CONTEMPORARY RADIATION DOSES IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY: A NATIONWIDE STUDY OF PATIENT DOSES IN FINLAND

National survey to update the diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology procedures in Italy: working methodology

Interventional Radiology (IR) deals with the diagnosis and treatment of various diseases through medically guided imaging. It provides unquestionable benefits to patients, but requires, in many cases, the use of high doses of ionizing radiation with a high impact on radiation risks to patients and to overall dose to the population. The International Commission on Radiological Protection introduced Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as an effective tool to facilitate dose verification and optimize protection for patients undergoing radiological procedures. In addition, EURATOM Council Directive 2013/59 and its Italian transposition (Legislative Decree 101/2020) have reiterated that DRLs must be established for many common radiological diagnostic procedures to compare the radiation dose delivered for the same diagnostic examination. Within this framework, Istituto Superiore di Sanità-Italian National Institute of Health (ISS)-, in collaboration with relevant Italian Scientific Societies, has provided documents on DRLs in radiological practices such as diagnostic and IR and diagnostic nuclear medicine. These reference documents enable National Hospitals to comply national regulation. The implementation of DRLs in IR is a difficult task because of the wide distribution of doses to patients even within the same procedure. Some studies have revealed that the amount of radiation in IR procedures is influenced more by the complexity of the procedure than by the weight of the patient, so complexity should be included in the definition of DRLs. For this reason, ISS promoted a survey among a sample of Italian Centers update national DRL in IR procedures with related complexity factors than can be useful for other radiological centers and to standardize the DRLs values. In the present paper the procedural methodology developed by ISS and used for the survey will be illustrated.

Current status of diagnostic reference levels in interventional cardiology

Interventional cardiology provides indisputable benefits for patients but uses a substantial amount of ionising radiation. The diagnostic reference level (DRL) is the tool recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to optimise imaging procedures. In this work, a review of studies dealing with radiation dose or recommending DRL values for interventional cardiology since 2010 is presented, providing quantitative and qualitative results. There are many published papers on coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention. The DRL values compiled for different continental regions are different: the DRL for CA is about 35 Gy cm²for Europe and 83 Gy cm²for North America. These differences emphasise the need to establish national DRLs considering different social and/or economic factors and the harmonisation of the survey methodology. Surveys with a large amount of data collected with the help of dose management systems provide more reliable information with less chance of statistical bias than those with a small amount of data. The complexity of procedures and improvements in technology are important factors that affect the radiation dose delivered to patients. There is a need for additional data on structural and electrophysiological procedures. The analysis of paediatric procedures is especially difficult because some studies present results split into age bands and others into weight bands. Diagnostic procedures are better described, but there is a great variety of therapeutic procedures with different DRL values (up to a factor of nine) and these require a dedicated review.

Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in Thailand

PURPOSE

To establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Thailand for lesions of different complexity.

METHODS

Radiation dose quantity as kerma-area-product (KAP) and cumulative air-kerma at reference point (CAK) from 76 catheterization labs in 38 hospitals in PCI registry of Thailand was transferred online to central data management. Sixteen months data (May 2018 to August 2019) was analyzed. We also investigated role of different factors that influence radiation dose the most.

RESULTS

Analysis of 22,737 PCIs resulted in national DRLs for PCI of 91.3 Gy.cm² (KAP) and 1360 mGy (CAK). The NDRLs for KAP for type C, B2, B1 and A lesions were 106.8, 82.6, 67.9, and 45.3 Gy.cm² respectively and for CAK, 1705, 1247, 962, and 790 mGy respectively. Thus, as compared to lesion A, lesion C had more than double the dose and B2 had nearly 1.6 times and B1 had 1.2 times CAK. Our DRL values are lower than other Asian countries like Japan and Korea and are in the middle range of Western countries. University hospital had significantly higher dose than private or public hospital possibly because of higher load of complex procedures in university hospitals and trainees performing the procedures. Transradial approach showed lower doses than transfemoral approach.

CONCLUSIONS

This large multi-centric study established DRLs for PCIs which can act as reference for future studies. A hallmark of our study is establishment of reference levels for coronary lesions classified as per ACC/AHA and thus for different complexities.

PATIENT SIZE INDICES AND DOSE IN FLUOROSCOPICALLY GUIDED LUMBAR DISCECTOMY AND FUSION: A PRELIMINARY STUDY

Patient dose values varied significantly during interventional procedures, mainly due to the patient size, operators' choices and clinical complexity. In this study, the effect of applying a previously described and validated size-correction method to normalise kerma-area product (KAP) and average KAP rate values of the whole procedure (KAP rate) and isolate variations in dose due to the patient size and complexity, during lumbar discectomy and fusion (LDF) procedures, was investigated. Fluoroscopy time (FT), KAP, KAP rate and patient size data (weight, height and equivalent diameter) were recorded, for 96 patients who underwent single or multilevel LDF procedures by three senior neurosurgeons, defining three different patient groups (surgeon 1, surgeon 2, surgeon 3). Simple linear regression and coefficients of determination were used to investigate the relationship between uncorrected and corrected KAP and KAP rate values and patient size indices in these groups. The results showed that the size correction decreased the influence of patient size and could contribute to the isolation of the variations in patient dose due to the patient size. From this point of view, dose surveys during lumbar spine interventions may include dosimetric data from all patients independently of their body size and not only for standard-sized patients, providing the advantage of accessible data collection for the establishment of local dose reference levels and optimisation purposes, within the framework of the radiation protection program in the Neurosurgery Department.

Radiation Dose of Patients in Fluoroscopically Guided Interventions: an Update

The benefits of fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures are significant and have established new standards in the clinical management of many diseases. Despite the benefits, it is known that they come with known risks, such as the exposure to ionizing radiation. To minimize such risks, it is crucial that the health professionals involved in the procedures have a common understanding of the concepts related to radiation protection, such as dose descriptors, diagnostic reference levels and typical dose values. An update about these concepts will be presented with the objective to raise awareness amongst health professionals and contribute to the increase in knowledge, skills and competences in radiation protection in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures.