1
|
Mahaffee WF, Margairaz F, Ulmer L, Bailey BN, Stoll R. Catching Spores: Linking Epidemiology, Pathogen Biology, and Physics to Ground-Based Airborne Inoculum Monitoring. PLANT DISEASE 2023; 107:13-33. [PMID: 35679849 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-11-21-2570-fe] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Monitoring airborne inoculum is gaining interest as a potential means of giving growers an earlier warning of disease risk in a management unit or region. This information is sought by growers to aid in adapting to changes in the management tools at their disposal and the market-driven need to reduce the use of fungicides and cost of production. To effectively use inoculum monitoring as a decision aid, there is an increasing need to understand the physics of particle transport in managed and natural plant canopies to effectively deploy and use near-ground aerial inoculum data. This understanding, combined with the nuances of pathogen-specific biology and disease epidemiology, can serve as a guide to designing improved monitoring approaches. The complexity of any pathosystem and local environment are such that there is not a generalized approach to near-ground air sampler placement, but there is a conceptual framework to arrive at a "semi-optimal" solution based on available resources. This review is intended as a brief synopsis of the linkages among pathogen biology, disease epidemiology, and the physics of the aerial dispersion of pathogen inoculum and what to consider when deciding where to locate ground-based air samplers. We leverage prior work in developing airborne monitoring tools for hops, grapes, spinach, and turf, and research into the fluid mechanics governing particle transport in sparse canopies and urban and forest environments. We present simulation studies to demonstrate how particles move in the complex environments of agricultural fields and to illustrate the limited sampling area of common air samplers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter F Mahaffee
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Corvallis, OR 97330
| | - Fabien Margairaz
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
| | - Lucas Ulmer
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
| | - Brian N Bailey
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616
| | - Rob Stoll
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chaulagain B, Contina JB, Mills K, Seibel RL, Mundt CC. Comparing the efficacy of control strategies for infectious disease outbreaks using field and simulation studies. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2022; 32:e2631. [PMID: 35403765 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Diseases characterized by long distance inoculum dispersal (LDD) are among the fastest spreading epidemics in both natural and managed landscapes. Management of such epidemics is extremely challenging because of asymptomatic infection extending at large spatial scales and frequent escape from the newly established disease sources. We compared the efficacy of area- and timing-based disease management strategies in artificially initiated field epidemics of wheat stripe rust and complemented with simulations from an updated version of the spatially explicit model EPIMUL, using model parameters relevant to field epidemics. The model was further used to expand the number of epidemic mitigations beyond that feasible to incorporate in the field. The field experiment was conducted for 2 years in two locations having different climatic conditions. Culling and protection treatments were applied at different times after epidemic initiation and to different spatial extents surrounding the outbreaks. In each experiment, treatments were replicated four times in plots 33.5 m long and 1.52 m wide with a 0.76 × 0.76 m inoculated focus centered within each plot. Disease gradients were assessed along the center lines of the plots at 1.52 m intervals both upwind and downwind from the focus. Both field and simulation results indicated that control measures applied over the entire population were highly effective in suppressing the epidemics by more than 99% but may not always be logistically and economically feasible at large spatial scales. Comparison between the variable sized treatment areas and application timings suggested that implementing contiguous premises (CP) cull at 1 day after first sporulation in the outbreak focus reduced rust by 52% and 60% in Corvallis and Madras, respectively. However, altering the cull size did not significantly affect the disease epidemic development, which suggested that early timing had a greater influence in suppressing the epidemics than did increased area of application. However, sufficiently large, treated areas may compensate for a delay in application timing to some extent. Results from these replicated treatments may help to devise appropriate management strategies for other LDD pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhim Chaulagain
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Jean Bertrand Contina
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Karasi Mills
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Rachel L Seibel
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| | - Christopher C Mundt
- College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Severns PM, Mundt CC. Delays in Epidemic Outbreak Control Cost Disproportionately Large Treatment Footprints to Offset. Pathogens 2022; 11:pathogens11040393. [PMID: 35456068 PMCID: PMC9030382 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11040393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Epidemic outbreak control often involves a spatially explicit treatment area (quarantine, inoculation, ring cull) that covers the outbreak area and adjacent regions where hosts are thought to be latently infected. Emphasis on space however neglects the influence of treatment timing on outbreak control. We conducted field and in silico experiments with wheat stripe rust (WSR), a long-distance dispersed plant disease, to understand interactions between treatment timing and area interact to suppress an outbreak. Full-factorial field experiments with three different ring culls (outbreak area only to a 25-fold increase in treatment area) at three different disease control timings (1.125, 1.25, and 1.5 latent periods after initial disease expression) indicated that earlier treatment timing had a conspicuously greater suppressive effect than the area treated. Disease spread computer simulations over a broad range of influential epidemic parameter values (R0, outbreak disease prevalence, epidemic duration) suggested that potentially unrealistically large increases in treatment area would be required to compensate for even small delays in treatment timing. Although disease surveillance programs are costly, our results suggest that treatments early in an epidemic disease outbreak require smaller areas to be effective, which may ultimately compensate for the upfront costs of proactive disease surveillance programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M. Severns
