Second-line chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin and irinotecan in patients with refractory lung cancer

Second-Line Chemotherapy and Beyond for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The landscape for the second- and third-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer has changed dramatically over the last two decades. Immunotherapeutic agents have become a preferred choice following progression on platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. However, there remains a role for cytotoxic chemotherapy and pemetrexed and docetaxel (with or without ramucirumab) are approved for single-agent use in the second-line setting. With the discovery of new genetic alterations and the development of novel targeted drugs, the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer following progression on first-line therapy continues to become more complicated as new treatment algorithms evolve.

Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review

Combination chemotherapy is the current strategy of choice for treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Platinum containing combination regimens are superior to non-platinum regimens in limited stage-SCLC and possibly also in extensive stage-SCLC as first and second-line treatments. The addition of ifosfamide to platinum containing regimens may improve the outcome but at the price of increased toxicity. Suboptimal doses of chemotherapy result in inferior survival. Early intensified, accelerated and high-dose chemotherapy gave conflicting results and is not considered a standard option outside of clinical trials. A number of newer agents have provided promising results when used in combination regimens, for example, gemcitabine, irinotecan and topotecan. However, more studies are required to appropriately evaluate them. There is a definitive role for radiotherapy in LD-SCLC. However, timing and schedule are subject to further research. Novel approaches are currently being investigated in the hope of improving outcome.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapies for the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive cancer with poor outcome if left untreated, but it is also one of the most chemotherapy responsive cancers. Overall it has a very poor prognosis especially if it is chemotherapy resistant to first line treatment. Second line chemotherapy has not been very beneficial in SCLC as opposed to breast cancer and lymphoma. In the last few years topotecan is the only drug that has been approved by the food and drug administration (FDA) for the second line treatment of SCLC but in Japan another drug, amrubicin is approved. There are many combinations of different chemotherapies available in moderate to high intensity, in this difficult to treat patient to overcome the chemo resistance, but many of these studies are small or phase II trials. In this article we have reviewed single agent and multidrug regimens that were studied in both chemo sensitive and refractory setting, including the most recent clinical trials.

High response of second-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or gemcitabine combined with carboplatin in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy

Because of improved therapeutic results after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), second-line chemotherapy may be considered for a growing number of patients. Approximately, 10% of patients have an interval time after concluding first-line platinum-based chemotherapy greater than 6 months. These patients may achieve high tumor responses when platinum is again used in second-line treatment. Twenty-three patients experiencing progression following 6 months after concluding platinum-based chemotherapy were managed with second-line treatment with carboplatin combined with gemcitabine or pemetrexed. Overall response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after initiation of second-line treatment were calculated for all patients. Median PFS after first-line treatment was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 10.4-14.7 months). Partial response was achieved in 7 of 23 patients, resulting in an overall response of 30.4% (95% CI, 11.6-49.0). Following initiation of second-line chemotherapy, median PFS was 5.9 months (95% CI, 1-10.9 months) and median OS was 12.5 months (95% CI, 3.5-21.5 months). The 1-year survival rate for all patients was 61.0% (95% CI, 29.5-82.0). Adding these results to those of the 10 previously published trials, 75 of 326 patients, 23%, (95% CI, 18.7-27.3) presented an overall response with the use of second-line platinum-based chemotherapy. The use of platinum combinations as second-line chemotherapy seems to have a place in the management of patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those with an interval time to progression greater than 6 months.

Phase II study of weekly irinotecan and cisplatin for refractory or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer

Even with the standard first-line chemotherapy, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurs in most cases. The purpose of this study is to develop a new chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with NSCLC that has relapsed or was refractory to previous chemotherapy. Patients with proven NSCLC refractory or recurrent after previous single-regimen chemotherapy, PS of 0-2, age of 15 years or older, adequate organ functions and measurable lesions were treated with irinotecan at 60 mg/m(2) and cisplatin at 25 mg/m(2) with 1000 ml hydration on day 1. This administration, considered as one cycle, was repeated every week without rest unless encountering defined skip and dose-reduction criteria. The treatment was administered for six cycles over a 49-day period, both median values, to 48 patients, with a response rate of 26%, progression free and median survival times of 3 and 11 months, respectively, and a 1-year survival rate of 46%. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia, anaemia and nausea, which were manageable. Subset analyses suggested that the response rate was independent of response to the first-line chemotherapy. In conclusion, second-line chemotherapy of weekly irinotecan and cisplatin with minimum hydration seemed effective, with tolerable toxicity, and is potentially useful irrespective of the outcome of previous chemotherapy.

