Long-Term Safety of Bone Regeneration Using Autologous Stromal Vascular Fraction and Calcium Phosphate Ceramics: A 10-Year Prospective Cohort Study

3D printed PLGA scaffold with nano-hydroxyapatite carrying linezolid for treatment of infected bone defects

BACKGROUND

Linezolid has been reported to protect against chronic bone and joint infection. In this study, linezolid was loaded into the 3D printed poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) scaffold with nano-hydroxyapatite (HA) to explore the effect of this composite scaffold on infected bone defect (IBD).

METHODS

PLGA scaffolds were produced using the 3D printing method. Drug release of linezolid was analyzed by elution and high-performance liquid chromatography assay. PLGA, PLGA-HA, and linezolid-loaded PLGA-HA scaffolds, were implanted into the defect site of a rabbit radius defect model. Micro-CT, H&E, and Masson staining, and immunohistochemistry were performed to analyze bone infection and bone healing. Evaluation of viable bacteria was performed. The cytocompatibility of 3D-printed composite scaffolds in vitro was detected using human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Long-term safety of the scaffolds in rabbits was evaluated.

RESULTS

The linezolid-loaded PLGA-HA scaffolds exhibited a sustained release of linezolid and showed significant antibacterial effects. In the IBD rabbit models implanted with the scaffolds, the linezolid-loaded PLGA-HA scaffolds promoted bone healing and attenuated bone infection. The PLGA-HA scaffolds carrying linezolid upregulated the expression of osteogenic genes including collagen I, runt-related transcription factor 2, and osteocalcin. The linezolid-loaded PLGA-HA scaffolds promoted the proliferation and osteogenesis of BMSCs in vitro via the PI3K/AKT pathway. Moreover, the rabbits implanted with the linezolid-loaded scaffolds showed normal biochemical profiles and normal histology, which suggested the safety of the linezolid-loaded scaffolds.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the linezolid-loaded PLGA-HA scaffolds fabricated by 3D printing exerts significant bone repair and anti-infection effects.

Comparative Analysis of Stromal Vascular Fraction and Alternative Mechanisms in Bone Fracture Stimulation to Bridge the Gap between Nature and Technological Advancement: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Various stimulation methods, including electrical, ultrasound, mechanical, and biological interventions, are explored, each leveraging intricate cellular and molecular dynamics to expedite healing. The advent of stromal vascular fraction (SVF) marks a significant stride, offering multifarious benefits in bone healing, from enhanced bone formation to optimal vascular integration, drawing a harmonious balance between innate mechanisms and scientific advancements.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted focusing on literature from 2016 to 2023 and encompassing various bone healing stimulation mechanisms like SVF, electrical, ultrasound, and mechanical stimulation. The extracted data underwent meticulous synthesis and analysis, emphasizing comparative evaluations of mechanisms, applications, and outcomes of each intervention.

RESULTS

The reviewed studies reveal the potential of SVF in bone fracture healing, with its regenerative and anti-inflammatory effects. The purification of SVF is crucial for safe therapeutic use. Characterization involves flow cytometry and microscopy. Studies show SVF's efficacy in bone regeneration, versatility in various contexts, and potential for clinical use. SVF appears superior to electrical, ultrasound, and mechanical stimulation, with low complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This review compares bone healing methods, including SVF. It provides valuable insights into SVF's potential for bone regeneration. However, due to limited human studies and potential bias, cautious interpretation is necessary. Further research is essential to validate these findings and determine the optimal SVF applications in bone healing.

Stem Cells and Their Derivatives: Unlocking the Promising Potential of Minimally Manipulated Cells for In Situ Tissue Engineering

We've read with great interest the article by Smolinska et al. entitled "Stem Cells and Their Derivatives: An Implication for the Regeneration of Nonunion Fractures" regarding the recent scientific studies dealing with the treatment of nonunion fractures in clinical and preclinical settings using Mesenchymal Stem Cell (MSC)-based therapeutic techniques. Bone tissue regeneration is a dynamic process that involves the restoration of damaged or lost bone structure and function. Traditional approaches such as autografts and allografts, platelet rich plasma (PRP) treatment and cell therapies, have limitations, including donor site morbidity and immunologic concerns, as well as cell culture and processing requirements. In contrast, the use of minimally manipulated cells that do not require culturing has emerged as a promising alternative that offers several advantages in bone tissue regeneration.