Effectiveness of a Daily Rounding Checklist on Processes of Care and Outcomes in Diverse Pediatric Intensive Care Units Across the World

21st century critical care medicine: An overview

Critical care medicine in the 21st century has witnessed remarkable advancements that have significantly improved patient outcomes in intensive care units (ICUs). This abstract provides a concise summary of the latest developments in critical care, highlighting key areas of innovation. Recent advancements in critical care include Precision Medicine: Tailoring treatments based on individual patient characteristics, genomics, and biomarkers to enhance the effectiveness of therapies. The objective is to describe the recent advancements in Critical Care Medicine. Telemedicine: The integration of telehealth technologies for remote patient monitoring and consultation, facilitating timely interventions. Artificial intelligence (AI): AI-driven tools for early disease detection, predictive analytics, and treatment optimization, enhancing clinical decision-making. Organ Support: Advanced life support systems, such as Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy provide better organ support. Infection Control: Innovative infection control measures to combat emerging pathogens and reduce healthcare-associated infections. Ventilation Strategies: Precision ventilation modes and lung-protective strategies to minimize ventilator-induced lung injury. Sepsis Management: Early recognition and aggressive management of sepsis with tailored interventions. Patient-Centered Care: A shift towards patient-centered care focusing on psychological and emotional well-being in addition to medical needs. We conducted a thorough literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus using our tailored strategy, incorporating keywords such as critical care, telemedicine, and sepsis management. A total of 125 articles meeting our criteria were included for qualitative synthesis. To ensure reliability, we focused only on articles published in the English language within the last two decades, excluding animal studies, in vitro/molecular studies, and non-original data like editorials, letters, protocols, and conference abstracts. These advancements reflect a dynamic landscape in critical care medicine, where technology, research, and patient-centered approaches converge to improve the quality of care and save lives in ICUs. The future of critical care promises even more innovative solutions to meet the evolving challenges of modern medicine.

Pediatric unplanned extubation risk score: A predictive model for risk assessment

BACKGROUND

Unplanned extubation is one of the most common preventable adverse events associated with invasive mechanical ventilation.

OBJECTIVE

This research study aimed to develop a predictive model to identify the risk of unplanned extubation in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

This single-center, observational study was conducted at the PICU of the Hospital de Clínicas. Patients were included based on the following criteria: aged between 28 days and 14 years, intubated, and using invasive mechanical ventilation.

RESULTS

Over 2 years, 2,153 observations were made using the Pediatric Unplanned Extubation Risk Score predictive model. Unplanned extubation occurred in 73 of 2,153 observations. A total of 286 children participated in the application of the Risk Score. This predictive model was created to categorize the following significant risk factors: 1) inadequate placement and fixation of the endotracheal tube (odds ratio 2.00 [95%CI,1.16-3.36]), 2) Insufficient level of sedation (odds ratio 3.00 [95%CI,1.57-4.37]), 3) age ≤ 12 months (odds ratio 1.27 [95%CI,1.14-1.41]), 4) presence of airway hypersecretion (odds ratio 11.00 [95%CI,2,58-45.26]) inadequate family orientation and/or nurse to patient ratio (odds ratio 5.00 [95%CI,2.64-7.99]), and 6) weaning period from mechanical ventilation (odds ratio 3.00 [95%CI,1.67-4.79]) and 5 risk enhancement factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoring system demonstrated effective sensitivity for estimating the risk of UE with the observation of six aspects, which overlap as an isolated risk factor or are associated with a risk enhancement factors.

Fitness checklist model for spontaneous breathing tests in pediatrics

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether a model of a daily fitness checklist for spontaneous breathing tests is able to identify predictive variables of extubation failure in pediatric patients admitted to a Brazilian intensive care unit.

METHODS

This was a single-center, cross-sectional study with prospective data collection. The checklist model comprised 20 items and was applied to assess the ability to perform spontaneous breathing tests.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 126 pediatric patients (85 males (67.5%)) on invasive mechanical ventilation, for whom 1,217 daily assessments were applied at the bedside. The weighted total score of the prediction model showed the highest discriminatory power for the spontaneous breathing test, with sensitivity and specificity indices for fitness failure of 89.7% or success of 84.6%. The cutoff point suggested by the checklist was 8, with a probability of extubation failure less than 5%. Failure increased progressively with increasing score, with a maximum probability of predicting extubation failure of 85%.

