Accuracy and clinical impact of mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET imaging in potentially resectable lung cancer

Recommended changes for the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer-the findings of a single-institution evaluation

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy of the nodal descriptors and subgroups proposed by International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) in the 8th edition of the TNM classification system and to provide references for future editions.

METHODS

A total of 3,177 patients with non-small cell lung cancer at the Beijing Cancer Hospital were classified based on the following three methods: (I) the N descriptors in the 8th edition of the TNM classification system: N0, N1, N2, and N3; (II) the IASLC-proposed N subgroups: N1a, N1b, N2a1, N2a2, and N2b; (III) our more extensive division method: N1a, N1b, N1c, N2a1, N2a2, N2b1, N2b2, N2c, N3a, and N3b. Five-year survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and differences between subgroups were evaluated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

(I) A significant survival difference was found between each adjacent N descriptor; (II) the difference between each adjacent subgroup N descriptor was significant, but the difference between N1b and N2a1 was not; (III) in our proposed method, a significant difference was found between all the subgroups apart from N2a2 and N2b1, N2b1 and N2b2, N2c and N3a, and N3a and N3b.

CONCLUSIONS

The N descriptors in the 8th edition of the tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) classification system are consistent with our data. Although our more extensive division method could distinguish between patients at different stages, its implementation is complicated; thus, we recommend the implementation of the IASLC-proposed subgroups with the addition of the N1b and N2a1 groups.

Combining Independent Studies of Diagnostic Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography in Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims and background

A meta-analysis of diagnostic test performance was conducted to compare the results of relevant studies reporting diagnostic accuracy values for mediastinal staging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This paper deals with the two most accurate imaging techniques currently in use: positron emission tomography (PET) with FDG and computed tomography (CT). A statistical pooling method was used to perform a quantitative meta-analysis aimed at demonstrating the potential advantage of one of these two methods.

Methods

Studies in all languages published between 1998 and 2005 that examined the use of FDG-PET and CT for mediastinal staging in NSCLC patients, enrolled at least 18 participants, and provided enough data to allow calculation of sensitivity and specificity rates were considered eligible for the quantitative meta-analysis. Statistical methods to pool the overall estimates of sensitivity and specificity and to compare the discriminant power of PET and CT were discussed and used.

Results

Of the 13 studies included in the analysis, 12 reported greater accuracy of FDG-PET than CT in detecting mediastinal lymph node metastases. The sensitivity of FDG-PET ranged from 50% to 100%. The estimate of the overall sensitivity was 0.83% with 95% CI (0.749–0.913). Specificity ranged from 79% to 100%, with an overall estimated specificity of 0.87% with 95% CI (0.80–0.95). For CT, the sensitivity and specificity ranged from 50% to 97% and 58% to 94%, respectively; the overall estimate was 0.68% with 95% CI (0.582–0.788) and 0.76% with 95% CI (0.668–0.859). The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) approach was used to assess the superior diagnostic accuracy of one of the two methods. The areas under the two SROC curves were AUCPET = 0.909 vs AUCCT = 0.794.

Conclusions

Numerical and visual results of the meta-analysis of recent relevant reports agreed that FDG-PET is more accurate than CT in identifying mediastinal lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer.

Impact of FDG-PET findings on decisions regarding patient management strategies: a multicenter trial in patients with lung cancer and other types of cancer

OBJECTIVE

To date, numerous studies have been conducted on the diagnostic capabilities of positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). However, no studies designed to evaluate the influence of FDG-PET on the selection of patient management strategies within the Japanese healthcare system have been reported to date. The aim of the present study was to investigate prospectively the proportion of patients whose management strategies were modified based on FDG-PET findings (strategy modification rate).

METHODS

The strategy modification rate was calculated by comparing the patient management strategy (test and treatment plans) after FDG-PET with the strategy before FDG-PET for 560 cancer patients with nine types of cancer (lung cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, head/neck cancer, brain tumor, pancreas cancer, malignant lymphoma, cancer of unknown origin, and melanoma). In addition, the details of the modifications to the patient management strategies were analyzed.

RESULTS

The strategy modification rate for patients with lung cancer was 71.6% (149 of 208 patients, 95% confidence interval 65.0-77.7%), which was higher than previously reported strategy modification rates for lung cancer before and after FDG-PET (25.6%). The strategy modification rates for patients with cancers other than lung cancer were as follows: breast, 44.4% (56/126); colorectal, 75.6% (62/82); head and neck, 65.2% (15/23); malignant lymphoma, 70.0% (35/50); pancreas, 85.0% (17/20); and cancer of unknown origin, 78.0% (32/41). The mean modification rate (major and minor modifications) of the treatment plans after FDG-PET, relative to the plans before FDG-PET, was 55.4% (range 44.0-69.2%), with major modifications pertaining to the treatment plan made in 43.3-68.2% of the patients based on the objectives of the FDG-PET examination.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from this study indicate that FDG-PET can contribute to the modification of management strategies (particularly treatment plans), especially for lung cancer patients but also for patients with other types of cancer.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology

Since its introduction in the early nineties as a promising functional imaging technique in the management of neoplastic disorders, FDG-PET, and subsequently FDG-PET/CT, has become a cornerstone in several oncologic procedures such as tumor staging and restaging, treatment efficacy assessment during or after treatment end and radiotherapy planning. Moreover, the continuous technological progress of image generation and the introduction of sophisticated software to use PET scan as a biomarker paved the way to calculate new prognostic markers such as the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and the total amount of tumor glycolysis (TLG). FDG-PET/CT proved more sensitive than contrast-enhanced CT scan in staging of several type of lymphoma or in detecting widespread tumor dissemination in several solid cancers, such as breast, lung, colon, ovary and head and neck carcinoma. As a consequence the stage of patients was upgraded, with a change of treatment in 10%-15% of them. One of the most evident advantages of FDG-PET was its ability to detect, very early during treatment, significant changes in glucose metabolism or even complete shutoff of the neoplastic cell metabolism as a surrogate of tumor chemosensitivity assessment. This could enable clinicians to detect much earlier the effectiveness of a given antineoplastic treatment, as compared to the traditional radiological detection of tumor shrinkage, which usually takes time and occurs much later.

