1
|
Bennett R, Driessen C, Zorbas C, Sacks G, Gupta A, Cameron A, Gomez-Donoso C, Peeters A, Backholer K. ' Healthier options tend to get lost in the noise of online' - Australian shoppers' experiences with online grocery platforms. Public Health Nutr 2024; 27:e134. [PMID: 38742445 PMCID: PMC11148825 DOI: 10.1017/s1368980024001046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to understand what influences parents' purchasing behaviours when shopping for groceries online and potential ways to improve the healthiness of online grocery platforms. DESIGN We conducted semi-structured interviews, guided by the Marketing Mix framework. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse data. SETTING Online interviews were conducted with primary grocery shoppers. PARTICIPANTS Parents (n 14) or caregivers (n 2) using online grocery platforms at least every 2 weeks. RESULTS Most participants perceived purchasing healthy food when shopping for groceries online to be more challenging compared to in physical stores. They expressed concerns about the prominence of online marketing for unhealthy food. Participants from lower socio-economic backgrounds often depended on online supermarket catalogues to find price promotions, but healthy options at discounted prices were limited. Across socio-economic groups, fresh items like meat and fruit were preferred to be purchased instore due to concerns about online food quality.Participants believed online grocery platforms should make healthy foods more affordable and supported regulations on supermarket retailers to promote healthy options and limit unhealthy food promotion online. CONCLUSIONS Participants had varied experiences with online grocery shopping, with both positive and negative aspects. Efforts to improve population diets need to include mechanisms to create health-enabling online grocery retail platforms. Government interventions to restrict marketing of unhealthy foods and promote marketing of healthy options on these platforms warrant investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Bennett
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Christine Driessen
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Christina Zorbas
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Gary Sacks
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Adyya Gupta
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | | | - Clara Gomez-Donoso
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Anna Peeters
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Kathryn Backholer
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute of Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hedrick VE, Farris AR, Houghtaling B, Mann G, Misyak SA. Validity of a Market Basket Assessment Tool for Use in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education Healthy Retail Initiatives. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR 2022; 54:776-783. [PMID: 35623937 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2022.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the validity of the Market Basket Analysis Tool (MBAT) for food environment quality within various retail environments compared to the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in Stores (NEMS-S). METHODS In-store assessments using the MBAT and the NEMS-S on the same day in a given store were conducted in grocery stores, corner stores, pharmacies, and dollar stores in a metropolis, and urban and rural counties across 4 states: Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Virginia. Descriptive statistics, correlations, and ANOVAs were used to assess store location, store type differences, and MBAT and NEMS-S scores. RESULTS Market Basket Analysis Tool and NEMS-S data were collected from 114 stores. Market Basket Analysis Tool and NEMS-S total and all individual component scores were significantly correlated (r = 0.84, P ≤ 0.0001; r range, 0.51-0.88; P ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The MBAT offers a methodology to measure the food retail environment focusing on the availability of healthful food items with a reduced training time and streamlined data collection compared with the NEMS-S. Future work can assess the completion time of the MBAT compared with the NEMS-S and the ability of the MBAT to detect changes in food environment quality post healthy food retail interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valisa E Hedrick
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
| | - Alisha R Farris
- Department of Nutrition and Health Care Management, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC
| | - Bailey Houghtaling
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA
| | - Georgianna Mann
- Department of Nutrition and Hospitality Management, University of Mississippi, University, MS
| | - Sarah A Misyak