Sequential Chemotherapy with Combination Irinotecan and Cisplatin Followed by Docetaxel for Treatment-Naïve Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Sequential administration of platinum-based doublet therapy and then a taxane may reduce the risk of drug resistance and, therefore, improve treatment outcome. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sequential administration of irinotecan and cisplatin and then docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eligible patients received irinotecan in 60-mg/m2 infusions for 30 to 60 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15, and cisplatin in 75-mg/m2 infusions for 60 minutes on day 1 every 28 days for four cycles (IC). Regardless of the response, patients received up to four cycles of sequential docetaxel in 75-mg/m2 infusions for 60 minutes.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients with histologically confirmed chemotherapy-naïve stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled, of whom 42 were evaluable. The response rate at completion of chemotherapy with IC was 45.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 30.2%-60.3%). Five patients had improvement of disease status during sequential docetaxel, and seven patients had disease progression. Progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-9.9 months), and the overall median survival was 14.6 months (95% CI: 9.8-17.9 months). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 54.3%, 22.6%, and 12.1%, respectively. The incidence of severe (> or =CTC V2 grade 3) neutropenia during IC was 23.9% compared with 95.7% for sequential docetaxel (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Sequential administration of IC and then docetaxel is feasible and is associated with a prolonged progression-free survival, but the current data do not confirm an improvement in treatment outcome by the sequential approach.

Pooled efficacy analysis from a phase I-II study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Development of treatments to improve the outcomes achieved with single-agent gemcitabine therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer remains a research priority. G-FLIP (gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin and cisplatin) is a four-drug regimen designed to maximize sequence-dependent synergy, while attempting to minimize toxicity among the four drugs. The dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan as part of the G-FLIP regimen have been published. For phase II testing, G-FLIP consisted of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m2 at a fixed rate of 10 mg/m2/min, irinotecan 120 mg/m2, bolus 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 and leucovorin 300 mg, followed by a 24-h 5-fluorouracil infusion of 1500 mg/m2 on day 1 and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 14 days. Thirty-three patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (22 men and 11 women) were treated and 31 were evaluable. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78 years) and median Karnofsky performance status score was 70-80. Estimated median time to disease progression was 171 days (6.1 months) and Kaplan-Meir-estimated median overall survival was 229 days (8.1 months). Twelve- and 18-month survivals were 33 and 21%, respectively. As per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, 13 patients had stable disease, seven (22%) attained a partial response, and 10 (32%) had disease progression. One patient attained a complete response and two were not evaluable (one withdrew consent and one died suddenly, each after cycle 1). Treatment generally was well tolerated. Grade 3-4 toxicities/patient were thrombocytopenia (3.1%), leukopenia (15%), neutropenia (21%), neutropenic fever (3%), fatigue (18%) and thrombosis (12.5%). Common grade 1-2 toxicities per patient included nausea/vomiting (69%), diarrhea (45%), constipation (21%) and fatigue (39%). In conclusion, G-FLIP is a feasible outpatient regimen with acceptable toxicity for metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. Disease control rate (stable disease rate plus partial or complete responses) and 1-year survival outcomes are encouraging.

A Phase II NCCTG study of irinotecan and docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

This Phase II study was undertaken to define the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of docetaxel and irinotecan for the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients with measurable NSCLC who had relapsed after an initial response to chemotherapy or who had failed to respond to initial chemotherapy, received 130 mg/m2 of irinotecan IV over 90 minutes and 50 mg/m2 docetaxel IV over 60 minutes on Day 1 q3 weeks for 6 cycles. Dexamethasone and diphenhydramine pretreatment were given. Response to treatment was evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors RECIST criteria, and toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) version 2.0.

RESULTS

The most common severe (NCI CTC Grade 3+) adverse events were neutropenia (67 percent), diarrhea (28 percent), fatigue (20 percent), nausea (17 percent), infection (15 percent), vomiting (13 percent), leucopenia (13 percent), abdominal pain (11 percent), and dyspnea (11 percent). Grade 5 toxic events were seen in 2 patients. One of these 2 cases was a possibly-treatment related event (intestinal fistula). The median number of treatment cycles received was 3. Twelve patients (26 percent) received all 6 cycles of treatment. Five patients (11 percent) had a confirmed response (complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or regression). Median follow-up for the five surviving patients is 26.5 months (range: 25.1-28.4). Forty-two patients have reported progressive disease and 41 patients have died. Median time-to-progression (TTP) and survival are 2.6 months and 7.5 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This second-line treatment regimen of irinotecan and docetaxel in NSCLC patients has shown activity, but can not be recommended over single-agent regimens because of significant toxicity.