CONCLUSION

The extubation failure rate with the use of this model was within what is acceptable in the literature. The daily checklist model for the spontaneous breathing test was able to identify predictive variables of failure in the extubation process in pediatric patients.

Effects of multidisciplinary rounds and checklist in an Intensive Care Unit: a mixed methods study

OBJECTIVES

to analyze the implementation of multidisciplinary checklist-directed rounds before health indicators and multidisciplinary team perception of an Intensive Care Unit.

METHODS

a mixed methods study, with an explanatory sequential design, carried out at a hospital in southern Brazil, from September 2020 to August 2021. The integration of quantitative and qualitative data was combined by connection.

RESULTS

after the implementation of checklist-directed rounds, there was a significant reduction in hospital stay from ventilator-associated pneumonia, urinary tract infection and daily invasive device use. The investigated practice is essential for comprehensive care, harm reduction, effective work and critical patient safety.

CONCLUSIONS

the multidisciplinary rounds with checklist use reduced data on health indicators of critically ill patients and was considered a vital practice in the intensive care setting.

A Pediatric Intensive Care Checklist for Interprofessional Rounds: The R-PICniC Study

BACKGROUND

The use of checklists in the pediatric intensive care unit can help improve the quality of care and patient safety.

OBJECTIVES

To build and validate a checklist for use in interprofessional rounds in a pediatric intensive care unit.

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted in a 20-bed pediatric intensive care unit serving children up to 14 years old. A checklist prototype was constructed through review of the literature and achievement of consensus among the professionals providing care in the unit. Content validation was performed using a modified Delphi technique involving specialists with more than 5 years of experience in pediatric intensive care, methodological studies, and patient safety. Content validity ratios were calculated for the elements of the checklist, which were considered valid when they reached values greater than 0.78. The checklist was tested for usability, application time, and effects on patient care, and feedback was obtained from potential users.

RESULTS

Before content validation, the checklist contained 11 domains, 32 items, and 6 daily goals. The invitation to validate content was sent to 86 specialists, and content validity was achieved after 2 rounds of evaluation, with the checklist elements having content validity ratios ranging from 0.94 to 0.97. The mean application time of the checklist was 5 minutes. The final version consisted of 11 domains, 33 items, and 8 daily goals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study resulted in a useful and valid instrument for application in interprofessional rounds that was tailored to the needs of local health care professionals.

Efeitos de rounds multidisciplinares e checklist em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva: estudo de método misto

RESUMO Objetivos: analisar a implementação de rounds multidisciplinares direcionados por checklist frente aos indicadores de saúde e a percepção da equipe multiprofissional de uma Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Métodos: estudo de método misto, com desenho sequencial explanatório, realizado em um hospital do sul do Brasil, no período de setembro de 2020 a agosto de 2021. A integração dos dados quantitativos e qualitativos foi combinada por conexão. Resultados: após a implementação dos rounds direcionados por checklist, constatou-se redução significativa no tempo de internação por pneumonias associadas à ventilação mecânica, infecção do trato urinário e nos dias de uso de dispositivos invasivos. A prática investigada é essencial para o cuidado integral, a redução de danos, o trabalho eficaz e a segurança do paciente crítico. Conclusões: os rounds multidisciplinares com uso de checklist reduziram os dados dos indicadores de saúde de pacientes críticos e foi considerado como prática vital no cenário de cuidados intensivos.

Round multiprofissional com checklist: associação com a melhoria na segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva

RESUMO Objetivo Verificar a associação entre round multiprofissional com uso de checklist e práticas de segurança do paciente por profissionais de saúde de uma unidade de terapia intensiva. Método Estudo de método misto, delineado pela abordagem sequencial explanatória, realizado em um hospital do sul do Brasil. Os dados quantitativos foram analisados por meio de regressão de Poisson e os dados qualitativos, pela análise de conteúdo. Fez-se a análise integrada por meio da combinação explicada/conectada. Resultados No período pós-implementação dos rounds com uso sistemático de checklist houve melhora significativa da profilaxia de tromboembolia venosa, sedação leve, redução dos dias de uso de ventilação mecânica, cateter venoso central e de sonda vesical de demora. Conclusão O round multiprofissional com uso sistemático de checklist, associado com a melhoria nas práticas de segurança do paciente, foi considerado como uma estratégia que assegura melhores cuidados em terapia intensiva e favorece a satisfação no trabalho.

