Exploring the role of m6A methylation regulators in glioblastoma multiforme and their impact on the tumor immune microenvironment

METTL3 Promotes OSCC Progression by Down-Regulating WEE1 in a m6A-YTHDF2-Dependent Manner

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a common and highly lethal epithelial cancer. This study aimed to confirm the role of METTL3 in promoting OSCC and investigate its specific underlying mechanisms. Expression of the METTL3, YTH domain-containing family 2 (YTHDF2), and WEE1 were examined in normal oral epithelial cells and OSCC cells. Cell functions were examined after overexpressing WEE1 in OSCC cells. MeRIP-qPCR analysis was used to detect WEE1 m6A levels in HOK, SCC25, and CAL27 cells. WEE1 and its m6A levels were evaluated in OSCC cells by knocking down METTL3/YTHDF2, assessing the interaction between METTL3/YTHDF2 and WEE1. The impact of METTL3 and YTHDF2 downregulation on WEE1 mRNA stability was also investigated. The tumor weight and volume in a nude mouse model of OSCC after overexpression of WEE1 and YTHDF2 were measured. Expression of Ki-67 and WEE1 in OSCC tissue was detected using immunohistochemistry. Compared to normal oral epithelial cells, METTL3 and YTHDF2 were upregulated in OSCC cells, while WEE1 was downregulated, and there was a negative correlation between WEE1 and METTL3/YTHDF2 expression. WEE1 overexpression inhibited proliferation, invasion, and migration while promoting apoptosis in OSCC cells. METTL3 and YTHDF2 bound to WEE1 mRNA. METTL3/YTHDF2 knockdown increased WEE1 levels and WEE1 mRNA stability. METTL3 inhibition reduced WEE1 m6A levels. Inhibition of METTL3 weakened the interaction between YTHDF2 and WEE1 mRNA. In vivo, overexpression of WEE1 suppressed OSCC development, which was reversed by overexpression of YTHDF2. METTL3 facilitates the progression of OSCC through m6A-YTHDF2-dependent downregulation of WEE1.

METTL3 and METTL14-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification of SREBF2-AS1 facilitates hepatocellular carcinoma progression and sorafenib resistance through DNA demethylation of SREBF2

As the most prevalent epitranscriptomic modification, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) shows important roles in a variety of diseases through regulating the processing, stability and translation of target RNAs. However, the potential contributions of m6A to RNA functions are unclear. Here, we identified a functional and prognosis-related m6A-modified RNA SREBF2-AS1 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The expression of SREBF2-AS1 and SREBF2 in HCC tissues and cells was measured by RT-qPCR. m6A modification level of SREBF2-AS1 was measured by methylated RNA immunoprecipitation assay. The roles of SREBF2-AS1 in HCC progression and sorafenib resistance were investigated by proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and cell viability assays. The regulatory mechanisms of SREBF2-AS1 on SREBF2 were investigated by Chromatin isolation by RNA purification, RNA immunoprecipitation, CUT&RUN, and bisulfite DNA sequencing assays. Our findings showed that the expression of SREBF2-AS1 was increased in HCC tissues and cells, and positively correlated with poor survival of HCC patients. m6A modification level of SREBF2-AS1 was also increased in HCC and positively correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients. METTL3 and METTL14-induced m6A modification upregulated SREBF2-AS1 expression through increasing SREBF2-AS1 transcript stability. Functional assays showed that only m6A-modified, but not non-modified SREBF2-AS1 promoted HCC progression and sorafenib resistance. Mechanistic investigations revealed that m6A-modified SREBF2-AS1 bound and recruited m6A reader FXR1 and DNA 5-methylcytosine dioxygenase TET1 to SREBF2 promoter, leading to DNA demethylation at SREBF2 promoter and the upregulation of SREBF2 transcription. Functional rescue assays showed that SREBF2 was the critical mediator of the oncogenic roles of SREBF2-AS1 in HCC. Together, this study showed that m6A-modified SREBF2-AS1 exerted oncogenic roles in HCC through inducing DNA demethylation and transcriptional activation of SREBF2, and suggested m6A-modified SREBF2-AS1 as a prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for HCC.

