Impact of Methicillin Resistance on Clinical Features and Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis Due to Staphylococcus aureus

Using Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screens to Rule Out Methicillin-Resistant S aureus Pneumonia in Surgical Intensive Care Units

INTRODUCTION

The methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has a high negative predictive value (NPV). We aimed to understand if there was a difference in the NPV of the MRSA screen in surgical intensive care units (ICUs) and to determine its role in antibiotic de-escalation.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective cohort study of adults with a positive respiratory culture and MRSA nasal PCR admitted to a surgical ICU from 2016 to 2019. Patients were stratified by surgical ICU: cardiothoracic/cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) or transplant/acute care surgery intensive care unit (ACS-ICU). Our primary outcome was the NPV of MRSA screen. Secondary outcome was the duration of empiric MRSA-targeted therapy.

RESULTS

We analyzed 61 patients: 42.6% (n = 26) ACS-ICU and 57.4% (n = 35) CVICU. There were no differences in age, comorbidities, prior MRSA infection, recent antibiotic use, immunocompromised status, or renal replacement therapy. At pneumonia diagnosis, more patients in the ACS-ICU were hospitalized ≥5 d (65.4% versus 8.6%, P < 0.0001) and more patients in the CVICU were in septic shock (88.6% versus 34.5%, P < 0.0001) and thrombocytopenic (40% versus 11.5%, P = 0.02). NPV of the PCR was similar (ACS-ICU: 0.92 [0.75-0.98], CV-ICU 0.89 [0.73-0.96]). On multivariable linear regression, the CVICU was associated with longer empiric therapy (β 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-2.3, P < 0.0001), as was hospitalization for ≥5 d (β 0.73, 95% CI 0.06-1.39, P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The MRSA nasal PCR screen has a high NPV for ruling out MRSA pneumonia in critically ill surgical patients. However, patients in the CVICU and patients hospitalized ≥5 d had a longer time to de-escalation of MRSA-targeted therapy, potentially due to higher clinical risk profile.

Comparison of mortality, stroke, and relapse for methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: a retrospective cohort study

The purpose of this study was to compare survival, relapse, and stroke for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) vs methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) infective endocarditis (IE). In this retrospective study, the primary outcome of death and secondary outcomes of stroke and relapse were compared using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Surgical treatment was adjusted for as a time-dependent variable. In total, 355 patients with at least one episode of IE caused by S. aureus were included. Patients with MRSA IE had higher mortality than those with MSSA IE (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.77), but did not have a higher risk of stroke (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.43-1.32) or relapse (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.26-3.05). The cumulative incidence of relapse was very small. Among patients with IE caused by S. aureus MRSA infection is associated with higher mortality than MSSA infection.

The risk of infection after nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus

PURPOSE

Nasal, axillary, or inguinal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus generally precedes invasive infection. Some studies have found that colonization with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) poses a greater risk of clinical infection than colonization with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). However, the magnitude of risk is unclear.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review to provide an overall estimate of the risk of infection following colonization with MRSA compared with colonization by MSSA. Ten observational studies, with a total of 1170 patients, were identified that provided data on both MSSA and MRSA colonization and infection. A random-effects model was used to obtain pooled estimates of the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Overall, colonization by MRSA was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of infection (odds ratio 4.08, 95% confidence interval, 2.10-7.44). Studies differed in the choice of patient population, severity of illness, and frequency of sampling to detect colonization.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to identify effective methods for sustained eradication of MRSA carriage to reduce the high risk of subsequent infection.