Successful treatment with ranimustine and carboplatin for recurrent intraocular retinoblastoma with vitreous seeding

Comparing efficacy and side effects of two systemic chemotherapy regimens for eye-preserving therapy in children with retinoblastoma

BACKGROUND

Eye-preserving therapy in retinoblastoma comprises systemic chemotherapy, but studies analyzing the efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens are scarce.

METHODS

The efficacy and side effects of two different eye-preserving chemotherapy regimens containing either vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin (VEC) or cyclophosphamide, vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin (CyVEC) were compared in a prospective non-interventional observational study including children diagnosed with retinoblastoma between 2013 and 2019 in Germany and Austria. Event-free eye survival (EFES) and overall eye survival (OES) of all 164 eyes treated with both regimens and risk factors were investigated.

RESULTS

The EFES after VEC (2-year EFES 72.3%) was higher than after CyVEC (2-year EFES 50.4%) (p_logrank  < .001). The OES did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups (p_logrank  = .77; 2-year OES VEC: 82.1% vs. CyVEC: 84.8%). Advanced International Classification of Retinoblastoma (ICRB) group was prognostic for a lower EFES (p_logrank  < .0001; 2-year EFES ICRB A/B/C 71.3% vs. ICRB D/E 43.0%) and OES (p_logrank  < .0001; 2-year OES ICRB A/B/C 93.1% vs. ICRB D/E 61.5%). The multivariate analysis showed that age at diagnosis older than 12 months and ICRB A/B/C were associated with better EFES. No second malignancies or ototoxicities were reported after a follow-up of median 3.1 years after diagnosis of retinoblastoma (range 0.1-6.9 years).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite omitting cyclophosphamide, the EFES was higher after VEC chemotherapy that contains higher doses of carboplatin compared to CyVEC. The major risk factor for enucleation was advanced ICRB tumor grouping. Randomized clinical trials on efficacy and side effects of eye-preserving chemotherapy are required to tailor treatment protocols for retinoblastoma patients.

Clinical and genetic associations for carboplatin-related ototoxicity in children treated for retinoblastoma: A retrospective noncomparative single-institute experience

BACKGROUND

Children with retinoblastoma treated with carboplatin chemotherapy risk moderate to severe, irreversible hearing loss. Based on published evidence, we hypothesized that ototoxicity risk is associated with clinical parameters and variants in candidate genes in drug metabolism pathways (methyltransferases [thiopurine S-methyltransferase, TPMT] and [catechol-O-methyltransferase, COMT], and drug transporter ABCC3).

PROCEDURE

We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of patients with retinoblastoma treated with carboplatin chemotherapy regarding age (at diagnosis and chemotherapy initiation), chemotherapy sessions (cycles number, drug doses, and cumulative carboplatin dose), and hearing loss (defined as ototoxicity ≥grade 2 by at least one classification system). Blood samples were genotyped for genetic variants in TPMT (rs12201199, rs1800460), COMT (rs4646316, rs9332377), and ABCC3 (rs1051640) by quantitative PCR and confirmed by allele-specific PCR. Univariate statistical tests, receiver-operating characteristic analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine the association between hearing loss, clinical factors, and variants in candidate genes.

RESULTS

Audiometric data and stored DNA were available for 71 patients with retinoblastoma (88% carried an RB1 pathogenic variant allele). Median carboplatin cumulative dose was 1,400 mg/m² (260-5,148 mg/m² ). Ototoxicity occurred in 18 patients (25%), strongly associated with age at diagnosis (P = 0.01) and age at chemotherapy initiation (OR = 4.99, P = 0.008). The highest likelihood ratio of hearing loss was associated with chemotherapy initiation <4.25 months of age. Ototoxicity was not associated with any tested genetic variants.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a 25% prevalence of ototoxicity in patients with retinoblastoma treated with carboplatin, higher than previously published. Age at chemotherapy initiation was associated with carboplatin-induced ototoxicity, with children <4.25 months of age at highest risk.

Analysis of ototoxicity in young children receiving carboplatin in the context of conservative management of unilateral or bilateral retinoblastoma

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin plays an important role in the conservative management of retinoblastoma, but is associated with risk of ototoxicity in these young children whose sensory prognosis may be also compromised by their loss of vision. This retrospective study analyzed the impact of carboplatin on hearing in the context of conservative management of children with retinoblastoma.

