Chromophobe cell carcinoma of the kidney. A clinicopathologic study of 21 cases

Personalized Driver Gene Prediction Using Graph Convolutional Networks with Conditional Random Fields

Cancer is a complex and evolutionary disease mainly driven by the accumulation of genetic variations in genes. Identifying cancer driver genes is important. However, most related studies have focused on the population level. Cancer is a disease with high heterogeneity. Thus, the discovery of driver genes at the individual level is becoming more valuable but is a great challenge. Although there have been some computational methods proposed to tackle this challenge, few can cover all patient samples well, and there is still room for performance improvement. In this study, to identify individual-level driver genes more efficiently, we propose the PDGCN method. PDGCN integrates multiple types of data features, including mutation, expression, methylation, copy number data, and system-level gene features, along with network structural features extracted using Node2vec in order to construct a sample-gene interaction network. Prediction is performed using a graphical convolutional neural network model with a conditional random field layer, which is able to better combine the network structural features with biological attribute features. Experiments on the ACC (Adrenocortical Cancer) and KICH (Kidney Chromophobe) datasets from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) demonstrated that the method performs better compared to other similar methods. It can identify not only frequently mutated driver genes, but also rare candidate driver genes and novel biomarker genes. The results of the survival and enrichment analyses of these detected genes demonstrate that the method can identify important driver genes at the individual level.

Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma with Sarcomatoid Differentiation: Clinicopathologic Correlation and Molecular Findings

Introduction: Sarcomatoid differentiation has been reported in approximately 8% of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and is associated with a worse prognosis. We aim to describe the clinicopathologic and molecular findings of chromophobe RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation. Methods: Surgical pathology database was searched to identify chromophobe RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation from January 2015 to December 2021. Results: Five patients were diagnosed with chromophobe RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 57 years (range 51-61 years). Three patients died after median follow-up of 12.1 months (range 1.6-18.2 months). The median tumor size was 10.7 cm (range 5.6-13.6 cm). The median percentage of sarcomatoid component was 60% (range 10-90%), and the median percentage of necrosis was 30% (range 10-50%). One tumor demonstrated osteoid formation. PAX8, keratin 7, KIT (CD117), and Hale colloidal iron were positive in the epithelial component, whereas the sarcomatoid component was positive for vimentin, CD10, and high Ki67 proliferative index. Molecular testing was performed in three specimens: all were TP53 mutated and microsatellite stable. One aggressive tumor had RB1 frameshift mutation and copy number gains for TERT and CUL4A. Conclusion: Chromophobe RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation is a rare entity with aggressive behavior. Percentage of sarcomatoid component, necrosis, and the occurrence of metastasis is associated with worse prognosis. Molecular profiling reveals frequent TP53 mutation. While TERT promoter mutation has no prognostic implication, FLCN inactivation may be associated with a less aggressive course. The clinical significance of RB1 loss is unclear.

Differential Immunohistochemical and Molecular Profiling of Conventional and Aggressive Components of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: Pitfalls for Diagnosis

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is a relatively rare subtype of RCC with a characteristic histologic appearance. Most ChRCC are slow growing, but sarcomatoid differentiation and metastases can occur, indicative of aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. Herein, we characterize ten ChRCC with aggressive components, defined as sarcomatoid change and/or metastasis. Immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing was performed on available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, with differential profiling of conventional and aggressive components. All ten cases showed a conventional component of renal tumor morphologically consistent with ChRCC: three had sarcomatoid change, four had metastases, and three had both sarcomatoid change and metastases. In the primary conventional components, a typical ChRCC IHC pattern (CK7+, CD117+ and CAIX-) was observed in 8/10 cases; 2 cases had rare CK7 staining. In the aggressive components, CD117 and/or CK7 was lost in 7/10 cases; 3 cases showed loss of both. Two of 10 cases showed significant CAIX staining in the aggressive component. All 7 cases that had molecular profiling performed showed characteristic chromosomal losses reported for ChRCC, though two cases showed additional complex copy number alterations in the aggressive component only. Recurrent TP53 mutations (TP53m) were also seen; however surprisingly, the conventional and aggressive components had no shared TP53m: a TP53m was private to aggressive components in 2 cases; to the conventional component in 1 case; and in 4 cases, components demonstrated different TP53m. Of the 21 pathogenic alterations identified in 7 tumors, only a PTEN splicing alteration was shared between both components in one case. In conclusion, ChRCC can have IHC staining patterns and molecular profile that differ between conventional and aggressive components. Interpretation of stains on metastases or small biopsies to determine histologic subtype can be misleading. The lack of shared pathogenic mutations between the two components supports a model in which aggressive ChRCC can have convergent subclones with different TP53m.

Decreased Mitochondrial DNA Content Drives OXPHOS Dysregulation in Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) and renal oncocytoma are closely related, rare kidney tumors. Mutations in complex I (CI)-encoding genes play an important role in dysfunction of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) system in renal oncocytoma, but are less frequently observed in chRCC. As such, the relevance of OXPHOS status and role of CI mutations in chRCC remain unknown. To address this issue, we performed proteome and metabolome profiling as well as mitochondrial whole-exome sequencing to detect mitochondrial alterations in chRCC tissue specimens. Multiomic analysis revealed downregulation of electron transport chain (ETC) components in chRCC that differed from the expression profile in renal oncocytoma. A decrease in mitochondrial (mt)DNA content, rather than CI mutations, was the main cause for reduced OXPHOS in chRCC. There was a negative correlation between protein and transcript levels of nuclear DNA- but not mtDNA-encoded ETC complex subunits in chRCC. In addition, the reactive oxygen species scavenger glutathione (GSH) was upregulated in chRCC due to decreased expression of proteins involved in GSH degradation. These results demonstrate that distinct mechanisms of OXPHOS exist in chRCC and renal oncocytoma and that expression levels of ETC complex subunits can serve as a diagnostic marker for this rare malignancy. SIGNIFICANCE: These findings establish potential diagnostic markers to distinguish malignant chRCC from its highly similar but benign counterpart, renal oncocytoma.