New CT criteria for nodal staging in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to develop a simple noninvasive technique for nodal staging using routine preoperative computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and written informed consent to perform the initial and follow-up CT studies was obtained from all patients. Preoperative CT findings (n=218 patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer) and pathological diagnoses after surgical resection were evaluated. Using CT images, lymph node section area, circumference, and lesion attenuation values (LAVs) were drawn freehand, and the short axis (SA) and long axis (LA) were measured using caliper software. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were then used to analyze the section area, circumference, and LAVs.

RESULTS

Based on ROC curves, two cut-off values, lymph node section area >30 mm(2) and circumference >25 mm, showed greater sensitivity for nodal staging than the conventional criterion of lymph node SA ≥10 mm or the LA, SA/LA ratio or LAVs. Using lymph node section area >30 mm(2) for diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of nodal staging were 90.5%, 56.3%, and 58.3%, respectively. Using lymph node circumference >25 mm, the values were 76.2%, 70.4%, and 70.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Lymph node section area >30 mm(2) and circumference >25 mm can serve as supportive criteria used by radiologists and surgeons to determine nodal staging. If these CT criteria are met, use of a more sensitive procedure such as positron emission tomography or mediastinoscopy is recommended.

CONCISE ABSTRACT

CT is used routinely during preoperative management of lung cancer. Based on ROC analyses, the cut-off values for surface area, circumference, the SA/LA ratio, and LAVs for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis were 30 mm(2), 25 mm, 0.65, and 50 Hounsfield units, respectively. Our findings indicate that lymph node surface area >30 mm(2) and circumference >25 mm are supportive criteria that can be used by radiologists and thoracic surgeons to determine nodal staging and surgical indications.

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: current status, future aspects

Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a promising novel technology for oncology diagnosis and staging and neurologic and cardiac applications. Our institution's current research protocol results in a total imaging time of approximately 45 to 70 minutes with simultaneous PET/MR imaging, making this a feasible total body imaging protocol. Further development of MR-based attenuation correction will improve PET quantification. Quantitatively accurate multiparametric PET/MR data sets will likely improve diagnosis of disease and help guide and monitor the therapies for individualized patient care.

Diagnostic imaging in the preoperative management of lung cancer

Surgical resection is the accepted standard of care for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several imaging modalities play central roles in the detection and staging of the disease. The aim of this review is to evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and PET/CT for NSCLC staging. Radiographic staging refers to the use of CT as a non-invasive diagnostic technique. However, while the vast majority of patients undergo only CT, CT is a notoriously inaccurate means of tumor and nodal staging in many situations. PET/CT clearly improves the staging, particularly nodal staging, compared to CT or PET alone. In addition, as a result of the increased soft-tissue contrast, MRI is superior to CT for distinguishing between tissue characteristics. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), which is a minimally invasive technique, also has pathological diagnostic potential. Extensive research and the resultant improvements in the understanding of genetics, histology, molecular biology and oncology are transforming our understanding of lung cancer, and it is clear that imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, PET and PET/CT will have an important role in its preoperative management. However, thoracic surgeons should also be aware of the limitations of these techniques.

Additional value of FDG-PET to contrast enhanced-computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a Japanese multicenter clinical study

OBJECTIVE

This study was a controlled multicenter clinical study to verify the diagnostic effects of additional FDG-PET to contrast-enhanced CT for mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

NSCLC patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (short diameter, 7-20 mm), confirmed using contrast-enhanced CT, were examined using FDG-PET to detect metastases prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was the accuracy for concomitantly used CT and FDG-PET showing the additional effects of FDG, compared with CT alone. The secondary endpoints were the clinical impact of FDG-PET on therapeutic decisions and adverse reaction from FDG administration. The images were interpreted by investigators at each institution. Moreover, blinded readings were performed by an image interpretation committee independent of the institutions. The gold standard was the pathological diagnosis determined by surgery or biopsy after PET, and patients in whom a pathological diagnosis was not obtained were excluded from the analysis.

RESULTS

Among 99 subjects, the results for 81 subjects eligible for analysis showed that the accuracy improved from 69.1% (56/81) for CT alone to 75.3% (61/81) for CT + PET (p = 0.404). These findings contributed to treatment decisions in 63.0% (51/81) of the cases, mainly with regard to the selection of the operative procedure. The results of the image interpretation committee showed that the accuracy improved from 64.2% (52/81) (95% CI 52.8-74.6) for CT to 75.3% (61/81) (95% CI 64.5-84.2) for CT + PET. The accuracy for 106 mediastinal lymph nodes improved significantly from 62.3% (66/106) (95% CI 52.3-71.5) for CT to 79.2% (84/106) (95% CI 70.3-86.5) for CT + PET (p < 0.05). We found that no serious adverse drug reactions appeared in any of the 99 patients who received FDG, except for transient mild outliers in the laboratory data for two patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of FDG-PET to contrast-enhanced CT imaging for the staging of NSCLC improved the diagnostic accuracy for mediastinal lymph node metastasis. FDG-PET improved the precision of the staging of NSCLC and contributed to the surgical decisions.