- Virginia Cooperative Extension Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ng S, Yeatman H, Kelly B, Sankaranarayanan S, Karupaiah T. Identifying barriers and facilitators in the development and implementation of government-led food environment policies: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 2022; 80:1896-1918. [PMID: 35388428 PMCID: PMC9263881 DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Policy-specific actions to improve food environments will support healthy population diets. OBJECTIVE To identify cited barriers and facilitators to food environment policy (FEP) processes reported in the literature, exploring these according to the nature of the policy (voluntary or mandatory) and country development status. DATA SOURCES A systematic search was conducted of 10 academic and 7 grey-literature databases, national websites, and manual searches of publication references. DATA EXTRACTION Data on government-led FEPs, barriers, and facilitators from key informants were collected. DATA SYNTHESIS The constant-comparison approach generated core themes for barriers and facilitators. The appraisal tool developed by Hawker et al. was adopted to determine the quality of qualitative and quantitative studies. RESULTS A total of 142 eligible studies were identified. Industry resistance or disincentive was the most cited barrier in policy development. Technical challenges were most frequently a barrier for policy implementation. Frequently cited facilitators included resource availability or maximization, strategies in policy process, and stakeholder partnership or support. CONCLUSIONS The findings from this study will strategically inform health-reform stakeholders about key elements of public health policy processes. More evidence is required from countries with human development indices ranging from low to high and on voluntary policies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration no. CRD42018115034.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SeeHoe Ng
- Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Heather Yeatman
- Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bridget Kelly
- Early Start, School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sreelakshmi Sankaranarayanan
- School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Tilakavati Karupaiah
- School of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Houghtaling B, Englund T, Chen S, Pradhananga N, Kraak VI, Serrano E, Harden SM, Davis GC, Misyak S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-authorized retailers received a low score using the Business Impact Assessment for Obesity and population-level nutrition (BIA-Obesity) tool. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1225. [PMID: 35725448 PMCID: PMC9208119 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13624-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) supports Americans with lower income to purchase dietary products at authorized retailers. This research aimed to evaluate SNAP-authorized retailers' public commitments in support of nutrition security and to examine differences between traditional grocers and nontraditional (e.g., convenience, drug, dollar) SNAP-authorized retailers' public commitments. METHODS Prominent United States (U.S.) SNAP-authorized retailers nationally and in two U.S. states (California and Virginia) were identified based on number of store locations (n = 61). Public information available in grey literature were reviewed and scored using the Business Impact Assessment for Obesity and population-level nutrition (BIA-Obesity) tool. SNAP-authorized retailers were classified as traditional (e.g., grocery) or nontraditional (e.g., non-grocery) retailers. Total BIA-Obesity from 0 to 615, representing low to optimal support) and category scores were calculated for corporate strategy, relationships with external organizations, product formulation, nutrition labeling, product and brand promotion, and product accessibility. Descriptive statistics were used to describe BIA-Obesity scores overall and by category. Mann-Whitney U was used to test for potential differences in median BIA-Obesity total scores between traditional and nontraditional SNAP-authorized retailers (a priori, p < 0.05). RESULTS Average total BIA-Obesity scores for SNAP-authorized retailers ranged from 0 to 112 (16.5 ± 23.3). Total BIA-Obesity scores for traditional SNAP-authorized retailers (32.7 ± 33.6; median 25) were higher than nontraditional SNAP-authorized retailer scores (11.2 ± 16; median 5) (p = 0.008). For BIA-Obesity categories, average scores were highest for the category relationships with external organizations (8.3 ± 10.3) and lowest for promotion practices (0.6 ± 2.1). CONCLUSIONS Results of this research underscore a dearth of available evidence and substantial opportunity for improvement regarding SNAP-authorized retailer strategies to support nutrition security among Americans with lower income.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bailey Houghtaling
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, 70803, US.