Detection of tetraploidization in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Insights and pitfalls

Chromosomal losses resulting in a marked hypodiploidy are a specificity of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC), the third most frequent type of kidney cancer. Its detection is useful in challenging cases. However some ChRCC, especially the eosinophilic variant, do not exhibit hypodiploidy and deserve to be better explored. Using comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) we observed chromosomal gains in five cases of nonmetastatic ChRCC. Our objective was to determine whether these apparent chromosomal gains were instead losses within a near-polyploid genome. We performed a retrospective and prospective molecular study of 26 cases of ChRCC retrieved among 643 renal tumors (2012-2019). All tumors were analyzed using array-CGH (Agilent) and array-CGH (Affymetrix) coupled to single nucleotide polymorphism analysis (array-SNP). In silico manual centralization of the fluorescence ratio, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next generation sequencing were made in the five cases suspected of polyploidy. Tetraploidization was observed in 19% of our series of ChRCC. None of the methods used individually could identify both chromosomal losses and tetraploidy. Only the combination of manual recentring of array-CGH and FISH provided relevant results. B-allele frequency results indicated that tetraploidization occurred secondarily to chromosomal losses in four cases while it preceded losses in one case. Tetraploidization is a frequent but underestimated phenomenon in ChRCC that may be overlooked using the individual standard genomic methods. Its potential clinical consequences are not identified yet. Whether the mechanisms that induce chromosomal losses in ChRCC are the same that generate tetraploidization is not known.

Comprehensive Immunoprofiles of Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes

In recent years, renal epithelial tumors have been among the fastest reclassifying tumors, requiring updates to the tumor classification system. Nonetheless, immunohistochemistry (IHC) remains the most widely used tool for renal epithelial tumors. In this proposal, we aimed to create the most efficient IHC panel for categorizing the diverse subtypes of renal tumors, and to find out more specific immunohistochemical results in each subtype or each antibody. A total of 214 renal tumors were analyzed using 10 possible IHC markers to differentiate subtypes, including three major renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes, clear-cell type (50 cases), papillary type (50 cases), and chromophobe type (20 cases), and minor subtypes (MiT RCC, 13 cases; collecting duct carcinoma, 5 cases; and oncocytoma, 10 cases). A triple immunomarker (cytokeratin 7 (CK7)-carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX)- alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR)) panel is useful in particular high-grade clear-cell tumors. If IHC remains ambiguous, the use of an adjunctive panel can be suggested, including CD10, epithelial membrane antigen, cathepsin K, c-kit, hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-β, and E-cadherin. For an efficient immunohistochemical strategy for subtyping of RCC, we conclude that the CK7-CAIX-AMACR panel is the best primary choice for screening subtyping.

Classic Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Incur a Larger Number of Chromosomal Losses Than Seen in the Eosinophilic Subtype

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is a renal tumor subtype with a good prognosis, characterized by multiple chromosomal copy number variations (CNV). The World Health Organization (WHO) chRCC classification guidelines define a classic and an eosinophilic variant. Large cells with reticular cytoplasm and prominent cell membranes (pale cells) are characteristic for classic chRCC. Classic and eosinophilic variants were defined in 42 Swiss chRCCs, 119 Japanese chRCCs and in whole-slide digital images of 66 chRCCs from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) kidney chromophobe (KICH) dataset. 32 of 42 (76.2%) Swiss chRCCs, 90 of 119 (75.6%) Japanese chRCCs and 53 of 66 (80.3%) TCGA-KICH were classic chRCCs. There was no survival difference between eosinophilic and classic chRCC in all three cohorts. To identify a genotype/phenotype correlation, we performed a genome-wide CNV analysis using Affymetrix OncoScan^® CNV Assay (Affymetrix/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in 33 Swiss chRCCs. TCGA-KICH subtypes were compared with TCGA CNV data. In the combined Swiss and TCGA-KICH cohorts, losses of chromosome 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, and 17 were significantly more frequent in classic chRCC (p < 0.05, each), suggesting that classic chRCC are characterized by higher chromosomal instability. This molecular difference justifies the definition of two chRCC variants. Absence of pale cells could be used as main histological criterion to define the eosinophilic variant of chRCC.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma or oncocytoma: a manner of challenge in frozen section diagnosis

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a rare type of kidney neoplasm that is diagnosed in the 6th decade of life with similar incidence in male and female. We reported a case of 73-year-old man with a chief complaint of nocturia, frequency, dribbling and urinary retention with renal mass in ultrasound examination. Histologic examination and immunohistochemistry study revealed the diagnosis of chromophobe RCC which initially was mistaken for oncocytoma in frozen section diagnosis. The pathologist should be aware of this malignant entity and be cautious in diagnosing oncocytoma in frozen section and routine H & E staining.

Diagnosis of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma by Chromosomal Analysis

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma may pose a differential diagnostic problem by routine histologic examination because it may be misdiagnosed as another type of renal cancer with a totally different clinical behavior. A low DNA content as well as hypodiploidy seem to be associated with this renal tumor subtype. We report a case in which the cytogenetic report was of great value for a correct histologic diagnosis.

Erythrocytosis caused by giant chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a case report indicating a 9-year misdiagnosis of polycythemia vera

Background

Erythrocytosis, a rare paraneoplastic syndrome, generally occurs in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and has never been reported in patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Case presentation

We report a case of a young man suffering from a giant (22-cm) mass on his left kidney. Because of a history of polycythemia vera, the patient had been treated for the condition for 9 years. Radical nephrectomy was successfully performed, and the postoperative pathologic examination confirmed a diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Unexpectedly, the symptom of erythrocytosis disappeared after the surgery. Further examination and analysis were performed, and we finally attributed his erythrocytosis to chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.

Conclusions

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma could cause erythrocytosis, but the clear-cut mechanism needs further research. Secondary erythrocytosis such as those related with renal tumors should be taken into consideration during the diagnosis of polycythemia vera.

PD-L2: A prognostic marker in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma?

In the context of cancer immunotherapy, PD-1 as well as PD-L1 has been widely studied in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PD-1 and PD-L1 play a significant role as prognostic markers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. In contrast, little is known about PD-L2 expression patterns in RCC, especially in rarer subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, distribution and prognostic impact of PD-L2 expression in chromophobe (ch)RCC. Eighty-one patients who underwent renal surgery due to chRCC were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor specimens were analyzed for PD-L2 expression by immunohistochemistry. Expression data were associated with clinicopathological parameters and overall survival (OS). Twenty-three (28.4%) patients showed a PD-L2 > median (PD-L2 high) staining intensity. No significant association between clinicopathological parameters and PD-L2 expression was identified. A significant difference between 5- and 10-year OS in dependence of PD-L2 expression was found (PD-L2 low 96.4 and 87.7% vs. PD-L2 high 87.1 and 56%; log rank, p = 0.029). However, in multivariate analysis PD-L2 expression failed to be proofed as an independent prognostic factor. In conclusion, to our knowledge this is the first study evaluating the prognostic impact of PD-L2 in a considerably large cohort of chRCC. Our results showed a significant diminished OS in dependence of PD-L2 expression. This implicates that PD-L2 might play a role as prognostic marker in chRCC demanding further evaluation.

