Integration of Palliative Care into Primary Care for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients

An ethical exploration of the narratives surrounding substance use and pain management at the end of life: a discussion paper

This discussion article examines narrative positioning related to pain management for people who use substances at the end of life. We explore how dominant narrative genres associated with biomedicine, such as ‘restitution’ and narratives common within the context of drug services such as ‘recovery’ can hinder effective pain management within this population. We argue that these discourses can marginalise the ethical self-identity of patients who use substances at the end of life. It can also trouble health and social care professionals in supporting patients and generating counter-narratives that challenge those often associated with substance use. Stigma is a common experience for this population with stereotyping as ‘junkies’ and associated with criminality. They are positioned as drug-seeking, and this requires more surveillance at the end of life when opioid therapy is potentially more available and authorised. This can make it challenging to generate ‘companion’ stories that are positive and maintain moral adequacy. Dominant biomedical narrative genres often prevent the recognition of the fractured stories that people using substances can often present with. This can lead to narrative silencing and to the under treatment of pain. The person’s self-identity is invested in narratives of recovery, and opioid use symbolises their addicted past because for practitioners, this population is at clinical risk with the potential for drug seeking behaviours. Whilst not requiring formal ethical review this discussion paper was constructed in accordance with good scientific practice with the work of other researchers respected and cited appropriately.

Palliative HIV care: opportunities for biomedical and behavioral change

Advances in treatment are contributing to substantial increases in life expectancy for individuals living with HIV, prompting a need to develop care models for the effective management of HIV as a chronic illness. With many individuals continuing to experience symptoms and complications that add to the disease burden across the spectrum of HIV disease, the discussion herein explores the complementary role that early palliative care can play in HIV primary care as a strategy for enhancing long-term quality of life. After first defining the concept of early palliative care, its scope in the context of current clinical realities in HIV treatment and implications for HIV care models is described. After reviewing the emerging extant research literature on HIV palliative care outcomes, a program description is offered as an illustration of how palliative care integration with HIV primary care can be achieved.

[A survey on the view of end-of-life care in the elderly -a comparison among elderly patients, family members. physicians, nurses, and other caregivers]

AIM

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of geriatric physicians in end-of-life care through surveying elderly patients, their families, and health-care providers including physicians, nurses, and other caregivers, in order to determine what comprises good end-of-life care.

METHODS

The survey respondents comprised 148 elderly patients, 76 members of their families, 105 physicians, 784 nurses, and 193 other caregivers. The survey asked respondents to rate the importance of (a) indicators of end-of-life in the elderly and (b) 17 aspects of quality of end-of-life care.

RESULTS

With respect to indicators of end-of-life in the elderly, a patient being consistently critically ill was rated highly by all health-care providers (>70% responded that this indicated end-of-life). Being unable to perform the activities of daily life was considered an indicator of end-of-life by 36% of patients and 45% of their family members, but only by 23% of physicians, 8% of nurses, and 24% of other caregivers. For quality of end-of-life care, four items were rated as being important by all groups (>70% in each group): palliation of pain, freedom from anxiety regarding death, ability to spend time with close friends or family, and being respected. However, respecting the patient's principles and lifestyle was thought to be less important by patients (16.1%) and family members (28.2%) than it was by physicians (63.8%). Death at home was also thought to be less important by patients (21.0%) and family members (7.1%) than by physicians (37.5%).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients and their families have different views from their health-care providers on matters related to good end-of-life care. Geriatric physicians should pay attention to not only the care of patients' physical needs, but also other needs of the patients and their families.

Who receives specialist palliative care in Western Australia--and who misses out

OBJECTIVES

To describe the characteristics of Western Australian (WA) people who received, and did not receive, specialist palliative care (SPC) during their last 12 months of life.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

People who died between 1 July 2000 and 31 December 2002 in WA, and whose cause of death was from cancer or selected non-cancer conditions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Use of SPC in the last 12 months of life.

RESULTS

There were 27,971 deaths from all causes in WA over the study period. Two-thirds (68%) of people who died of cancer received SPC, but less than one in ten (8%) who died of selected non-cancer conditions received SPC. Those who died of cancer were significantly less likely to receive SPC if they were single or widowed, aged > 85 years or lived in a region other than a major city. Of those who died of selected noncancer conditions, people other than those who were married were significantly less likely to have accessed SPC. Indigenous people were less likely to have accessed SPC, although this was not statistically significant (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.36-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Within a WA context, this study confirms established international evidence for problems of access to SPC by non-cancer patients and other disadvantaged groups. Importantly, this evidence is provided at a population level, thus documenting the extent of inequities in palliative care service provision. By pointing to the areas of most critical need, this study assists in health service policy and planning.

Estimating the size of a potential palliative care population

OBJECTIVES

To develop a method for estimating the population who could potentially benefit from receiving palliative care in the last year of their lives, and then apply the estimates to the Western Australian population to ascertain characteristics of these people.

METHODS

Three estimates of the potential palliative care population, Minimal, Mid-range and Maximal, were developed through focus groups, interviews and the literature. These estimates were applied to the cohort of people who died in Western Australia between 1 July 2000 and 31 December 2002 by linking death records with hospital morbidity data through the Western Australian Data Linkage System.

RESULTS

Between 0.28% and 0.50% of people in the Western Australian population in any one year could potentially benefit from palliative care, many of whom die from conditions other than neoplasms. While neoplasms accounted for 59.5% of all underlying causes of deaths in the Minimal Estimate, heart failure (21.0%), renal failure (9.8%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (9.6%), Alzheimer's disease (4.0%), liver failure (3.2%), Parkinson's disease (1.3%), motor neurone disease (0.9%), HIV/AIDS (<0.01%) and Huntington's disease (<0.01%) accounted for other conditions in this estimate. The study was expanded to include Mid-range and Maximal Estimates. Characteristics of the Western Australian population in these three estimates are described.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike traditional palliative care estimates that focus on malignant disease, this study included nonmalignant conditions in a set of three estimates of a potential palliative care population. By using population-based data to describe characteristics of people who compose palliative care populations, these results offer a tool for planning equitable healthcare services.