[Impact of positron emission tomography on clinical management of potentially resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a French prospective multicenter study]

BACKGROUND

Whole-body (18)F-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has the potential to improve the management of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We prospectively evaluated the impact of combining FDG-PET with conventional staging methods, including computed tomography (CT), on the staging and management of patients with potentially resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

Ninety-four consecutive patients with newly diagnosed/suspected NSCLC were enrolled. Each patient was first staged by using conventional methods, and then by FDG-PET. FDG-PET results were forwarded in a sealed envelope and divulged at the weekly staff meeting on staging and treatment, only after "Decision 1", based on conventional staging, had been reached by consensus; reevaluation taking FDG-PET into account yielded "Decision 2". The validity of these latter decisions was analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were eligible. Relative to standard imaging, FDG-PET led to clinical staging changes in 26 (29.2%) patients. The stage was lowered in eight cases (9%) and raised in 18 cases (20.2%). "Decision 2" differed from "Decision 1" in 19 patients, modifying the surgical procedure in four cases, indicating other investigations to confirm FDG-PET evidence of metastases in 12 cases, or modifying the medical treatment in three cases. These modifications were retrospectively justified in 9/19 cases, and consisted of 2/4 modifications of the surgical procedure (one hilar and one adrenal metastasis not confirmed histologically), 4/12 further investigations (axillary and liver biopsies, mediastinoscopy, occult colon cancer) and three indications for palliative treatment, in patients who all died within 3 months after FDG-PET.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on FDG-PET, management was modified in 19/89 (21.3%) patients, but these changes were justified in only 9/89 patients (10.1%). FDG-PET can detect asymptomatic local and distant metastases and improves the preoperative assessment of NSCLC, thereby avoiding unnecessary surgery. However, histological verification is required because of the risk of false-positive results.

Molecular PET/CT imaging-guided radiation therapy treatment planning

The role of positron emission tomography (PET) during the past decade has evolved rapidly from that of a pure research tool to a methodology of enormous clinical potential. (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET is currently the most widely used probe in the diagnosis, staging, assessment of tumor response to treatment, and radiation therapy planning because metabolic changes generally precede the more conventionally measured parameter of change in tumor size. Data accumulated rapidly during the last decade, thus validating the efficacy of FDG imaging and many other tracers in a wide variety of malignant tumors with sensitivities and specificities often in the high 90 percentile range. As a result, PET/computed tomography (CT) had a significant impact on the management of patients because it obviated the need for further evaluation, guided further diagnostic procedures, and assisted in planning therapy for a considerable number of patients. On the other hand, the progress in radiation therapy technology has been enormous during the last two decades, now offering the possibility to plan highly conformal radiation dose distributions through the use of sophisticated beam targeting techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy, and many other promising technologies for sculpted three-dimensional (3D) dose distribution. The foundation of molecular imaging-guided radiation therapy lies in the use of advanced imaging technology for improved definition of tumor target volumes, thus relating the absorbed dose information to image-based patient representations. This review documents technological advancements in the field concentrating on the conceptual role of molecular PET/CT imaging in radiation therapy treatment planning and related image processing issues with special emphasis on segmentation of medical images for the purpose of defining target volumes. There is still much more work to be done and many of the techniques reviewed are themselves not yet widely implemented in clinical settings.

Mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary experience with diffusion-weighted MR imaging

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study was to describe our preliminary experience of evaluating mediastinal lymph node metastases with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two consecutive patients with non-small cell lung cancer underwent preoperative diffusion-weighted MR imaging using a non-breath-hold short inversion time inversion recovery-echo planar imaging sequence with a high b value of 1000 s/mm2. An experienced thoracic radiologist prospectively evaluated each study for mediastinal lymph node metastases on a per-patient basis. On diffusion-weighted MR imaging, mediastinal lymph node metastasis was defined as a focus of low signal intensity at the site of a visible lymph node on corresponding T2-weighted image. The MR results were correlated with histopathologic findings.

RESULTS

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging demonstrated mediastinal lymph node metastasis in 4 (80%) of 5 patients with pathologically proven metastasis and accurately identified 36 (97%) of 37 patients without mediastinal lymph node metastasis. Thus, 40 (95%) of 42 patients were accurately diagnosed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for mediastinal lymph node metastasis were 80%, 97%, 80%, 97%, and 95%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary results show that diffusion-weighted MR imaging has a high negative predictive value for excluding mediastinal lymph node metastases from non-small cell lung cancer and has the potential to be a reliable alternative non-invasive imaging method for the preoperative staging of mediastinal lymph node in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Identifying patients with peripheral-type early non-small cell lung cancer (T1N0M0) for whom irradiation of the primary focus alone could lead to successful treatment

We investigated the indication of radiotherapy in operable patients with peripheral-type early non-small cell lung cancer (T1N0M0 (TNM staging in 1997)). The subjects comprised 396 patients with non-small cell lung cancer in whom the clinical stage was evaluated as IA. We examined age, gender, Brinkmann's index, histopathological type, the grade of histopathological differentiation, tumour diameter and the level of carcinoembryonic antigen as factors involved in lymph node metastasis. Lymph node metastasis was detected in 79 patients (20%). Factors such as the grade of histopathological differentiation and tumour diameter were involved in lymph node metastasis. In well-differentiated lesions, the probability of metastasis was <10% even when the tumour diameter exceeded 2 cm. However, the probability rapidly increased with tumour size in moderately and poorly differentiated lesions. Among the patients with peripheral-type early non-small cell lung cancer (T1N0M0), the risk of lymph node metastasis was low in those with well-differentiated carcinoma and those with moderately differentiated lesions measuring </=1.5 cm in diameter. The proportion of our patients fitting these criteria was approximately 30%. For these patients, stereotactic body radiotherapy and particle therapy may be indicated.