| | - Tessa Englund
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, US
| | - Susan Chen
- Department of Nutrition, Food Science, and Packaging, San José State University, San José, CA, 95192, US
| | - Nila Pradhananga
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, 70803, US
| | - Vivica I Kraak
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US
| | - Elena Serrano
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US.,The Virginia Cooperative Extension Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US
| | - Samantha M Harden
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US
| | - George C Davis
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US.,Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US
| | - Sarah Misyak
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US.,The Virginia Cooperative Extension Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, US
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Houghtaling B, Cater M, Bryant D, Brooks A, Holston D. What is the availability, affordability, and quality of foods and beverages aligned with dietary guidance in Louisiana Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) authorized stores? Prev Med Rep 2021; 24:101578. [PMID: 34976640 PMCID: PMC8683981 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthy food retail strategies are delivered by Cooperative Extension Services in Louisiana to improve public health among communities with lower income. To guide Cooperative Extension Services Programming, the aim of this study was to assess healthy food access among SNAP-authorized stores. This included comparing the availability, affordability, and quality of healthy foods sold in these stores by geography, ownership, and store type. Seventy-five Louisiana SNAP-authorized stores were selected for measurement. Between October 2019 and March 2020 (prior to the COVID-19 national emergency declaration), trained researchers used the Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in Stores (NEMS-S) to assess the availability, affordability, and quality of healthy versus less healthy foods and beverages in 42 SNAP-authorized stores, including: grocery (n = 12, 29%), convenience (n = 17, 41%), drug (n = 1, 2%), dollar (n = 11, 26%), and butcher/meat (n = 1, 2%). Multivariate analysis of variance (a priori, p < 0.05) determined if differences in total NEMS-S scores or subscores existed by geography (urban versus rural), ownership (corporate/chain versus independent), or store type. No urban/rural differences were identified. Corporate/chain SNAP-authorized stores scored higher on average than independent SNAP-authorized stores for the total NEMS-S score (17.2 versus 8.1; p = 0.009) and availability subscore (13.1 versus 6.1; p = 0.02). SNAP-authorized grocery stores scored higher than all other store types (total NEMS-S score 27.6), followed by SNAP-authorized dollar stores (total NEMS-S score 10.7), and SNAP-authorized convenience stores (total NEMS-S score 5) (p < 0.001). Louisiana Cooperative Extension Services should explore ways to scale healthy food retail strategies statewide with a specific emphasis on independent and smaller SNAP-authorized retailers.
Collapse
Key Words
- Beverages
- CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- DGA, 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans
- EFNEP, Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program
- Food
- Food access
- Food assistance
- Food security
- NEMS-S, Nutrition Environment Measures Survey in Stores
- PSE, policy, systems, and environmental
- Public health
- RUCC, Rural-Urban Continuum Code
- SNAP, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program
- SNAP-Ed, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education
- WIC, Special Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program for Women, Infants, and Children
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bailey Houghtaling
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Melissa Cater
- Agricultural and Extension Education and Evaluation, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - De'Jerra Bryant
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Allie Brooks
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| | - Denise Holston
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Anderson E, Wei R, Liu B, Plummer R, Kelahan H, Tamez M, Marrero A, Bhupathiraju S, Mattei J. Improving Healthy Food Choices in Low-Income Settings in the United States Using Behavioral Economic-Based Adaptations to Choice Architecture. Front Nutr 2021; 8:734991. [PMID: 34692747 PMCID: PMC8526839 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.734991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Low diet quality is a significant public health problem in the United States, especially among low-income populations. The food environment influences dietary choices. When applied to eating behavior, behavioral economics (BE) recognizes that decision biases instigated by a food environment saturated with unhealthy foods may lead people to purchase such foods, even when they possess the necessary information and skills to make healthy dietary choices. Choice architecture, a BE concept that involves modifying the appeal or availability of choices to “nudge” people toward a certain choice, retains freedom of choice but makes unhealthy options less convenient or visible. Choice architecture has been demonstrated to influence food choices in various settings, including supermarkets, convenience stores, and food pantries. These modifications are low-cost and feasible to implement, making them a viable strategy to help “nudge” patrons toward healthier choices in food establishments serving low-income populations, including food pantries and retailers accepting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. This narrative review searched, appraised, and underscored the strengths and limitations of extant research studies that used choice architecture adaptations to influence food choices among low-income populations in the United States. Findings from studies in food pantry settings suggest the potential of BE strategies to improve the healthfulness of food choices and dietary intake in low-income populations. In food retail settings, research suggests that BE strategies increase sales of healthy foods, like fruits and vegetables. We identify new areas of research needed to determine if BE-based modifications in low-income settings have sustained impacts on diet quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Anderson