METHODS

Data for 175 children treated at the Institut Curie between 1994 and 2002 were analyzed.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 8 months (0-60). Carboplatin was administered on 3 days (200 mg/m(2)/day) or 5 days (160 mg/m(2)/day) with etoposide and with diode-laser therapy at the dose of 560 mg/m(2) (chemothermotherapy). Median cumulative dose of carboplatin was 2,880 mg/m(2) (560-6,160). Ototoxicity was investigated by pure-tone audiometry and scored by Brock's grading scale before and after treatment. The median follow-up of hearing assessment was 5 years (1.8-11). Ototoxicity was detected in 8 children: 3 grade 1, 1 grade 2, and 2 grade 4. The two patients with grade 4 hearing-loss required a hearing aid. Two children developed bilateral high frequency hearing-loss, considered to be secondary to carboplatin but with less than Brock grade 1. Ototoxicity was observed for a median cumulative dose of carboplatin of 3,120 mg/m(2) (1,200-5,830). Only one child developed ototoxicity during treatment. All other cases were discovered after the last dose of carboplatin with a median interval of 3.7 years (0-7.6). No other risk factor for ototoxicity was able to account for these lesions.

CONCLUSION

Children receiving carboplatin require long-term audiometric follow-up.

A multidisciplinary treatment strategy that includes high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic retinoblastoma without CNS involvement

The prognosis of patients with metastatic retinoblastoma is poor with conventional chemotherapy and radiation. Since retinoblastoma is highly chemosensitive, dose-escalation of chemotherapeutic agents with stem cell support should be promising. We report our experience with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with metastatic retinoblastoma. Five patients with metastatic retinoblastoma underwent HDC with autologous SCT following conventional chemotherapy and local radiation therapy. Stem cells (bone marrow in four and peripheral blood stem cells in one) were collected after marrow involvement was cleared. Melphalan was a key drug in all patients, and was administered in combination with other agents such as cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, carboplatin or thiotepa. Three patients are currently alive disease-free at 113, 107 and 38 months, respectively, from the time of SCT. They had no central nervous system (CNS) involvement. The two patients who died of disease had CNS involvement. No long-term sequelae of HDC have been noted. Our treatment strategy using HDC appears to be effective for treating metastatic retinoblastoma without CNS involvement.

Continuing challenges in the management of retinoblastoma with chemotherapy

The management of retinoblastoma has gradually changed over the past 10 years. Over 95% of children with retinoblastoma in the United States are cured with modern techniques. The challenge remains, however, in maintaining the eye and vision. There is a trend away from enucleation and external beam radiotherapy toward focal conservative treatments involving primary chemoreduction in conjunction with thermotherapy and cryotherapy. This is related to earlier detection of the disease, recognition of more effective chemotherapeutic agents, more focused local treatment modalities, and, most importantly, knowledge of the long-term risks of external beam radiotherapy. Enucleation is still preferable for retinoblastoma that fills most of the eye, especially when the disease is unilateral or when there is concern for tumor invasion into the optic nerve, choroid, or orbit. The orbital integrated implant is placed after enucleation and provides acceptable prosthesis motility and appearance. External beam radiotherapy is still vital for treating advanced retinoblastoma, especially when there is diffuse vitreous or subretinal seeding after failure of other methods and preservation of vision is a priority. The most important recent advance in the management of retinoblastoma is the use of intravenous chemotherapy for tumor reduction, a technique of neoadjuvant chemotherapy termed "chemoreduction." This is followed by tumor consolidation with focal measures such as thermotherapy, cryotherapy, and plaque radiotherapy. This strategy provides reduced tumor volume and often permits consolidation with methods other than radiotherapy. It appears that vision can be preserved in some cases with these methods, avoiding some of the local complications like radiation cataract or macular edema that have been found with radiotherapy techniques. External beam radiotherapy and enucleation can now be avoided in most cases of Reese-Ellsworth groups I (minimal disease) through IV (moderate disease) retinoblastoma. The most advanced stage of retinoblastoma, Reese-Ellsworth group V, continues to provide the greatest difficulty for management, and external beam radiotherapy and enucleation are often employed in addition to chemoreduction to save the child's life. A collaborative prospective study in North America is currently under way to further study the benefits and risks of chemoreduction for minimal, moderate, and advanced retinoblastoma.