[Usefulness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in respiratory medicine]

The introduction of positron emission tomography (PET) into the management of neoplastic disease in respiratory patients signified an important change from classic algorithms based exclusively on anatomic information obtained through computed tomography (CT). Non-small cell lung cancer and solitary pulmonary nodule were the 2 diseases in which metabolic PET imaging offered the highest diagnostic yield, as has been evident since the inclusion of this technology among the services available within the Spanish national health service. However, a number of limitations were encountered in relation to the lack of anatomic definition in PET imaging, as had been described in the literature. The appearance in 2001 of hybrid PET-CT devices has not only helped remedy those defects, but has also made it possible to combine anatomic and metabolic information in a single image, making this hybrid technology the most valuable tool in the current diagnostic arsenal.

Staging non-small cell lung cancer

Patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) need accurate tumor staging in order to direct appropriate therapy and establish prognosis; the tumor is usually staged using the TNM system. The major imaging modalities currently used for staging this disease are thoracic computed tomography (CT) (including the adrenal glands) and whole body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) scanning. CT is generally most useful in evaluating the T stage, i.e. local spread of the neoplasm, whereas PET is most helpful in assessing the N and M stages, i.e. regional and distant tumor spread, respectively. Integrated CT-PET imaging adds information compared to the use of either modality alone. PET findings frequently lead to upstaging the disease and thus prevent unindicated surgeries. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful in evaluating local extent of disease in patients with superior sulcus tumors and possible brachial plexus involvement. Staging accuracy using any of these imaging techniques is imperfect; therefore, pathologic confirmation of positive findings is recommended, whenever possible, before denying a patient potentially curative therapy.

Detecting extrathoracic metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Is routine scanning necessary?

There is controversy over whether to scan extrathoracic sites for metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We tested the efficiency of clinical factors to determine whether metastasis has occurred, and whether routine scanning for NSCLC is required. Nine hundred and forty five patients scanned for extrathoracic metasates were included. Clinical factors indicating metastasis were determined using multivariate analysis. Of the 945 cases, 377 (39.9%) had metastasis. Bone metastases were determined by focal skeleton pains, elevated serum alkaline phosphatase levels, adenocarcinoma, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 90.6, specificity of 12.7, PPV of 16.3, NPV of 87.8, and silent metastases rate (SMR) of 9.4%. Brain metastases were determined by neurological symptoms, adenocarcinoma, hematocrite <40 for men and <35 for women, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 89.9, specificity of 7.9, PPV of 9.2, NPV of 88.3, and SMR of 10.1%. Abdominal metastases were determined by abdominal pain/tension, hepatomegaly, elevated GGT levels, serum LDH levels >500 IU, a N2 or N3 case, KPS</=70, sensitivity of 95.9, specificity of 7.1, PPV of 13.3, NPV of 92.1 and SMR of 4.1%. Of the 224 patients with stage I and II disease, 73 had metastasis with a rate of 10.9% silent metastasis. We concluded that routine scanning of NSCLC for staging is necessary.

Factors involved in lymph node metastasis in clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer—From studies of 604 surgical cases

PURPOSE

To identify the factors involved in lymph node metastasis, 604 clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer cases were studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Age, sex, Brinkmann Index (BI), histopathological type, histopathological differentiation degree, tumor size and CEA value were studied as factors involved in lymph node metastasis for 604 cases that were diagnosed to be clinical stage I (T1-T2N0M0; 1997 TNM categorization) non-small cell lung cancer.

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis was observed in 161 cases (27%). The factors involved in lymph node metastasis included the degree of histopathological differentiation and the tumor size. While the metastasis rate was less than 10% in well-differentiated cancers (even when the tumor size exceeded 4cm), in moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated cancers, the lymph node metastasis rate increased in proportion to tumor size.

CONCLUSION

In stage I non-small cell lung cancer cases, cases with a low probability of lymph node metastasis are well-differentiated cancers. In these cases, lymph node dissection may be omitted in surgery (reduction surgery), and such cases may thus be good subjects for undergoing either stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or particle therapy.

The value of video-assisted mediastinoscopy in pulmonary metastasectomy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of video-assisted mediastinoscopy (VAM) in identifying involved mediastinal lymph nodes in patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy.

METHODS

Over a 4-year period (2002-2005) a retrospective study was carried out in 57 patients (44 men, 13 women, mean age 59 years) undergoing isolated, unilateral or bilateral metastasectomy. Following staging CT scan, VAM was performed prior to open thoracotomy, median sternotomy or VATS resection of the metastasis. Follow-up was complete in all patients.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients underwent 62 operations for metastatic disease. The majority had colorectal cancer (39) followed by renal (11), sarcoma (9), liver (2) and miscellaneous (8). Six patients (10.5%) had positive mediastinal nodes on VAM. There was no perioperative morbidity or mortality. At a median follow-up of 25 months, 63 patients (68.5%) were still alive.

