Evidence for an oscillator other than luteinizing hormone controlling the secretion of progesterone in cattle

Loss of luteal sensitivity to luteinizing hormone underlies luteolysis in cattle: A hypothesis

By virtue of the secretion of progesterone (P4), corpus luteum (CL) is important not only for normal cyclicity but also for conception and continuation of pregnancy in female mammals. Luteolysis (also called luteal regression) is defined as loss of the capacity to synthesize and secrete P4 followed by the demise of the CL. There is strong evidence that sequential pulses of prostaglandin F2α (PGF) secreted from the uterus near the end of luteal phase induces luteolysis in farm animals. Loss of luteal sensitivity to luteinizing hormone (LH) at the end of menstrual cycle has been reported to be critical for initiation of luteolysis in primates, however this has not been investigated in farm animals. A closer observation of the published real-time profiles of circulating hormones (P4, LH, and PGF) and their inter-relationships around the time of the beginning of spontaneous luteolysis in cattle revealed- 1) A natural pulse of PGF causes a transient P4 suppression lasting a couple of hours followed by a rebound in P4 concentration, 2) The P4 secretions that occur in response to LH pulses before the beginning of luteolysis (i.e., preluteolysis) either fail or do so to a lesser extent during luteolysis indicating a loss of sensitivity to LH, and 3) The loss of sensitivity coincides with the beginning of luteolysis (i.e., transition), and apparently luteolysis does not initiate until there is loss of sensitivity to LH. The CL is sensitive to LH during preluteolysis, and the LH-stimulated P4-dependent and/or independent local survival mechanisms maintain the steroidogenic capability and viability of the CL until the very end of preluteolysis. Luteolysis does not appear to initiate with the PGF pulse(s) that occur during this period. With the loss of sensitivity to LH at the transition, however, a progressive decline in P4 begins initiating luteolysis. Also, the survival mechanisms become compromised making the CL less viable. The uterine PGF pulses that occur after the beginning of luteolysis induces increase in the local luteolytic factors, which contribute to further luteolysis, more importantly, structural luteolysis with ultimate demise of the CL. Therefore, I hypothesize that the loss of luteal sensitivity to LH underlies luteolysis in cattle. The hypothesis not only unifies the basic mechanism of luteolysis in a farm animal and primates but also provides a perspective to view luteolysis as a process rather than a factor-mediated event. A novel unified working model for luteolysis in a farm animal and primates is described. A better understanding of the luteal physiology including how responsiveness to LH diminishes in aging CL would help in the development of novel strategies in modulating CL structure-function to improve and/or control fertility in humans as well as in animals.

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibits the stimulatory effect of luteinizing hormone and prostaglandin E(2) on progesterone secretion by the bovine corpus luteum

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) is involved in the tissue remodeling that occurs in the corpus luteum (CL) during its development and regression. This cytokine is also implicated in the regulation of reproduction by its actions on ovarian steroidogenic cells. The aim of this study was to examine the influence of TNF-α on (1) progesterone (P(4)) output by the bovine CL and on (2) the responsiveness of the CL to LH or prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) in vitro. In experiment 1, CL (days 8 to 10 of the estrous cycle) were perfused by using an in vitro microdialysis system with TNF-α (0.1, 0.5, or 1 μg/mL) alone or with TNF-α (1 μg/mL) followed by LH (1000 ng/mL) or PGE(2) (2 × 10(-5) M). Basal P(4) release (P < 0.05) was increased by TNF-α (0.5 or 1 μg/mL). Moreover, TNF-α (1 μg/mL) inhibited the stimulatory effect of LH or PGE(2) on P(4) output (P < 0.05). In experiment 2, 4 h after intrauterine infusion of TNF-α (0.01 μg/mL or 1 μg/mL), CL (days 8 to 10 of the estrous cycle) were collected by colpotomy, cultured, and stimulated with LH (10 ng/mL) or PGE(2) (10(-6) M). Intrauterine infusion of TNF-α at a concentration of 1 μg/mL increased basal P(4) output by CL (P < 0.05). Moreover, the intrauterine infusion of TNF-α at a concentration of 0.01 μg/mL inhibited the stimulatory effect of LH or PGE(2) on P(4) output (P < 0.05). These results indicate that TNF-α (1) does not have an effect on the autonomous, pulsatile release of P(4); (2) increases P(4) secretion by bovine CL with increasing doses, and (3) reduces in a dose-dependent manner the responsiveness of CL to luteotropic factors both directly (after infusion to CL) and indirectly (after intrauterine infusion).

Role of intraluteal prostaglandin F2α, progesterone and oxytocin in basal and pulsatile progesterone release from developing bovine corpus luteum

The present study examined the role of intra-luteal prostaglandin (PG) F(2alpha), progesterone (P4) and oxytocin (OT) on the corpus luteum function by using specific hormone antagonists. Luteal cells from the developing CL (days 5-7 of the estrous cycle) were exposed to P4 antagonist (onapristone, OP, 10(-4)M), OT antagonist (atosiban, AT; 10(-6)M) or indomethacin (INDO; 10(-4)M), for 12h and then stimulated with PGF(2alpha) (10(-8)M) for 4h. Pre-treatment of the cells with OP, AT or INDO resulted in an increase in P4 secretion in response to PGF(2alpha). To examine the temporal effects of P4, OT and PGs on P4 secretion, dispersed luteal cells were pre-exposed to OP, AT or INDO for 1, 2, 4, 6 or 12h. Prostaglandin F(2alpha) stimulated P4 secretion (P<0.05) after 2h of pre-exposition. In the microdyalisis study, the spontaneous release of P4 from developing CL tissue was of pulsatile nature with irregular peaks at 1-2h intervals. Treatment with OP increased the number of P4 peaks (P<0.05), whereas AT and INDO significantly reduced the number of P4 peaks detected (P<0.05). Interestingly, INDO completely blocked the pulsatile nature in the release of P4, but it secretion remained stable throughout the experimental period. These results demonstrate that luteal PGF(2alpha), OT, and P4 are components of an autocrine/paracrine intra-ovarian regulatory system responsible for the episodic (pulsatile) release of P4 from the bovine CL during the early luteal phase.

Phytoestrogens and their metabolites inhibit the sensitivity of the bovine corpus luteum to luteotropic factors

The aim of this study was to examine whether active metabolites of phytoestrogens (equol and para-ethyl-phenol) inhibit sensitivity of bovine corpus luteum (CL) to luteinizing hormone (LH) and to auto/paracrine luteotropic factors (prostaglandin E2-PGE2 and prostaglandin F(2alpha)-PGF(2alpha)), and whether they influence pulsatile progesterone (P4) secretion by the bovine CL. In in vivo experiments, high levels of equol and para-ethyl-phenol were found in plasma and in the CL tissue of heifers and cows fed a soy bean diet (2.5 kg/animal/day), along with lower concentrations of P4 (P < 0.05). Both Prostaglandins (PG) and LH strongly stimulated P4 secretion in cultured pieces of CL that were collected from cows fed a standard diet (P < 0.01). There was no effect of PGs and LH on P4 stimulation in CLs obtained from cows fed a diet rich in soy bean. Finally, we examined whether active metabolites of phytoestrogens participated in regulation of pulsatile P4 secretion and LH-stimulated P4 secretion in vitro using a microdialysis system. Equol and para-ethyl-phenol had no effect on basic and pulsatile P4 secretion in CLs during 240 min of perfusion when compared to the control (P < 0.05). However, they inhibited LH-stimulated P4 secretion (P < 0.05). Phytoestrogens and their metabolites may disrupt CL function by inhibiting PG- and LH-stimulated P4 secretion.

Endotoxemia in pregnant cows: Comparisons of maternal and fetal effects utilizing the chronically catheterized fetus

