Microdosimetric spread for cell-sized targets exposed to ⁶⁰Co, ¹⁹²Ir and ¹²⁵I sources

Patient-specific microdosimetry: a proof of concept

Microscopic energy deposition distributions from ionizing radiation are used to predict the biological effects of an irradiation and vary depending on biological target size. Ionizing radiation is thought to kill cells or inhibit cell cycling mainly by damaging DNA in the cell nucleus. The size of cells and nuclei depends on tissue type, cell cycle, and malignancy, all of which vary between patients. The aim of this study was to develop methods to perform patient-specific microdosimetry, that being, determining microdosimetric quantities in volumes that correspond to the sizes of cells and nuclei observed in a patient's tissue. A histopathological sample extracted from a stage I lung adenocarcinoma patient was analyzed. A pouring simulation was used to generate a three-dimensional tissue model from cell and nucleus size information determined from the histopathological sample. Microdosimetric distributions including f(y) and d(y) were determined for Co-60,Ir-192,Yb-169 and I-125 in a patient-specific model containing a distribution of cell and nucleus sizes. Fixed radius models and a summation method (where f(y) from many fixed radii models are summed) were compared to the full patient-specific model to evaluate their suitability for fast determination of patient-specific microdosimetric parameters. Fixed radius models do not provide a close approximation of the full patient-specific model y ̅_f or y ̅_d for the lower energy sources investigated, Yb-169 and I-125. The higher energy sources investigated, Co-60 and Ir-192 are less sensitive to target size variation than Yb-169 and I-125. A summation method yields the most accurate approximation of the full model d(y) for all radioisotopes investigated. A summation method allows for the computation of patient-specific microdosimetric distributions with the computing power of a personal computer. With appropriate biological inputs the microdosimetric distributions computed using these methods can yield a patient-specific relative biological effectiveness as part of a multiscale treatment planning approach.

Development of patient-specific 3D models from histopathological samples for applications in radiation therapy

The biological effects of ionizing radiation depend on the tissue, tumor type, radiation quality, and patient-specific factors. Inter-patient variation in cell/nucleus size may influence patient-specific dose response. However, this variability in dose response is not well investigated due to lack of available cell/nucleus size data. The aim of this study was to develop methods to derive cell/nucleus size distributions from digital images of 2D histopathological samples and use them to build digital 3D models for use in cellular dosimetry. Nineteen of sixty hematoxylin and eosin stained lung adenocarcinoma samples investigated passed exclusion criterion to be analyzed in the study. A difference of gaussians blob detection algorithm was used to identify nucleus centers and quantify cell spacing. Hematoxylin content was measured to determine nucleus radius. Pouring simulations were conducted to generate one-hundred 3D models containing volumes of equivalent cell spacing and nuclei radius to those in histopathological samples. The nuclei radius distributions of non-tumoral and cancerous regions appearing in the same slide were significantly different (p < 0.01) in all samples analyzed. The median nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio was 0.36 for non-tumoral cells and 0.50 for cancerous cells. The average cellular and nucleus packing densities in the 3D models generated were 65.9% (SD: 1.5%) and 13.3% (SD: 0.3%) respectively. Software to determine cell spacing and nuclei radius from histopathological samples was developed. 3D digital tissue models containing volumes with equivalent cell spacing, nucleus radius, and packing density to cancerous tissues were generated.

Assessment of Radio-Induced Damage in Endothelial Cells Irradiated with 40 kVp, 220 kVp, and 4 MV X-rays by Means of Micro and Nanodosimetric Calculations