Multiprofessional round with checklist: association with the improvement in patient safety in intensive care

ABSTRACT Objective To verify the association between a multiprofessional round with the use of checklists and patient safety practices by health professionals in an intensive care unit. Method Mixed-method study, delineated by the sequential explanatory approach, conducted in a hospital in southern Brazil. Quantitative data were analyzed using Poisson regression, and qualitative data, using content analysis. The integrated analysis was performed through the explained/connected combination. Results In the post-implementation period of the rounds with systematic use of the checklist, there was a significant improvement in the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism, light sedation, reduction in the days of use of mechanical ventilation, central venous catheter and indwelling urinary catheter. Conclusion The multiprofessional round with the systematic use of checklist, associated with the improvement in patient safety practices, was considered as a strategy that ensures better care in intensive care and favors job satisfaction.

ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY CHECKLIST FOR ROUNDS IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

ABSTRACT Objective: to perform the adaptation, content validation and semantic analysis of a Multidisciplinary Checklist used in rounds in Intensive Care Units for adults. Method: a methodological study, consisting of three stages: Adaptation of the checklist, performed by one of the authors; Content validation, performed by seven judges/health professionals from a public teaching hospital in Paraná; and Semantic analysis, performed in a philanthropic hospital in the same state. Agreement of the judges and of the target audience in the content validation and semantic analysis stages was calculated using the Content Validity Index and the Agreement Index, respectively, with a minimum acceptable value of 0.80. Results: in the content validation stage, the checklist obtained a total agreement of 0.84. Of the 16 items included in the instrument, 11 (68.75%) were readjusted and four (25%) were excluded for not reaching the minimum agreement. The readjusted items referred to sedation; analgesia; nutrition; glycemic control; headboard elevation; gastric ulcer prophylaxis; prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism; indwelling urinary catheter, central venous catheter; protective mechanical ventilation and spontaneous breathing test. Regarding the items excluded, they referred to the cuff pressure of the orotracheal tube and to Nursing care measures such as taking the patient out of the bed, pressure injury prophylaxis, and ophthalmoprotection. In the semantic analysis, the final agreement of the instrument's items was 0.96. Conclusion: after two evaluation rounds by the judges, testing in critically-ill patients and high inter-evaluator agreement index, the Multidisciplinary Checklist is found with validated content suitable for use in rounds in intensive care.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Dose Optimization of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Children

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Critically ill children may exhibit varied vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters mainly due to altered protein binding, extracellular volume, and renal elimination. The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in critically ill children and determine the optimum dose regimen.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of critically ill children admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit. They received vancomycin dose of 15 mg/kg every 8 h for mild infections or every 6 h if infection was moderate or severe. A nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach was applied in estimating pharmacokinetic parameters using Monolix 2019R2®. We performed Monte Carlo simulations to assess and optimize the dosing regimen using Simulx®. We used the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve up to 24 h to minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC_0-24/MIC) ≥ 400 as the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight critically ill children with 145 concentrations were included in the present study. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model with linear elimination described the concentration-time profile well. The estimated median (95% confidence intervals) volume of distribution (Vd) was 13.3 (10.8-16.5) l and clearance (CL) was 1.23 (1.03-1.45) l/h. Creatinine clearance significantly affected the CL of vancomycin. Monte Carlo simulations revealed that a dose of either 15 mg/kg 6 hourly or 20 mg/kg 8 hourly was likely to result into most critically ill children attaining the vancomycin lead pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target.

CONCLUSION

We established pharmacokinetic parameters of vancomycin for critically ill children. We also observed that the current dosing regimen practiced in the intensive care unit was inadequate for achieving the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target. We recommend vancomycin dose escalation in critically ill pediatric patients from 15 mg/kg 8 hourly (current dosing regimen) to either 6 hourly or 20 mg/kg 8 hourly with intense therapeutic drug monitoring for adverse effects.