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ruobin Wei
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Binkai Liu
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Rachel Plummer
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Heather Kelahan
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Martha Tamez
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Abrania Marrero
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Shilpa Bhupathiraju
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Josiemer Mattei
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rantala E, Vanhatalo S, Tilles-Tirkkonen T, Kanerva M, Hansen PG, Kolehmainen M, Männikkö R, Lindström J, Pihlajamäki J, Poutanen K, Karhunen L, Absetz P. Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13103592. [PMID: 34684592 PMCID: PMC8538928 DOI: 10.3390/nu13103592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Redesigning choice environments appears a promising approach to encourage healthier eating and physical activity, but little evidence exists of the feasibility of this approach in real-world settings. The aim of this paper is to portray the implementation and feasibility assessment of a 12-month mixed-methods intervention study, StopDia at Work, targeting the environment of 53 diverse worksites. The intervention was conducted within a type 2 diabetes prevention study, StopDia. We assessed feasibility through the fidelity, facilitators and barriers, and maintenance of implementation, building on implementer interviews (n = 61 informants) and observations of the worksites at six (t1) and twelve months (t2). We analysed quantitative data with Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests and qualitative data with content analysis. Intervention sites altogether implemented 23 various choice architectural strategies (median 3, range 0-14 strategies/site), employing 21 behaviour change mechanisms. Quantitative analysis found implementation was successful in 66%, imperfect in 25%, and failed in 9% of evaluated cases. These ratings were independent of the ease of implementation of applied strategies and reminders that implementers received. Researchers' assistance in intervention launch (p = 0.02) and direct contact to intervention sites (p < 0.001) predicted higher fidelity at t1, but not at t2. Qualitative content analysis identified facilitators and barriers related to the organisation, intervention, worksite environment, implementer, and user. Contributors of successful implementation included apt implementers, sufficient implementer training, careful planning, integration into worksite values and activities, and management support. After the study, 49% of the worksites intended to maintain the implementation in some form. Overall, the choice architecture approach seems suitable for workplace health promotion, but a range of practicalities warrant consideration while designing real-world implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eeva Rantala
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland; (S.V.); (M.K.); (K.P.)
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland; (T.T.-T.); (M.K.); (R.M.); (J.P.); (L.K.); (P.A.)
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, 00271 Helsinki, Finland;
- Correspondence:
| | - Saara Vanhatalo
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland; (S.V.); (M.K.); (K.P.)
| | - Tanja Tilles-Tirkkonen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland; (T.T.-T.); (M.K.); (R.M.); (J.P.); (L.K.); (P.A.)
| | - Markus Kanerva
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland; (T.T.-T.); (M.K.); (R.M.); (J.P.); (L.K.); (P.A.)
- D Department, Tikkurila Campus, Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Ratatie 22, 01300 Vantaa, Finland
| | - Pelle Guldborg Hansen
- Department of Communication, Business & Information Technologies, Universitetsvej 1, Roskilde University, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark;
| | - Marjukka Kolehmainen
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland; (S.V.); (M.K.); (K.P.)
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland; (T.T.-T.); (M.K.); (R.M.); (J.P.); (L.K.); (P.A.)
| | - Reija Männikkö
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland; (T.T.-T.); (M.K.); (R.M.); (J.P.); (L.K.); (P.A.)
| | - Jaana Lindström
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, 00271 Helsinki, Finland;
| | - Jussi Pihlajamäki
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland; (T.T.-T.); (M.K.); (R.M.); (J.P.); (L.K.); (P.A.)
- Department of Medicine, Endocrinology and Clinical Nutrition, Kuopio University Hospital, P.O. Box 100, 70029 Kuopio, Finland
| | - Kaisa Poutanen
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Tietotie 2, P.O. Box 1000, 02044 Espoo, Finland; (S.V.); (M.K.); (K.P.)
| | - Leila Karhunen
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland; (T.T.-T.); (M.K.); (R.M.); (J.P.); (L.K.); (P.A.)
| | - Pilvikki Absetz
- Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland; (T.T.-T.); (M.K.); (R.M.); (J.P.); (L.K.); (P.A.)
