Continuous venous infusion 5-fluorouracil and interferon-alpha in pancreatic carcinoma

Potentials of interferon therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options. To improve survival for patients with pancreatic cancer, research has focused on other treatment modalities like adding biological modulators such as type-I interferons (IFNs). Type I IFNs (ie, IFN-α/IFN-β) have antiproliferative, antiviral, and immunoregulatory activities. Furthermore, they are able to induce apoptosis, exert cell cycle blocking, and sensitize tumor cells for chemo- and radiotherapy. A few years ago in vitro, in vivo, and several clinical trials have been described regarding adjuvant IFN-α therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Some studies reported a remarkable increase in the 2- and 5-year survival. Unfortunately, the only randomized clinical trial did not show a significant increase in overall survival, although the increased median survival implicated that some patients in the experimental group benefited from the adjuvant IFN-α therapy. Furthermore, encouraging in vitro and in vivo data points to a possible role for adjuvant IFN therapy. However, up till now, the use of IFNs in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains controversial. This review, therefore, aims to describe, based on the available data, whether there is a distinct role for IFN therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

The expression of interferon receptor α/β in human pancreatic cancer in nude mice is essential for tumor response to interferon α treatment

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant interferon based chemoradiation has rendered promising results against pancreatic cancer. This study evaluated the in vivo effect of interferon α on two human pancreatic carcinoma cell lines implanted in nude.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

MiaPaCa-2 expressed the interferon α/β receptor and Panc-1 cells did not. Regimen I consisted of intraperitoneal single-agent gemcitabine and Regimen II consisted of IFN-α and gemcitabine biweekly for 30 d.

RESULTS

Regimen I and II significantly decreased median tumor volume compared with control mice (P < 0.001). However, MiaPaCa-2 showed a more dramatic response to Regimen II compared with Panc-1 implanted mice. MiaPaCa-2 and treated with Regimen II showed less metastasis and less local invasion compared with Panc-1 treated with same regimen. Regimen II was more effective on MiaPaCa-2 compared with Regimen I (P < 0.001). There were no differences between Regimens I and II in the Panc-1 group.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of human pancreatic cancer in nude mice with interferon α and gemcitabine was associated with a reduction in tumor volume. This process was more prominent in the cells that express the interferon receptors.

Using lentiviral vectors for efficient pancreatic cancer gene therapy

Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains a life-threatening disease. Efficient therapeutic gene delivery to PC-derived cells continues to present challenges. We used self-inactivated lentiviral vectors to transduce PC-derived cells in vitro and in vivo. We showed that lentiviral vectors transduce PC-derived cell lines with high efficiency (>90%), regardless of the differentiation state of the cell. Next, we transferred human interferon beta (hIFN-beta) gene. Expression of hIFN-beta in PC cells using lentiviral vectors resulted in the inhibition of cell proliferation and the induction of cell death by apoptosis. In vivo, lentiviral administration of hIFN-beta prevented PC tumor progression for up to 15 days following gene therapy, and induced tumor regression/stabilization in 50% of the mice treated. Again, hIFN-beta expression resulted in cancer cell proliferation inhibition and apoptosis induction. We provide evidence that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-based lentiviral vectors are very efficient for gene transfer in PC-derived cells in vitro and in vivo. As a consequence, delivery of hIFN-beta stopped PC tumor progression. Thus, our approach could be applied to the 85% of PC patients with a locally advanced disease.

Type I interferons in the treatment of pancreatic cancer: mechanisms of action and role of related receptors

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the role of type I interferons (IFNs) and IFN receptors in the regulation of cell growth in 3 human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines (BxPC-3, MiaPaCa-2, and Panc-1).

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy have a marginal role in the management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The addition of IFN-alpha showed promising results in early clinical trials.

METHODS

Cell proliferation and apoptosis were evaluated by DNA measurement and DNA fragmentation, respectively. Type I IFN receptor (IFNAR-1 and IFNAR-2 subunits) was determined by quantitative RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. Cell cycle distribution was evaluated by propidium iodide staining and flow-cytometric analysis.

RESULTS

The incubation with IFN-beta for 6 days showed a potent inhibitory effect on the proliferation of BxPC-3 (IC(50), 14 IU/mL) and MiaPaCa-2 (IC(50), 64 IU/mL). The inhibitory effect of IFN-beta was stronger than IFN-alpha in all 3 cell lines and mainly modulated by the stimulation of apoptosis, although cell cycle arrest was induced as well. The expression of the type I IFN receptors was significantly higher in BxPC-3 (the most sensitive cell line to IFN) and mainly localized on the membrane, whereas in Panc-1 (the most resistant cell line) about 60% to 70% of cells were negative for IFNAR-2c with a mainly cytoplasmic staining for IFNAR-2c.