CONCLUSIONS

Mediastinal lymph node involvement has been reported to occur in up to 14% of patients with pulmonary metastasis. In our study, 10% of patients treated for pulmonary metastasis had positive nodal disease at metastasectomy. We believe our results confirm that VAM can be safely performed and may have a role in more accurate staging of metastatic disease and influence the decision for post-resection adjuvant therapy.

Staging of Lung Cancer

Imaging techniques play a vital role in the diagnosis, staging, and follow-up of patients who have lung cancer. For this purpose, PET has become an important adjunct to conventional imaging techniques such as chest radiography, CT, ultrasonography, and MR imaging. The ability of PET to differentiate the metabolic properties of tissues allows more accurate assessment of undetermined lung lesions, mediastinal lymph nodes, or extrathoracic abnormalities, tumor response after induction treatment, and detection of disease recurrence.

Partnerships in oncology and radiology: the role of radiology in the detection, staging, and follow-up of lung cancer

In this review, I examine the multifaceted role of radiology in the diagnosis, staging, and management of lung cancer, highlighting new applications and modalities such as computer-aided detection of lung nodules and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and monitoring response to therapy. Lung cancer screening is also discussed.

Navigating the Fifth Dimension: Innovative Interface for Multidimensional Multimodality Image Navigation

The display and interpretation of images obtained by combining three-dimensional data acquired with two different modalities (eg, positron emission tomography and computed tomography) in the same subject require complex software tools that allow the user to adjust the image parameters. With the current fast imaging systems, it is possible to acquire dynamic images of the beating heart, which add a fourth dimension of visual information-the temporal dimension. Moreover, images acquired at different points during the transit of a contrast agent or during different functional phases add a fifth dimension-functional data. To facilitate real-time image navigation in the resultant large multidimensional image data sets, the authors developed a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine-compliant software program. The open-source software, called OsiriX, allows the user to navigate through multidimensional image series while adjusting the blending of images from different modalities, image contrast and intensity, and the rate of cine display of dynamic images. The software is available for free download at http://homepage.mac.com/rossetantoine/osirix.

The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography on Clinical Decision Making in a University-Based Multidisciplinary Lung Cancer Practice

INTRODUCTION

Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning has gained increasing application as a diagnostic and staging tool in the evaluation of lung cancer. Although PET scanning has been demonstrated to be a cost-effective adjunct to lung cancer diagnosis, its global impact on clinical decision making has not been assessed.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of the systematic use of PET scanning on clinical decision making.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

A university-based multidisciplinary lung cancer practice.

PATIENTS

All patients undergoing diagnostic or staging PET scans from December 31, 2000, to December 31, 2002.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

One hundred ninety-eight patients underwent PET for diagnosis (161 patients) or staging (37 patients). PET scan results and clinical outcomes were retrospectively reviewed to determine the frequency with which PET scan findings (1) upstaged patients, (2) downstaged patients, (3) changed the diagnostic workup, (4) altered therapy, (5) resulted in a significant additional diagnosis, and (6) triggered evaluations that ultimately proved fruitless. PET upstaged 32 of 198 patients (16.2%) and downstaged 12 patients (6.1%), facilitating curative resection in 4 patients. Overall, PET scan findings changed the stage in 44 patients (22.2%). PET scan findings changed diagnostic management in 105 of 198 patients (53%), among whom biopsy was deferred in 65 patients (61.9%) and was triggered or guided in 40 patients (38.1%). PET scan findings altered treatment decisions in 38 patients (19.2%), leading to neoadjuvant therapy in 6 patients and resection in 5 patients, and forestalling noncurative thoracotomy in 6 patients. PET scan findings prompted or redirected chemotherapy or radiotherapy in the remainder of the patients. Overall, PET scan findings changed management in 143 patients (72.2%). PET scan findings triggered additional diagnostic testing in 32 patients (16.2%), resulting in no new diagnosis in 16 patients (50%) and a critical change in management in 7 patients (21.9%). PET scan findings were solely responsible for a significant non-lung cancer diagnosis in eight patients (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematically applied PET scanning has a significant impact on patient management, altering diagnostic or therapeutic interventions in 72.2% of patients, changing staging in 22.2% of patients, and identifying serious unsuspected diagnoses in 4.0% of patients, with potentially life-saving consequences in 2.0%. Key Words: diagnosis; lung neoplasms; positron emission tomography.

Non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of integrated FDG PET/CT and CT alone for preoperative staging

PURPOSE

To evaluate prospectively the accuracy of integrated positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) with use of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), compared with that of stand-alone CT, for the preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer, with surgical and histologic findings used as the reference standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board approval and patient informed consent were obtained. From November 2003 to February 2004, 106 patients (78 men, 28 women; mean age, 56 years) with non-small cell lung cancer underwent curative surgical resection (tumor resection and lymph node dissection) after stand-alone CT followed by integrated FDG PET/CT. Tumor stages were determined by using the TNM and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems. Histopathologic results served as the reference standard. Statistically significant differences in tumor staging between integrated PET/CT and stand-alone CT were determined with P < .05 obtained by using the McNemar test or with a generalized estimating equation.