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, 33520 Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gillespie R, DeWitt E, Norman-Burgdolf H, Dunnaway B, Gustafson A. Community-Based Efforts Aim to Improve the Food Environment within a Highly Obese Rural Appalachian County. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13072200. [PMID: 34206825 PMCID: PMC8308232 DOI: 10.3390/nu13072200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Rural communities in Appalachia are displaying increased obesity prevalence, yet traditional interventions have not provided a broad enough impact to improve dietary consumption patterns. Therefore, expanding efforts that address the food environment and incorporate behavioral nudges through community-developed marketing strategies may be a viable mechanism to improve food and beverage choices within this unique population. This study installed shelf-wobblers across n = 5 gas stations in one rural Appalachian county in Kentucky. Smart Snacks were identified from store inventory lists utilizing the CDC Food Service Guideline for Federal Facilities calculator and were categorized into high-protein snacks, low-fat carbohydrate snacks, meal replacement snacks, and no-calorie beverages. NEMS-CS audits were conducted, and monthly sales data was collected at baseline and for six months thereafter for each store location. A difference-in-difference model was used, adjusting for total sales or total mean sales for each Smart Snack model to assess the percentage change within and between stores. Overall, percent change in mean sales and total sales across all stores resulted in a percentage increase of sales of Smart Snack items following wobbler installment. This study provides unique insight into how a community-driven approach to marketing can influence the sale of healthier food and beverage items.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Gillespie
- Family Consumer Sciences Extension, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-859-257-7793
| | - Emily DeWitt
- Family Consumer Sciences Extension, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA;
| | - Heather Norman-Burgdolf
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA; (H.N.-B.); (B.D.); (A.G.)
| | - Brynnan Dunnaway
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA; (H.N.-B.); (B.D.); (A.G.)
| | - Alison Gustafson
- Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA; (H.N.-B.); (B.D.); (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Houghtaling B, Holston D, Szocs C, Penn J, Qi D, Hedrick V. A rapid review of stocking and marketing practices used to sell sugar-sweetened beverages in U.S. food stores. Obes Rev 2021; 22:e13179. [PMID: 33331094 PMCID: PMC7988563 DOI: 10.1111/obr.13179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2020] [Revised: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are a primary source of added sugars in the American diet. Habitual SSB consumption is associated with obesity and noncommunicable disease and is one factor contributing to U.S. health disparities. Public health responses to address marketing-mix and choice-architecture (MMCA) strategies used to sell SSB products may be required. Thus, our goal was to identify original research about stocking and marketing practices used to sell SSB in U.S. food stores. We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) protocol for rapid reviewing. We searched six databases and Google Scholar using key terms focused on store type and SSB products. We characterized results using an MMCA framework with categories place, profile, portion, pricing, promotion, priming or prompting, and proximity. Our search resulted in the identification of 29 articles. Most results focused on profile (e.g., SSB availability) (n = 13), pricing (e.g., SSB prices or discounts) (n = 13), or promotion (e.g., SSB advertisements) (n = 13) strategies. We found some evidence of targeted MMCA practices toward at-risk consumers and differences by store format, such as increased SSB prominence among supermarkets. The potential for systematic variations in MMCA strategies used to sell SSB requires more research. We discuss implications for public health, health equity, and environmental sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bailey Houghtaling
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Denise Holston
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Courtney Szocs
- E.J. Ourso College of Business, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Jerrod Penn
- Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University (LSU) and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Danyi Qi
- Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University (LSU) and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Valisa Hedrick
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Houghtaling B, Serrano E, Chen S, Kraak VI, Harden SM, Davis GC, Misyak S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-Authorized Retailers' Perceived Costs to Use Behavioral Economic Strategies to Encourage Healthy Product Sales. Ecol Food Nutr 2020; 60:212-224. [PMID: 33164562 DOI: 10.1080/03670244.2020.1833873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
SNAP-authorized retailers could use marketing-mix and choice-architecture (MMCA) strategies to improve SNAP purchases, but associated costs are unknown. Perceived cost and inconvenience to implement eight MMCA strategies were assessed among 29 U.S. retailers. Differences in perspective were explored (owners vs. managers, corporate vs. independent retailers, and by format). Place changes (e.g., added refrigeration) were perceived more costly and prompting (e.g., shelf labeling) less costly. Managers rated the perceived inconvenience to make proximity changes higher than owners (3.78 ± 1.4 and 2.33 ± 1.2, respectively) (p < .05). Results can inform strategies to improve the adoption and implementation of healthy food retail programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bailey Houghtaling