PD-1/PD-L1 expression in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: An immunological exception?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the inhibitory cross talk between tumor and immune cells have been approved for therapy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In contrast to clear cell RCC, little is known on PD-1/PD-L1 expression patterns in rarer RCC subtypes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, distribution and prognostic impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in chromophobe (ch)RCC. Patients who underwent renal surgery due to chRCC were retrospectively evaluated. Tumor specimen was analyzed for PD-1 and PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry. Expression data were correlated with clinic-pathological parameters including patient survival. Eighty-one chRCC patients were eligible for analysis, thereof 25 (30.9 %) and 11 (13.6 %) patients were positive for PD-1⁺ tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMCs) and tumoral PD-L1⁺ expression, respectively. No significant associations were found for PD-1⁺ TIMC or tumoral PD-L1⁺ expression and clinical attributes. In addition, no differences in 5- and 10-year overall survival for PD-1^- TIMC compared to PD-1⁺ TIMC (90.5 and 72.2 vs. 100 and 75 %; p = 0.41) and for PD-L1^- tumors compared to PD-L1⁺ tumors (91.9 and 76.4 vs. 100 and 50 %; p = 0.48) were observed. In conclusion, to our knowledge this is the first study to evaluate the prognostic impact of PD-1 and PD-L1 in chRCC. PD-L1 does seem to be expressed in a minority of all chRCC, likewise only a minority of chRCC was infiltrated by PD-1-positive inflammatory cells. Neither PD-1⁺ TIMC nor tumoral PD-L1⁺ expression was associated with parameters of aggressiveness or survival.

Selected tumor markers in the routine diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most malignant tumors, affecting men more frequently than women and constituting nearly 90% of all kidney tumors. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma has been described as a new histological type of renal cell carcinoma. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma constitutes up to 5% of all cases of kidney cancer. It is characterized by a significant number of deletions in many chromosomes, as well as the loss of entire chromosomes. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma arises from tubular cells or cells of the macula densa. In contrast to other types of kidney cancer, it occurs with equal frequency in men and women, mostly in the sixth decade of life. It is characterized by a relatively good prognosis and exhibits a low degree of malignancy. Histopathologic diagnosis of ChRCC can be a diagnostic challenge because these tumors may resemble oncocytoma or conventional cancer. Research by Mathers et al. proposed the use of cytokeratin 7 as a marker useful in the differentiation of these changes.

Expression of Serine Protease Matriptase in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Correlation of Tissue Microarray Immunohistochemical Expression Analysis Results with Clinicopathological Parameters

Serine protease matriptase (matriptase) cleaves and activates proteins implicated in the progression of cancer and represents a potential therapeutic target. Immunohistochemical analysis of matriptase was performed in tissue microarrays of 168 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). All subtypes of RCC showed significant immunohistochemical expression of matriptase. In contrast, no expression occurred in areas of RCC with sarcomatous differentiation (SRCC) and in normal collecting tubules. The matriptase scores were significantly higher in papillary RCC (341) and clear cell RCC with granular cell differentiation (GRCC; 324) than in other histologic subtypes of RCC. In GRCC, matriptase scores were correlated with TNM staging and nuclear grading. Matriptase was overexpressed in all subtypes of RCC, and matriptase scores could distinguish between conventional clear cell RCC, GRCC, and SRCC.

Diagnosis of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma on Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology

Fine-needle aspiration has assumed an increasingly important role in the diagnosis and management of patients with advanced stage cancer. Given its predilection for metastases to distant sites and organs at the time of presentation, metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is not infrequently encountered in the setting of fine-needle aspiration for initial diagnosis. In some instances, fine-needle aspiration may be the only opportunity to obtain diagnostic tissue to diagnose and subclassify RCC. Therefore, cytopathologists and cytotechnologists should be familiar with and recognize the cytomorphology of RCC and the ancillary studies that can be used to confirm and subclassify RCC. Herein, we describe a case of metastatic RCC initially diagnosed on fine-needle aspiration, discuss the cytomorphologic features of RCC subtypes, and review pertinent ancillary immunohistochemical and cytogenetic adjuncts.

Cervical lymph node metastasis in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

The metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma to head and neck region, described herein, has never been reported before to our knowledge. A 56-year-old woman with a history of nephrectomy, that revealed chromophobe renal cell carcinoma six years before, presented left cervical mass. Imaging showed with left cervical lymphadenopathies and thyroid nodule. Surgery with histopathological examination confirmed that it was a left central and lateral jugular lymph node metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma treated postoperatively by antiangiogenic therapy. The patient was successfully treated by surgery and antiangiogenic drugs with stabilization and no recurrence of the metastatic disease. The case and the literature reported here support that chromophobe renal cell carcinoma can metastasize to the head and neck region and should preferentially be treated with surgery and antiangiogenic therapy because of the associated morbidity and quality-of-life issues.

[Relevance of the clinical-pathological predictive factors in force in chromophobe renal cell cancer]

INTRODUCTION

The identification of new subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has made it necessary to re-evaluate the current clinical and pathological predictive factors (stage, Fuhrman nuclear grade, necrosis, lymphovascular invasion [LVI] and sarcomatoid component) in these new subtypes. The chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) is considered a less aggressive subtype of RCC. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the usefulness of current clinicopathologic predictors of RCC in our series of CRCC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinicopathologic features of 63 patients with CRCC treated with radical nephrectomy. The parameters analyzed were tumor extension with the TNM, grade according to Fuhrman classification, LVI, tumor necrosis, tumor thrombus, surgical margin status, and involvement of the collecting system. The results (disease recurrence) were evaluated by Cox regression model with univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

With a median follow up of 60.2 months (0.37-160.2), 8 (11%) patients had recurrence, with median time to recurrence of 31.7 months (5.37-124.33). In the univariate analysis, TNM extension (p=0.0001), Fuhrman grade III or IV (p=0.031), LVI (p=0.0001) and the presence of positive surgical margins (p=0.0001) were statistically significant variables for recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, only tumor stage was confirmed as an independent predictor of recurrence, pT1 versus pT2 (p=0.02, OR 0.27 95% CI 0.03-0.258) and pT2 versus higher stage (p=0.037, OR 0.173 95% CI 0.033-0.896).