The objective of this work was to study the differences in terms of early biological effects that might exist between different X-rays energies by using a mechanistic approach. To this end, radiobiological experiments exposing cell monolayers to three X-ray energies were performed in order to assess the yields of early DNA damage, in particular of double-strand breaks (DSBs). The simulation of these irradiations was set in order to understand the differences in the obtained experimental results. Hence, simulated results in terms of microdosimetric spectra and early DSB induction were analyzed and compared to the experimental data. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were irradiated with 40, 220 kVp, and 4 MV X-rays. The Geant4 Monte Carlo simulation toolkit and its extension Geant4-DNA were used for the simulations. Microdosimetric calculations aiming to determine possible differences in the variability of the energy absorbed by the irradiated cell population for those photon spectra were performed on 10,000 endothelial cell nuclei representing a cell monolayer. Nanodosimetric simulations were also carried out using a computation chain that allowed the simulation of physical, physico-chemical, and chemical stages on a single realistic endothelial cell nucleus model including both heterochromatin and euchromatin. DNA damage was scored in terms of yields of prompt DSBs per Gray (Gy) and per giga (10⁹) base pair (Gbp) and DSB complexity was derived in order to be compared to experimental data expressed as numbers of histone variant H2AX (γ-H2AX) foci per cell. The calculated microdosimetric spread in the irradiated cell population was similar when comparing between 40 and 220 kVp X-rays and higher when comparing with 4 MV X-rays. Simulated yields of induced DSB/Gy/Gbp were found to be equivalent to those for 40 and 220 kVp but larger than those for 4 MV, resulting in a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.3. Additionally, DSB complexity was similar between the considered photon spectra. Simulated results were in good agreement with experimental data obtained by IRSN (Institut de radioprotection et de sûreté nucléaire) radiobiologists. Despite differences in photon energy, few differences were observed when comparing between 40 and 220 kVp X-rays in microdosimetric and nanodosimetric calculations. Nevertheless, variations were observed when comparing between 40/220 kVp and 4 MV X-rays. Thanks to the simulation results, these variations were able to be explained by the differences in the production of secondary electrons with energies below 10 keV.

Reply to the comment on 'Monte Carlo calculated microdosimetric spread for cell nucleus-sized targets exposed to brachytherapy 125I and 192Ir sources and 60Co cell irradiation'

A discrepancy between the Monte Carlo derived relative standard deviation [Formula: see text] (microdosimetric spread) and experimental data was reported by Villegas et al (2013 Phys. Med. Biol. 58 6149-62) suggesting wall effects as a plausible explanation. The comment by Lindborg et al (2015 Phys. Med. Biol. 60 8621-4) concludes that this is not a likely explanation. A thorough investigation of the Monte Carlo (MC) transport code used for track simulation revealed a critical bug. The corrected MC version yielded [Formula: see text] values that are now within experimental uncertainty. Other microdosimetric findings are hereby communicated.

Cell to Cell Variability of Radiation-Induced Foci: Relation between Observed Damage and Energy Deposition

Most studies that aim to understand the interactions between different types of photon radiation and cellular DNA assume homogeneous cell irradiation, with all cells receiving the same amount of energy. The level of DNA damage is therefore generally determined by averaging it over the entire population of exposed cells. However, evaluating the molecular consequences of a stochastic phenomenon such as energy deposition of ionizing radiation by measuring only an average effect may not be sufficient for understanding some aspects of the cellular response to this radiation. The variance among the cells associated with this average effect may also be important for the behaviour of irradiated tissue. In this study, we accurately estimated the distribution of the number of radiation-induced γH2AX foci (RIF) per cell nucleus in a large population of endothelial cells exposed to 3 macroscopic doses of gamma rays from ⁶⁰Co. The number of RIF varied significantly and reproducibly from cell to cell, with its relative standard deviation ranging from 36% to 18% depending on the macroscopic dose delivered. Interestingly, this relative cell-to-cell variability increased as the dose decreased, contrary to the mean RIF count per cell. This result shows that the dose effect, in terms of the number of DNA lesions indicated by RIF is not as simple as a purely proportional relation in which relative SD is constant with dose. To analyse the origins of this observed variability, we calculated the spread of the specific energy distribution for the different target volumes and subvolumes in which RIF can be generated. Variances, standard deviations and relative standard deviations all changed similarly from dose to dose for biological and calculated microdosimetric values. This similarity is an important argument that supports the hypothesis of the conservation of the association between the number of RIF per nucleus and the specific energy per DNA molecule. This comparison allowed us to calculate a volume of 1.6 μm³ for which the spread of the specific energy distribution could explain the entire variability of RIF counts per cell in an exposed cell population. The definition of this volume may allow to use a microdosimetric quantity to predict heterogeneity in DNA damage. Moreover, this value is consistent with the order of magnitude of the volume occupied by the hydrated sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA molecule, which is the part of the DNA molecule responsible for strand breaks.