESULTS

The baseline MRP8/14 blood levels were significantly higher in patients using synthetic antirheumatic drugs than in patients with no systemic medications at 1 year after diagnosis in serum (mean 298 vs. 198 ng/ml, P < 0.001) and in plasma (mean 291 vs. 137 ng/ml, P = 0.001). MRP8/14 levels at the time of JIA diagnosis were higher in patients who started methotrexate during 1.5-year follow-up compared to those who achieved long-lasting inactive disease status without systemic medications (serum: mean 298 vs. 219 ng/ml, P = 0.006 and plasma: 296 vs. 141 ng/ml, P = 0.001). P-MRP8/14 was the most effective predictive variable for disease activity (by PGA) in linear multivariate regression model (combined to ESR, CRP, leukocytes, and neutrophils), whereas S-MRP8/14 was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Blood MRP8/14 levels at baseline seem to predict disease course in new-onset JIA patients. P-MRP8/14 might be better than S-MRP8/14 when assessing disease activity at the time of JIA diagnosis.

Biomarkers to Predict DMARDs Efficacy and Adverse Effect in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), one of the most common immune system diseases, mainly affects middle-aged and elderly individuals and has a serious impact on the quality of life of patients. Pain and disability caused by RA are significant symptoms negatively affecting patients, and they are especially seen when inappropriate treatment is administered. Effective therapeutic strategies have evolved over the past few decades, with many new disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) being used in the clinic. Owing to the breakthrough in the treatment of RA, the symptoms of patients who could not be treated effectively in the past few years have been relieved. However, some patients complain about symptoms that have not been reported, implying that there are still some limitations in the RA treatment and evaluation system. In recent years, biomarkers, an effective means of diagnosing and evaluating the condition of patients with RA, have gradually been used in clinical practice to evaluate the therapeutic effect of RA, which is constantly being improved for accurate application of treatment in patients with RA. In this article, we summarize a series of biomarkers that may be helpful in evaluating the therapeutic effect and improving the efficiency of clinical treatment for RA. These efforts may also encourage researchers to devote more time and resources to the study and application of biomarkers, resulting in a new evaluation system that will reduce the inappropriate use of DMARDs, as well as patients’ physical pain and financial burden.

Immunoprofiling of active and inactive systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis reveals distinct biomarkers: a single-center study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to perform an immunoprofiling of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) in order to define biomarkers of clinical use as well as reveal new immune mechanisms.

METHODS

Immunoprofiling of plasma samples from a clinically well-described cohort consisting of 21 sJIA patients as well as 60 age and sex matched healthy controls, was performed by a highly sensitive proteomic immunoassay. Based on the biomarkers being significantly up- or down-regulated in cross-sectional and paired analysis, related canonical pathways and cellular functions were explored by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA).

RESULTS

The well-studied sJIA biomarkers, IL6, IL18 and S100A12, were confirmed to be increased during active sJIA as compared to healthy controls. IL18 was the only factor found to be increased during inactive sJIA as compared to healthy controls. Novel factors, including CASP8, CCL23, CD6, CXCL1, CXCL11, CXCL5, EIF4EBP1, KITLG, MMP1, OSM, SIRT2, SULT1A1 and TNFSF11, were found to be differentially expressed in active and/or inactive sJIA and healthy controls. No significant pathway activation could be predicted based on the limited factor input to the IPA. High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1), a damage associated molecular pattern being involved in a series of inflammatory diseases, was determined to be higher in active sJIA than inactive sJIA.