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor stage predicts aggressiveness in the CCRC. The classification of Fuhrman nuclear grade is not useful for this histological subtype.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: analysis of 53 cases

PURPOSE

To discuss the pathological and clinical characteristics, treatments and prognosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC).

METHODS

We developed a database that contained 1,870 patients who were diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and who underwent surgery in our hospital between 2002 and 2010. Afterward, the clinical and pathological data of 53 CRCC cases were extracted and analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 53 patients at diagnosis was 50.2 years (range, 21-88 years), and the ratio of male to female was 1:1. All tumors were unilateral and a majority of them (69.8%) were discovered incidentally. The mean tumor size was 5.8 ± 3.2 cm (range, 2-20 cm). Stage T1, T2, and T3 tumors, in accordance with 2004 TNM classification, accounted for 75.5, 13.2 and 11.3% of all cases, respectively. By histologic grading, 11.3, 73.6 and 15.1% of the tumors were G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Forty-one (77.4%) patients underwent radical nephrectomy, 12 (22.6%) underwent partial nephrectomy. Forty-five (84.9%) patients with follow-up results were alive after a mean follow-up of 34 months (range, 4-79 months). Tumor metastasis was discovered in 2 patients: one tumor metastasis was found in the liver 4 months postoperation, and the other was found in the lumbar vertebrae 47 months postoperation. No local recurrence was found. The overall survival rate was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

CRCC is an uncommon subtype of RCC, with a favorable prognosis. Chinese patients are seemingly younger at diagnosis. Prediction of prognosis is still difficult.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with prominent lymph node metastasis and polysomy of chromosome 21: poorly differentiated form or "presarcomatoid" form?

Lymph node metastasis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is extremely rare. It has been recently reported that sarcomatoid chromophobe RCC frequently show polysomy of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, and 17. In this article, we report an unusual case of chromophobe RCC. A 42-year-old Japanese woman presented with hematuria and complained of inguinal pain 2 months after the initial symptoms. Radical nephrectomy and renal hilar lymphadenectomy were performed. The tumor was 8 cm in greatest diameter; its cut surface was beige in color. Large metastasis to the renal hilar lymph node was identified. Histological examination of the right renal tumor met the criteria of chromophobe RCC. In addition to histological findings of typical chromophobe RCC, small cell foci, comedo-like necrosis, trabecular growth pattern, and sclerosing stroma were observed. However, no sarcomatoid foci were identified anywhere, despite extensive tumor sampling including lymph node lesions. Immunohistochemically, neoplastic cells were positive for E-cadherin and CD117 (c-kit). Ultrastructurally, tumorous cells contained abundant mitochondria and cytoplasmic microvesicles. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed monosomy of chromosomes 2 and 10 and polysomy of chromosome 21. Finally, we suggest that this tumor may show the poorly differentiated or presarcomatoid form of chromophobe RCC.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A report of two cases with unusual histological features

We report two cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with unusual histological features; one case of eosinophilic variant of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and another case with extensive metaplastic ossification.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma in Iceland: an epidemiological and clinicopathological study

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have suggested that the rare chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) has a more favourable prognosis than the other more common subtypes of RCC, clear cell RCC (CCRCC) and papillary RCC (PRCC). These studies have, however, usually involved selected patient cohorts and not whole populations. This study compared CRCC patients with patients with the other two major histological subtypes and established a population-based age-standardized incidence rate (ASR).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 828 histopathologically confirmed RCCs diagnosed between 1971 and 2005 in Iceland, 15 CRCC cases were identified. Histological material was reviewed, the TNM system was used for staging and cancer-specific survival was estimated. Univariate and multivariate analysis was used to compare CRCC to both CCRCC (n = 740) and PRCC (n = 66). Mean follow-up was 6.7 years.

RESULTS

CRCC accounted for 1.8% of RCCs, the ASR being 0.17/100,000 per year. Compared to other subtypes, CRCC was detected incidentally less often (7% vs 29%, p = 0.02), but was more often diagnosed at lower stages (73% vs 45% at stage I + II, p < 0.001). One patient had synchronous metastasis and another developed recurrent CRCC; both died of CRCC. Five-year survival for CRCC, CCRCC and PRCC was 86%, 59% and 50%, respectively (p = 0.004). After correcting for TNM stage (odds ratio 1.98), multivariate analysis did not indicate that CRCC subtype was an independent predictive factor for survival.

CONCLUSION

CRCC is a rare neoplasm with an ASR of 0.17/100,000 per year. These tumours often present with symptoms despite being at lower stages than the other RCC subtypes. The more favourable survival of the CRCC subtype appears to be explained by these tumours being diagnosed at low stages. These findings may suggest that CRCC has a different biological behaviour.

Mitochondria with tubulovesicular cristae in renal oncocytomas

Renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) are closely related tumors. They are considered the extremes of a spectrum with several variants. Ultrastructural examination of the mitochondria is a helpful procedure in the diagnosis of these neoplasms. Renal oncocytomas show mitochondria with piled lamellar cristae, and CRCC exhibited mitochondria with tubulovesicular cristae. In a series of 23 histologically diagnosed renal oncocytomas examined by electron microscopy, the authors found 5 tumors exhibiting more cells with mitochondria showing tubulovesicular cristae. The authors believe these 5 cases present a submicroscopic appearance intermediate between renal oncocytoma and CRCC, although with benign clinical behavior.

Molecular pathology of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a review

The recognition of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) among other distinct types of renal cell tumors (RCT) based on light-microscopic features, such as cytoplasmic and nuclear characteristics, might pose a dilemma in some cases because of morphological pattern overlapping with renal oncocytoma or conventional RCC. The present article reviews chromophobe RCC with focus on aspects of its molecular pathology, which was shown using ancillary modern microarray-based technology that can distinguish it from its mimics and therefore be helpful for its correct diagnosis. Although the high resolution DNA-microarray analyses excluded with all certainty the occurrence of small specific alterations, the loss of entire chromosomes 2, 10, 13, 17 and 21 occurs exclusively in chromophobe RCC and therefore probes localized at these chromosomes might be used to establish the diagnosis of chromophobe RCC in cases with uncertain histology. The usefulness of proposed candidate genes selected by the global gene expression analyses in the diagnostic pathology is far below expectations. The conflicting staining patterns, together with the poor specificity of used antibodies, leads us to believe that these candidate immunomarkers might not help in the separation of chromophobe RCC, with the exception of CD82, which has recently been suggested to be used for routine histological diagnosis.

