1
|
Kyriakou I, Tremi I, Georgakilas AG, Emfietzoglou D. Microdosimetric investigation of the radiation quality of low-medium energy electrons using Geant4-DNA. Appl Radiat Isot 2021; 172:109654. [PMID: 33676082 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The increasing clinical use of low-energy photon and electron sources (below few tens of keV) has raised concerns on the adequacy of the existing approximation of an energy-independent radiobiological effectiveness. In this work, the variation of the quality factor (Q) and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of electrons over the low-medium energy range (0.1 keV-1 MeV) is examined using several microdosimetry-based Monte Carlo methodologies with input data obtained from Geant4-DNA track-structure simulations. The sensitivity of the results to the different methodologies, Geant4-DNA physics models, and target sizes is examined. Calculations of Q and RBE are based on the ICRU Report 40 recommendations, the Kellerer-Hahn approximation, the site version of the theory of dual radiation action (TDRA), the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) of cell survival, and the calculated yield of DNA double strand breaks (DSB). The stochastic energy deposition spectra needed as input in the above approaches have been calculated for nanometer spherical volumes using the different electron physics models of Geant4-DNA. Results are normalized at 100 keV electrons which is here considered the reference radiation. It is shown that in the energy range ~50 keV-1 MeV, the calculated Q and RBE are approximately unity (to within 1-2%) irrespective of the methodology, Geant4-DNA physics model, and target size. At lower energies, Q and RBE become energy-dependent reaching a maximum value of ~1.5-2.5 between ~200 and 700 eV. The detailed variation of Q and RBE at low energies depends mostly upon the adopted methodology and target size, and less so upon the Geant4-DNA physics model. Overall, the DSB yield predicts the highest RBE values (with RBEmax≈2.5) whereas the MKM the lowest RBE values (with RBEmax≈1.5). The ICRU Report 40, Kellerer-Hahn, and TDRA methods are in excellent agreement (to within 1-2%) over the whole energy range predicting a Qmax≈2. In conclusion, the approximation Q=RBE=1 was found to be valid only above ~50 keV whereas at lower energies both Q and RBE become strongly energy-dependent. It is envisioned that the present work will contribute towards establishing robust methodologies to determine theoretically the energy-dependence of radiation quality of individual electrons which may then be used in subsequent calculations involving practical electron and photon radiation sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna Kyriakou
- Medical Physics Laboratory, University of Ioannina Medical School, 45110, Ioannina, Greece.
| | - Ioanna Tremi
- DNA Damage Laboratory, Physics Department, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Zografou, Athens, Greece
| | - Alexandros G Georgakilas
- DNA Damage Laboratory, Physics Department, School of Applied Mathematical and Physical Sciences, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Zografou, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimitris Emfietzoglou
- Medical Physics Laboratory, University of Ioannina Medical School, 45110, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
DNA damage interactions on both nanometer and micrometer scale determine overall cellular damage. Sci Rep 2018; 8:16063. [PMID: 30375461 PMCID: PMC6207695 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34323-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
DNA double strand breaks (DSB) play a pivotal role for cellular damage, which is a hazard encountered in toxicology and radiation protection, but also exploited e.g. in eradicating tumors in radiation therapy. It is still debated whether and in how far clustering of such DNA lesions leads to an enhanced severity of induced damage. Here we investigate - using focused spots of ionizing radiation as damaging agent - the spatial extension of DNA lesion patterns causing cell inactivation. We find that clustering of DNA damage on both the nm and µm scale leads to enhanced inactivation compared to more homogeneous lesion distributions. A biophysical model interprets these observations in terms of enhanced DSB production and DSB interaction, respectively. We decompose the overall effects quantitatively into contributions from these lesion formation processes, concluding that both processes coexist and need to be considered for determining the resulting damage on the cellular level.
Collapse
|
3
|
Hellweg CE, Chishti AA, Diegeler S, Spitta LF, Henschenmacher B, Baumstark-Khan C. Molecular Signaling in Response to Charged Particle Exposures and its Importance in Particle Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2018; 5:60-73. [PMID: 31773020 PMCID: PMC6871585 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-18-00016.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Energetic, charged particles elicit an orchestrated DNA damage response (DDR) during their traversal through healthy tissues and tumors. Complex DNA damage formation, after exposure to high linear energy transfer (LET) charged particles, results in DNA repair foci formation, which begins within seconds. More protein modifications occur after high-LET, compared with low-LET, irradiation. Charged-particle exposure activates several transcription factors that are cytoprotective or cytodestructive, or that upregulate cytokine and chemokine expression, and are involved in bystander signaling. Molecular signaling for a survival or death decision in different tumor types and healthy tissues should be studied as prerequisite for shaping sensitizing and protective strategies. Long-term signaling and gene expression changes were found in various tissues of animals exposed to charged particles, and elucidation of their role in chronic and late effects of charged-particle therapy will help to develop effective preventive measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E. Hellweg
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| | - Arif Ali Chishti
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
- The Karachi Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Sebastian Diegeler
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| | - Luis F. Spitta
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| | - Bernd Henschenmacher
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| | - Christa Baumstark-Khan
- German Aerospace Center (DLR), Institute of Aerospace Medicine, Radiation Biology Department, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jezkova L, Zadneprianetc M, Kulikova E, Smirnova E, Bulanova T, Depes D, Falkova I, Boreyko A, Krasavin E, Davidkova M, Kozubek S, Valentova O, Falk M. Particles with similar LET values generate DNA breaks of different complexity and reparability: a high-resolution microscopy analysis of γH2AX/53BP1 foci. NANOSCALE 2018; 10:1162-1179. [PMID: 29271466 DOI: 10.1039/c7nr06829h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Biological effects of high-LET (linear energy transfer) radiation have received increasing attention, particularly in the context of more efficient radiotherapy and space exploration. Efficient cell killing by high-LET radiation depends on the physical ability of accelerated particles to generate complex DNA damage, which is largely mediated by LET. However, the characteristics of DNA damage and repair upon exposure to different particles with similar LET parameters remain unexplored. We employed high-resolution confocal microscopy to examine phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX)/p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) focus streaks at the microscale level, focusing on the complexity, spatiotemporal behaviour and repair of DNA double-strand breaks generated by boron and neon ions accelerated at similar LET values (∼135 keV μm-1) and low energies (8 and 47 MeV per n, respectively). Cells were irradiated using sharp-angle geometry and were spatially (3D) fixed to maximize the resolution of these analyses. Both high-LET radiation types generated highly complex γH2AX/53BP1 focus clusters with a larger size, increased irregularity and slower elimination than low-LET γ-rays. Surprisingly, neon ions produced even more complex γH2AX/53BP1 focus clusters than boron ions, consistent with DSB repair kinetics. Although the exposure of cells to γ-rays and boron ions eliminated a vast majority of foci (94% and 74%, respectively) within 24 h, 45% of the foci persisted in cells irradiated with neon. Our calculations suggest that the complexity of DSB damage critically depends on (increases with) the particle track core diameter. Thus, different particles with similar LET and energy may generate different types of DNA damage, which should be considered in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Jezkova
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia and University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mariia Zadneprianetc
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia and Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
- Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
| | - Elena Kulikova
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia and Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
- Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
| | | | - Tatiana Bulanova
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia and Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
- Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
| | - Daniel Depes
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Iva Falkova
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Alla Boreyko
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia and Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
- Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
| | - Evgeny Krasavin
- Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia and Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
- Dubna State University, Dubna, Russia
| | - Marie Davidkova
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Nuclear Physics Institute, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Stanislav Kozubek
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | - Olga Valentova
- University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Falk
- Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Brno, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|