Now that automatic processing makes CAP scoring fast and reliable is the sleep field ready for a paradigm shift?

Cyclic Alternating EEG Patterns: From Sleep to Encephalopathy

SUMMARY

In the 2021 version of the Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology, the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society introduced new definitions, including for the cyclic alternating pattern of encephalopathy (CAPE). CAPE refers to changes in background EEG activity, with two patterns alternating spontaneously in a regular manner. CAPE shares remarkable similarities with the cyclic alternating pattern, a natural EEG phenomenon occurring in normal non-rapid eye movement sleep, considered the main electrophysiological biomarker of sleep instability. This review explores similarities and differences between cyclic alternating pattern and CAPE and, leveraging the existing expertise on cyclic alternating pattern, aims to extend knowledge on CAPE. A standardized assessment of CAPE features is key to ascertain its prevalence and clinical significance among critically ill patients and to encompass the impact of confounding factors such as anesthetic and sedative agents. Although the preservation of non-rapid eye movement sleep-related elements has a well-known prognostic value in the critical care setting, the clinical importance of cyclic oscillating patterns and the prognostic significance of CAPE remain to be elucidated.

Towards automatic EEG cyclic alternating pattern analysis: a systematic review

This study conducted a systematic review to determine the feasibility of automatic Cyclic Alternating Pattern (CAP) analysis. Specifically, this review followed the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to address the formulated research question: is automatic CAP analysis viable for clinical application? From the identified 1,280 articles, the review included 35 studies that proposed various methods for examining CAP, including the classification of A phase, their subtypes, or the CAP cycles. Three main trends were observed over time regarding A phase classification, starting with mathematical models or features classified with a tuned threshold, followed by using conventional machine learning models and, recently, deep learning models. Regarding the CAP cycle detection, it was observed that most studies employed a finite state machine to implement the CAP scoring rules, which depended on an initial A phase classifier, stressing the importance of developing suitable A phase detection models. The assessment of A-phase subtypes has proven challenging due to various approaches used in the state-of-the-art for their detection, ranging from multiclass models to creating a model for each subtype. The review provided a positive answer to the main research question, concluding that automatic CAP analysis can be reliably performed. The main recommended research agenda involves validating the proposed methodologies on larger datasets, including more subjects with sleep-related disorders, and providing the source code for independent confirmation.

Subject-level Normalization to Improve A-phase Detection of Cyclic Alternating Pattern in Sleep EEG

Automatic detection systems for activation phases (A-phase) of the cyclic alternating pattern (CAP) in electroencephalograms (EEG) are designed to automatically score A-phases in any individual but typically fail to factor in EEG signal variations between individuals, e.g. due to sleep disorders, recording site differences or equipment differences. Here, we investigate the effect of subject-level normalization on the performance of an automatic A-phase detection system consisting of a recurrent neural network. We compared the classification performance of various subject-level normalization methods to the standard training set normalization. Systems were trained and tested on subjects with different sleep disorders using the publicly available CAP Sleep Database on Physionet. Subject-level normalization using Zscore or median and interquartile range (IQR) increases the F1-score for A1-phases by +11-22% (Z-Score: +11-20%, Median/IQR: +16-22%), for A2-phases by +2-9% (Z-Score: +59%, Median/IQR: +2-7%), for A3-phases by -1 - +8% (Z-Score: +3-8%, Median/IQR: -1-+5%) as compared to the standard training data normalization when tested across sleep disorders. Our results show that subject-level normalization drastically improves the precision of A-phase detection in case the training population differs from the testing population.Clinical Relevance- Subject-level normalisation improves the automatic CAP scoring system performances for the general population by minimizing the effect of individual EEG differences.

The Contribution of Sleep Texture in the Characterization of Sleep Apnea

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is multi-faceted world-wide-distributed disorder exerting deep effects on the sleeping brain. In the latest years, strong efforts have been dedicated to finding novel measures assessing the real impact and severity of the pathology, traditionally trivialized by the simplistic apnea/hypopnea index. Due to the unavoidable connection between OSA and sleep, we reviewed the key aspects linking the breathing disorder with sleep pathophysiology, focusing on the role of cyclic alternating pattern (CAP). Sleep structure, reflecting the degree of apnea-induced sleep instability, may provide topical information to stratify OSA severity and foresee some of its dangerous consequences such as excessive daytime sleepiness and cognitive deterioration. Machine learning approaches may reinforce our understanding of this complex multi-level pathology, supporting patients' phenotypization and easing in a more tailored approach for sleep apnea.