Molecular pathology of renal oncocytoma: a review

Differentiating renal oncocytoma from its renal cell carcinoma (RCC) mimics, particularly chromophobe RCC, can be difficult, especially when limited tissue is available for evaluation and requires sophisticated microscopic, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical evaluation. In this review, the relevant literature has been reviewed, and supporting data obtained by applying modern microarray-based technologies are discussed with a focus on molecular pathology of renal oncocytoma. The high resolution whole-genome DNA-microarray based analyses excluded with all certainty the occurrence of small specific alterations. Renal oncocytomas are characterized by variable chromosomal patterns. The number of genes selected by global gene expression analyses and their usefulness in the diagnostic pathology based on immunohistochemical evaluation is far below the expectations. The conflicting staining patterns, together with the poor specificity of proposed antibodies, leads us to believe that these candidate immunomarkers might not help in the separation of these tumors. Applying DNA based tools might help in the diagnosis of renal oncocytoma with uncertain histology. However, only the combination of all available techniques could give reliable information.

A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a histologic subtype of RCC that portends a favorable prognosis. It is controversial whether the Fuhrman nuclear grade of chromophobe RCC has prognostic utility. Irregular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and nuclear pleomorphism are inherently present in chromophobe RCC. Hence, the Fuhrman nuclear grade is higher even though the majority of these tumors have a favorable outcome. In this study, the prognostic utility of a novel 3-tiered tumor grading system in which the innate nuclear atypia of chromophobe RCC was discounted, herein referred to as chromophobe tumor grade from a series of 124 chromophobe RCC, was compared with Fuhrman nuclear grade. Chromophobe tumor grade is based on the assessment of geographic nuclear crowding and anaplasia. The Fuhrman nuclear grade distribution between the tumors was grade 1 (1%), grade 2 (19%), grade 3 (74%), and grade 4 (6%), whereas the chromophobe tumor grade distribution was grade 1 (74%), grade 2 (16%), and grade 3 (10%). Neither Fuhrman nuclear grade nor chromophobe tumor grade was significantly associated with patient's age or sex and chromophobe RCC cell types, but both showed a significant association with tumor size. Both Fuhrman nuclear grade and chromophobe tumor grade showed statistically significant positive associations with broad alveolar growth, necrosis, vascular invasion, and with pathologic stage; however, all these associations tended to be dictated by tumors with sarcomatoid change. When tumors with sarcomatoid change were excluded, a strong positive association persisted between chromophobe tumor grade and pathologic stage. In contrast, there was no such association between Fuhrman nuclear grade and stage in nonsarcomatoid chromophobe RCCs. Characterizing aggressive chromophobe RCC with aggressive behavior with the time from surgery to first occurrence of metastasis, local recurrence, or death owing to disease, we found that both Fuhrman nuclear grade and chromophobe tumor grade were highly associated with adverse outcome. However, as with the pathologic stage, only a significant association between chromophobe tumor grade and outcome was retained among nonsarcomatoid chromophobe RCCs. Multivariable Cox regression analysis also tended to support chromophobe tumor grade rather than Fuhrman nuclear grade as an independent predictor of adverse outcome, controlling for other univariably significant risk factors [estimated relative hazard=3.68 (P=0.026) vs. 1.86 (P=0.42)]. In conclusion, the novel chromophobe tumor grading system proposed herewith provides superior prognostic value to that of the Fuhrman nuclear grade in chromophobe RCC and will potentially help stratify patients of chromophobe RCC who are at a greater risk of disease progression.

Ultrastructural Studies in a Series of 18 Cases of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) is a distinct variant of renal epithelial neoplasm. Ultrastructurally, the presence of numerous cytoplasmic microvesicles is highly characteristic of CRCC, as are mitochondria with tubulovesicular cristae. All 18 cases is this study present these two elements with a different distribution, depending on the morphological variant (typìcal or eosinophilic). In both variants, the mitochondria show tubulovesicular cristae and budding from the outer mitochondrial membrane that is very similar to the cytoplasmic microvesicles. An association was also found between intracristal mitochondrial swelling and bud formation. These buds, when detached from the mitochondrial membrane, may convert into the cytoplasmic microvesicles.

Prognostic relevance of the histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

According to several studies, when the histological subtype of renal cell carcinoma is established it is possible to attribute a different life expectancy to each patient. We analyzed the prognostic significance of the histological subtype in renal cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the follow-up of 230 patients after radical or conservative renal surgery. The histological characteristics of the different subtypes of tumor were obtained and the disease-free and cancer-specific survival curves for the clear cell, cromophobic, papillary, collecting duct (Bellini) subtypes and those with sarcomatoid differentiation were individualized.

RESULTS

The disease-free and cancer-specific survival rates for clear cell tumors were 76.6% and 68.0% respectively, 71.2% and 82.1% respectively for the cromophobic type, 71.1% and 79.8% respectively for the papillary type, 26.9% and 39.3% respectively for the sarcomatoid type, and 0.0% and 0.0% respectively for the collecting ducts (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The histological subtypes of renal tumors can stratify patients into different prognostic groups only when the sarcomatoid differentiation is present.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 145 cases

