1
|
Non fluoroscopic ablation of different arrhythmic structures in an electrophysiology unit. Assessment of efficiency and security. Ir J Med Sci 2020; 190:79-87. [PMID: 32514660 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-020-02247-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electroanatomical mapping systems (EMS) reduce fluoroscopy dose for the ablation. Higher costs and longer procedure times are the drawbacks associated with EMS. Our objective was to validate the efficiency of the EMS. OBJECTIVE To demonstrate that using EMS is more efficient and as secure as the traditional system of ablation. METHODS From April 2013 to June 2018, all patients were included into two groups, according to the intention of ablation with or without fluoroscopy. Right, left, supraventricular and ventricular ablation were included. We compared procedure variables (fluoroscopy, radiofrequency and procedure times, ablation results, complication rates and costs of the procedure) that included material and detrimental effect of fluoroscopy. RESULTS A total of 105 were included in the fluoroscopy group and 287 in the without fluoroscopy group. We found an important reduction in time and radiation dose in all the ablation procedures studied, without increasing the procedure time. No differences in ablation results nor complications rate were found. We found lower costs in the flutter ablation without fluoroscopy, similar costs in the right focal tachycardia ablation group and higher costs in the without fluoroscopy group for the AVNRT and left accessory pathway. When detrimental effect of fluoroscopy was added, all procedures without fluoroscopy were significantly more efficient than the ones performed with it. CONCLUSIONS Ablation without fluoroscopy is a technique as safe and effective as the conventional technique. Our study suggests that the radiation dose delivered to the patient and staff might be reduced, without increasing the total procedure time, being even more efficient.
Collapse
|
2
|
Betti M, Mazzoni LN, Belli G, Bernardi L, Bicchi S, Busoni S, Fedele D, Fedeli L, Gasperi C, Gori C, Quattrocchi M, Taddeucci A, Vigliotti M, Vaiano A, Rossi F. Surgeon eye lens dose monitoring in catheterization lab: A multi-center survey: Invited for ECMP 2018 Focus Issue. Phys Med 2019; 60:127-131. [PMID: 31000072 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 03/27/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a multi-centre survey on the eye lens equivalent dose absorbed by primary interventionalist during catheterization procedures, using a personal dosimeter placed close to the eye lens. METHODS 15 different cardiologists working in 3 different centers, for a total of 5 operating rooms were enrolled. All of them were provided with a single thermoluminescent dosimeter positioned on the inner side of the temples of eyeglasses. The dose monitoring, performed on a two-months basis, started in 2016 and is still running. All dose measurements were performed by a ISO 17025 standard accredited dosimetry service thus providing certified uncertainties as well. Correlation of eye lens and wrist dose with KAP was also investigated. RESULTS A total number of 101 eye lens measurements were performed. Annual eye lens dose estimation was obtained for all 15 surgeons (mean, mode, range, standard deviation: 10.8, 8, 4.9-27.3, 5.6 mSv, respectively). Uncertainties on annual eye lens dose estimations ranged between 10% and 20%. No significant correlation was found between eye lens dose and KAP. CONCLUSIONS Cardiologists involved in catheterization procedures may receive annual eye lens doses close to the ICRP 118 dose limit and thus individual monitoring with a dedicated dosimeter should be carried out. Uncertainty assessment play a relevant role in eye lens equivalent dose estimation to ensure not to exceed dose limit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margherita Betti
- Azienda Usl Toscana Centro, Medical Physics Unit Pistoia Prato, Italy
| | | | - Giacomo Belli
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Medical Physics Unit, Firenze, Italy
| | - Luca Bernardi
- Azienda Usl Toscana Centro, Medical Physics Unit Pistoia Prato, Italy
| | - Sara Bicchi
- Azienda Usl Toscana Centro, Medical Physics Unit Pistoia Prato, Italy
| | - Simone Busoni
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Medical Physics Unit, Firenze, Italy
| | - David Fedele
- Azienda Usl Toscana Centro, Medical Physics Unit Pistoia Prato, Italy
| | - Luca Fedeli
- Università degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy
| | - Chiara Gasperi
- Azienda Usl Toscana Sud-Est, Medical Physics Unit, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Cesare Gori
- Università degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy; INFN, Sezione di Firenze, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | | | - Adriana Taddeucci
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Medical Physics Unit, Firenze, Italy
| | | | - Angela Vaiano
- Azienda Usl Toscana Centro, Medical Physics Unit Pistoia Prato, Italy
| | - Francesco Rossi
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Medical Physics Unit, Firenze, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pekkarinen A, Siiskonen T, Lehtinen M, Savolainen S, Kortesniemi M. Potential occupational exposures in diagnostic and interventional radiology: statistical modeling based on Finnish national dose registry data. Acta Radiol 2019; 60:68-77. [PMID: 29665709 DOI: 10.1177/0284185118770902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation worker categorization and exposure monitoring practices must be proportional to the current working environment. PURPOSE To analyze exposure data of Finnish radiological workers and to estimate the magnitude and frequency of their potential occupational radiation exposure, and to propose appropriate radiation worker categorization. MATERIAL AND METHODS Estimates of the probabilities of annual effective doses exceeding certain levels were obtained by calculating the survival function of a lognormal probability density function (PDF) fitted in the measured occupational exposure data. RESULTS The estimated probabilities of exceeding annual effective dose limits of 1 mSv, 6 mSv, and 20 mSv were in the order of 1:200, 1:10,000, and 1:500,000 per person, respectively. CONCLUSION It is very unlikely that the Category B annual effective dose limit of 6 mSv could even potentially be exceeded using modern equipment and appropriate working methods. Therefore, in terms of estimated effective dose, workers in diagnostic and interventional radiology could be placed into Category B in Finland. Current national personal monitoring practice could be replaced or supplemented using active personal dosimeters, which offer more effective means for optimizing working methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antti Pekkarinen