RESULTS

The primary tumor was correctly staged in 84 patients (79%) at stand-alone CT and in 91 patients (86%) at integrated FDG PET/CT (P = .25). For the depiction of malignant nodes, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT were 70% (23 of 33 nodal groups), 69% (248 of 360), and 69% (271 of 393), respectively, whereas those of PET/CT were 85% (28 of 33), 84% (302 of 360), and 84% (330 of 393) (P = .25, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). There were 112 false-positive interpretations at CT for 54 hilar, 16 subcarinal, 29 paratracheal, 10 subaortic, and two pulmonary ligament nodal groups and one upper paratracheal group, compared with only 58 false-positive interpretations at PET/CT for 32 hilar, seven subcarinal, 13 lower paratracheal, and six subaortic nodal groups. There were 10 false-negative interpretations at CT for four hilar, two lower paratracheal, and two subcarinal nodal groups, one prevascular and retrotracheal group, and one inferior pulmonary group, but only five false-negative interpretations at PET/CT (one each for paratracheal, subaortic, subcarinal, inferior pulmonary, and hilar nodal groups).

CONCLUSION

Integrated FDG PET/CT is significantly better than stand-alone CT for lung cancer staging and provides enhanced accuracy and specificity in nodal staging.

Seeking a home for a PET, part 3: Emerging applications of positron emission tomography imaging in the management of patients with lung cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is an important tool to refine the diagnosis and staging approach in patients with a possible lung cancer. In addition, other applications of PET imaging are being explored. Data consistently show that the intensity of uptake on a PET scan correlates with the biological aggressiveness of a tumor. PET imaging for restaging after induction therapy does not appear to be accurate enough to guide management. The results of PET imaging late after completion of treatment are highly predictive of future survival, and changes in PET images after only one cycle of chemotherapy are predictive of how a patient will respond to that planned treatment. PET imaging may allow radiotherapy treatment fields to be planned with greater accuracy, although data on how this affects patient outcomes are not yet available. Further technologic improvements in PET scanners are likely to bring further benefits to the management of patients with lung cancer in the future.

Impact thérapeutique de l’imagerie TEP-FDG en carcinologie bronchopulmonaire

BACKGROUND

Because of the expected high performances of scintigraphic scans with [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) not only in diagnostics and but also in therapeutic impact, especially in thoracic oncology, there are a lot of French nuclear medicine departments which will soon be equipped with a positron emission tomograph (PET).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The Nuclear Medicine Department of the Hôpital d'Instructions des Armées du Val-de-Grâce, Paris, led a retrospective study among physicians interested in 338 FDG-PET exams performed between may 2000 and march 2002 in order to compare its own results with international literature concerning four indications for lung cancer: pulmonary nodule or mass malignancy diagnostic, lung carcinoma extension evaluation, therapeutic efficiency, recurrence suspicion.

RESULTS

There seems to be no divergence, regarding limitation induced by the not exhaustive analysis of the retrospective study: more than every two FDG-PET exam highly influenced the effective therapy.

CONCLUSION

That is why clinical FDG-PET has to be widely developed to investigate lung cancer.

Endoscopic Ultrasound in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer and Negative Mediastinum on Computed Tomography

Despite technical advances in staging non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accurate staging remains a challenge. Endoscopic ultrasound is useful in staging NSCLC when lymphadenopathy is present on a computed tomography (CT), but its role in the absence of lymphadenopathy on CT has not been well defined. Therefore, we sought to determine the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in staging NSCLC in absence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy on CT. Seventy-six patients with NSCLC with absence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy on CT were enrolled and followed prospectively. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration was performed on sites that were suspicious for metastases. Surgical pathology after thoracotomy was used as the reference standard for assessing accuracy. Sixty-two (86%) patients underwent surgery, and 10 (13%) did not. EUS precluded surgery in 9 patients (12%) and influenced management in 18 (25%) of all patients in this study. EUS detected malignant mediastinal lymphadenopathy more frequently in patients with lower lobe and hilar cancers combined compared with upper lobe cancers (p = 0.004). EUS played a significant role in identifying patients with unresectable (N3) NSCLC when adenopathy was not present on CT imaging and appears to be more sensitive in detecting lymph node metastases in lower lobe and hilar NSCLC compared with upper lobe NSCLC.

Lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Since tobacco smoking is the cause in vast majority of cases, the incidence of lung cancer is expected to rise in those countries with high or rising incidence of tobacco smoking. Even though populations at risk of developing lung cancer are easily identified, mass screening for lung cancer is not supported by currently available evidence. In the case of non-small cell lung cancer, a cure may be possible with surgical resection followed by post-operative chemotherapy in those diagnosed at an early stage. A small minority of patients who present with locally advanced disease may also benefit from pre-operative chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy to down stage the tumor to render it potentially operable. In a vast majority of patients, however, lung cancer presents at an advanced stage and a cure is not possible with currently available therapeutic strategies. Similarly, small cell lung cancer confined to one hemi-thorax may be curable with a combination of chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation followed by prophylactic cranial irradiation, if complete remission is achieved at the primary site. Small cell lung cancer that is spread beyond the confines of one hemi-thorax is, however, considered incurable. In this era of molecular targeted therapies, new agents are constantly undergoing pre-clinical and clinical testing with the aim of targeting the molecular pathways thought be involved in etiology and pathogenesis of lung cancer.

The Role of PET Scan in Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer

Positron emission tomography (PET) is now an important cancer imaging tool, both for diagnosis and staging, as well as offering prognostic information based on response. This report attempts to comprehensively review the value of PET in the locoregional and distant staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), illustrate the potential effects on patient management, and give a short overview of newer applications. PET sets the gold standard in the evaluation of an indeterminate solitary pulmonary nodule or mass, where PET has proven to be significantly more accurate than computed tomography (CT) in the distinction between benign and malignant lesions. In the evaluation of metastatic spread to locoregional lymph nodes, PET is significantly more accurate than CT, so that invasive surgical staging may be omitted in many patients with negative mediastinal PET images. In patients with positive mediastinal PET images, invasive surgical staging remains mandatory because of the possibility of false-positive findings due to inflammatory nodes or granulomatous disorders. In the search for metastatic spread, PET is a useful adjunct to conventional imaging. This may be due to the finding of unexpected metastatic lesions or due to exclusion of malignancy in lesions that are equivocal on standard imaging. However, at this time, PET does not replace conventional imaging. Large-scale randomized studies are currently examining whether PET staging will actually improve the appearance of lung cancer outcome.