The aggregate literature suggests that chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is biologically a tumor of low malignant potential with reported 5-year and 10-year survival rates of 78% to 100% and 80% to 90%, respectively. The conventional prognostic parameters that determine the outcome of the tumors that progress remain to be fully characterized. Clinicopathologic features of 145 cases were correlated with outcome. The mean age of the patients was 59 years (range, 27 to 82) and the male to female ratio was 1.1:1. Most tumors were well circumscribed and averaged 8.0 cm (range, 1.0 to 30.0 cm); multifocality and bilaterality were present in 8% and 3% of patients. Sixty (41%) were eosinophilic variant (greater than 80% eosinophilic cells), 18 (12%) were classic type (greater than 80% pale cells), and 67 (46%) were mixed (containing variable admixture of pale and eosinophilic cells). A subset of eosinophilic chromophobe RCC contained or had areas similar to renal oncocytomas. These tumors tended to be more commonly bilateral (11%) and multifocal (22%) and were not associated with necrosis or sarcomatoid change. Sarcomatoid change was present in 12/145 (8%) tumors. By histologic grade, 1%, 19%, 74%, 6% were Fuhrman nuclear grade 1, 2, 3, and 4. Nineteen percent, 21%, 28%, 13%, 4%, 1%, and 3% were pT (2002) stage pT1a, pT1b, pT2, pT3a, pT3b, pT3c, and pT4 tumors. Two percent tumors were pN1 at presentation and 2.8% tumors were M1 at presentation. Follow-up (1 to 182 mo, mean 48 mo, median 37 mo) was available in 123 cases. Disease progression (local recurrence 4, metastasis 15, and/or death 10) was seen in 20 patients. In univariable analysis, tumor size (P=0.025), pT stage (P<0.001), broad alveolar architecture (P=0.012), Fuhrman nuclear grade (P<0.001), microscopic tumor necrosis (P=0.001), vascular invasion (P=0.020), and sarcomatoid change (P< or =0.001) were associated with progression. A multivariable Cox regression model revealed sarcomatoid change (P=0.013, estimated relative hazard 4.7), microscopic necrosis (P=0.020, relative hazard=3.5), and pT stage (P=0.025, relative hazard 3.4) as independent predictors of aggressive chromophobe RCC. Although the large majority of chromophobe RCCs have a favorable prognosis, a distinct subset of patients progress. The pT stage of tumor, tumor necrosis, and sarcomatoid change all predict aggressive phenotype of chromophobe RCC. The adverse presence of these features in a nephrectomy specimen with chromophobe RCC warrants active surveillance, and these patients may be candidates for adjuvant therapies as they become available.

Fuhrman Grading is not Appropriate for Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma

This study was undertaken to assess the prognostic effectiveness of Fuhrman nuclear grading and the individual components of this grading system, in a series of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Eighty-seven cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were investigated. There were 47 males and 40 females, 28 to 78 years of age. The carcinomas ranged from 25 to 180 mm in size and on TNM staging there were 38 stage I, 25 stage II, 22 stage III, and 2 stage IV tumors. Whole tumor Fuhrman grading was grade 1, 6 cases; grade 2, 72 cases; grade 3, 8 cases; and grade 4, 1 case, whereas focal (single high power field) grading was grade 1, 1 case; grade 2, 62 cases; grade 3, 21 cases; and grade 4, 3 cases. On assignment of nucleolar grading using Fuhrman criteria there were 37 grade 1, 44 grade 2, and 4 grade 3 tumors on whole tumor assessment and 3 grade 1, 63 grade 2, and 21 grade 3 tumors on assessment of the high power field showing the greatest degree of nuclear pleomorphism. Measurements of nuclear size showed nuclear area to range from 26.14 to 100.74 microm2, nuclear perimeter from 19.73 to 39.28 microm, and nuclear major axis from 6.49 to 13.21 microm, whereas the ranges of measures of nuclear shape were; shape factor 0.798 to 0.890, compactness 14.260 to 15.843, and feret diameter 5.694 to 11.242. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 150 months and 8 patients died of tumor-related causes 5 to 53 months from diagnosis. On log rank testing against survival, only patient age (P=0.016) and tumor maximum diameter (P=0.0055) were significant, whereas patient sex and TNM stage were not significant. Whole tumor and focal Fuhrman grading, as well as all measures of nucleolar prominence, nuclear size, and nuclear shape showed no significant association with outcome. It is concluded that neither Fuhrman grading, nor any of the components of the Fuhrman grading system, is useful as prognostic indicators for this tumor type.

Chemotherapy for non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma

Clear-cell carcinoma is the most common histopathologic subtype of kidney tumors. Consequently, clinical trials for advanced-stage kidney cancer have focused on patients with clear-cell carcinoma and not on the less common subtypes, including papillary, chromophobe, collecting-duct carcinoma, and sarcomatoid-variant tumors. Whereas immunotherapy has constituted the standard treatment for patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), it does not appear to have activity in the management of patients with other histologic subtypes. Novel therapies, including those targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway, have recently demonstrated significant activity in clear-cell RCC. Historically, chemotherapy has shown limited activity in advanced-stage RCC; however, clinical trials to date have failed to individualize treatment based on histologic subtype. In this article, we will review the literature and present our experience with the use of chemotherapy in patients with non-clear-cell kidney cancer by histologic subtype.

Increasing expression of extracellular matrix metalloprotease inducer in renal cell carcinoma: Tissue microarray analysis of immunostaining score with clinicopathological parameters

AIM

Renal tumor cell invasion is responsible for both local tissue destruction and distant metastasis. Invasion is largely mediated by matrix metalloproteases that are thought to be induced by tumor cell-derived extracellular matrix metalloprotease inducer (EMMPRIN) in surrounding fibroblasts. We hypothesized that EMMPRIN and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) are over-expressed in renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical analysis of EMMPRIN and MMP-9 was performed in tissue microarrays of 79 renal cell carcinomas including 12 cases of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC), 53 cases of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC), 8 cases of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC), and 6 cases of carcinoma of the collecting ducts of Bellini (CoRCC).

RESULTS

All renal cell carcinomas showed significant immunohistochemical expression of EMMPRIN. The EMMPRIN score in ChRCC (321+/-21) was significantly higher than in other histological subtypes of RCC (166+/-19 for CRCC; 276+/-24 for PRCC; 98+/-17 for CoRCC). MMP-9 was mainly expressed in tumor stromal cells and not in non-cancerous fibrovascular regions. The percent positive staining of MMP-9 at the invasive front of tumor cells was significantly higher in CRCC than in ChRCC, PRCC, or CoRCC. Higher EMMPRIN scores in CRCC were associated with shorter survival time, and correlated with higher T staging and nuclear grading.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate for the first time that EMMPRIN is over-expressed in renal cell carcinomas. Increased expression of EMMPRIN in tumor cells is associated with poor prognosis of patients with CRCC.

Natural history of the Nihon (Bhd gene mutant) rat, a novel model for human Birt–Hogg–Dubé syndrome

In the Nihon rat, an established model of hereditary renal cell carcinoma (RCC), the propensity for tumor development, is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait due to a single germline nucleotide insertion mutation in the rat Bhd ortholog. The Birt-Hogg-Dubé (BHD) syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant disease characterized by fibrofolliculoma, pulmonary cysts, spontaneous pneumothorax, and renal neoplasm. The renal lesions of the Nihon rat are characterized, and extrarenal lesions are also described in this work. The earliest lesion of the RCC was identified as an altered tubule at as early as 3 weeks of age and rapidly progressed through adenoma to carcinoma with the primary cell type being clear/acidophilic where some similarities were evident to RCCs in BHD syndrome. The Nihon rats demonstrate a heterotopic ossification within RCCs and three extrarenal lesions, clear cell hyperplasia/adenoma of the endometrium, clear cell change of the epithelium of striated portions of salivary glands, and cardiac rhabdomyomatosis. This rat model of hereditary RCC provides a useful tool for analyzing the series of events leading to renal tumorigenesis and for studying BHD gene functions.