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Teemu Siiskonen
- STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maaret Lehtinen
- STUK - Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sauli Savolainen
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mika Kortesniemi
- HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thibault B, Macle L, Mondésert B, Dubuc M, Shohoudi A, Dyrda K, Guerra PG, Rivard L, Roy D, Talajic M, Khairy P. Reducing radiation exposure during procedures performed in the electrophysiology laboratory. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2017; 29:308-315. [PMID: 29064134 DOI: 10.1111/jce.13373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Expert societies recently published strong recommendations to reduce the exposure of patients and staff to ionizing radiation (IR) during interventional and electrophysiology (EP) procedures. However, adherence to these guidelines remains difficult and the impact of implementing such recommendations is poorly characterized. METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a single-center cohort study to quantify radiation exposure over time in three EP laboratories at the Montreal Heart Institute during 5,546 consecutive procedures from 2012 to 2015 by 11 primary operators. Overall, 2,618 (47.2%) procedures were catheter-based and 2,928 (52.8%) were device interventions. Interventions to reduce radiation exposure included educational initiatives to raise awareness (i.e., limiting cine acquisition, patient position, table height), slower frame rate, lower radiation dose per pulse, collimation, and integration with 3-D mapping systems and/or MediGuide technology. An 85% reduction in IR exposure was observed from 2012 to 2015, with the mean dose-area-product (DAP) decreasing from 7.65 ± 0.05 Gy·cm2 to 1.15 ± 0.04 Gy·cm2 (P < 0.001). This was true for catheter-based procedures (mean DAP 16.99 ± 0.08 to 2.00 ± 0.06 Gy·cm2 , P < 0.001) and device interventions (mean DAP 4.18 ± 0.06 to 0.64 ± 0.05 Gy·cm2 , P < 0.001). The median effective dose of IR recorded per quarter by 282 cervical dosimeters on EP staff decreased from 0.57 (IQR 0.18, 1.03) mSv in 2012 to 0.00 (IQR 0.00, 0.19) mSv in 2015, P < 0.001. CONCLUSION Enforcing good clinical practices with simple measures and low-dose fluoroscopy settings are highly effective in reducing IR exposure in the EP lab. These promising results should encourage other EP labs to adopt similar protective measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard Thibault
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Laurent Macle
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Blandine Mondésert
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Marc Dubuc
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Azadeh Shohoudi
- Montreal Health Innovations Coordinating Center, Montreal Heart Innovations Coordinating Center, Montrel Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Katia Dyrda
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Peter G Guerra
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Léna Rivard
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Denis Roy
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Mario Talajic
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Paul Khairy
- Electrophysiology Service, Montreal Heart Institute and the Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Perisinakis K, Solomou G, Stratakis J, Damilakis J. Data and methods to assess occupational exposure to personnel involved in cardiac catheterization procedures. Phys Med 2016; 32:386-92. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2015] [Revised: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
|
6
|
|
7
|
Huo Y, Christoph M, Forkmann M, Pohl M, Mayer J, Salmas J, Sitzy J, Wunderlich C, Piorkowski C, Gaspar T. Reduction of radiation exposure during atrial fibrillation ablation using a novel fluoroscopy image integrated 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, and controlled study. Heart Rhythm 2015; 12:1945-55. [PMID: 26001508 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We explored whether the use of a novel fluoroscopy image integrated 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (F-EAM) system could result in a reduction of overall fluoroscopy time and radiation doses during the whole procedure of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS Eighty patients (44 men (55%); mean age 63 ± 10 years) who underwent catheter ablation due to paroxysmal AF were recruited consecutively in the present study. Patients were randomized (1:1) into 2 arms for AF ablation: one using a conventional 3-dimensional electroanatomical mapping (EAM) system and the other using the F-EAM system. RESULTS Fluoroscopy time (10:42 [interquartile range {IQR} 8:45-12:46] minutes:seconds vs 1:45 [IQR 1:05-2:22] minutes:seconds; P < .001) and radiation doses (2440 [IQR 1593-3091] cGy·cm(2) vs 652 [IQR 326-1489] cGy·cm(2); P < .001) in the EAM group were significantly greater than those in the F-EAM group. The majority of reduction of radiation exposure was achieved after transseptal puncture, which was near-zero fluoroscopic exposure. In total, approximately 84% of fluoroscopy time and 73% of radiation doses have been reduced during the AF ablation procedure using the F-EAM system compared to using the conventional EAM system. However, procedure time did not differ significantly (1:39 [IQR 1:18-2:10] hours:minutes vs 1:37 [IQR 1:17-1:50] hours:minutes; P = .362). During follow-up (5.9 ± 1.3 months), 61 patients (76.3%) had no recurrence of atrial arrhythmias. The recurrence rate between the 2 groups did not differ. CONCLUSION AF catheter ablation using the F-EAM system was safe and resulted in a significant reduction of radiation exposure to patients and staff without complicating the workflow of the procedure. A near-zero fluoroscopic catheter ablation procedure could be performed without compromising acute/mid-term efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Huo