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Christopher C. Mundt
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dillon CF, Dillon MB. Multi-Scale Airborne Infectious Disease Transmission. Appl Environ Microbiol 2021; 87:AEM.02314-20. [PMID: 33277266 PMCID: PMC7851691 DOI: 10.1128/aem.02314-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Airborne disease transmission is central to many scientific disciplines including agriculture, veterinary biosafety, medicine, and public health. Legal and regulatory standards are in place to prevent agricultural, nosocomial, and community airborne disease transmission. However, the overall importance of the airborne pathway is underappreciated, e.g.,, US National Library of Medicine's Medical Subjects Headings (MESH) thesaurus lacks an airborne disease transmission indexing term. This has practical consequences as airborne precautions to control epidemic disease spread may not be taken when airborne transmission is important, but unrecognized. Publishing clearer practical methodological guidelines for surveillance studies and disease outbreak evaluations could help address this situation.To inform future work, this paper highlights selected, well-established airborne transmission events - largely cases replicated in multiple, independently conducted scientific studies. Methodologies include field experiments, modeling, epidemiology studies, disease outbreak investigations and mitigation studies. Collectively, this literature demonstrates that airborne viruses, bacteria, and fungal pathogens have the capability to cause disease in plants, animals, and humans over multiple distances - from near range (< 5 m) to continental (> 500 km) in scale. The plausibility and implications of undetected airborne disease transmission are discussed, including the notable underreporting of disease burden for several airborne transmitted diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael B Dillon
- Atmospheric, Earth, and Energy Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, California, USA 94551
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rasmussen DA, Grünwald NJ. Phylogeographic Approaches to Characterize the Emergence of Plant Pathogens. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2021; 111:68-77. [PMID: 33021879 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-07-20-0319-fi] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Phylogeography combines geographic information with phylogenetic and population genomic approaches to infer the evolutionary history of a species or population in a geographic context. This approach has been instrumental in understanding the emergence, spread, and evolution of a range of plant pathogens. In particular, phylogeography can address questions about where a pathogen originated, whether it is native or introduced, and when and how often introductions occurred. We review the theory, methods, and approaches underpinning phylogeographic inference and highlight applications providing novel insights into the emergence and spread of select pathogens. We hope that this review will be useful in assessing the power, pitfalls, and opportunities presented by various phylogeographic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A Rasmussen
- Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
- Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
| | - Niklaus J Grünwald
- Horticultural Crops Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, OR
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Evans KJ, Scott JB, Barry KM. Pathogen Incursions - Integrating Technical Expertise in a Socio-Political Context. PLANT DISEASE 2020; 104:3097-3109. [PMID: 32697177 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-04-20-0812-fe] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
The incursion of a plant pathogen into a new geographic area initiates a series of decisions about appropriate control or eradication efforts. Incomplete, erroneous, and/or selective information may be used by diverse stakeholders to support individual goals and positions on how an incursion should be managed. We discuss the complex social, political, and technical factors that shape a biosecurity response prior to reviewing information needs and common stakeholder misunderstandings. Selected examples focus on the rust fungi (order Pucciniales). We then explore how plant pathologists, as technical experts, can interact with biosecurity stakeholders to build empathy and understanding that in turn allows a shift from being a distant subject matter expert to an active participant helping to structure problems and shape knowledge flows for better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine J Evans
- Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
| | - Jason B Scott
- Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
| | - Karen M Barry
- Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Detection, identification, and quantification of plant diseases by sensor techniques are expected to enable a more precise disease control, as sensors are sensitive, objective, and highly available for disease assessment. Recent progress in sensor technology and data processing is very promising; nevertheless, technical constraints and issues inherent to variability in host-pathogen interactions currently limit the use of sensors in various fields of application. The information from spectral [e.g., RGB (red, green, blue)], multispectral, and hyperspectral sensors that measure reflectance, fluorescence, and emission of radiation or from electronic noses that detect volatile organic compounds released from plants or pathogens, as well as the potential of sensors to characterize the health status of crops, is evaluated based on the recent literature. Phytopathological aspects of remote sensing of plant diseases across different scales and for various purposes are discussed, including spatial disease patterns, epidemic spread of pathogens, crop characteristics, and links to disease control. Future challenges in sensor use are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erich-Christian Oerke
- INRES, Plant Diseases and Crop Protection, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Contina JB, Dandurand LM, Knudsen GR. A Spatiotemporal Analysis and Dispersal Patterns of the Potato Cyst Nematode Globodera pallida in Idaho. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2020; 110:379-392. [PMID: 31573395 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-04-19-0113-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida is a globally regulated potato pest. It was detected for the first time in the United States in the state of Idaho in 2006, and as of February 2019, the infestation is limited to 1,326 hectares. G. pallida is a specialized obligate sedentary endoparasite that can survive in the soil for up to 30 years in the absence of its potato host. In highly infested fields, the nematode can reduce tuber yields up to 80% and is spread mainly through the movement of soil, tubers, or farm equipment. The objectives of this study were to describe the spatiotemporal pattern of G. pallida in infested fields and model its dispersal patterns in southeastern Idaho. We used geostatistical tools and simulation models for precise mapping and to describe the relationships between G. pallida incidence and the spatial configurations. We found that the nematode is spatially clustered and prevalent around edges of fields, and its dispersal pattern followed the direction of cultivation. We found that the absence of potato in an infested field significantly reduced the number of cysts sampled each year subsequent to the initial delimitation sampling in 2007. Phytosanitary measures prohibiting the growth of potato contributed to stopping nematode reproduction, and the use of chemical fumigants and biofumigant cover crops contributed to a significant reduction in egg viability. We observed a process of a nonlinear decline in the prevalence of cysts as the distance separation from the primary infestation focus increased. A power law model was used to fit G. pallida dispersal capabilities. This study contributed to describing G. pallida infestation for Idaho. The goal of this study is to provide information on the spatial pattern and landscape ecology of G. pallida in Idaho for policy makers, industry, and researchers as well as facilitate common understandings on the challenges and opportunities for controlling this pest in Idaho.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J B Contina
- Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2329
| | - L M Dandurand
- Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology and Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2329
| | - G R Knudsen
- Department of Soil and Water Systems, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2340 (deceased)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sherman J, Burke JM, Gent DH. Cooperation and Coordination in Plant Disease Management. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2019; 109:1720-1731. [PMID: 31148511 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-01-19-0010-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Scaling of management efforts beyond the boundaries of individual farms may require that individuals act collectively. Such approaches have been suggested several times in plant pathology contexts but rarely have been implemented, in part because the institutional structures that enable successful collective action are poorly understood. In this research, we conducted in-depth interviews with hop producers in Oregon and Washington State to identify their motivations for and barriers to collective action regarding communication of disease levels, coordination of management practices, and sharing of best management practices and other data for powdery mildew (caused by Podosphaera macularis). Growers were generally open to and engaged in communication with neighbors and others on disease status in their hop yards and some evidence of higher levels of information sharing on management practices was found. However, growers who had developed extensive knowledge and databases were reluctant to share information viewed as proprietary. Relationships, trust, and reciprocity were facilitating factors for communication and information sharing, whereas lack of these factors and social norms of independence and pride in portions of the grower community were identified as impediments. Given the heterogeneity of trust, lack of confidence in reciprocity, and weak shared norms, communication of disease risk and coordinated management may be most successful if directed at a smaller scale as a series of neighborhood-based partnerships of growers and their immediate neighbors. Developing a disease reporting system and coordinated disease management efforts with more producers and at larger spatial extents would require formalized structures and rules that would provide assurance that there is consistency in disease data collection and reporting, reciprocation, and sanctions for those who use the information for marketing purposes against other growers. Given the analyses presented here, we believe there is potential for collective action in disease management but with limitations on the scope and nature of the actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Sherman
- Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
| | - Jordan M Burke
- Department of Sociology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA
| | - David H Gent
- Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, OR