Aplicación clínica de las actuales clasificaciones del cáncer renal

The purpose of classifying neoplasias is to recognize groups with similar progress and prognosis and, if possible, receiving the same treatment. This is why those classifications are systematically being submitted to review and improvement through the new technologies. Differentiation of various entities in renal cancer has been comparatively fast, as the new genetic and molecular discoveries have confirmed the morphologic criteria of the different cell types, thus making it possible to open new therapeutic pathways. Using the current WHO classification we recognize subtypes with excellent prognosis (Multilocular cystic renal carcinoma, Type I renal papillary carcinoma, Tubular and fusocellular mucinous carcinoma), other very aggressive ones (Bellini's collecting duct carcinoma, Medullary carcinoma), and also that the sarcomatoid transformation, even in small areas, impacts the prognosis negatively. Childhood-characteristic renal carcinomas associated with chromosome translocations have been recognized (genetic fusion TFE3 or TFEB), as well as the family forms of renal carcinoma. Regarding the UICC (International Union Against Cancer) classification, there are a series of aspects under argument (size, venous invasion, microvascular invasion, invasion of the adipous tissue of the renal sinus) that shall be discussed too, since it is possible that some modifications of the TNM might occur in the near future.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: comprehensive analysis of 104 cases from multicenter European database

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinical behavior of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC), we retrospectively evaluated the data from six European centers. In 1985, CRCC was identified as a new RCC histologic subtype. Because of its low frequency, only few large CRCC series are available.

METHODS

We created a renal cancer database including 3228 patients who underwent surgery between 1986 and 2002 in six European centers. The relevant clinical and pathologic data were extracted from the clinical charts at each institution and collected into a unique database.

RESULTS

Of the 3228 patients, 104 (3.2%) affected by CRCC were identified. The mean age at diagnosis was 57.6 years (range 22 to 83). Of the 104 patients, 51 (49%) were men and 53 (51%) were women. The mean tumor size was 6.4 +/- 3.6 cm. An incidental diagnosis accounted for 61.5% of the cases. Radical nephrectomy was performed in 88 patients (85%). After a median follow-up of 38 months (mean 44, range 1 to 153), no local recurrence was observed. The 5-year overall survival rate for CRCC was 81%. Of the 104 patients, 5 (4.8%) and 9 (8.6%) died of unrelated causes and renal cancer, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series confirmed a favorable outcome for the CRCC subtype with little local aggressiveness and a low propensity for progression and death from cancer.

Differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes by multislice computerized tomography

PURPOSE

We differentiated renal cell carcinoma subtypes using multislice computerized tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the CT images of 87 patients with renal cell carcinoma. Three subtypes of renal cell carcinoma were noted, including clear cell in 37 cases, papillary in 26 and chromophobe in 24. Biphasic CT (unenhanced, corticomedullary and excretory phases) was done in all patients. We compared patient age and sex, tumor size, enhancement degree and pattern (homogeneous, heterogeneous and predominantly peripheral), the presence or absence of calcification or cystic degeneration (necrotic or hemorrhagic areas within the tumor) and tumor spreading patterns, including perinephric change, venous invasion and lymphadenopathy, in the 3 subtypes.

RESULTS

The degree of enhancement was significantly different among the 3 subtypes in the corticomedullary and excretory phases (p <0.001). Cystic degeneration was more evident in the clear cell subtype than in the other subtypes regardless of tumor size (p <0.001). A hypervascular pattern (higher tumor enhancement after contrast material injection due to higher vascularity) was noted in 48.6% of clear cell subtype in comparison to 15.4% of papillary and 4.2% of chromophobe subtypes (p <0.001). The chromophobe subtype showed homogeneous enhancement in 75% of cases in comparison to 45% and 65% of clear cell and papillary subtypes (p >0.05). Calcification was evident in 21.6%, 23.1% and 25% of clear cell, papillary and chromophobe subtypes, respectively (p >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

To differentiate the subtypes of renal cell carcinoma the degree of enhancement is the most valuable parameter. The presence or absence of cystic degeneration, vascularity and enhancement patterns can serve supplemental role in differentiating renal cell carcinoma subtypes.

Can renal oncocytoma be differentiated from its renal mimics? The utility of anti-mitochondrial, caveolin 1, CD63 and cytokeratin 14 antibodies in the differential diagnosis

Among the epithelial renal tumours with eosinophilic cytoplasm, the main differential diagnostic problem arises between renal oncocytomas (ROs) and eosinophilic variants of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). We investigated the possible role of anti-mitochondrial (AMA), anti-caveolin 1 (CAV1), anti-CD63 (CD63) and anti-cytokeratin 14 (CK14) antibodies in the differential diagnosis of eosinophilic epithelial tumours and applied the Muller and Mowry modification of Hale's colloidal iron stain (HCI). Thirty-five ROs and 77 eosinophilic RCCs (27 chromophobe, 28 clear cell and 22 papillary RCCs) were included in this study. Apical and/or polar CD63 immunostaining (94%) and diffuse AMA (91%) and CAV1 (88%) immunostainings were the characteristics of ROs, whereas diffuse CD63 immunostaining (96%) and diffuse-peripheral AMA (96%) and CAV1 (92%) immunostainings were characteristic immunohistochemical features of eosinophilic chromophobe RCCs. We showed CK14 antibody not to be useful in the differential diagnosis of the eosinophilic epithelial renal tumours. The staining localisations with AMA, CAV1 and CD63 antibodies were significantly different between tumour groups. AMA had 96% sensitivity and 94% specificity, whereas CAV1 had 92% sensitivity and 97% specificity in diagnosing chromophobe RCCs. With HCI staining, ROs, showing apical and/or polar staining, could be differentiated from chromophobe RCCs, showing diffuse cytoplasmic staining. HCI had fairly low (69%) sensitivity and 100% specificity, whereas CD63 had 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity to diagnose ROs. We recommend using CD63 as the best marker of choice for distinguishing ROs from eosinophilic chromophobe RCCs when standard diagnostic criteria are not helpful.