- Steinbeis Research Institute 'Electrophysiology and Cardiac Devices', Dresden, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Marian Christoph
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Mathias Forkmann
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Matthias Pohl
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Julia Mayer
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jozef Salmas
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Judith Sitzy
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carsten Wunderlich
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Christopher Piorkowski
- Steinbeis Research Institute 'Electrophysiology and Cardiac Devices', Dresden, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Gaspar
- Steinbeis Research Institute 'Electrophysiology and Cardiac Devices', Dresden, Germany; Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Dresden, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Casella M, Russo E, Pizzamiglio F, Conti S, Al-Mohani G, Colombo D, Casula V, D Alessandra Y, Biagioli V, Carbucicchio C, Riva S, Fassini G, Moltrasio M, Tundo F, Zucchetti M, Majocchi B, Marino V, Forleo G, Santangeli P, Di Biase L, Dello Russo A, Natale A, Tondo C. The Growing Culture Of A Minimally Fluoroscopic Approach In Electrophysiology Lab. J Atr Fibrillation 2014; 7:1104. [PMID: 27957101 DOI: 10.4022/jafib.1104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2014] [Revised: 07/16/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Most of interventional procedures in cardiology are carried out under fluoroscopic imaging guidance. Besides other peri-interventional risks, radiation exposure should be considered for its stochastic (inducing malignancy) and deterministic effects on health (tissue reactions like erythema, hair loss and cataracts). In this article we analized the radiation risk from cardiovascular imaging to both patients and medical staff and discusses how customize the X-ray system and how to implement shielding measures in the cath lab. Finally, we reviewed the most recent developments and the latest findings in catheter navigation and 3D electronatomical mapping systems that may help to reduce patient and operator exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Casella
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Eleonora Russo
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Sergio Conti
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ghaliah Al-Mohani
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Colombo
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Victor Casula
- Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu
| | - Yuri D Alessandra
- Laboratory of immunology and functional genomics, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Viviana Biagioli
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Corrado Carbucicchio
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Riva
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaetano Fassini
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Moltrasio
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Tundo
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Zucchetti
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedetta Majocchi
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Vittoria Marino
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Forleo
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Pasquale Santangeli
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive H 2146, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute at St David?s Medical Center, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Antonio Dello Russo
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Natale
- Cardiac Arrhythmia Service, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive H 2146, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Claudio Tondo
- CardiacArrhythmia Research Centre, Centro CardiologicoMonzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Özcan EE, Szeplaki G, Tahin T, Osztheimer I, Szilagyi S, Apor A, Horvath PM, Vago H, Merkely B, Geller L. Impact of respiration gating on image integration guided atrial fibrillation ablation. Clin Res Cardiol 2014; 103:727-31. [PMID: 24803131 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-014-0707-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping systems is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation. However, it may be affected by respiration movements. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of respiratory gating on procedural parameters in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS One-hundred forty consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation were admitted to study. Respiratory gating module (AccuResp algorithm, Carto3, Biosense Webster) was enabled in 70 patients and disabled in 70 patients during procedures. Successful pulmonary vein isolation and sinus rhythm were obtained in all patients. A significant reduction in total procedure times [median 77, interquartile range (IQR 66-95) min vs median 82 (IQR 72-104) min, p < 0.05] and fluoroscopy times [median 14 (IQR 9-17) min vs median 16 (IQR 12-22) min, p < 0.05] were observed in the respiratory gated group. Although ablation times (duration between the first and last ablation) were significantly shorter in respiratory gated group [median 37 (IQR 32-53) min vs median 48 (IQR 39-65) min, p < 0.05], total RF application durations were not different between two groups [median 1,554 (IQR 1,213-2,196) s vs median 1,802 (IQR 1,344-2,448) s, p = 0.11]. Difference in electroanatomical map reconstruction times was not significant [median 14 (IQR 12-16) min in gated group vs median 13 (IQR 10-18) min in nongated group, p = 0.19]. CONCLUSION Respiratory gating significantly improves fluoroscopy and ablation times during electroanatomic mapping guided AF ablation. Respiratory gated maps may provide uninterrupted continuous ablation applications. Furthermore, using automatic respiratory gating module does not prolong mapping times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emin Evren Özcan
- Heart Center, Semmelweis University, Gaál József Street 9, Budapest, 1122, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|