MEASUREMENT OF ABSORPTION DOSE OUTSIDE IRRADIATION FIELD IN IMRT

Feasibility study of volumetric modulated arc therapy with Halcyon™ linac for total body irradiation

Background

The use of total body irradiation (TBI) with linac-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been steadily increasing. Helical tomotherapy has been applied in TBI and total marrow irradiation to reduce the dose to critical organs, especially the lungs. However, the methodology of TBI with Halcyon™ linac remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether VMAT with Halcyon™ linac can be clinically used for TBI.

Methods

VMAT planning with Halcyon™ linac was conducted using a whole-body computed tomography data set. The planning target volume (PTV) included the body cropped 3 mm from the source. A dose of 12 Gy in six fractions was prescribed for 50% of the PTV. The organs at risk (OARs) included the lens, lungs, kidneys, and testes.

Results

The PTV D_98%, D_95%, D_50%, and D_2% were 8.9 (74.2%), 10.1 (84.2%), 12.6 (105%), and 14.2 Gy (118%), respectively. The homogeneity index was 0.42. For OARs, the D_mean of the lungs, kidneys, lens, and testes were 9.6, 8.5, 8.9, and 4.4 Gy, respectively. The V_12Gy of the lungs and kidneys were 4.5% and 0%, respectively. The D_max of the testes was 5.8 Gy. Contouring took 1–2 h. Dose calculation and optimization was performed for 3–4 h. Quality assurance (QA) took 2–3 h. The treatment duration was 23 min.

Conclusions

A planning study of TBI with Halcyon™ to set up VMAT-TBI, dosimetric evaluation, and pretreatment QA, was established.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-021-01959-3.

The impact of the offset distance between the planning target volume and isocenter on irradiation time in TomoTherapy: A phantom study

PURPOSE

The influence of the offset distance from treatment target to gantry isocenter (GIC) on the dosimetric parameter and irradiation time was investigated using TomoTherapy METHODS: The reference position was defined as the centers of both the I'mRT phantom and planning target volume (PTV) with a spherical of 4 cm diameter aligned with the GIC. The dose calculations were performed in two offset methods with 2 and 12 Gy/fr, Method 1. The PTV was moved from 0.0 to 12.5 cm along the RL direction and -5.0 to 5.0 cm along the AP direction (PTV offset), Method 2. The phantom was moved from 0.0 to -7.5 cm along the RL direction and -5.0 to 5.0 cm along the AP direction (Phantom offset). The maximum, minimum and mean doses, homogeneity index, conformity index, irradiation time, and monitor unit were compared.

RESULTS

The irradiation times increased with increasing PTV offset. The increases in the irradiation time were 54.4% and 40.8% at PTV offsets of 12.5 cm along the RL direction for 2 and 12 Gy/fr, while the increases were 20.1% and 15.0% at a PTV offset of 5.0 cm along the AP direction. An increased irradiation time was not observed for the phantom offset. The offset didn't affect the other parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The PTV location offset of ≥5 cm from the GIC along the RL and AP axes increased the irradiation time; therefore, the PTV should be aligned with the GIC as much as possible to reduce the irradiation time on TomoTherapy.