Second-line treatment with irinotecan plus cisplatin vs cisplatin of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer pretreated with taxanes and gemcitabine: a multicenter randomised phase II study

The aim of this study was to compare the irinotecan/cisplatin regimen with cisplatin as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) pretreated with a taxane/gemcitabine regimen. Patients (n = 147) with stage IV NSCLC pretreated with a taxane/gemcitabine regimen were randomly assigned to receive either irinotecan (110 mg m(-2), day 1 and 100 mg m(-2), day 8) and cisplatin (80 mg m(-2), day 8) (IC; n = 74) or CDDP (80 mg m(-2), day 1) (C; n = 73) every 3 weeks. Patients treated with IC and C had a median survival of 7.8 and 8.8 months, respectively (P = 0.933). The 1-year survival rate was 34.3% for IC-treated patients and 31.7% for C-treated patients. Cox's regression analysis revealed that response to treatment (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.787; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1578-4.922) and performance status (HR = 1.865; 95% CI: 1.199-2.872) was independent prognostic factors for survival. Overall response rate was 22.5% (95% CI: 12.8-32.2%) for IC-treated patients and 7.0% (95% CI: 1.15-13.6%) for C-treated patients (P = 0.012); tumour growth control (partial remission (PR) + stable disease (SD)) was observed in 26 (38%) IC and 25 (36%) C patients (P = 0.878). There was no difference in terms of quality of life between the two chemotherapy arms. The incidence of febrile neutropenia, grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and grade 3 and 4 diarrhoea was significantly higher in the IC- than the C-treated patients. Other toxicities were mild. There were no treatment-related deaths in either arm. The IC regimen did not confer a survival benefit compared with C as second-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC pretreated with a taxane/gemcitabine regimen, despite its better efficacy in terms of response rate.

Multi-institutional phase II trial of irinotecan, cisplatin, and etoposide for sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Irinotecan (CPT-11) has been shown to exhibit excellent antitumour activity against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). A multi-institutional phase II study was therefore conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of CPT-11 combined with cisplatin (CDDP) and etoposide (ETOP) (PEI regimen) for the treatment of sensitive relapsed SCLC. Patients who responded to first-line chemotherapy but relapsed more than 8 weeks after the completion of first-line therapy (n=40) were treated using the PEI regimen, which consisted of CDDP (25 mg m⁻²) weekly for 9 weeks, ETOP (60 mg m⁻²) for 3 days on weeks 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9, and CPT-11 (90 mg m⁻²) on weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Five complete responses and 26 partial responses were observed, and the overall response rate was 78% (95% confidence interval 61.5–89.2%). The median survival time was 11.8 months, and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 49%. Grade 3/4 leucocytopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were observed in 55, 73, and 33% of the patients, respectively. Nonhaematological toxicities were mild and transient in all patients. In conclusion, the PEI regimen is considered to be highly active and well tolerated for the treatment of sensitive relapsed SCLC.

Phase I dose-finding study of biweekly irinotecan in combination with fixed doses of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer or other solid tumors

This phase I trial was initiated based on encouraging clinical data with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV), gemcitabine and cisplatin (G-FLIP) in the therapy of solid tumors. In this trial, G-FLIP has been modified to facilitate outpatient administration and to optimize sequence-dependent synergistic activity. Treatment consisted of biweekly (once every 14 days) cycles of sequential gemcitabine 500 mg/m, irinotecan per dose escalation schedule, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m and LV 300 mg on day 1 followed by a 24-h 5-FU infusion 1500 mg/m, followed by cisplatin 35 mg/m on day 2. The irinotecan starting dose was 80 mg/m and escalated by 20 mg/m in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined. Twenty-three patients were enrolled (13 men/10 women) with the following cancers: 11 pancreatic, five gallbladder, three squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, one hepatocellular carcinoma, one melanoma, one gastric, and one breast cancer. Median patient age was 63 years (range 44-78) and median Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 80. Patients received a median of 8 cycles (range 1-16) over five irinotecan dose levels (80, 100, 120, 140 and 160 mg/m). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 3 nausea/vomiting despite aggressive anti-emetic therapy occurred in one patient at dose level 1 and three patients at dose level 3. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities per patient consisted of thrombocytopenia (3%), anemia (6%), thrombosis (23%), neutropenia (16%) and neutropenic fever (10%). Of 18 patients evaluable for response, one complete response (pancreatic) and eight partial responses (three gallbladder, two pancreatic, two head and neck, and one breast) were attained. Seven patients had disease stabilization (five pancreatic, one hepatocellular and one gastric) for a median of 16 weeks (range 10-22). Median time to disease progression among all 23 patients enrolled to the phase I portion of the trial was 20.5 weeks (range 4-37). We conclude that G-FLIP is a novel outpatient chemotherapy regimen with acceptable toxicity at the maximum tolerated irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m. The phase II trial of G-FLIP using an irinotecan dose of 120 mg/m for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer is ongoing.