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University (LSU) & LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
| | - Elena Serrano
- Virginia Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Susan Chen
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Vivica I Kraak
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Samantha M Harden
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - George C Davis
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.,Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| | - Sarah Misyak
- Virginia Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Houghtaling B, Kniola D, Misyak S. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-Authorized Grocery, Convenience, Dollar, and Restaurant or Delivery Service Settings Are Associated With Increased Obesity Prevalence in Virginia. Am J Health Promot 2020; 35:127-130. [PMID: 32567325 DOI: 10.1177/0890117120934610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE United States Department of Agriculture Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) participants use SNAP-authorized stores for dietary purchases. Relationships between obesity prevalence and access to grocery and varied nontraditional (eg, dollar, drug, and convenience) SNAP settings are underexplored. This research aimed to determine the association of a full range of SNAP-authorized stores with obesity prevalence in Virginia. DESIGN The SNAP Retailer Locator was used to cross-sectionally identify authorized stores, and county health ranking information was applied based on store location. SETTING Virginia, United States. SAMPLE The SNAP-authorized stores, classified among store categories: grocery or supermarket; drug; mass merchandiser; supercenter; convenience; dollar; club; other; nonfood store; farmers markets; and independent grocery stores. MEASURES County-level obesity prevalence with income and rurality as potential confounders. ANALYSIS Multiple linear regression was used to determine associations between county-level adult obesity prevalence and available SNAP-authorized store formats (P < .05 a priori). RESULTS Store format was a predictor of obesity prevalence in Virginia in simple and adjusted models (R 2 = 0.035, P < .0001 and R 2 = 0.434, P < .0001, respectively). Grocery store or supermarket access was associated with obesity. The SNAP-authorized convenience, dollar, and nonfood stores were associated with a 0.3, 0.5, and 1.3 increase in county obesity prevalence, respectively (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Research, practice, and health policy approaches to improve grocery, convenience, dollar, and restaurant or delivery service settings may favorably influence community obesity prevalence in Virginia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bailey Houghtaling
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 5779Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - David Kniola
- School of Education, 1757Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Sarah Misyak
- Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, 1757Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fleischhacker S, Parks CA, Yaroch AL. Addressing food insecurity in the United States: the role of policy, systems changes, and environmental supports. Transl Behav Med 2020; 9:827-836. [PMID: 31504976 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibz131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This commentary provides a brief overview of the historical, contemporary, and potential future approaches for using policy, systems changes, and environmental supports (PSE) to address food insecurity in the United States. We reflect on and integrate where possible the findings put forth in the other 16 papers included in the Translational Behavioral Medicine Special Issue entitled: Food Access Among Low-Income Populations: Understanding the Potential Intersect of Diet, Obesity, Food Insecurity, and Hunger.
Collapse
|
13
|
Houghtaling B, Serrano E, Dobson L, Kraak VI, Harden SM, Davis GC, Misyak S. Perceptions of Rural SNAP-Authorized Food Store Owners and Managers About Healthy Product Availability. JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR 2020; 52:171-179. [PMID: 31732431 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2019.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-authorized retailers' healthy perceptions and store availability of healthy products were explored to plan a healthy food retail program. METHODS Cognitive anthropology (free list) and quantitative (food environment measure) methods were used to assess retailers' healthy product perceptions and the availability of store products aligned with dietary guidance. Cultural domain analysis techniques and descriptive and inferential statistics were used to interpret data. RESULTS SNAP-authorized retailers (n = 29) of rural grocery (17%), dollar (14%), convenience (66%), and specialty (3%) stores participated. There was low salience for what constituted healthy and misalignments with dietary guidance and inventory. Dried beans, nuts, and seeds were widely available products across all stores and were listed less frequently by retailers. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Engagement with SNAP-authorized retailers to develop retailer-focused nutrition education and/or training protocols is warranted to improve the capacity for retailers to market store products aligned with dietary guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bailey Houghtaling
- School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA.
| | - Elena Serrano
- Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| | - Liza Dobson
- Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| | - Vivica I Kraak
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| | - Samantha M Harden
- Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| | - George C Davis
- Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| | - Sarah Misyak
- Family Nutrition Program, Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
| |
Collapse
|