SCATTER RADIATION IN THE FLUOROSCOPY-GUIDED INTERVENTIONAL ROOM

Evaluation of radiation protection effectivity in a cardiac angiography room using visualized scattered radiation distribution

In this study, we devised a radiation protection tool specifically designed for healthcare professionals and students engaged in cardiac catheterization to easily monitor and evaluate scattered radiation distribution across diverse C-arm angles and arbitrary physician associated staff positions-scrub nurse and technologist positions. In this study, scattered radiation distributions in an angiography room were calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation of particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) code. Four visualizations were performed under different C-arm angles with and without radiation protection: (1) a dose profile, (2) a 2D cross-section, (3) a 3D scattered radiation distribution, and (4) a 4D scattered radiation distribution. The simulation results detailing the scattered radiation distribution in PHITS were exported in Visualization Toolkit format and visualized through the open-source visualization application ParaView for analysis. Visualization of the scattered dose showed that dose distribution depends on the C-arm angle and the x-ray machine output parameters (kV, mAs s-1, beam filtration) which depend upon beam angulation to the patient body. When irradiating in the posterior-anterior direction, the protective curtain decreased the dose by 62% at a point 80 cm from the floor, where the physician's gonads are positioned. Placing the protection board close to the x-ray tube reduced the dose by 24% at a location 160 cm from the floor, where the lens of the eye is situated. Notably, positioning the protection board adjacent to the physician resulted in a 95.4% reduction in incident air kerma. These visualization displays can be combined to understand the spread and direction of the scattered radiation distribution and to determine where and how to operate and place radiation protection devices, accounting for the different beam angulations encountered in interventional cases. This study showed that scatter visualization could be a radiation protection teaching aid for students and medical staff in angiography rooms.

X-ray scatter in projection radiography

Projection radiography is the most common radiological modality, and radiation safety of it concerns both radiation workers and the public. We measured and generated a series of scattered radiation maps for projection radiography and estimated effective doses of the supporting person during exposure. Measured adult patient protocols included chest posterior-anterior, chest lateral, pelvis anterior-posterior (AP), abdomen AP and bedside chest AP. Maps concretise spatial distribution and the scattered radiation dose rates in different imaging protocols. Highest and lowest rates were measured in abdomen AP and bedside chest AP protocols, respectively. The effective dose of supporting person in abdomen AP examination at distance of 0.5 m was 300 nSv and in bedside supine chest AP examination at distance of 0.7 m was 0.5 nSv. The estimated annual effective dose of emergency unit radiographer was 0.11 mSv. The obtained effective dose values are small compared to annual dose limits of radiation workers and the public.

Technical note: Characteristics of the energy spread kernels of scattered radiation in an x-ray room

PURPOSE

To describe the scattered radiation spectra inside an x-ray room for different scattering conditions.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations of an x-ray room using phantoms of different size, varying field sizes, and a range of mono-energetic beams were carried out. For each energy, the particle fluence spectrum of scattered photons was collected at different spherical zones to describe the radiation reaching the different boundaries of the x-ray room. The effect on the scattered spectrum of the room floor was also considered.

RESULTS

The scattered spectra for mono-energetic primary beams at a given spherical zone give rise to oriented energy spread kernels (OESKs) that can be used to calculate the scattered spectrum for any poly-energetic beam at that zone. Despite the large differences, which can be seen in the OESKs when the scattering conditions vary, an important invariance is also observed: the position of the broad scatter peak for a given primary energy and zone.

CONCLUSIONS

The result of breaking down the calculation of the scattered radiation spectrum into the different factors that influence it allows estimating the spectrum in a wide range of situations. The invariant position of the broad scatter peak can be used to estimate the highest energy of the scattered photons for a given primary energy and zone, which may determine radiation shielding needs.

Whole-body radiation exposure in Trauma and Orthopaedic surgery

Aims

The use of fluoroscopy in orthopaedic surgery creates risk of radiation exposure to surgeons. Appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) can help mitigate this. The primary aim of this study was to assess if current radiation protection in orthopaedic trauma is safe. The secondary aims were to describe normative data of radiation exposure during common orthopaedic procedures, evaluate ways to improve any deficits in protection, and validate the use of electronic personal dosimeters (EPDs) in assessing radiation dose in orthopaedic surgery.

Methods

Radiation exposure to surgeons during common orthopaedic trauma operations was prospectively assessed using EPDs and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Normative data for each operation type were calculated and compared to recommended guidelines.

Results

Current PPE appears to mitigate more than 90% of ionizing radiation in orthopaedic fluoroscopic procedures. There is a higher exposure to the inner thigh during seated procedures. EPDs provided results for individual procedures.

Conclusion

PPE currently used by surgeons in orthopaedic trauma theatre adequately reduces radiation exposure to below recommended levels. Normative data per trauma case show specific anatomical areas of higher exposure, which may benefit from enhanced radiation protection. EPDs can be used to assess real-time radiation exposure in orthopaedic surgery. There may be a role in future medical wearables for orthopaedic surgeons. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(11):907–912.