1
|
Cantone MC, Ginjaume M, Martin CJ, Hamada N, Yokoyama S, Bordy JM, Dauer L, Durán A, Jeffries C, Harris W, Kashirina O, Koteng AO, Michelin S, Sudchai W. Report of IRPA task group on issues and actions taken in response to the change in eye lens dose limit. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020; 40:1508-1533. [PMID: 33226005 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abb5ec] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
In 2018, the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) established its third task group (TG) on the implementation of the eye lens dose limit. To contribute to sharing experience and raising awareness within the radiation protection community about protection of workers in exposure of the lens of the eye, the TG conducted a questionnaire survey and analysed the responses. This paper provides an overview of the results of the questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Merce Ginjaume
- Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Colin J Martin
- University of Glasgow, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Nobuyuki Hamada
- Radiation Safety Research Center, Nuclear Technology Research Laboratory, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI), Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Jean-Marc Bordy
- CEA, LIST, Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel, F-91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Lawrence Dauer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, New York, United States of America
| | - Ariel Durán
- University Hospital, Montevideo School of Medicine, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Cameron Jeffries
- Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders Drive, South Australia, Australia
| | - Willie Harris
- Exelon Nuclear, 200 Exelon Way, United States of America
| | - Olga Kashirina
- Burnazyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre, Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia
| | - Arthur Omondi Koteng
- Kenia Radiation Protection Board, RPB, Eastern Africa Association for Radiation Protection, EAARP, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - Waraporn Sudchai
- TINT, Thailand Institute of Nuclear Technology, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poon R, Badawy MK. Radiation dose and risk to the lens of the eye during CT examinations of the brain. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2019; 63:786-794. [DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2019] [Revised: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah Poon
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences School of Primary and Allied Health Care Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia
| | - Mohamed K Badawy
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences School of Primary and Allied Health Care Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Clayton Victoria Australia
- Monash Imaging Monash Health Clayton Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Acton H, James K, Kavanagh RG, O'Tuathaigh C, Moloney D, Wyse G, Fanning N, Maher M, O'Connor OJ. Monitoring neurointerventional radiation doses using dose-tracking software: implications for the establishment of local diagnostic reference levels. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:3669-3675. [PMID: 29651772 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5405-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Revised: 02/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is potential for high radiation exposure during neurointerventional procedures. Increasing regulatory requirements mandate dose monitoring of patients and staff, and justification of high levels of radiation exposure. This paper demonstrates the potential to use radiation dose-tracking software to establish local diagnostic reference levels. METHODS Consecutive neurointerventional procedures, performed in a single institution within a one-year period, were retrospectively studied. Dose area product (DAP) data were collected using dose-tracking software and clinical data obtained from a prospectively generated patient treatment database. RESULTS Two hundred and sixty-four procedures met the selection criteria. Median DAP was 100 Gy.cm2 for aneurysm coiling procedures, 259 Gy.cm2 for arteriovenous malformation (AVM) embolisation procedures, 87 Gy.cm2 for stroke thrombolysis/thrombectomy, and 74 Gy.cm2 for four-vessel angiography. One hundred and nine aneurysm coiling procedures were further studied. Six significant variables were assessed using stepwise regression analysis to determine effect on DAP. Aneurysm location (anterior vs posterior circulation) had the single biggest effect (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS This paper confirms variable radiation exposures during neurointerventional procedures. The 75th percentile (used to define diagnostic reference levels) of DAP measurements represents a reasonable guidance metric for monitoring purposes. Results indicate that aneurysm location has the greatest impact on dose during coiling procedures and that anterior and posterior circulation coiling procedures should have separate diagnostic reference levels. KEY POINTS • Dose-tracking software is useful for monitoring patient radiation dose during neurointerventional procedures • This paper provides a template for methodology applicable to any interventional suite • Local diagnostic reference levels were defined by using the 75th percentile of DAP as per International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations • Aneurysm location is the biggest determinant of radiation dose during coiling procedures. • Anterior and posterior circulation coiling procedures should have separate diagnostic reference levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Acton
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Karl James
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Richard G Kavanagh
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. .,Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.