Current state of imaging for lung cancer staging

Proper selection and interpretation of imaging studies is essential to provide optimal treatment to patients who have lung cancer. The following combines the recommendations of the American College of Chest Physicians [74] and the authors' current clinical practice guidelines: --All patients who have known or suspected lung cancer should undergo a CT of the chest and upper abdomen. --An FDG-PET study should be performed, if available. --Mediastinoscopy should be performed in all patients except those who have peripheral small (<2 cm) tumors and no evidence of N2 disease on CT or PET imaging. --MRI should be performed for tumors of the superior sulcus to define the relationship of the tumor to adjacent neurovascular structures. --Patients who have neurologic signs or symptoms should undergo a brain imaging study (CT or MRI). --Screening for extrathoracic disease is not necessary in asymptomatic patients who have clinical stage I or II disease.

Impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate the impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease and on the treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of 125 consecutive patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer referred for FDG PET from January 1998 through May 2002 were retrospectively reviewed. The rationale for FDG PET referral and the impact of FDG PET on subsequent treatment decisions for patients were determined by chart review. The impact of FDG PET on defining the extent of disease was determined by comparing the FDG PET interpretation at the time of the examination with findings from conventional imaging (CI) performed before FDG PET. FDG PET results were confirmed in nearly half (n = 61) of the patients by histopathology (n = 23) or follow-up imaging (n = 38; mean follow-up interval, 21.3 months).

RESULTS

Patients were referred for FDG PET for the following reasons: evaluation of disease response or viability after therapy (n = 43 [35%]), local recurrence, with intent of aggressive local treatment (n = 39 [31%]), equivocal findings on CI (n = 25 [20%]), evaluation of disease extent in patients with known metastases (n = 13 [10%]), and elevated tumor markers with unknown disease site (n = 5 [4%]). Compared with CI findings, the extent of disease increased in 54 (43%), did not change in 41 (33%), and decreased in 30 (24%) of 125 patients using FDG PET. Results of FDG PET altered the therapeutic plan in 40 (32%), directly helped to support the therapeutic plan in 34 (27%), and did not change the plan devised before FDG PET in 51 (41%) of 125 patients. FDG PET altered therapy most frequently in the patients suspected of having locoregional recurrence and in those being evaluated for treatment response versus other referral categories (p = 0.04). For patients with confirmation of FDG PET findings, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FDG PET were 94%, 91%, and 92%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET contributes significantly to defining the extent of disease and deciding on treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer.

Evaluation of the Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes by FDG-PET in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer (LABC)

The presence of internal mammary (IM) lymph node metastases in breast cancer predicts outcome and may alter treatment. Standard imaging has limited usefulness for evaluation of the IM chain because of low sensitivity. Our preliminary studies suggested that [F-18]-2-fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) improves the detection of IM and mediastinal metastases. We therefore performed a retrospective review of women who underwent FDG-PET prior to treatment to determine the benefit of PET for imaging IM disease. The records of 28 consecutive patients undergoing FDG-PET prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for suspected locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) were reviewed. The presence of abnormal IM uptake on FDG-PET was noted. IM uptake on FDG PET was compared with standard radiographic imaging and was correlated with putative risk factors for IM involvement and with clinical patterns of failure. Patients did not undergo IM biopsy; however, patterns of failure were assessed to validate the FDG-PET findings. Clearly abnormal FDG uptake in the IM nodes was seen in 7 of 28 women (25%). Prospective conventional chest imaging failed to identify IM metastases in any patient. IM uptake on PET was associated with large size of the primary tumor (P = 0.03) and with inflammatory disease (P = 0.04). The presence of IM FDG uptake predicted failure by a pattern consistent with spread from IM lymph node metastasis. FDG-PET appears to be a useful noninvasive modality to detect IM metastases in LABC. Pathologic verification in a prospective study is necessary to confirm these findings.

Impact of Positron Emission Tomography on the Management of Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Accurate staging is important in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients with limited stage may benefit from chemoradiation, whereas those with extensive stage conventionally receive chemotherapy. Prophylactic cranial irradiation may benefit those attaining complete remission (CR). 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) enhances accuracy of staging in non-SCLC. Its role in SCLC remains unclear. We reviewed 36 consecutive SCLC patients who underwent 47 PET studies between December 1996 and January 2001, for either staging (n = 11), restaging after therapy (n = 21), or both (n = 4). Conventional imaging was also performed. Of 15 patients who had PET for staging, 5 (33%) were upstaged from limited to extensive disease and treated without thoracic radiotherapy. Twenty-five patients underwent 32 restaging PET scans, of which 20 (63%) were discordant with conventional imaging. In 8 cases PET showed more extensive disease than conventional imaging, and in 12 cases PET-apparent disease appeared less extensive. In 13 patients, 14 untreated discordant lesions were evaluable; PET was confirmed accurate in 11 (79%) sites by last follow-up. Restaging PET influenced management in 13 cases (52%). PET-CR conferred longer median time to progression (13.7 months) than no CR (9.7 months). FDG-PET for SCLC was often discordant with conventional assessment and frequently influenced management.

