DERIVATION OF LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS FOR COMMON ADULT COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS IN MOROCCAN HOSPITAL

Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for paediatric abdominal-pelvis and Chest-abdominal-pelvis computed tomography in Morocco: suggests the need for improved optimization efforts

The purpose of the current study was to derive the local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for paediatric abdominal-pelvis (AP) and chest-abdominal-pelvis (CAP) computed tomography in Morocco. The data were gathered retrospectively from two hospitals for 6 months. The LDRLs were defined by volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) per sequence, DLP per procedure and size-specific dose estimates (SSDE). The SSDE assessment was based on the effective diameters of patients scanned. A total of 630 CT examinations were collected involving 324 AP and 306 CAP scans. The proposed LDRLs for AP, in terms of CTDIvol (mGy), were 6.9, 8.5, 8.5 and 8.5 for < 1, 1 to < 5, 5 to < 10 and 10 to < 15 y age groups, respectively. In terms of DLP (mGy.cm) per procedure, they were 436.3, 534.5, 687.9 and 961.7. In terms of SSDE (mGy), thet were 16.73, 16.83, 17.5 and 15.8 for < 1, 1 to < 5, 5 to < 10 and 10 to < 15 y, respectively. The corresponding LDRLs for CAP, in terms of CTDIvol (mGy), were 7.3, 7.3, 7.3 and 10.35. In terms of DLP (mGy.cm) per procedure, they were 531, 622.5, 705 and 936. In terms of SSDE (mGy), they were 16.22, 15.05, 14.47 and 15.2, respectively, for the four age groups. The derived dose levels were mostly higher than those found in other studies, which demonstrates the need for dose optimization and paediatric protocol standardization as well as the timeliness of the intent to establish not only local DRLs but national ones in the near future.

How to establish and use local diagnostic reference levels: an ESR EuroSafe Imaging expert statement

Abstract

Although the Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) have been shown to be an important tool for optimising patient radiation protection, there are still difficulties related to the methodology that should be used to establish and use local DRL values. This statement represents the current view of the EuroSafe Imaging ‘Clinical DRLs’ working group formed with the purpose to produce scientific and educational material on DRLs and promote the concept of local DRLs. Guidelines on how to establish and how to use local DRLs presented herein can be implemented using a multidisciplinary team approach. Local DRLs are easy to determine and implement and they reflect local equipment performance and local clinical needs. They can be updated more frequently than the national DRLs, especially if a dose management system is available. To establish local DRLs, a practical approach could be to collect a reasonable set, i.e., at least 20–30 procedures, of data for well-defined clinical indications and calculate the 3rd quartile values. The median values of the distribution can be set to define the ‘typical values’. The International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) suggests setting ‘typical values’ for newer technologies that enable decreased amounts of radiation exposure for a similar level of image quality. Local DRLs should be similar or lower to the national DRLs. They could be higher only if the clinical benefits for some medical indications are fully explained and reported. Local DRLs may be used as a quality benchmark to track outliers and can be also used as alert values.

Key points

Guidelines on how to establish and use local DRLs are presented.

Local DRLs are easy to determine and implement and can be updated frequently

Additionally, local DRLs can be used to track outliers.