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Andersen KF, Buddenhagen CE, Rachkara P, Gibson R, Kalule S, Phillips D, Garrett KA. Modeling Epidemics in Seed Systems and Landscapes To Guide Management Strategies: The Case of Sweet Potato in Northern Uganda. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2019; 109:1519-1532. [PMID: 30785374 PMCID: PMC7779973 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-03-18-0072-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Seed systems are critical for deployment of improved varieties but also can serve as major conduits for the spread of seedborne pathogens. As in many other epidemic systems, epidemic risk in seed systems often depends on the structure of networks of trade, social interactions, and landscape connectivity. In a case study, we evaluated the structure of an informal sweet potato seed system in the Gulu region of northern Uganda for its vulnerability to the spread of emerging epidemics and its utility for disseminating improved varieties. Seed transaction data were collected by surveying vine sellers weekly during the 2014 growing season. We combined data from these observed seed transactions with estimated dispersal risk based on village-to-village proximity to create a multilayer network or "supranetwork." Both the inverse power law function and negative exponential function, common models for dispersal kernels, were evaluated in a sensitivity analysis/uncertainty quantification across a range of parameters chosen to represent spread based on proximity in the landscape. In a set of simulation experiments, we modeled the introduction of a novel pathogen and evaluated the influence of spread parameters on the selection of villages for surveillance and management. We found that the starting position in the network was critical for epidemic progress and final epidemic outcomes, largely driven by node out-degree. The efficacy of node centrality measures was evaluated for utility in identifying villages in the network to manage and limit disease spread. Node degree often performed as well as other, more complicated centrality measures for the networks where village-to-village spread was modeled by the inverse power law, whereas betweenness centrality was often more effective for negative exponential dispersal. This analysis framework can be applied to provide recommendations for a wide variety of seed systems.[Formula: see text] Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY 4.0 International license.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. F. Andersen
- Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
- Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
| | - C. E. Buddenhagen
- Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
- Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
| | - P. Rachkara
- Department of Rural Development and Agribusiness, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda
| | - R. Gibson
- Natural Resource Institute, University of Greenwich, Greenwich, United
| | - S. Kalule
- Department of Rural Development and Agribusiness, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda
| | - D. Phillips
- Natural Resource Institute, University of Greenwich, Greenwich, United
| | - K. A. Garrett
- Plant Pathology Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
- Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
- Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0680, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gent DH, Bhattacharyya S, Ruiz T. Prediction of Spread and Regional Development of Hop Powdery Mildew: A Network Analysis. PHYTOPATHOLOGY 2019; 109:1392-1403. [PMID: 30880573 DOI: 10.1094/phyto-12-18-0483-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Dispersal is a fundamental aspect of epidemic development at multiple spatial scales, including those that extend beyond the borders of individual fields and to the landscape level. In this research, we used the powdery mildew of the hop pathosystem (caused by Podosphaera macularis) to formulate a model of pathogen dispersal during spring (May to June) and early summer (June to July) at the intermediate scale between synoptic weather systems and microclimate (mesoscale) based on a census of commercial hop yards during 2014 to 2017 in a production region in western Oregon. This pathosystem is characterized by a low level of overwintering of the pathogen as a result of absence of the ascigerious stage of the fungus and consequent annual cycles of localized survival via bud perennation and pathogen spread by windborne dispersal. An individual hop yard was considered a node in the model, whose disease status in a given month was expressed as a nonlinear function of disease incidence in the preceding month, susceptibility to two races of the fungus, and disease spread from other nodes as influenced by their disease incidence, area, distance away, and wind run and direction in the preceding month. Parameters were estimated by maximum likelihood over all 4 years but were allowed to vary for time transition periods from May to June and from June to July. The model accounted for 34 to 90% of the observed variation in disease incidence at the field level, depending on the year and season. Network graphs and analyses suggest that dispersal was dominated by relatively localized dispersal events (<2 km) among the network of fields, being mostly restricted to the same or adjacent farms. When formed, predicted disease attributable to dispersal from other hop yards (edges) associated with longer distance dispersal was more frequent in the June to July time transition. Edges with a high probability of disease transmission were formed in instances where yards were in close proximity or where disease incidence was relatively high in large hop yards, as moderated by wind run. The modeling approach provides a flexible and generalizable framework for understanding and predicting pathogen dispersal at the regional level as well as the implications of network connectivity on epidemic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David H Gent
- 1Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, U.S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Corvallis, OR 97331
| | | | - Trevor Ruiz
- 2Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
| |
Collapse
|