Monte Carlo Simulation of Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer in Pregnant Patients: How to Reduce the Radiation Dose and Risks to Fetus?

Development of a computational pregnant female phantom and calculation of fetal dose during a photon breast radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The incidence of carcinoma during pregnancy is reported to be 1:1000-1:1500 pregnancies with the breast carcinoma being the most commonly diagnosed. Since the fetus is most sensitive to ionizing radiation during the first two trimesters, there are mixed clinical opinions and no uniform guidelines on the use of radiotherapy during pregnancy. Within this study the pregnant female phantom in the second trimester, that can be used for radiotherapy treatment planning (as DICOM data), Monte Carlo simulations (as voxelized geometry) and experimental dosimetry utilizing 3D printing of the molds (as .STL files), was developed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The developed phantom is based on MRI images of a female patient in her 18th week of pregnancy and CT images after childbirth. Phantom was developed in such a manner that a pregnant female was scanned "in vivo" using MRI during pregnancy and CT after childbirth. For the treatment of left breast carcinoma, 3D conformal radiotherapy was used. The voxelized geometry of the phantom was used for Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using Monte Carlo N-Particle transport code^TM 6.2 (MCNP).

CONCLUSIONS

The modeled photon breast radiotherapy plan, applied to the phantom, indicated that the fetus dose is 59 mGy for 50 Gy prescribed to the breast. The results clearly indicate that only 9.5% of the fetal dose is caused by photons that are generated in the accelerator head through scattering and leakage, but the dominant component is scattered radiation from the patient's body.

Assessment of Fetal Dose and Health Effect to the Fetus from Breast Cancer Radiotherapy during Pregnancy

Decision for radiotherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy may occur, as patients may not realize their pregnancy at the very early stage. Since radiation dose can affect fetal development, the aim of this study was to evaluate fetal dose and associated deterministic effects and risks to the fetus from breast cancer radiotherapy of an 8-week pregnant patient. PHITS (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System) Monte Carlo simulation and the J-45 computational pregnancy phantom were used to simulate breast cancer radiotherapy from a 6 MV TrueBeam linear accelerator using the three dimensional-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique with a prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) of 50 Gy. Once the fetal dose was evaluated, the occurrence of the deterministic effects and risks for developing stochastic effects in the fetus were assessed using the recommendations of NCRP Report No. 174, AAPM Report No. 50, and ICRP Publication 84. The fetal dose was evaluated to be 3.37 ± 2.66 mGy, suggesting that the fetus was expected to have no additional deterministic effects, while the risks for developing cancer and malfunctions were similar to that expected from exposure to background radiation. The comparison with the other studies showed that accurate consideration of fetal position and size was important for dose determination in the fetus, especially at the early pregnancy stage when the fetus is very small.

Measurement of peripheral dose to the pelvic region and the associated risk for cancer development after breast intraoperative electron radiation therapy

This study aimed to measure the received dose to the pelvic region of patients during breast intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT). Furthermore, we compared the findings with those of external beam radiation therapy. Finally, secondary ovarian and uterus cancer risks following breast IOERT were estimated. In the current study, the received dose to the pelvic surface of 18 female patients during breast IOERT boosts were measured by thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD-100) chips. All patients were treated with 12 Gy given in a single fraction. To estimate the dose to the ovary and uterus of the patients, conversion coefficients for depth from the surface dose were obtained in a Rando phantom. Given the received dose to the pelvic region of the patients, secondary ovarian and uterus cancer risks following breast IOERT were estimated. The received doses to the ovary and uterus surface of the patients were 0.260 ± 0.155 mGy to 31.460 ± 6.020 mGy and 0.485 ± 0.122 mGy to 22.387 ± 15.476 mGy, respectively. Corresponding intra-pelvic (ovary and uterus) regional doses were 0.012 ± 0.007 mGy to 1.479 ± 0.283 mGy and 0.027 ± 0.001 mGy to 1.164 ± 0.805 mGy, respectively. Findings demonstrated that the ratio of the received dose by the pelvic surface to the regional dose during breast IOERT was much less than external beam radiation therapy. The mean of the secondary cancer risks for the ovary in 8 and 10 MeV electron beam energies were 135.722 ± 117.331 × 10^-6 and 69.958 ± 28.072 × 10^-6, and for the uterus were 17.342 ± 10.583 × 10^-6 and 2.971 ± 3.604 × 10^-6, respectively. According to our findings, the use of breast IOERT in pregnant patients can be considered as a safe radiotherapeutic technique, because the received dose to the fetus was lower than 50 mGy. Furthermore, IOERT can efficiently reduce the unnecessary dose to the pelvic region and lowers the risk of secondary ovarian and uterus cancer following breast irradiation.