Accuracy and Cost-Effectiveness of [18F]-2-Fluoro-Deoxy-D-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography Scan in Potentially Resectable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study of patients who were referred for surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) assessed the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of positron emission tomography (PET) with radiolabeled [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in staging mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs).

DESIGN

From January 2001 to September 2002, 90 patients with suspected or proven NSCLC who had been referred for curative resection were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were without evidence of metastatic disease. Sixty-nine of the 90 patients had undergone thoracic FDG-PET imaging as part of their evaluation and are the focus of this study. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for metastasis to the MLN were calculated for CT scanning vs FDG-PET scanning. Four algorithms for staging MLN with mediastinoscopy and/or FDG-PET scan were compared.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients underwent preoperative CT and FDG-PET scans, and 32 of 69 patients underwent mediastinoscopy. Fifty-seven patients underwent thoracotomy with complete mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values for CT scans and FDG-PET scans were 46%, 86%, 78%, 43%, and 87%, and 62%, 98%, 91%, 89% and 92%, respectively. Mediastinoscopy was accurate in 32 of 32 patients (100%). Routine mediastinoscopy remains the most economically reasonable strategy with excellent sensitivity. Selective FDG-PET imaging improved the sensitivity of noninvasive staging for patients with normal MLNs on CT scans.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective use of FDG-PET imaging improves staging accuracy compared to CT scanning alone and makes it a cost-effective adjunct to the preoperative staging of NSCLC. However, in patients with adenocarcinoma and MLNs of < 1 cm, FDG-PET scanning cannot yet replace mediastinoscopy.

Radionuclide imaging of thoracic malignancies

Over the past decade a variety nuclear medicine imaging studies have become available that are of considerable value to patients who have pulmonary malignancies. By far the greatest impact on the management of patients who have thoracic malignancy has been the availability of 18FDG-PET imaging. In the patient who has newly diagnosed lung carcinoma, 18FDG-PET improves the accuracy of staging the disease by identifying or excluding mediastinal disease and distant metastatic foci. 18FDG-PET is superior to anatomic methods for evaluating the response to therapy and for distinguishing recurrent disease from posttreatment changes. Studies are in progress to evaluate the role of 18FDG-PET imaging in assessing prognosis. In patients who have bronchial carcinoid, somatostatin receptor imaging with 111In-DTPA-pentetreotide (Octreoscan) can help identify patients who are candidates for curative surgery, detect unsuspected metastatic spread, and identify patients who might benefit from certain types of medical therapy. Although it was initially speculated that 18FDG-PET imaging would not be sensitive for tumor detection in patients who have neuroendocrine tumors because of the usual slow metabolism and biology of these tumors, many neuroendocrine tumors are positive on 18FDG-PET imaging. Nevertheless, there has been no direct comparison of 18FDG-PET imaging and somatostatin receptor imaging, nor does a positive or negative 18FDG-PET image exclude neuroendocrine tumor. 18FDG-PET imaging and somatostatin receptor imaging with (99m)Tc-depreotide (Neotect) are safe, cost-effective methods that are valuable in the diagnosis and management of patients who have suspected or known lung cancer. 18FDG-PET and (99m)Tc-depreotide imaging have a high degree of sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values in the evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. These agents provide noninvasive, cost-effective methods for selecting patients for aggressive intervention without contributing to increased morbidity. Both methods have incremental value over CT imaging in selecting patients who have solitary pulmonary nodules for invasive biopsy or for thoracotomy.

Positron emission tomography in the management of non–small cell lung cancer

In the past 10 years, FDG-PET has become an important imaging modality in NSCLC. Its indication in the assessment of lung nodules and staging is based on large prospective experience, further supported by some meta-analyses. This evidence has important consequences for patient management, which recently was proved in a randomized trial that showed a reduction in the number of futile thoracotomies by preoperative PET. The use of FDG-PET could become more widespread when commercial isotope distributors are able to deliver FDG so that an on-site cyclotron is no longer a prerequisite. FDG has a half-life of 110 minutes, so a practical distribution radius of 200 km should be feasible. Current indications for PET in the staging of newly diagnosed NSCLC are mainly the patients who are considered to be candidates for radical treatment. The technique does not have a clinical indication in other patients--for example, when metastatic lymph nodes are detected at clinical examination, when a simple ultrasound study already points to diffuse hepatic metastases, or in cases of poor performance status. PET also has prognostic value; it can be used for the evaluation of response or restaging after radiotherapy or chemotherapy and for early detection of relapse. The combination of CT and PET improves radiotherapy planning and it is to be expected that combined CT-PET-guided planning devices will further refine three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Finally, a whole new field of application of PET in molecular biology using new radiopharmaceutics is in development. FDG, with its possibility to study tumor glucose metabolism, has paved the way for PET in clinical oncology. It is hoped that PET examinations with new molecular tracers will allow ever better specificity and become sufficiently reliable and manageable to evaluate receptors, transport proteins, and intracellular enzymes so that very early response monitoring during chemotherapy or radiotherapy, evaluation of novel molecular-targeted lung cancer therapies, or even gene therapy becomes possible. New tracers that have showed their promise in early clinical studies include 18F-fluorothymidine (a proliferation marker that might give better specificity in the assessment of solitary pulmonary nodules or better accuracy in the evaluation of early response), (99m)Tc-Annexin V (Apomate; an apoptosis-imaging agent that could be correlated with overall and progression-free survival in phase I data), or 18F-fluoromisonidazole (which can be used to quantify regional hypoxia in human tumors with PET).