We utilized the chronically catheterized bovine fetus to compare maternal and fetal responses to maternal lipopolysaccharide (LPS) infusion. Our hypothesis was that LPS-induced abortion was primarily a maternal luteolytic event with minimal transplacental fetal exposure. Fetal tibial arteries, amniotic, allantoic cavities and maternal carotid arteries were catheterized. Three cows had patent catheters with viable fetuses (190 to 200 days of gestation) 1 week after operation and were included in the study. Following a 2-day maternal and fetal baseline, 0.5 mug Salmonella typhimurium LPS/kg was infused into a maternal jugular vein over a 2-hour period. Maternal and fetal responses were monitored clinically, biochemically and hormonally. The maternal response consisted of marked increases in plasma prostaglandin F(2alpha) metabolite (PGFM), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), ACTH and cortisol with a dramatic maternal leucopenia within 2 hours. Progesterone concentrations decreased within 7 hours (P<0.05). The LPS was rapidly cleared from maternal circulation and no transplacental exposure was detected in the fetuses. Fetal responses to maternal endotoxemia consisted of increased ACTH and cortisol concentrations with delayed increases in PGE(2); TNF did not change in fetal fluids following maternal endotoxemia. There was a fetal leucocytosis within 2 hours. The results indicate that the fetus does not appear to play a major role in the pathogenesis of LPS-induced abortions. However, the role of maternal TNF in endotoxin abortion requires further study.

Perifusion of human granulosa-luteal cells: response to LH stimulation

LH pulse frequency and amplitude vary significantly during the menstrual cycle; however, it is not clear what significance the secretory pattern has for the ovary. We have developed an in-vitro perifusion system in which luteinized human granulosa cells (GC) can be exposed to various patterns of gonadotrophin stimulation. GC were recovered following follicle aspiration for in-vitro fertilization, grown on Cytodex-3 for 6 days, and then perifused with medium containing LH (or hCG), delivered with differing pulse frequencies and amplitudes. When pulses of LH were applied to the cells, progesterone secretion rose initially and then fell to the baseline as the LH concentration declined. Pulsatile administration of LH, over a period of 10 h, stimulated progesterone secretion more efficiently than did continuous LH. Finally, delivery to the cells of pulses of hCG, a ligand known to bind to the LH receptor but with binding characteristics distinct from those of LH, failed to elicit pulses of progesterone.

Ultradian, circadian and seasonal variations of plasma progesterone and LH concentrations during the luteal phase

The circadian variations in plasma progesterone (P) and LH concentrations were investigated in six women, aged 23-40 years. All were studied in the mid-luteal phase (7 +/- 2 days after LH mid-cycle surge). Experiments were conducted in autumn and in spring. Blood samples were obtained every 15 min for 24 hr. Plasma P and LH concentrations were measured by RIA. Each subject's time-series was analysed using three methods; visual inspection (chronogram), spectral analysis to estimate component periods of rhythms (tau) and cosinor analysis to quantify the rhythms parameters. Marked temporal variations in plasma P concentration were observed in each subject. The maximal variations over a 24-hr period, ranged between 13-58.5 mmol/l. Differences related to sampling time were statistically validated by ANOVA (p less than 0.00001). Significant harmonic periods were detected by spectral analysis but differed among subjects. In all subjects but one, a circadian rhythm was detected. The acrophase location was similar (about 0700 hr) in the four subjects studied in autumn, but ranged from 1940 to 0320 hr in those studied in spring. An ultradian rhythm with tau = 8 hr was also validated in six time-series with similar acrophases (about 0200, 1000, and 1800 hr). Cosinor analysis of pooled data revealed that the 24-hr, 12-hr, and 8-hr rhythms were statistically significant (p = 0.001) in autumn. algebraic sum of these three cosine functions yielded a circadian waveform with peak-times occurring near 0300 and 1130 hr and a trough-time about 2200 hr. In spring, the circadian pattern appeared quite different, and peak-times were found near 0700 and 2000 hr, and trough-times near 0300 and 1500 hr. Furthermore, the 24-hr mean of P was higher in autumn (28.9 +/- 0.4 nmol/l) than in spring (17.2 +/- 0.4 nmol/l), p from ANOVA less than 0.00001. The evidence for a similar circadian LH pattern is not as strong. Seasonal, circadian and ultradian rhythms characterize the physiologic time structure of plasma P concentration in mid-luteal phase.

Recent advances in corpus luteum physiology

Development, maintenance, and regression of the corpus luteum have been investigated for many years. However, endocrine and cellular mechanisms regulating progesterone synthesis and secretion remain unclear. Because comprehensive reviews of factors affecting luteal function have been published recently, this paper discusses several emerging concepts that may be important in understanding the regulation of luteal progesterone synthesis and secretion. Concepts discussed include preovulatory follicular determinants of subsequent luteal function, hormonal stimulation of progesterone synthesis, effect of different luteal cell types on progesterone secretion, and role of secretory granules in luteal function.