ASSESSMENT OF THE AWARENESS LEVEL OF RADIATION PROTECTION AMONG RADIOGRAPHERS WORKING IN THE MEDICAL IMAGING WARDS OF THE HOSPITALS IN ZANJAN, IRAN

Radiation protection adherence and associated factors among radiology personnel

The aim of the study was to investigate radiation protection adherence among radiology personnel and associated factors. In light of the increasing integration of ionizing radiation in medical diagnostics and treatment-specifically in areas such as computed tomography, fluoroscopy, and therapeutic radiology-it is vital for radiology personnel to consistently uphold rigorous radiation protection standards. This cross-sectional study employed a self-administered questionnaire to collect demographic data and assess various aspects of radiation protection adherence among radiology personnel. The gathered data were entered into SPSS 16 for statistical analysis. Among the 119 participants, 72 (60.5%) worked in the radiology department, and 88 (77.9%) were married. Significant associations were observed between adherence levels and marital status, age groups, years of experience, and department type. Study findings showed a significant association between several demographic factors and radiation protection adherence. Furthermore, our results highlight the value of implementing radiation protection courses to enhance adherence among personnel.

A Study of Radiation Protection Standards Compliance in Hospital Radiographic Departments in Iran

Background

The X-ray is a critical diagnostic and therapeutic tool with harmful effects. The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has some recommendations regarding applying radiation protection principles.

Objective

This study aimed to determine the standards of the typical radiation protection in radiographic departments of hospitals in Iran.

Material and Methods

In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the usual radiation protection standards in places, such as the physical environment of the control and waiting rooms, radiographic devices, the physical space of the darkroom, and shielding facilities, were investigated using a checklist in Iran. A total of 84 hospitals in 51 cities throughout Iran were randomly selected, and the checklists were distributed to the radiation protection officers. In hospitals with multiple radiography rooms, the radiation protection officers were asked to complete the checklist about the room with the highest workload as a baseline to evaluate their facilities. Finally, the authors reviewed all checklists.

Results

In radiology departments in control and waiting rooms, the mean of radiation protection was 71.9%. Pregnancy and radiation warning signs and labels were present in 96.1% of the parameters, while gonad shielding protocols were not presented.

Conclusion

The principles of observed radiation protection were unsatisfactory, and it is recommended that surveillance be conducted at frequent intervals.