CONCLUSIONS

We could identify a novel set of biomarkers distinguishing active sJIA from inactive sJIA or healthy controls. Our findings enable a better understanding of the immune mechanisms active in sJIA and aid the development of future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Serum Calprotectin a Potential Biomarker in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Meta-Analysis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common inflammatory chronic disease affecting children and adolescents. Today, there are no specific biomarkers of inflammation. Therefore, it is important to identify new markers as predictors of disease activity. Recently, some researchers have directed their interest toward a protein, calprotectin (CLP), as a potential biomarker. The primary objective of our systematic review and meta-analysis was to analyze the possible role of CLP in JIA. Method: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Science Direct on 10 August 2021. The selection of studies was made using the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Cohen’s d with 95% CI and p-value were used as a measure of effect size. The random effects model was used to account for different sources of variation among studies. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q statistics and I². The publication bias was analyzed and represented by a funnel plot, and funnel plot symmetry was assessed with Egger’s test. Results: Our results at follow-up showed a statistically significant difference between patients with active disease compared to patients with inactive disease: 0.39 (0.16; 0.62), p = 0.001; without statistical heterogeneity. Another important aspect that emerged were the differences between the systemic disease form and any form of inactive disease showing a different concentration of calprotectin: 0.74 (0.40; 1.08), p < 0.001; without statistical heterogeneity. On the other hand, meta-regression analyses performed on gender, age, duration of disease, percentage of patients with ANA+ or RF+, medium value of ESR or CRP were not statistically significant. A statistically significant difference in serum calprotectin concentration between patients with JIA and healthy controls were observed. In fact, it presented lower values in the control group. Conclusions: The use of serum CLP could represent, in the future, a useful tool in JIA in order to stratify disease activity more accurately and may aid a more tailored approach to drug of choice in children with JIA. Further studies are needed to evaluate CLP as a predictor of flare in combination with other potential biomarkers of subclinical disease activity.

Serum calprotectin (S100A8/A9): a promising biomarker in diagnosis and follow-up in different subgroups of juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Introduction

In the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), there is a lack of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. This study assesses the use of serum calprotectin (sCal) as a marker to monitor disease activity, and as a classification and prognosis tool of response to treatment or risk of flares in patients with JIA.

Methods

Eighty-one patients with JIA from the CAP48 multicentric cohort were included in this study, as well as 11 non-paediatric healthy controls. An ELISA method was used to quantify sCal with a commercial kit.

Results

Patients with an active disease compared with healthy controls and with patients with inactive disease showed an eightfold and a twofold increased level of sCal, respectively. sCal was found to be correlated with the C-reactive protein (CRP) and even more strongly with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Evolution of DAS28 scores correlated well with evolution of sCal, as opposed to evolution of CRP. With regard to CRP, sCal could differentiate forms with active oligoarthritis from polyarthritis and systemic forms. However, sCal brought an added value compared with the CRP as a prognosis marker. Indeed, patients with active disease and reaching minimal disease activity (according to Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score) at 6 months following the test had higher sCal levels, while patients with inactive disease had higher sCal levels if a flare was observed up to 3–9 months following the test.

Conclusions

This study confirms the potential uses of sCal as a biomarker in the diagnosis and follow-up of JIA.

A cross-sectional cohort study of the activity and turnover of neutrophil granulocytes in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

BACKGROUND

The inflammatory process in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) involves both the innate and the adaptive immune system. The turnover and activity of neutrophil granulocytes may be reflected by proteins secreted from primary or secondary granules and from the cytoplasm of sequestered cells. Our primary aim was to compare the levels of the secondary neutrophil granule protein human neutrophil lipocalin (HNL), in JIA patients and controls, and to explore a possible priming of neutrophils through parallel analyses in plasma and serum. A secondary aim was to relate the levels of HNL to two other well-studied leukocyte proteins, S100A8/A9 and myeloperoxidase (MPO), as well as to clinical aspects of JIA.

METHODS

The concentrations of the three biomarkers in serum, two of them also in plasma, were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 37 children with JIA without medical treatment, in high disease activity based on juvenile arthritis disease activity score 27 (JADAS27), 32 children on medical treatment, mainly in lower disease activity, and 16 healthy children. We assessed for differences between two groups using the Mann-Whitney U test, and used the Kruskal-Wallis test for multiple group comparisons. Spearman rank correlation, linear and multiple regression analyses were used for evaluation of associations between biomarker concentrations and clinical scores.

