Is clinical coordination across care levels different according to the secondary care medical speciality? Results from the Catalan health system

BACKGROUND

Despite the scarce evidence, some studies suggest that cross-level clinical coordination may vary among secondary care (SC) doctors, influenced by their speciality and organisational model, including degree of decentralisation to primary care (PC). The aim was to determine the differences in experience and perception of cross-level clinical coordination and related factors according to the SC doctor's speciality in the Catalan health system.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study, based on an on-line survey using the COORDENA-CAT questionnaire, to SC doctors (n = 1666). Descriptive and multivariate analysis were used to compare five groups of SC specialities (decentralised, hospital-based, internists/geriatricians, gynaecologist, and paediatricians), for experience, perception and factors related to coordination.

RESULTS

When comparing with decentralised specialities, hospital-based specialities and internal medicine/geriatrics reported lower care consistency and follow up across levels, while gynaecology and paediatrics, higher accessibility. General perception of cross-level coordination was lower in hospital-based specialities (PR:0.80, 95% CI 0.72-0.89) and higher in gynaecology (PR:1.36, 95% CI 1.18-1.56). Moreover, hospital-based specialities reported a lower use of some coordination mechanisms and lower knowledge of the primary care doctors (PR:0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.72), while gynaecology a higher knowledge (PR:2.04, 95% CI 1.22-3.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Results show differences in experience, perception of coordination, organisational and interactional factors across specialities. These differences may be explained by their complexity, coordination needs and organisational model. Further research is needed to clarify and understand the causes of such differences and the particular needs of coordination of each speciality to identify strategies to improve cross-level clinical coordination.

Relational coordination and staff outcomes among healthcare professionals: a scoping review

Relational coordination (RC) is a process of coordinating work between professionals that can be used as a framework to enhance interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) in various healthcare settings. RC encompasses four communication dimensions (frequent, timely, accurate, problem-solving) and three relational dimensions (shared knowledge, shared goals, mutual respect). RC has been associated with better staff and patient outcomes; it has wide applicability, and it has been examined nationally and internationally in various healthcare settings. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and synthesize available evidence on RC and staff outcomes among healthcare professionals. Literature searches were conducted on articles published between May 2000 until February 2020. Sixteen abstracts were screened from four databases (PubMed, Psych Info, CINAHL, and Scopus). Eleven empirical studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Articles were excluded if they did not measure RC and staff outcomes. RC was reported as positively associated with higher job satisfaction, better work engagement, lower burnout, lower turnover, and reciprocal learning among healthcare professionals. Literature on this topic is scarce, despite RC being a promising framework for healthcare professionals in various disciplines to enhance IPCP and improve staff outcomes across healthcare settings.