Oncocytic renal neoplasms: diagnostic considerations

Advances in our understanding of renal neoplasia have resulted in recognition of numerous tumors that are composed predominantly of cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm. This article discusses the features of renal oncocytoma (including oncocytosis), chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and clear cell RCC; explores the relationship between renal oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC; briefly discusses other tumors with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm; and emphasizes the differential diagnosis of such tumors.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma showing oncocytoma-like hyalinized and edematous stroma: A case report and review of the literature

A case of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) with abundant hyalinized and edematous stroma mimicking oncocytoma is presented. This stromal architecture in the current case has not been reported on CRCC to our knowledge. A further interesting finding is entrapped non-neoplastic tubules in the hyalinized and edematous stroma composing the tumor. These histological features, such as abundant hyalinized and edematous stroma containing non-neoplastic tubules, may be analogous to oncocytoma. We reported a unique case of CRCC and studied with light microscopy and immunohistochemistry.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with microcystic and adenomatous arrangement and pigmentation—a diagnostic pitfall. Morphological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural and molecular genetic report of 20 cases

We present clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural and molecular genetic features of 20 cases of a peculiar form of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) with morphology differing from that of conventional CRCC. Microscopically, the typical features of the tumors were microcystic arrangement and formation of adenomatous structures. Microcystic areas were composed of smaller eosinophilic and bigger pale cells having cytological appearance typical of conventional CRCC. Cytological features of the adenomatous structures were mostly different from those of conventional CRCC. They had a typical columnar arrangement with nuclei positioned at the base of the glandular structures and a small amount of a deeply eosinophilic cytoplasm often endowed with brush border facing the lumen of the glands. In addition, all the tumors showed a brown pigmentation. The pigmentation was located mostly extracellularly, where it formed pools of heavy deposits. Microscopic calcifications present in all cases formed psammoma bodies or else the calcifications were more extensive and amorphous in shape. Ultrastructurally, the cells showed features characteristic of CRCC: typical cytoplasmic vesicles were 100-700 nm in size and mitochondria had tubulovesicular, lamellar or circular cristae. Some tumor cells contained dark, variously sized electron-dense pigment granules. Neither melanosomes nor membrane-bound neurosecretory granules were seen. Using fluorescence in-situ hybridization probes for chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17 and 21, the tumors revealed massive loss of tested chromosomes typical for conventional CRCC. Monosomy of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13 and 21 was found in 100, 36, 91, 82, 82, 82 and 64% of cases, respectively. None of the cases showed mutation of exons 9, 11, 13 and 17 of the c-kit gene. The important feature of pigmented microcystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma is a relatively benign biological behavior and the absence of distant metastases and sarcomatoid transformation.

CD10 is expressed in a subset of chromophobe renal cell carcinomas

CD10 has been considered a useful marker in the diagnosis of renal carcinomas, because of its expression in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas and its absence in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. On the other hand, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma expresses parvalbumin, which is absent in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas. To further address the relevance of these markers, we studied the expression of CD10 and parvalbumin in 42 samples of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (seven of which had aggressive features, including invasion beyond the renal capsule, renal vein invasion, metastases, or sarcomatoid transformation), 75 clear cell renal cell carcinomas (eight metastatic) and 51 papillary renal cell carcinomas (two metastatic). CD10 was found in 100% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas, 63% of papillary renal cell carcinomas and in all metastatic cases of both types. At variance with previous studies, we found CD10 expression in from 30 to 90% of the neoplastic cells, in 11 of 42 (26%) chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. The CD10-positive cases included five of the seven (71%) chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with aggressive features. Statistical analysis showed significant association of CD10-positive tumors with clinicopathologic aggressiveness (P=0.003) and mitotic figures (P=0.04). Parvalbumin was strongly expressed in all primary and metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinomas. Western blot analysis was utilized to confirm the expression of both CD10 and parvalbumin in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas.

Renal Tumor With Overlapping Distal Nephron Morphology and Karyotype

Although most renal epithelial tumors are derived from the proximal nephron, approximately 10% are believed to originate in the distal nephron. This latter group encompasses oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and several rare types, including collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma. Despite progress in the classification of renal tumors, a small subset of renal carcinomas remains unclassified (ie, renal cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified). We describe a metastatic tumor consisting of cells with overlapping distal nephron morphologies, including foci of oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and collecting duct carcinoma, as well as sarcomatoid dedifferentiation. Special stains were inconclusive, and ultrastructural study demonstrated abundant mitochondria and no microvesicles. The karyotype was hypodiploid with 41 chromosomes and abnormalities reported in all 3 phenotypes present. Rearrangements of 1p and of 11q13 previously seen in divergent subsets of oncocytomas were concomitantly present in the current tumor. Thus, this malignancy has features consistent with distal nephron derivation and demonstrates the convergence of the varied tumor morphologies arising within this site. Furthermore, this case exemplifies the value of cytogenetic analysis in the characterization of renal cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified. In view of recent advances in treatment approach, especially for collecting duct carcinoma, further categorization of this nondescript and heterogeneous group of renal cell carcinomas, not otherwise specified, at least by its derivation in relationship to the renal nephron (distal vs proximal), may be of value in the choice of treatment modality.

The genetics of renal oncocytosis: a possible modelfor neoplastic progression

Renal oncocytosis is a rare condition characterized by the presence of numerous oncocytomas and oncocytic changes in the renal tubules. Other than oncocytomas associated with the Birt-Hogg-Dube (BDH) syndrome, the genetics of oncocytosis is not known. Whether oncocytomas and oncocytosis are similar to BDH syndrome, in which the tumors diploid (as most oncocytomas are), or show chromosomal losses may be significant regarding the observation that in oncocytosis, there frequently is morphological evidence of progression to chromophobe carcinoma. Here we report on the case of a 69-year old male who underwent a staged procedure of partial nephrectomy on the left side and right radical nephrectomy for multiple renal tumors. The tumors were studied by routine hematoxylin and eosin morphology, immunohistochemistry, cytogenetics, and loss of heterozygosity analysis. Both kidneys had numerous oncocytic neoplasms morphologically progressing from oncocytomas to hybrid tumors with chromophobe carcinoma. Genetic studies demonstrated progression from normal cytogenetics to chromosomal losses similar to those in some oncocytomas and in chromophobe carcinomas. The genetics of this apparently nonfamilial oncocytoma differs from that of BDH syndrome and is characterized by losses involving chromosomes 1, 14, 21, and Y. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the genetic and cytogenetic findings in oncocytosis not related to BDH syndrome and may suggest a possible model of progression from oncocytoma to chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.