Chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, and procarbazine versus cisplatin and etoposide. A randomized study

Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

BACKGROUND

Most people who are newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have advanced disease. For these people, survival is determined by various patient- and tumor-related factors, of which the performance status (PS) is the most important prognostic factor. People with PS 0 or 1 are usually treated with systemic therapies, whereas people with PS 3 or 4 most often receive supportive care. However, treatment for people with PS 2 without a targetable mutation remains unclear. Historically, people with a PS 2 cancer are frequently excluded from (important) clinical trials because of poorer outcomes and increased toxicity. We aim to address this knowledge gap, as this group of people represents a significant proportion (20% to 30%) of the total population with newly diagnosed lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the best first-line therapy for advanced lung cancer in people with performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 17 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different chemotherapy (with or without angiogenesis inhibitor) or immunotherapy regimens, specifically designed for people with PS 2 only or studies including a subgroup of these people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. overall survival (OS), 2. health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and 3. toxicity/adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 4. tumor response rate, 5. progression-free survival, and 6. survival rates at six and 12 months' treatment. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 22 trials in this review and identified one ongoing trial. Twenty studies compared chemotherapy with different regimens, of which 11 compared non-platinum therapy (monotherapy or doublet) versus platinum doublet. We found no studies comparing best supportive care with chemotherapy and only two abstracts analyzing chemotherapy versus immunotherapy. We found that platinum doublet therapy showed superior OS compared to non-platinum therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.78; 7 trials, 697 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no differences in six-month survival rates (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.41; 6 trials, 632 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), whereas 12-month survival rates were improved for treatment with platinum doublet therapy (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97; 11 trials, 1567 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). PFS and tumor response rate were also better for people treated with platinum doublet therapy, with moderate-certainty evidence (PFS: HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.77; 5 trials, 487 participants; tumor response rate: RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.67 to 3.05; 9 trials, 964 participants). When analyzing toxicity rates, we found that platinum doublet therapy increased grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicities, all with low-certainty evidence (anemia: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.92; neutropenia: RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.82; thrombocytopenia: RR 3.96, 95% CI 1.73 to 9.06; all 8 trials, 935 participants). Only four trials reported HRQoL data; however, the methodology was different per trial and we were unable to perform a meta-analysis. Although evidence is limited, there were no differences in 12-month survival rates or tumor response rates between carboplatin and cisplatin regimens. With an indirect comparison, carboplatin seemed to have better 12-month survival rates than cisplatin compared to non-platinum therapy. The assessment of the efficacy of immunotherapy in people with PS 2 was limited. There might be a place for single-agent immunotherapy, but the data provided by the included studies did not encourage the use of double-agent immunotherapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review showed that as a first-line treatment for people with PS 2 with advanced NSCLC, platinum doublet therapy seems to be preferred over non-platinum therapy, with a higher response rate, PFS, and OS. Although the risk for grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicity is higher, these events are often relatively mild and easy to treat. Since trials using checkpoint inhibitors in people with PS 2 are scarce, we identified an important knowledge gap regarding their role in people with advanced NSCLC and PS 2.

Drug Resistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Potential for NOTCH Targeting?

Drug resistance is a major cause for therapeutic failure in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) leading to tumor recurrence and disease progression. Cell intrinsic mechanisms of resistance include changes in the expression of drug transporters, activation of pro-survival, and anti-apoptotic pathways, as well as non-intrinsic influences of the tumor microenvironment. It has become evident that tumors are composed of a heterogeneous population of cells with different genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic characteristics that result in diverse responses to therapy, and underlies the emergence of resistant clones. This tumor heterogeneity is driven by subpopulations of tumor cells termed cancer stem cells (CSCs) that have tumor-initiating capabilities, are highly self-renewing, and retain the ability for multi-lineage differentiation. CSCs have been identified in NSCLC and have been associated with chemo- and radiotherapy resistance. Stem cell pathways are frequently deregulated in cancer and are implicated in recurrence after treatment. Here, we focus on the NOTCH signaling pathway, which has a role in stem cell maintenance in non-squamous non-small lung cancer, and we critically assess the potential for targeting the NOTCH pathway to overcome resistance to chemotherapeutic and targeted agents using both preclinical and clinical evidence.

Randomised trials comparing chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: biases and evolution over time

We systematically evaluated the evidence from randomised trials comparing various chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Across 254 eligible trials (42661 patients), no regimens were compared in >6 studies. Twenty-six trials (10%) found statistically significant differences in survival between the compared arms. Only five reported the randomisation mode, and four reported adequate allocation concealment; nine performed unaccounted interim analyses. Statistical significance was more common in larger (P=0.003), more recent studies (P=0.031), and trials from countries with only one published eligible study (P=0.008). Increased reported median survival was independently associated with platinum and/or taxane and combination regimens, but also with the year of publication, smaller sample size, and larger representation of non-stage IV patients and patients with a better performance status. The proportion of enrolled patients with a performance status of 2 or worse decreased significantly over time (12.9% per decade, P<0.001). Randomised evidence in this field is fragmented and subject to considerable selection biases.