CONCLUSION

The antitumor activity of IFN-beta is more potent than IFN-alpha in pancreatic cancer cell lines through the induction of apoptosis. Further studies should investigate in vivo whether the intensity and distribution of IFNAR-1 and IFNAR-2c may predict the response to therapy with IFN-alpha and IFN-beta in pancreatic cancer.

Interferon receptor alpha/beta is associated with improved survival after adjuvant therapy in resected pancreatic cancer

AIM

Interferons (IFNs) are known to have antiproliferative and immunoregulatory activities that are modulated through specific cell surface ligands, known as IFN-alpha, -beta, and -gamma receptors. The presence of these receptors and their impact on response to adjuvant therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer has not been determined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Slides were prepared from 46 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was subsequently used to determine the expression of IFN- alpha/beta receptor-chain 2 (IFN-alpha/betaR) and IFN-gamma receptor-chain 1 (IFN-gammaR). The correlation between IFN receptor expression, tumor characteristics, and the overall patient response to adjuvant therapy were determined analytically.

RESULTS

The IHC performed for pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrated a high IFN-alpha/betaR expression in 4% (2/46) of patients, moderate expression in 20% (9/46) of patients, and faint or no expression in 76% (35/46) of patients. IHC confirmed a high expression of IFN-gammaR in 52% (24/46) of patients, moderate expression in 35% (16/46) of patients, and faint or no expression in the remaining 13% (6/46) of patients. Thirty-two (69.7%) patients received adjuvant therapy. Clinicopathological survey did not demonstrate any significant correlation between IFN-alpha/betaR and IFN-gammaR expression with regard to tumor size, vascular invasion, perineural invasion, lymph node metastases, or stage of disease. Use of adjuvant therapy was associated with increased survival in patients with IFN-alpha/betaR-positive tumors compared with patients with IFN-alpha/betaR-negative tumors (24 months versus 14.7 months in log rank test, p=0.012). The expression of IFN-gammaR, however, had no impact on patient survival (20 months vs 17 months; p=0.656, log rank test).

CONCLUSION

IFN-alpha/betaR is associated with improved survival for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who received adjuvant therapy.

Interferon receptors and the caspase cascade regulate the antitumor effects of interferons on human pancreatic cancer cell lines

BACKGROUND

Interferons (IFNs) have antiproliferative effects on tumor cells. The apoptotic effects and sensitization to chemotherapy conferred by IFN therapy, however, are not clearly understood. The aims of the present study were to explore the apoptotic effects of IFNs in human pancreatic cancer cell lines and to attempt to define their ability to synergistically enhance sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and gemcitabine, a mechanism that depends on the expression of IFN receptors.

METHODS

Human pancreatic cancer cells were cultured alone or in combination with the chemotherapeutic agents 5-FU and gemcitabine. Differential dosages of IFN-alpha, -beta, and -gamma were also added to the cell lines concomitantly during a period of 24 to 96 hours. The cell line viability and effects of treatment were examined using the methylthiazol tetrazolium assay and single-stranded DNA apoptosis assay. The expression of IFN receptors was determined using immunohistochemistry. Caspase-8 inhibitor was used to block the caspase cascade.

RESULTS

The antiproliferative and apoptotic effects of IFNs were most profoundly demonstrated on those cells that expressed the respective IFN receptor. The apoptotic effects provided by the interferons, however, were blocked by caspase-8 inhibition. The addition of IFNs significantly enhanced the cytotoxic effects of 5-FU and gemcitabine in those cell lines that expressed the corresponding IFN-alpha, -beta, or -gamma receptors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study on pancreatic cancer cell lines has demonstrated that IFNs mediate apoptosis through IFN receptors and the caspase cascade. Enhanced cytotoxicity occurred when IFNs were combined with 5-FU and gemcitabine.

