Case report: cisplatin-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome

Pediatric onco-nephrology: time to spread the word : Part I: early kidney involvement in children with malignancy

Onco-nephrology has been a growing field within the adult nephrology scope of practice. Even though pediatric nephrologists have been increasingly involved in the care of children with different forms of malignancy, there has not been an emphasis on developing special expertise in this area. The fast pace of discovery in this field, including the development of new therapy protocols with their own kidney side effects and the introduction of the CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy, has introduced new challenges for general pediatric nephrologists because of the unique effects of these treatments on the kidney. Moreover, with the improved outcomes in children receiving cancer therapy come an increased number of survivors at risk for chronic kidney disease related to both their cancer diagnosis and therapy. Therefore, it is time for pediatric onco-nephrology to take its spot on the expanding subspecialties map in pediatric nephrology.

Thrombotic microangiopathy, cancer, and cancer drugs

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a complication that can develop directly from certain malignancies, but more often results from anticancer therapy. Currently, the incidence of cancer drug-induced TMA during the last few decades is >15%, primarily due to the introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. It is important for clinicians to understand the potential causes of cancer drug-induced TMA to facilitate successful diagnosis and treatment. In general, cancer drug-induced TMA can be classified into 2 types. Type I cancer drug-induced TMA includes chemotherapy regimens (ie, mitomycin C) that can potentially promote long-term kidney injury, as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Type II cancer drug-induced TMA includes anti-VEGF agents that are not typically associated with cumulative dose-dependent cell damage. In addition, functional recovery of kidney function often occurs after drug interruption, assuming a type I agent was not given prior to or during therapy. There are no randomized controlled trials to provide physician guidance in the management of TMA. However, previously accumulated information and research suggest that endothelial cell damage has an underlying immunologic basis. Based on this, the emerging trend includes the use of immunosuppressive agents if a refractory or relapsing clinical course that does not respond to plasmapheresis and steroids is observed.

Chemotherapy-induced pulmonary toxicity in lung cancer management

Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of therapy in many stages of lung cancer. Many diagnostic options have to be taken into account when a patient suffering from lung cancer presents with nonspecific, respiratory, clinical manifestations. A multidisciplinary diagnostic approach is then warranted. The top priority is to rule out those life-threatening causes, such as lung infection, that could be properly treated if a right diagnosis is early. To reach a definite diagnosis frequently requires that one or more diagnostic, pneumologic techniques are performed. Regarding to drug-induced pulmonary disease, prevention is mandatory. In this review we have tried to highlight the risk and characteristics of cytostatic-induced pulmonary toxicity caused by those agents that have been commonly employed to treat lung cancer for the last decades. When treating lung cancer patients, a high clinical suspicion of chemotherapy-induced lung toxicity should be kept in mind since an early withdrawal of the offending drug is the most efficacious therapy.

Management and long-term complications of pediatric cancer

The impact of recently intensified and novel therapies for the treatment of childhood cancer has been an increased number of survivors and an increase in the number of treatment complications among survivors. Thus, it is important for the primary care practitioner to be aware of not only acute but chronic complications of therapy, including the possibility of second malignancies. Long-term follow-up is essential, and continuous education of patients and health care personnel is an important aspect for the complete success of treatment. Primary care practitioners also need to incorporate other subspecialties in the management of these patients to ensure that they receive complete evaluation and treatment.

Mitomycin-C induced hemolytic uremic syndrome: a case report and literature review

Hemolytic uremic syndrome spontaneously arises in a few patients with advanced cancer, but it is more commonly related to the use of certain chemotherapeutic agents. Mitomycin-C is, etiologically, the most common causative agent inducing hemolytic uremic syndrome, in a dose dependent manner. We report this syndrome, attributable to mitomycin-C at a cumulative dose of 40 mg/m2, in a gastric cancer patient. A 42-year-old female with stage III gastric cancer underwent radical gastrectomy and was given mitomycin-C at 10 mg/m2 intravenously every four weeks as adjuvant therapy. Hemolytic uremic syndrome was diagnosed three months after the last dose of mitomycin-C administration. The most prominent symptoms included pallor, hypertension and anasarca, with laboratory evidence of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, azotemia and hyperkalemia. Her disease was progressive, but fortunately stabilized after staphylococcus column A dialysis. Her disease remained in remission for 24 months from the time of diagnosis, and then relapsed in the form of peritoneal carcinomatosis with partial intestinal obstruction.

Toxicity of chemotherapy

Because anticancer drugs are cytotoxic for normal as well as neoplastic cells, the range of unwanted effects that accompanies their use is broad. Many of the side effects are potentially life-threatening or seriously debilitating. Many are similar to, and readily confused with, direct or indirect (paraneoplastic) consequences of the cancer itself. Recognition of drug side effects is vital for optimal patient care, because early withdrawal of the offending agent and institution of appropriate treatment have the potential to significantly reduce the overall morbidity and mortality associated with the diagnosis of cancer.