The role of irinotecan combined with Cisplatin or Carboplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

More than one third of all non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients present with advanced stage IV disease with metastases or with stage IIIB disease with a malignant pleural or pericardial effusion. The prognosis for these patients remains poor despite some improvement in survival produced by 2-drug chemotherapy combinations. With the best 2-drug combinations, the expected median survival is 8-9 months and > 80% of patients die within 2 years of diagnosis. The overall response rate to the best combination is < 40% and the complete response rate is only 1%. Clearly, superior therapies are needed. The topoisomerase I inhibitors have been developed because the topoisomerase I enzyme plays a critical role in the DNA repair process. Irinotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor developed during the 1990s. It was initially approved in the United States for the treatment of colorectal cancer. In early trials, considerable activity was seen in both small-cell lung cancer and NSCLC. These observations led to combination studies with cisplatin. Cisplatin-based therapy had become a standard approach in both stage IV disease and in combination with chest radiotherapy in stage IIIB disease because metaanalyses of randomized trials showed that cisplatin-based therapy significantly improved survival. Randomized trials also showed that cisplatin-based therapy improved symptoms in the majority of patients and improved quality of life. In early combination studies, the irinotecan/cisplatin combination produced responses in an average of 40% of patients and produced median survival times that averaged about 10 months. In randomized trials comparing irinotecan/cisplatin to vindesine/cisplatin, the irinotecan/cisplatin combination was slightly better than irinotecan alone and vindesine/cisplatin. These encouraging results led to ongoing randomized trials comparing the 2-drug combination of irinotecan/cisplatin to other 2-drug combinations. Irinotecan has also been combined safely and effectively with carboplatin. The 2-drug combination of irinotecan/carboplatin produced results similar to those achieved with irinotecan/cisplatin. Irinotecan has also been incorporated into 3-drug combinations such as irinotecan/carboplatin/paclitaxel with encouraging results. A randomized trial comparing docetaxel/irinotecan to docetaxel/cisplatin showed similar results. Randomized trials comparing the 3-drug combination to a 2-drug combination are in progress. The irinotecan/cisplatin combination has considerable activity in the second-line setting. Randomized trials comparing this combination to docetaxel are needed. Irinotecan is an active agent in the first- and second- line therapy of NSCLC.

Advanced NSCLC: new cytostatic agents

There are several new cytostatic agents under investigation for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer either as first or second-line. In this review we will present the current information about oxaliplatin, epothilones, irinotecan and alimta.

Second-line chemotherapy in relapsing or refractory patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

A comprehensive review of the literature on the efficacy of antitumor agents either alone or in combination as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cancer was undertaken.

RESULTS

An increasing number of patients with advanced NSCLC who progress or fail to respond to front-line chemotherapy are young and in good performance status, requiring further treatment. Since advanced NSCLC is an incurable and fatal disease, the aims of second-line chemotherapy should be the palliation of the symptoms and, probably, the improvement of survival. Docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan and paclitaxel have shown a promising activity as second-line treatment in patients with NSCLC, and several phase II studies of regimens associating either these drugs or these drugs with CDDP and ifosfamide have shown objective responses ranging from 15 to 25% and a median survival ranging from 4 to 8 months. Two randomized trials have clearly demonstrated that single agent docetaxel in the second line setting confers a survival benefit and an improvement of both the quality of life and the control of tumor-related symptoms establishing, thus, the role of docetaxel as standard treatment for relapsing or refractory patients with NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing evidence from both phase II and III studies seems to indicate that second-line chemotherapy may confer a survival benefit in a selected group of patients with advanced NSCLC.

Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan and vinorelbine in stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of combined irinotecan and vinorelbine in previously treated patients with stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-three patients with NSCLC (7 stage IIIB and 26 stage IV) were enrolled. All had been previously treated with cisplatin, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. In addition, 24 patients had received radiotherapy. Irinotecan (300 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1 and vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 14, every 4 weeks. Partial response was achieved in 3 patients (9%; 95% CI: 2-24%), stable disease (SD) in 13 (39%; 95% CI: 23-58%), whereas 17 patients progressed (51%; 95% CI: 33-69%). Median event-free survival was 10 weeks and median overall survival was 25 weeks. Three patients were event free at the end of the study with a follow-up of 40, 73, and 75 weeks. Toxicity was mild, with leukopenia grade III-IV in 8.6% of cycles. No episodes of diarrhea III-IV were observed. Three patients died early after administration of this combination, one of them in the context of severe leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Approximately 50% of patients treated with CPT-11 and vinorelbine in combination show partial response or stable disease with minimal toxicity.

Phase I study of weekly irinotecan combined with weekly cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have reported a synergistic effect between irinotecan and cisplatin. We have conducted a phase I trial combining these agents to find the optimal dose of irinotecan in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors, aged < or =75 years, performance status < or =2, and adequate organ function were enrolled in this study. They were treated at 4-week intervals with irinotecan plus 20 mg/m(2) cisplatin on days 1, 8, and 15. The starting dose of irinotecan of 40 mg/m(2) was escalated in 10 mg/m(2) increments until a maximum dose of 90 mg/m(2) was reached.

RESULTS

The recommended dose for phase II studies is 90 mg/m(2) of irinotecan and 20 mg/m(2) of cisplatin on days 1, 8, and 15. Overall response to the chemotherapy was 35% (95% confidential interval, 19.2-54.6%).

CONCLUSION

This combination seems to be active against lung cancer with acceptable toxicity. A phase II study is now ongoing.

Treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a comprehensive review

The current standard therapy for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the single-agent gemcitabine, by the increasingly used fixed rate infusion of 10 mg/m2/min. There is strong reason to anticipate that additional benefits will accrue with gemcitabine-based combination chemotherapy. Gemcitabine and CPT-11 are synergistic with many drugs and non-cross-resistant with each other. Rigorous clinical investigations will be performed in an effort to identify optimal drug sequence and schedules for these novel combinations.

Irinotecan and Platinums in the Treatment of Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States and in the world. In the United States, lung cancer ranks first in cancer deaths for both men and women. The 5-year survival rate is only 15%, but this has improved considerably from the 5% rate in the early 1960s. For many years, the standard therapy for patients with advanced, stage IIIB and IV non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was best supportive care, which consisted of palliative radiotherapy, pain management, and other symptom management. The median survival for these patients was only 4 months, and more than 85% died in the first year after diagnosis. Cisplatin was the first drug that was shown to prolong the survival of patients with advanced lung cancer. Meta-analyses of randomized trials showed that cisplatin reduced the hazard rate of death by 26%, increased median survival from 4 to 6 months, and increased 1-year survival from 15% to 25%. Cisplatin-based therapy also relieved symptoms in the majority of patients and improved the quality of life as assessed by patients themselves. Still, further advances are desperately needed, as three fourths of the cisplatin-treated patients die within a year of diagnosis. Topoisomerase I inhibitors are a new class of chemotherapeutic agents introduced into lung cancer therapy during the 1990s. Irinotecan (CPT-11) was shown to be active in patients with both small-cell and non small-cell lung cancers. The activity of irinotecan in advanced NSCLC made it logical to combine irinotecan with the two platinums, cisplatin and carboplatin. The combination of irinotecan with cisplatin produced response rates of about 40% in phase II trials conducted in previously un-treated patients with advanced NSCLC. The median survival in these studies ranged from 6-8 months, and the 1-year survival rates ranged from 40%-60%. Because carboplatin is more convenient and better tolerated than cisplatin, a number of more recent phase II trials have evaluated the combination of irinotecan and carboplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC. These trials produced results similar to those achieved with irinotecan/cisplatin and with other two-drug combinations such as paclitaxel/carboplatin and gemcitabine/ cisplatin. The excellent activity of the two-drug combination or irinotecan and a platinum led to trials of three-drug combinations, such as irinotecan/carboplatin/paclitaxel. Preliminary results from these studies showed excellent survival, although the toxicity required some dosage reductions. Randomized trials will be necessary to determine whether such three-drug combinations will be preferred over standard two-drug combinations.

