A MULTICENTRE SURVEY OF LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS AND ACHIEVABLE DOSE FOR CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY INTERVENTION PROCEDURES IN KOREA

Establishment of institutional diagnostic reference level for coronary angiography procedures in Sri Lanka

Amongst many interventional procedures performed in a cardiac catheterisation laboratory, the coronary angiography (CAG) is the most frequently performed cardiac interventional procedure. A diagnostic reference level (DRL) is an effective tool to optimise the radiation exposure to patients and staff whilst maintaining the adequate diagnostic image quality. The aim of the study was to establish institutional DRLs for the CAG procedures performed at a selected private hospital in Colombo, Sri Lanka. A total of 325 CAG procedures were selected for this study from two C-arm machines. The institutional DRLs of cumulative dose length product (DAP) and fluoroscopic time for the CAG procedure were calculated. The established institutional DRL for accumulated DAP and fluoroscopic time are 10 610 mGycm2 and 2.31 min, respectively. As this study conducted at only one institute we recommend to develop national DRLs for mostly performing interventional procedures in Sri Lanka by considering all influencing factors to optimise the patient dose.

Current status of diagnostic reference levels in interventional cardiology

Interventional cardiology provides indisputable benefits for patients but uses a substantial amount of ionising radiation. The diagnostic reference level (DRL) is the tool recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection to optimise imaging procedures. In this work, a review of studies dealing with radiation dose or recommending DRL values for interventional cardiology since 2010 is presented, providing quantitative and qualitative results. There are many published papers on coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention. The DRL values compiled for different continental regions are different: the DRL for CA is about 35 Gy cm²for Europe and 83 Gy cm²for North America. These differences emphasise the need to establish national DRLs considering different social and/or economic factors and the harmonisation of the survey methodology. Surveys with a large amount of data collected with the help of dose management systems provide more reliable information with less chance of statistical bias than those with a small amount of data. The complexity of procedures and improvements in technology are important factors that affect the radiation dose delivered to patients. There is a need for additional data on structural and electrophysiological procedures. The analysis of paediatric procedures is especially difficult because some studies present results split into age bands and others into weight bands. Diagnostic procedures are better described, but there is a great variety of therapeutic procedures with different DRL values (up to a factor of nine) and these require a dedicated review.

Patient size as a parameter for determining Diagnostic Reference Levels for paediatric Computed Tomography (CT) procedures

INTRODUCTION

The paediatric radiation dose has never been studied in Sri Lanka, nor has a national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) established. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to propose diagnostic reference levels (DRL) and achievable dose (AD) values for paediatric CT examinations based on size.

METHODS

A total of 658 paediatric (0-15 years) non-contrast-enhanced (NC) studies of head, chest and abdomen regions performed during six months in two dedicated paediatric hospitals (out of the three such institutions in the country) were included. For head examinations, the dose indexes were analysed based on age, while for body examinations, both age and effective diameter (D_eff) were used. The median and the third quartile of the pooled dose distribution were given as AD and NDRL, respectively.

RESULTS

The AD ranges for the head, chest and abdomen regions based on CTDI_vol were 45.8-57.2 mGy, 2.9-10.0 mGy and 3.8-10.3 mGy. The corresponding NDRL ranges were 45.8-95.8 mGy, 3.5-14.1 mGy and 4.5-11.9 mGy. The AD ranges based on SSDE_deff and d_eff were 3.5-9.6 mGy and 4.1-10.3 mGy in chest and abdomen regions. The corresponding NDRL were 4.5-14.1 mGy and 6.1-10.6 mGy.

CONCLUSION

Other institutions can use the present study DRLs as a reference dose for paediatric CT. The AD values can be used as a baseline for target dose optimisations, reducing doses up to 90%.

Establishment of national diagnostic reference levels for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in Thailand

PURPOSE

To establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Thailand for lesions of different complexity.

METHODS

Radiation dose quantity as kerma-area-product (KAP) and cumulative air-kerma at reference point (CAK) from 76 catheterization labs in 38 hospitals in PCI registry of Thailand was transferred online to central data management. Sixteen months data (May 2018 to August 2019) was analyzed. We also investigated role of different factors that influence radiation dose the most.

RESULTS

Analysis of 22,737 PCIs resulted in national DRLs for PCI of 91.3 Gy.cm² (KAP) and 1360 mGy (CAK). The NDRLs for KAP for type C, B2, B1 and A lesions were 106.8, 82.6, 67.9, and 45.3 Gy.cm² respectively and for CAK, 1705, 1247, 962, and 790 mGy respectively. Thus, as compared to lesion A, lesion C had more than double the dose and B2 had nearly 1.6 times and B1 had 1.2 times CAK. Our DRL values are lower than other Asian countries like Japan and Korea and are in the middle range of Western countries. University hospital had significantly higher dose than private or public hospital possibly because of higher load of complex procedures in university hospitals and trainees performing the procedures. Transradial approach showed lower doses than transfemoral approach.

CONCLUSIONS

This large multi-centric study established DRLs for PCIs which can act as reference for future studies. A hallmark of our study is establishment of reference levels for coronary lesions classified as per ACC/AHA and thus for different complexities.

First local diagnostic reference levels for fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures in adult patients in Chile

The goal of this study was to generate the first values of local diagnostic reference levels for a range of fluoroscopically guided cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in adult patients in Chile and to compare radiation dose levels with others presented in the literature. The dosimetric data collection period was conducted over the whole of 2020. The local diagnostic reference levels were calculated as the 75th percentile of patient dose data distributions for kerma area-product values. The sample of collected clinical procedures (480) was divided into diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. The kerma area-product differences found between diagnostic and therapeutic procedures were statistically significant. The local diagnostic reference levels were 81.6 Gy cm2 and 166.9 Gycm2 for fluoroscopically guided cardiac diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, respectively. A comparison of our results with results found in the literature for the last 10 years, showed that there are no published papers for hospitals in Latin America and the Caribbean. It becomes urgent to be able to carry out more research of this type, given that the health reality between countries on different continents is very different. While in some the establishment of diagnostic reference levels is a legal obligation, in others it is a matter of good or bad will.

TYPICAL VALUES OF DOSIMETRIC DATA FOR CARDIAC FLUOROSCOPY-GUIDED PROCEDURES IN A SOUTH AFRICAN TEACHING HOSPITAL

Currently there are limited diagnostic reference level (DRL) data for South African (SA) public sector cardiac fluoroscopy-guided procedures (FGPs). A 4-y retrospective study of dosimetric data on 6265 patients determined typical values (50th percentile) of dosimetric data for the seven most frequent cardiac FGPs at a SA teaching hospital. Kerma-area-product (KAP), reference point air Kerma (Ka,r) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were, respectively, calculated for coronary angiography (CA) (n = 1935; 61Gy.cm2, 624 mGy, 5 min); CA with left ventriculography (n = 1687; 85Gy.cm2, 840 mGy, 3.9 min), valve screening (n = 129; 6Gy.cm2, 164 mGy, 2.3 min), percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 1922; 145Gy.cm2, 1569 mGy, 11.9 min), pacemaker implantation (n = 432; 9Gy.cm2, 100 mGy, 6.5 min), pericardial tap (n = 115; 1.9Gy.cm2, 18 mGy, 1.5 min) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (n = 45; 65Gy.cm2, 658 mGy, 14.1 min). This work presents the largest SA public sector cardiac FGP dosimetric data to date and provides a key resource for future work in this domain.