Mitomycin C, vinblastine and carboplatin: effective outpatient chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC)

The majority of patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) present with advanced disease and, as such, are treated with palliative intent. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy plays an important role in the management of these patients, with response rates to most regimens being in the range of 30%-40%. with symptom relief in up to 60%. One of the most commonly utilized combinations is mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin (MVP). Owing to the hydration regimen, and to the age and performance status of many of these patients, in reality this combination often necessitates an overnight stay in hospital. A combination of drugs that could be administered as an outpatient would be beneficial to patients and could result in substantial economic benefits. Forty-three patients with Stage IlIb and IV NSCLC were treated with the MVCarbo regimen, in which the cisplatin in the MVP regimen was replaced with carboplatin. All treatment was administered on an outpatient basis. The overall objective response rate was 30%; the symptomatic response rate was 60%, which was exactly equivalent to the response rate seen in a comparable group of patients treated with MVP in a trial on duration of chemotherapy at the Royal Marsden Hospital. There was no difference in progression-free or overall survival between patients treated with the two regimens. The MVCarbo regimen resulted in response rates and survival rates equivalent to those seen with standard MVP and, as such, provides an acceptable outpatient alternative to this treatment.

The combination of etoposide and cisplatin in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been a subject of debate for many years. Only recently, cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy has been demonstrated to yield a small but definite survival benefit and to improve symptoms, performance status and quality of life in a substantial proportion of advanced NSCLC patients. The cisplatin-etoposide (PE) regimen was developed in the early 1980s and has been one of the standard chemotherapy programs most extensively used in the clinical practice until a few years ago. More recently, several randomized trials have compared the efficacy of new cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapies including Paclitaxel or Gemcitabine with that of PE or PE-like regimens. Preliminary results are encouraging, indicating a small benefit in favor of the last generation of regimens which might therefore replace PE as 'gold standards' in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. However, the costs of these last generation regimens is higher and the entity of the benefit small. Therefore, PE chemotherapy can still be an option in selected situations.

Clinical benefit from palliative chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer extends to the elderly and those with poor prognostic factors

The intention of this study was to identify the pretreatment characteristics predicting for the survival, objective response and symptom relief in patients with non-resectable, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) managed in the Lung Unit at the Royal Marsden Hospital. This analysis included 290 patients with advanced NSCLC generally treated with a cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimen in one of a series of trials. Thirty-seven pretreatment variables, response and survival data were collected prospectively and analysed using univariate and multivariate methods. By multivariate analysis performance status, disease extent and pattern of metastases along with certain biochemical features were influential independent variables for survival, objective and symptom response. Older age was positively associated with objective response (P = 0.04). When the independent factors for symptom response were used to group patients into prognostic categories, 30-48% of patients with an adverse set of factors had symptom relief. Similarly using the relative risk of death to subgroup the patient population, 54% of patients at high risk of death (greater than 8.0), with a median survival of 2.5 months, had symptom relief. The data are consistent with other studies in identifying the pretreatment factors predicting for survival and objective response. Additionally, older age is positively associated with objective response and the majority of patients with the worst prognosis have symptom relief from treatment with chemotherapy.

Combination of chemotherapy and recombinant interferon-alpha in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Some studies have shown that the combination of chemotherapy and interferon in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and other solid tumors is feasible and possesses antitumor activity. Our study was aimed at verifying whether the addition of recombinant human interferon alpha (rh-IFN alpha) to combined chemotherapy would be able to increase the response rate and survival of patients with NSCLC. Thirty-eight patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC were evaluated in this study. Median age of patients was 57 years; performance status according to ECOG 0 and 1, 37 pts (97%); stage IIIB, 27 pts (71%); stage IV, 11 pts (29%). Histology was squamous cell carcinoma in 53%, adenocarcinoma 44% and large cell carcinoma 3%. Our schedule consisted of 80 mg/m2 cisplatin I.V., 100 mg/m2 etoposide I.V., 10 million U rh-IFN alpha IM and 10 million U rh-IFN alpha I.V. on first day of treatment, every 3 weeks. None of the patients had complete response. Partial response rate was 34%. Median response duration was 7 months (range 3-19 months), median survival time was 11 months (range 4-41 months). Twenty-nine percent of patients had grade 3 nausea and vomiting, 24% had grade 2 leucopenia, 5% had grade 2 cardiotoxicity, 2.6% had flu-like syndrome. According to these results, in advanced NSCLC, the addition of rh-IFN alpha did not increase the cisplatin-etoposide combined chemotherapy induced response rate and survival time.

Vinorelbine treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with special emphasis on elderly patients

The aim of this study was to investigate the activity and the toxicity of vinorelbine (VNB) in a population of patients with locally advanced inoperable or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including elderly patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. VNB was administered at a dose of 25-30 mg/m2, intravenously, weekly until progression. Of the 83 patients who entered the study (median age 63 years, number of patients aged > or = 70 years = 23, median performance status = 80, stage IV in 58 patients, previous chemotherapy in 15 patients), 76 were evaluable. One complete remission and 22 partial remissions were noted (30.2% response rate). Toxicity was mild. Median survival was 9 months. No effect of age upon outcome was detected. Thus, single agent VNB is a reasonable option for advanced NSCLC, particularly in elderly patients.

