ESTIMATION OF RADIATION DOSE IN CT VENOGRAPHY OF THE LOWER EXTREMITIES: PHANTOM EXPERIMENTS USING DIFFERENT AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL SETTINGS AND SCAN RANGES

Radiation Dose Management in Computed Tomography: Introduction to the Practice at a Single Facility

Although the clinical benefits of computed tomography (CT) are undoubtedly high, radiation doses received by patients are also relatively high; therefore, radiation dose management is mandatory to optimize CT radiation doses and prevent excessive radiation events. This article describes CT dose management practice at a single facility. Many imaging protocols are used in CT depending on the clinical indications, scan region, and CT scanner; thus, managing the protocols is the first step for optimization. The appropriateness of the radiation dose for each protocol and scanner is verified, while answering whether the dose is the minimum to obtain diagnostic-quality images. Moreover, examinations with exceptionally high doses are identified, and the cause and clinical validity of the high dose are assessed. Daily imaging practice should follow standardized procedures, avoiding operator-dependent errors, and information required for radiation dose management should be recorded at each examination. The imaging protocols and procedures are reviewed for continuous improvement based on regular dose analysis and multidisciplinary team collaboration. The participation of many staff members in the dose management process is expected to contribute to promoting radiation safety through increased staff awareness.

SIZE-specific dose estimate for lower-limb CT

The Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) is an indicator for dose management in computed tomography (CT), but has limited use for patient dosimetry. To evaluate the patient dose, the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), reported by the American Association of Physics in Medicine task groups 204, 220, and 293, must be calculated by the CTDI_vol(z) displayed on the CT console, and the conversion factor f(D(z)) from the effective diameter (D_Eff) or water equivalent diameter (D_w). However, no reports have verified the appropriateness of using the 320-mm diameter phantom for dose assessment in CT examinations involving the lower limbs. Therefore, we validated a new method for evaluating the SSDE(z) of the lower limbs, using two 160-mm diameter phantoms instead of the 320-mm diameter phantom. The CTDI_vol(z) obtained from Monte Carlo (MC) simulation study was reliable because they were almost the same as obtained in a dosimetry study. The conversion factor f (D (z_l.l.)) for the lower limbs was evaluated based on the CTDI_vol(z) obtained by MC simulation performed using two polymethyl methacrylate cylinder phantoms of 160-mm diameter. The MC simulation was performed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 135 reference adult phantom and was used to evaluate the absorbed dose of the pelvis, thighs, knees, and ankles. The dose showing the greatest difference was the thighs, which was 8.3 mGy (16%) lower than the absorbed dose. Thus, the SSDE (z_l.l.) could be estimated from the [Formula: see text] displayed on the CT scanner console.

Conversion from dose-length product to effective dose in computed tomography venography of the lower extremities

For radiation dose assessment of computed tomography (CT), effective dose (ED) is often estimated by multiplying the dose-length product (DLP), provided automatically by the CT scanner, by a conversion factor. We investigated such conversion in CT venography of the lower extremities performed in conjunction with CT pulmonary angiography. The study subjects consisted of eight groups imaged using different scanners and different imaging conditions (five and three groups for the GE and Siemens scanners, respectively). Each group included ten men and ten women. The scan range was divided into four anatomical regions (trunk, proximal thigh, knee and distal leg), and DLP was calculated for each region (regional DLP). Regional DLP was multiplied by a conversion factor for the respective region, to convert it to ED. The sum of the ED values for the four regions was obtained as standard ED. Additionally, the sum of the four regional DLP values, an approximate of the scanner-derived DLP, was multiplied by the conversion factor for the trunk (0.015 mSv mGy cm^-1), as a simplified method to obtain ED. When using the simplified method, ED was overestimated by 32.3%-70.2% and 56.5%-66.2% for the GE and Siemens scanners, respectively. The degree of overestimation was positively and closely correlated with the contribution of the middle and distal portions of the lower extremities to total radiation exposure. ED/DLP averaged within each group, corresponding to the conversion factor, was 0.0089-0.0114 and 0.0091-0.0096 mSv mGy cm^-1for the GE and Siemens scanners, respectively. In CT venography of the lower extremities, ED is greatly overestimated by multiplying the scanner-derived DLP by the conversion factor for the trunk. The degree of overestimation varies widely depending on the imaging conditions. It is recommended to divide the scan range and calculate ED as a sum of regional ED values.