| | | | - Deirdre Moloney
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Gerald Wyse
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Noel Fanning
- Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Michael Maher
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| | - Owen J O'Connor
- School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Department of Radiology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jupp T, Kamali-Zonouzi P. EYE LENS DOSIMETRY WITHIN THE CARDIAC CATHETERISATION LABORATORY-ARE ANCILLARY STAFF BEING FORGOTTEN? RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2018; 178:185-192. [PMID: 28985396 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Eye lens doses have been widely explored for interventional clinicians, however, data for ancillary staff is limited. Eye doses have been measured using a headband technique for clinicians, specialist registrars, nurses and radiographers working in a cardiac catheterisation laboratory in a UK hospital. Workload was found to be significantly higher for ancillary staff, and consequently, despite the absolute monthly collar doses and other indicators such as eye dose/KAP and eye dose/procedure being highest for clinicians, our study found there was no significant difference in the monthly eye dose readings between the clinicians and nurses (p = 0.82), and clinicians and radiographers (p = 0.72). The average eye dose/collar dose ratios were 0.71 and 0.61 for cardiologists and SPRs, but ratios above one were found for nurses and radiographers. This work expands on the eye dose data available for ancillary staff and demonstrates that eye dosimetry for these workers should not be overlooked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Jupp
- Medical Physics Department, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| | - Pedrum Kamali-Zonouzi
- Medical Physics Department, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Egerton Road, Guildford, GU2 7XX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cantone MC, Ginjaume M, Miljanic S, Martin CJ, Akahane K, Mpete L, Michelin SC, Flannery CM, Dauer LT, Balter S. Report of IRPA task group on the impact of the eye lens dose limits. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2017; 37:527-550. [PMID: 28586315 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aa604b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
In 2012 IRPA established a task group (TG) to identify key issues in the implementation of the revised eye lens dose limit. The TG reported its conclusions in 2013. In January 2015, IRPA asked the TG to review progress with the implementation of the recommendations from the early report and to collate current practitioner experience. This report presents the results of a survey on the view of the IRPA professionals on the new limit to the lens of the eye and on the wider issue of tissue reactions. Recommendations derived from the survey are presented. This report was approved by IRPA Executive Council on 31 January 2017.
Collapse
|
6
|
Strocchi S, Chiaravalli A, Veronese I, Novario R. ON-FIELD EVALUATION OF OPERATOR LENS PROTECTIVE DEVICES IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2016; 171:382-388. [PMID: 26410765 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2015] [Revised: 06/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The recent publication of the Euratom Directive 2013/59, adopting the reduction of eye lens dose limits from 150 to 20 mSv y-1, calls for the development of new tools and methodologies for evaluating the eye lens dose absorbed by the medical staff involved in interventional radiology practices. Moreover, the effectiveness of the protective devices, like leaded glasses, which can be employed for radiation protection purposes, must be tested under typical exposure scenarios. In this work, eye lens dose measurements were carried out on an anthropomorphic phantom simulating a physician bound to perform standard interventional neuroradiology angiographic procedures. The correlation between eye lens doses, in terms of Hp(0.07), and the equivalent dose [again in terms of Hp(0.07)] monthly measured with thermoluminescent dosemeters placed above the lead apron at the chest level was studied, in the presence and in the absence of different types of leaded glasses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Strocchi
- Medical Physics Department, Varese Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - A Chiaravalli
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - I Veronese
- Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - R Novario
- Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, Medical Physics, University Hospital of Varese, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pradhan AS, Lee JI, Kim JL. On the scenario of passive dosimeters in personnel monitoring: Relevance to diagnostic radiology and fluoroscopy-based interventional cardiology. J Med Phys 2016; 41:81-4. [PMID: 27217618 PMCID: PMC4871007 DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.181634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A. S. Pradhan
- Radiation Dosimetry Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Yuseong, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - J. I. Lee
- Radiation Dosimetry Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Yuseong, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - J. L. Kim
- Radiation Dosimetry Team, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Yuseong, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Carinou E, Ferrari P, Bjelac OC, Gingaume M, Merce MS, O'Connor U. Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H p (3) monitoring. A 2015 review. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2015; 35:R17-R34. [PMID: 26343787 DOI: 10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/r17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
A thorough literature review about the current situation on the implementation of eye lens monitoring has been performed in order to provide recommendations regarding dosemeter types, calibration procedures and practical aspects of eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel. Most relevant data and recommendations from about 100 papers have been analysed and classified in the following topics: challenges of today in eye lens monitoring; conversion coefficients, phantoms and calibration procedures for eye lens dose evaluation; correction factors and dosemeters for eye lens dose measurements; dosemeter position and influence of protective devices. The major findings of the review can be summarised as follows: the recommended operational quantity for the eye lens monitoring is H p (3). At present, several dosemeters are available for eye lens monitoring and calibration procedures are being developed. However, in practice, very often, alternative methods are used to assess the dose to the eye lens. A summary of correction factors found in the literature for the assessment of the eye lens dose is provided. These factors can give an estimation of the eye lens dose when alternative methods, such as the use of a whole body dosemeter, are used. A wide range of values is found, thus indicating the large uncertainty associated with these simplified methods. Reduction factors from most common protective devices obtained experimentally and using Monte Carlo calculations are presented. The paper concludes that the use of a dosemeter placed at collar level outside the lead apron can provide a useful first estimate of the eye lens exposure. However, for workplaces with estimated annual equivalent dose to the eye lens close to the dose limit, specific eye lens monitoring should be performed. Finally, training of the involved medical staff on the risks of ionising radiation for the eye lens and on the correct use of protective systems is strongly recommended.
Collapse
|