A pilot study of mitomycin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (MCF) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

A pilot study of continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil 200 mg m-2 per 24 h by ambulatory pump and Hickman line for the entire treatment cycle with mitomycin C 8 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and cisplatin 75 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1, both repeated every 28 days, was carried out in 31 previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Of 31 patients assessable for response, one attained a complete remission and eight a partial remission, an overall response rate of 29%. Haematological toxicity was minimal, with only 3% of patients developing WHO grade III/IV neutropenia and 13% grade III/IV thrombocytopenia. Significant side-effects included moderate to severe emesis (41%), mucositis (34%), diarrhoea (31%) and palmar-plantar syndrome (14%). Seven patients (23%) had Hickman line complications requiring line removal. Continuous infusional chemotherapy with this regimen is active in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, but its complexity and associated treatment toxicity offer little advantage over equally active but simpler and less toxic cisplatin-based regimens.

Etoposide: twenty years later

Since the beginning of its clinical development 20 years ago, etoposide has become an important and widely used agent in clinical oncology. Its integral role in the treatment of germ cell tumors and small-cell lung cancer seems unlikely to diminish in the future, and its use in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and in various high dose regimens will probably continue to increase. Active investigation continues regarding the optimal dose and schedule of etoposide, and it is likely that these investigations will result in further improvement of its clinical activity in patients with sensitive tumor types. Continued clinical investigation may result in the identification of active etoposide containing combination regimens for ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and some of the childhood malignancies. Exciting possibilities for the future include exploration of etoposide in combination with the topoisomerase I inhibitors, as well as the development of drugs to reverse drug resistance. During the next 10 years, the applications and importance of this unique drug will continue to increase.

Symptom relief with MVP (mitomycin C, vinblastine and cisplatin) chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The role of chemotherapy in the palliation of patients with advanced stage (IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. We have carried out a chemotherapy study emphasising symptom relief, a topic not normally discussed in previous similar studies. A total of 120 patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a moderate-dose palliative chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitomycin C 8 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (alternate courses), vinblastine 6 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and cisplatin 50 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 (MVP), repeating every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. Thirty-eight of 118 assessable patients (32%) achieved an objective response. Patients with locally advanced disease (stage IIIB) had a significantly better response rate (52%) than those with metastatic disease (25%) (P < 0.01). In 76 out of 110 (69%) patients, with tumour-related symptoms including 24 out of 31 patients (78%) with locally advanced disease, symptoms completely disappeared or substantially improved. In only 15 patients (14%) did symptoms progress during treatment. Symptomatic improvement was achieved after one course of chemotherapy in 61% and after two courses in 96% of responding patients. The schedule was well tolerated. Only 19% developed WHO grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, and only 3% developed significant alopecia. Other toxicities were minimal. MVP is a pragmatic inexpensive chemotherapy regimen that offers useful symptom palliation in patients with advanced NSCLC and merits a 1-2 course therapeutic trial in such patients. The schedule should also be assessed as primary (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy before radical radiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC in a randomised trial.

Combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in locally advanced epidermoid bronchogenic carcinoma. A randomized study

Between June 1980 and December 1983, 111 patients with inoperable epidermoid bronchogenic carcinoma (limited disease) were entered into a randomized trial comparing radiotherapy alone versus radiotherapy and combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin), methotrexate, and procarbazine. Thirty-five of 62 (56.4%) patients treated with 4500 rad in 15 fractions in 3 weeks and 19 of 49 (38.8%) patients treated with the same radiation treatment and chemotherapy had an objective response. The difference in response rate was not significant (P = 0.900). Median time to progression was 5.9 and 7.02 months, respectively, for the radiation treatment and the combined treatment. Median survival was 11.74 and 10.03 months, respectively, without statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients. The toxicity was acceptable and no treatment-related death occurred in either treatment schedule. In this study no significant superiority of combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment over radiation therapy alone was evidenced. Whether different chemotherapy regimens may prove more effective in this context should be clarified by further studies.

Five-day continuous infusion of cisplatin and etoposide in non-small cell lung cancer. A phase II trial

Cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide are synergistic in vitro: the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a continuous infusion (C.I.) of these 2 drugs in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Patients were to receive 3 courses of CDDP 20 mg/m2/d in 1 l saline x 5d and etoposide 50 mg/m2/d in 21 saline x 5d--both in C.I.--every 3-4 weeks. Thirty patients have entered the study. Four were inevaluable for response. One patient got complete remission, 15 partial remission, 8 no change and 2 progressive disease. The response rate was 53.3% overall (95% confidence interval: 35-71%), and 61.5% for 26 assessable patients. Toxicity appeared to be acceptable despite 52% transient neutropenia--one patient died during aplasia--and 78% grade 1 to 3 nausea or vomiting. Treatment was stopped in only one case, and modified in 6 others. The high response rate that we observed, supports the idea of potentiation of the antineoplastic effect of CDDP and etoposide by C.I., in non-small cell lung cancer. These results must be confirmed in larger series before definitive conclusions can be drawn.