INSTITUTIONAL BREAST DOSES IN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY

Clinical image quality assessment and mean glandular dose for full field digital mammography

This study aims to assess the image quality (IQ) of 12 mammographic units and to identify units with potential optimisation needs. Data for 350 mammography examinations meeting inclusion criteria were collected retrospectively from April 2021 to April 2022. They were categorised based on the medical reports into 10 normal cases, 10 cases displaying calcifications and 10 cases presenting lesions. Two radiologists assessed the IQ of 1400 mammograms, evaluating system performance per Boitaet al's study and positioning performance following European guidelines. To measure agreement between the two radiologists, the Cohen's Kappa coefficient (κ) was computed, quantifying the excess of agreement beyond chance. The visual grading analysis score (VGAS) was computed to compare system and positioning performance assessments across different categories and facilities. Median average glandular dose (AGD) values for cranio caudal and medio lateral oblique views were calculated for each category and facility and compared to the national diagnostic reference levels. The health facilities were categorised by considering both IQ VGAS and AGD levels. Inter-rater agreement between radiologists ranged from poor (κ< 0.20) to moderate (0.41 <κ< 0.60), likely influenced by inherent biases and distinct IQ expectations. 50% of the facilities were classified as needing corrective actions for their system performance as they had IQ or high AGD that could increase recall rate and radiation risk and 50% of the health facilities exhibited insufficient positioning performance that could mask tumour masses and microcalcifications. The study's findings emphasise the importance of implementing quality assurance programs to ensure optimal IQ for accurate diagnoses while adhering to radiation exposure guidelines. Additionally, comprehensive training for technologists is essential to address positioning challenges. These initiatives collectively aim to enhance the overall quality of breast imaging services, contributing to improved patient care.

Evaluation of patient dose during a digital breast tomosynthesis

INTRODUCTION

When the patient dose in mammography is assessed, it is important to evaluate both average glandular dose (AGD) and entrance surface dose (ESD). A dose survey on both AGD and ESD in mammography has never been studied in Sri Lanka. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the patient dose received during a full-field digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) examination by determining both AGD and ESD.

METHODS

The study was performed on 140 patients who underwent DBT examination. The AGD, ESD, compression breast thickness (CBT), half-value layer (HVL), target/filter combination, kVp, and mAs values were obtained from the machine, and AGD for each projection was calculated using the equation proposed by the Dance 2011.

RESULTS

The measured mean AGDs and ESDs of both the breasts were statistically significantly lower than the reference values given by European protocol (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in both AGDs and ESDs between the right and left breast, between right craniocauidal (RCC) and left craniocaudal (LCC), and between right mediolateral oblique (RMLO) and left mediolateral oblique (LMLO) examinations (p > 0.05). The measured median AGDs and ESDs received for MLO projections of both breasts were statistically significantly higher than that of CC projections (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The patients receive a low radiation dose during their DBT examination with both lowered AGD and ESD than the recommended values.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The results can be used as a baseline to optimize the radiation dose in mammography in Sri Lanka.

Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Full-Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia

A set of national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) was established in Malaysia for a range of breast thicknesses in 2013, but no updates for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Due to the increasing number of DBTs used and concern over radiation exposure, this study aimed to explore and establish local diagnostic reference levels for FFDM and DBT in Malaysia health facilities at different compressed breast thickness (CBT) ranges. The CBT, kilovoltage peak (kVp), Entrance surface dose (ESD), and average glandular dose (AGD) were retrospectively extracted from the mammography Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) header. The 75th and 95th percentile values were obtained for the AGD distribution of each mammography projection for three sets of CBT range. The difference in AGD values between FFDM and DBT at three CBT ranges was determined. The DRLs for FFDM were 1.13 mGy, 1.52 mGy, and 2.87 mGy, while DBT were 1.18 mGy, 1.88 mGy, and 2.78 mGy at CBT ranges of 20−39 mm, 40−59 mm, and 60−99 mm, respectively. The AGD of DBT was significantly higher than FFDM for both mammographic views (p < 0.005). All three CBT groups showed a significant difference in AGD values for FFDM and DBT (p < 0.005). The local DRLs from this study were lower than the national DRLs, with the AGD of FFDM significantly lower than DBT.

Diagnostic reference levels in digital mammography: a systematic review

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in digital mammography (DM) serve as a useful benchmark for dose monitoring and optimisation, allowing comparison amongst countries, institutions and mammography units. A systematic review of DRLs in DM, published in 2014, reported a lack of consistent and internationally accepted protocol in DRLs establishment, thereby resulting in wide variations in methodologies which complicates comparability between studies. In 2017, the International Commission of Radiation Protection (ICRP) published additional guidelines and recommendations to provide clarity in the protocol used in DRLs establishment. With the continuing evolvement of technology, optimisation of examinations and updates in guidelines and recommendations, DRLs should be revised at regular intervals. This systematic review aims to provide an update and identify a more consistent protocol in the methodologies used to establish DRLs. Searches were conducted through Web of Science, PubMed-MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, CINAHL and Google Scholar, which resulted in 766 articles, of which 19 articles were included after screening. Relevant data from the included studies were summarised and analysed. While the additional guidelines and recommendations have provided clarifications in the methodologies used in DRLs establishment, such as data source (i.e. the preference to use data derived from patient instead of phantoms to establish DRLs), protocol (i.e. stratification of DRLs by compressed breast thickness and detector technology, and the use of median value for DRLs quantity instead of mean) and percentiles used to establish DRLs (i.e. set at the 75th percentile with a minimum sample size of 50 patients), other differences such as the lack of a standard dose calculation method used to estimate mean glandular dose continues to complicate comparisons between studies and different DM systems. This systematic review update incorporated the updated guidelines and recommendations from ICRP which will serve as a useful resource for future research efforts related to DRLs, dose monitoring and optimisation.

Establishment of regional diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in Western Province of Sri Lanka

The radiation dose to the breasts should be kept to a minimum as breast tissues are highly sensitive to radiation. In mammography, the mean glandular dose (MGD) is used to specify the patient dose. In this study, data on the MGD during diagnostic mammographic examinations was collected using the database from six digital mammography facilities available in the Western Province in Sri Lanka. Examinations involving breast pathology, breast implants, or compressed breast thicknesses (CBT) outside the range of 20-110 mm were excluded in this study. The mean MGD per breast was 3.50 mGy, with a mean CBT of 57 mm. The mean MGD per facility varies from 1.58 to 2.27 mGy, with overall 75th and 95th percentiles of 2.15 and 2.82 mGy, respectively. The 75th and 95th percentile MGD per image, for the average CBT of 57 ± 12 mm, were 2.00 and 2.65 mGy respectively. The 75th percentile value of the MGD is suggested for the Western Province and it depends on the specific CBT.