Potential of interferon-alpha in solid tumours: part 2

The second part of this review examines the use of recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFNalpha) in the following solid tumours: superficial bladder cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma, head and neck cancer, gastrointestinal cancers, lung cancer, mesothelioma and ovarian, breast and cervical malignancies. In superficial bladder cancer, intravesical rIFNalpha has a promising role as second-line therapy in patients resistant or intolerant to intravesical bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG). In HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma, rIFNalpha is active as monotherapy and in combination with antiretroviral agents, especially in patients with CD4 counts >200/mm(3), no prior opportunistic infections and nonvisceral disease. rIFNalpha has shown encouraging results when used in combination with retinoids in the chemoprevention of head and neck squamous cell cancers. It is effective in the chemoprevention of hepatocellular cancer in hepatitis C-seropositive patients. In neuroendocrine tumours, including carcinoid tumour, low-dosage (</=3 MU) or intermediate-dosage (5 to 10 MU) rIFNalpha is indicated as second-line treatment, either with octreotide or alone in patients resistant to somatostatin analogues. Intracavitary IFNalpha may be useful in malignant pleural effusions from mesothelioma. Similarly, intraperitoneal IFNalpha may have a role in the treatment of minimal residual disease in ovarian cancer. In breast cancer, the only possible role for IFNalpha appears to be intralesional administration for resistant disease. IFNalpha may have a role as a radiosensitising agent for the treatment of cervical cancer; however, this requires confirmation in randomised trials. On the basis of current evidence, the routine use of rIFNalpha is not recommended in the therapy of head and neck squamous cell cancers, upper gastrointestinal tract, colorectal and lung cancers, or mesothelioma. Pegylated IFNalpha (peginterferon-alpha) is an exciting development that offers theoretical advantages of increased efficacy, reduced toxicity and improved compliance. Further data from randomised studies in solid tumours are needed where rIFNalpha has activity, such as neuroendocrine tumours, minimal residual disease in ovarian cancer, and cervical cancer. A better understanding of the biological mechanisms that determine response to rIFNalpha is needed. Studies of IFNalpha-stimulated gene expression, which are now feasible, should help to identify molecular predictors of response and allow us to target therapy more selectively to patients with solid tumours responsive to IFNalpha.

Current status of and future prospects for the medical management of adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas

Adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas is one of the most refractory neoplasms to medical treatment. Although of marginal value, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone or in combination with other agents or modalities has been the standard surgical adjuvant approach to localized unresectable tumor as well as the standard treatment for disseminated pancreatic cancer. Recently, a new chemotherapeutic agent, gemcitabine, has been shown to be somewhat more effective than 5-FU against metastatic pancreatic cancer. Treatment with gemcitabine usually results in a greater likelihood of objective response and better symptom control than treatment with 5-FU or drug combinations that include 5-FU. However, treatment with gemcitabine does not improve overall survival of patients with disseminated neoplasm. Newer promising agents such as 9-nitrocamptothecin have recently entered clinical trials, and novel modalities (e.g., gene therapy) are nearing full-scale clinical trial. There are reasons to believe that these and other new initiatives may soon significantly improve the medical management of adenocarcinoma of the exocrine pancreas.

Combined chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma--a case report

Therapeutic modalities for incompletely resected pancreatic carcinoma are rare. Effective treatment must not only prolong the period of palliation but also limit the adverse sequelae of the Whipple procedure so as not to compromise the quality of the remaining life span. New treatments include the use of gemcitabine and type I interferons. We treated a patient with incomplete resection of a pancreatic tumor with two cycles of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and cisplatinum (50 mg/m2) followed by radiotherapy (45 Gy/5 weeks) combined with interferon-beta (three times a week/5 x 10(6) IU). Two small liver metastases occurred subsequently. In all, four cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatinum were delivered. The patient lived at least 9 months with stable metastatic liver disease and local control. He had no acute toxic reactions except for a decrease in the leukocyte count, no long-term side effects, and a satisfactory quality of life. A regimen of sequential gemcitabine/cisplatinum and radiotherapy in combination with interferon-beta deserves further consideration as therapy for pancreatic carcinoma.

[Contribution of gemcitabine in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common tumor of the gastrointestinal tract.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Because this malignancy is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, its prognosis is poor, and patients are generally considered incurable at diagnosis. The traditional palliative approach to management of this tumor is chemotherapy. The most widely used agent is 5-FU, alone or in combination. Benefits of the treatment are still poor: the overall survival time rarely exceeds 5 months, and no study has shown a response rate greater than 20%.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Gemcitabine, a new antinucleoside agent, has led to promising results, as several phase II and III studies have demonstrated an increase in survival as compared with 5-FU, the overall 1-year survival rates being 18% and 2%, respectively (p < 0.002). Furthermore, even if only discrete results in terms of objective response rate have been achieved, gemcitabine decreases disease-related symptoms, thus benefiting to the patient's quality of life. The concept of clinical benefit therefore appears to be an important judgement criteria in the assessment of chemotherapy efficacy, and will certainly be extended to other malignant neoplasms.