Emerging Roles and Mechanisms of RNA Modifications in Neurodegenerative Diseases and Glioma

Despite a long history of research, neurodegenerative diseases and malignant brain tumor gliomas are both considered incurable, facing challenges in the development of treatments. Recent evidence suggests that RNA modifications, previously considered as static components of intracellular RNAs, are in fact dynamically regulated across various RNA species in cells and play a critical role in major biological processes in the nervous system. Innovations in next-generation sequencing have enabled the accurate detection of modifications on bases and sugars within various RNA molecules. These RNA modifications influence the stability and transportation of RNA, and crucially affect its translation. This review delves into existing knowledge on RNA modifications to offer a comprehensive inventory of these modifications across different RNA species. The detailed regulatory functions and roles of RNA modifications within the nervous system are discussed with a focus on neurodegenerative diseases and gliomas. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the fundamental mechanisms and emerging roles of RNA modifications in these diseases, which can facilitate the creation of innovative diagnostics and therapeutics for these conditions.

m6A mRNA Modifications in Glioblastoma: Emerging Prognostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets

Glioblastoma, the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor, is highly invasive and neurologically destructive. The mean survival for glioblastoma patients is approximately 15 months and there is no effective therapy to significantly increase survival times to date. The development of effective therapy including mechanism-based therapies is urgently needed. At a molecular biology level, N6-methyladenine (m6A) mRNA modification is the most abundant posttranscriptional RNA modification in mammals. Recent studies have shown that m6A mRNA modifications affect cell survival, cell proliferation, invasion, and immune evasion of glioblastoma. In addition, m6A mRNA modifications are critical for glioblastoma stem cells, which could initiate the tumor and lead to therapy resistance. These findings implicate the function of m6A mRNA modification in tumorigenesis and progression, implicating its value in prognosis and therapies of human glioblastoma. This review focuses on the potential clinical significance of m6A mRNA modifications in prognostic and therapeutics of glioblastoma. With the identification of small-molecule compounds that activate or inhibit components of m6A mRNA modifications, a promising novel approach for glioblastoma therapy is emerging.

Exploring the prognostic potential of m6A methylation regulators in low-grade glioma: implications for tumor microenvironment modulation

BACKGROUND

The biological behavior of low-grade glioma (LGG) is significantly affected by N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation, an essential epigenetic alteration. Therefore, it is crucial to create a prognostic model for LGG by utilizing genes that regulate m6A methylation.

METHODS

Using TCGA and GTEx databases. We examined m6A modulator levels in LGG and normal tissues, and investigated PD-L1 and PD-1 expression, immune scores, immune cell infiltration, tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and potential underlying mechanisms in different LGG clusters. We also performed immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR to identify essential m6A adjustment factor.

RESULTS

The results showed that m6A regulatory element expression was significantly increased in LGG tissues and was significantly associated with TMIE. A substantial increase in PD-L1 and PD-1 levels in LGG tissues and high-risk cohorts was observed. PD-L1 expression was positively correlated with FTO, ZCCHC4, and HNRNPD, whereas PD-1 expression was negatively correlated with FTO, ZC3H7B, and HNRNPD. The prognostic signature created using regulators of m6A RNA methylation was shown to be strongly associated with the overall survival of LGG patients, and FTO and ZCCHC4 were confirmed as independent prognostic markers by clinical samples. Furthermore, the results revealed different TIME characteristics between the two groups of patients, indicating disrupted signaling pathways associated with LGG.

CONCLUSION

Our results present that the m6A regulators play vital role in regulating PD-L1/PD-1 expression and the infiltration of immune cells, thereby exerting a sizable impact on the TIME of LGG. Therefore, m6A regulators have precise predictive value in the prognosis of LGG.