Irinotecan (CPT-11): recent developments and future directions--colorectal cancer and beyond

Since its approval in the United States in 1996, irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar, Pharmacia Corp.; Peapack, NJ) has undergone extensive clinical evaluation. In the past five years, the focus of development has evolved from evaluation of single-agent activity in refractory disease settings to evaluation of front-line irinotecan-based combination chemotherapy regimens and integration of irinotecan into combined modality regimens. Important studies have been performed clarifying the role of irinotecan in treating colorectal and other gastrointestinal cancers, small cell and non-small cell lung cancer, and a variety of other malignancies. Preclinical studies performed in conjunction with these clinical trials have also provided significant insights into the pharmacology, metabolism, mechanisms of resistance, and molecular determinants of response. This review summarizes that progress, focusing on the achievements of the past five years.

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of second-line chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have relapsed or failed to respond to first-line treatment was unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of any second-line chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Bibliographic databases were searched. Handsearching and contact with experts was also performed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled clinical trials in which any second-line chemotherapy was compared with BSC in patients with NSCLC who had previously failed to any previous chemotherapy regimen.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted by 2 independent reviewers and revised by all authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one study was included. It randomised 204 patients to receive either doxetaxel or BSC. Following an unacceptably high toxic death rate the dose of doxetaxel was reduced from 100 mg/m(2) to 75 mg/m(2). Doxetaxel gave an extra 2.4 months of survival - an average of 7.0 months vs 4.6 months on BSC. At 1 year after diagnosis 29% of doxetaxel treated patients were alive compared with 19% of the BSC group.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Definitive recommendations cannot be made since evidence is only available from one randomised controlled trial which, though of reasonable quality, had a number of limitations. There is currently no evidence to support second-line treatment of patients with poor performance status. Larger, well-designed controlled trials are needed to further evaluate whether the benefits of second-line chemotherapy to patients with NSCLC outweigh its risks and costs.

Second-line chemotherapy in relapsing or refractory non-small-cell lung cancer: a review

PURPOSE

Since the increased use of first-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), second-line chemotherapy may nowadays be considered for a growing group of patients. Guidelines for second-line treatment have to be developed yet.

METHODS

We reviewed the published literature on second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC with emphasis on the role of factors such as pretreatment, response to first-line treatment, and length of disease-free-interval.

RESULTS

Thirty-four single-agent-studies and 24 multidrug-studies on second-line treatment were identified. Docetaxel has been studied most extensively and is the only agent that has been studied in randomized phase III trials. Different definitions of sensitivity applied by different authors and conflicting results have been reported about the influence of response to prior chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Since most patients are treated with a platinum-based regimen in the first line, platinum resistance usually is a major consideration for the use of second-line agents. We argue, however, that a more general definition of drug resistance is more appropriate than resistance to platinum only. Criteria to select NSCLC patients for second-line treatment have not been defined yet. This is also important in light of the upcoming necessity to test new drugs in pretreated instead of treated patients. Guidelines for second-line treatment of NSCLC based on clinical information on drug sensitivity to first-line therapy need to be developed.

Second-line chemotherapy for recurrent non-small cell lung cancer: do new agents make a difference?

After a certain degree of nihilism, chemotherapy has become the standard treatment for advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The new chemotherapeutic drugs (vinorelbine, taxanes, gemcitabine, and irinotecan) and their associations with cisplatin have shown better response rates and survival in comparison with the standard regimens. This increase of survival is the main motive of the possible consideration of a second-line therapy in NSCLC patients. To this regard, the most promising drug may be docetaxel that, in a randomized trial comprising a best supportive care arm (BSC), documented a response rate of 7.6%, a longer median survival (31 weeks versus 21 of BSC), and a statistically better quality life. Other phase II studies obtained a response rate of 20% and 1-year survival of 40% using docetaxel. Also gemcitabine has shown interesting results in this setting, with a 19% response rate and a median and 1-year survival rate of 34 weeks and 45%, respectively. The activity of paclitaxel is not well defined because of conflicting results and deserves further investigations, while the efficacy of vinorelbine and irinotecan has been dismal. Large randomized trials comparing the treatment arm with best supportive care and a careful analysis of quality of life and cost-effectiveness will be needed to clarify the role of second-line therapy in advanced NSCLC.