RESULTS

The concentrations of HNL and MPO in serum were significantly increased in children with JIA (p < 0.001, p = 0.002) compared with healthy children, but we found no difference in the plasma levels of HNL and MPO between children with JIA and controls. The serum concentrations of MPO and HNL were unaffected by medical treatment, but S100A8/A9 was reduced by medical treatment and correlated with JADAS27 in both univariate (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) and multivariate (r = 0.59, p < 0.001) analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Neutrophil granulocytes in children with JIA are primed to release primary and secondary granule proteins, without relation to medical treatment, whereas signs of increased turnover and sequestration of neutrophil granulocytes are reduced by treatment. Levels of neutrophil-originating proteins in serum most likely reflect underlying disease activities of JIA.

Biomarkers of tolerance in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a new era in clinical management?

Modern therapeutic agents and treatment regimens have made sustained remission an attainable target for many patients across a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, albeit at the risk of adverse events and the expense of drug prescription and safety monitoring. Clinicians and patients are thus increasingly faced with a novel treatment dilemma: whether and how best to stop immunomodulatory treatment in patients who achieve remission. In this final paper in a Series on therapeutic tolerance induction, we summarise our current knowledge of biomarkers of immune homeostasis in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and their application to the prediction and attainment of sustained drug-free remission. We summarise evidence from prospective studies of immunomodulatory drug cessation across a range of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease. We also consider current evidence for clinical, serological, proteomic, metabolomic, cellular, and microbiomic biomarkers of immune homeostasis. Finally, we discuss the steps necessary for clinical translation of these biomarkers, as well as the potential transformative effect of these biomarkers on management of patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases if clinical translation is successfully achieved.

Update on the treatment of nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis including treatment-to-target: is (drug-free) inactive disease already possible?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review concerns the outcome for nonsystemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with emphasis on treatment-to-target (T2T) and treatment strategies aiming at inactive disease by giving an overview of recent articles.

RECENT FINDINGS

More efficacious therapies and treatment strategies/T2T with inactive disease as target, have improved the outcome for JIA significantly. Recent studies regarding treatment strategies have shown 47-68% inactive disease after 1 year. Moreover, probability of attaining inactive disease at least once in the first year seems even higher in recent cohort-studies, reaching 80%, although these studies included relatively high numbers of oligoarticular JIA patients. However, 26-76% of patients flare upon therapy withdrawal and prediction of flares is still difficult.

SUMMARY

Remission can be achieved and sustained in (some) JIA patients, regardless of initial treatment. Cornerstone principles in the management of nonsystemic JIA treatment are early start of DMARD therapy, striving for inactive disease and T2T by close and repeated monitoring of disease activity. T2T and tight control appear to be more important than a specific drug in JIA. Next to inactive disease, it is important that patients/parents are involved in personal targets, like reduction of pain and fatigue. Future studies should focus on predictors (based on imaging-methods or biomarkers) for sustained drug-free remission and flare.

Biomarkers of Response to Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Background: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common chronic inflammatory arthritis of childhood, characterized by various clinical phenotypes associated with variable prognosis. Significant progress has been achieved with the use of biologic treatments, which specifically block pro-inflammatory molecules involved in the disease pathogenesis. The most commonly used biologics in JIA are monoclonal antibodies and recombinant proteins targeting interleukins 1 (IL-1) and 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α). Several biomarkers have been investigated in JIA. Aims: To assess the level of evidence available regarding the role of biomarkers in JIA related to guiding clinical and therapeutic decisions, providing disease prognostic information, facilitating disease activity monitoring and assessing biologic treatment response in JIA, as well as propose new strategies for biologic therapy-related biomarker use in JIA. Methods: We searched PubMed for relevant literature using predefined key words corresponding to several categories of biomarkers to assess their role in predicting and assessing biologic treatment response and clinical remission in JIA. Results: We reviewed serological, cellular, genetic, transcriptomic and imaging biomarkers, to identify candidates that are both well-established and widely used, as well as newly investigated in JIA on biologic therapy. We evaluated their role in management of JIA as well as identified the unmet needs for new biomarker discovery and better clinical applications. Conclusion: Although there are no ideal biomarkers in JIA, we identified serological biomarkers with potential clinical utility. We propose strategies of combining biomarkers of response to biologics in JIA, as well as routine implementation of clinically acceptable imaging biomarkers for improved disease assessment performance.